SSP Daily Digest: 2/11

CA-Sen: The latest in palace intrigue in California supposes that Meg Whitman managed to pave the way for Tom Campbell’s exit from the gubernatorial race and move to the Senate race, culminating in a private appeal to Campbell from Arnold Schwarzenegger to switch (using a soft touch, instead of the alleged sledgehammer that the Steve Poizner camp accuses Whitman’s camp of wielding). Campbell says no, he made the decision all on his own (helped along by some internal polling, no doubt).

FL-Sen: Continuing his role as right-wing kingmaker, or rainmaker, or rainy kingmaker, Jim DeMint orchestrated a moneybomb over recent days for upstart Florida candidate Marco Rubio that pulled in over $140K.

SC-Sen: Attorney Chad McGowan, as close as the Dems have to a leading candidate to take on Jim DeMint this year, ended his campaign, citing family demands. It’s possible, though, that McGowan’s exit may lead to a slight upgrade (although not likely the kind that puts the race into play): Charleston Co. Commissioner Vic Rawl is now contemplating making the race, and self-financing Mullins McLeod is weighing a switch over from the gubernatorial bid where he’s made little headway in a better-defined Democratic field.

TX-Sen: It’s looking less and less likely that the Texas Senate special election is ever going to happen (most likely, Kay Bailey Hutchison will wind up serving out the rest of her term in ignominy). If she does resign at some point, though, it doesn’t look too promising for Democrats. PPP tested a generic ballot on the race, with Generic Republican winning 53-38. Former comptroller John Sharp may be in position to overperform Generic D a bit, but it’d still be an uphill climb. For one thing, he’d be running against Barack Obama’s very low 33/61 approval in Texas.

CT-Gov: Former state House speaker Jim Amann ended his bid for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination today. That he was even in the race may be news to most Connecticut residents, given his low-single-digits support in recent polling, and Ned Lamont and ex-Stamford mayor Dan Malloy gobbling up most of the oxygen.

MI-Gov: In the wake of Denise Ilitch’s surprising decision to stand down, a different Democrat got into the gubernatorial field: former state treasurer (from the 1980s) Bob Bowman. He’s been out of state for a long time, most recently as the CEO of major league baseball’s interactive media wing, but if he’s willing to self-finance, he could be an interesting wildcard here.

WI-Gov: Details are sketchy, but a Democratic internal poll by the Mellman Group finds a very tight gubernatorial race, quite in line with what other pollsters have seen. Democratic Milwaukee mayor Tom Barrett leads Republican Milwaukee Co. Exec Scott Walker 40-39. There’s no word on a Barrett/Mark Neumann matchup.

AL-05: Another catastrophic success for the NRCC, as they blasted their newest member with some friendly fire. Pete Sessions sent out a fundraising letter to AL-05 voters letting them know that their “Democrat in Congress has been falling in line with Nancy Pelosi’s destructive liberal agenda..” One small problem: Parker Griffith is now, quite famously, a Republican.

AR-01: Unlike the deeply troublesome KS-03 and LA-03, thanks to their deep Arkansas bench, Democrats don’t seem to be having trouble finding a replacement to run for the seat of retiring Rep. Marion Berry. The latest to step up is state Sen. Steve Bryles, who represents Blytheville in this mostly-rural district’s northeast corner.

AZ-03: It looks like a big Democratic name may be interested in tackling the GOP-leaning open seat left behind by retiring Rep. John Shadegg, after all. Phoenix mayor Phil Gordon has opened up an exploratory committee to consider a run, and has set a three or four-week timetable for deciding. Democratic attorney Jon Hulburd is already running and has had some fundraising success as well, so it seems unlikely he’d get out of the way for the more conservative Gordon.

CA-19: An internal poll by POS offered by state Sen. Jeff Denham shows the Republican candidate with a solid lead over his carpetbagging neighbor, ex-Rep. Richard Pombo. Denham leads Pombo 28-12 in the GOP primary, and that expands to 38-11 when voters were informed that outgoing Rep. George Radanovich has endorsed Denham.

CA-44: Yet another internal poll, this one from Tulchin and released by Democratic challenger Bill Hedrick, who came within a few thousand votes of upsetting Rep. Ken Calvert in 2008. Calvert has lousy re-elects – 38% say ‘yes’ while 41% say someone else – but Calvert leads a head-to-head against Hedrick, 49-35.

FL-21, FL-25: New names are already surfacing for potential candidates in the 25th, where Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart is creating an open seat by leaving for the somewhat safer 21st, vacated by his retiring brother, Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart. One name moving to the forefront is termed-out Republican state Sen. Majority leader Alex Diaz de la Portilla. However, it sounds like Mario plans to endorse state Rep. David Rivera (who’s currently running for state Senate) instead. Two other possible GOP names include state Sen. Alex Villalobos, and Carlos Curbelo, currently an aide to Sen. George LeMieux. Joe Garcia, who came close to taking out Mario in 2008, seems to be the Dems’ preferred candidate (although he previously ruled out a re-run, he might reconsider with an open seat).

IA-01: Republicans landed Some Dude to run against Rep. Bruce Braley in the Dem-leaning 1st, a district which hasn’t been on anyone’s radar so far: insurance salesman Brian Cook. The NRCC had previously touted businessman Rod Blum for the race, but he says he’s leaning against a bid.

MA-10: Yet one more internal poll, and this one’s a little alarming for Democratic Rep. Bill Delahunt, who nobody thought of as a target until his district went strongly for Scott Brown in the Senate special election. The McLaughlin poll on behalf of Republican former state treasurer Joe Malone gives Malone a 37-34 lead over Delahunt among likely voters. Delahunt is still in positive territory, approval-wise, at 44/33.

MS-01: Maybe this is the oppo that insiders said would sink Fox News pundit Angela McGlowan’s House bid before it got out of the gate. In a radio interview last year, she suggested that gun owners should include an inventory of their guns on their federal tax forms, and in defending the idea went on to talk about “crazies… stockpiling guns.” Starting out in a probably gun-loving district with a proposal that wouldn’t pass muster among House Democrats, and framing it with decidedly lefty-sounding language… well, that’s probably a deal-breaker.

NC-08: Free advice to candidates, not just Democrats but anyone: don’t waste time worrying about what people are saying in the anonymous comments section of blogs. (And, yes, I realize the irony of that coming from an pseudonymous blogger.) But most of all, don’t actually get so hot under the collar that you weigh in in the comments section and embarrass yourself in the process. Tim D’Annunzio seems to be the leading GOP contender in the 8th, thanks in large measure to his self-funding, but his recent foray into the comments section at the Charlotte Observer (to defend his machine-gun-shooting fundraiser) may have cast his candidacy in a decidedly amateurish light.

OH-14: Here’s a swing district that has consistently eluded Democrats, where they’ve finally nailed down a challenger. Retired judge Bill O’Neill is back for another whack at Rep. Steve LaTourette in the suburban 14th. O’Neill ran against LaTourette in 2008 and didn’t get much traction that year, though.

Census: Here’s some good news on the redistricting front: the Census Bureau has given states the green light to decide whether to count prisons as part of the local population, or whether to count prisoners according to their previous place of residence. The Census will provide states with ‘group quarters’ information to help them with the process. That’s an especially big deal in New York, where the legislature is considering legislation that would count prisoners by previous residence, which would decidedly tip the balance away from GOP-leaning rural areas and back toward the cities.

Redistricting: Some bad news on redistricting, though, from South Dakota (although, with its at-large House seat, it’ll really only have an impact on state legislative redistricting). A legislative committee shot down plans to switch to an independent redistricting commission. Democrats proposed the idea, and unsurprisingly, the plan died along party lines (not much incentive for the GOP to switch, as they control the trifecta and probably will for the foreseeable future).

Dogcatcher: With Martha Coakley’s announcement that she’s going to attempt to run for re-election, the whole idea of getting elected dogcatcher is back on people’s minds. You may recall we had an extended thread on the matter some months ago… and here’s an interesting discovery. There’s an actual place in America – Duxbury, Vermont – where it’s an elective position. (H/t David Kowalski.) Zeb Towne’s term expires in 2010, so we’ll keep monitoring this race as events warrant.

55 thoughts on “SSP Daily Digest: 2/11”

  1. Assemblyman Molinaro decided against running for Congress. Looks like Scott Murphy might just get by without a first or second tier opponent.

  2. I’m very disappointed in these numbers in a head to head with Calvert.

    The main problem I think Hedrick faces is the fact that HE ISNT RAISING ENOUGH MONEY.  Calvert is a money machine with all the wealthy conservative morons who live in Orange County.  I have really no money to give, but god damnit I think I’m going to plop down another $50 and encourage my family members to do so as well.

    At least Calvert is under 50% :/

    I would really recomend anyone who wants to donate to a progressive who can win in an R+6 district to give it to Bill Hedrick, if he wins, you will not be dissapointed.

  3. I would assume the other third of the electorate are Dems. No doubt he’ll have a race but if he actually campaigns he wins.  

  4. Keep FL-25 at solid R despite it being an open seat, I’m going to start regarding Cook in the same vein as Scott Rasmussen.  It’ll be clear that they both are trying to push either an agenda or a narrative of “the democrats are doomed.”  

    Seriously.  MI-3 just opened up and they kept that one at Solid R, that district is R+6.  FL-25 is R+5.  MI-3 ended up tied in 2008, and in FL-25 Obama lost by 1%.  These districts aren’t that Republican!  It’s not out of the question that a democrat could win these seats.  Look at all the R+ seats the Dems control right now.

    Look at it the other way.  If say for instance, in my home district of OH-13 (D+5 PVI), Betty Sutton decided to either retire or run for higher office, you mean to tell me that Cook would leave that rating at Solid D?  Somehow, I doubt that would be the case.  He’d probably put it at toss-up!

  5. BUT–the Dummies in Sacramento just denied State Senator Maldanado the Lt. Gov. spot.

    I don’t know what they’re afraid of–and from what I understand from the comments on this blog, Maldanado’s senate seat could have been a potential Dem pickup.

    I guess the Sacramento folks figured they’d run out the clock on the Lt. Gov. position and on Maldanado, since he’s term-limited out.

  6. Mullins McLeod should run for SC-1 instead of Senate.  He could honestly win the House seat, but SC-Senate would be uphill.  

    That said, he probably would do about the same or maybe better than Rawl.

    BTW, in 1982, McLeod’s father ran for the SC-1 seat and lost 54-46 (to freshman Tommy Hartnett). He would probably have won if he had not gotten a DUI within a month of the election.  The elder Mullins McLeod had Hartnett on the ropes before that incident.

    That was the first year I followed Senate and House races, outside of my own, very closely.  Where has the time gone?

    BTW, previously declared Lt-Gov candidate Tim Scott (R), has officially switched races to SC-1.  If elected he would become the first African American Republican in the House since JC Watts.  He is considered a strong,(perhaps the co-frontrunner), candidate for the GOP.              

  7. The polls for CA-44, CA-19, and MA-10 must be taken with HUGE grains of salt.  Look at their sample sizes and margins of error.  MA-10 is the worst, where supposedly the Republican LEADS Delahunt.  They only interviewed 300 people, for a whopping 5.7% margin of error.  What does a 37%-34% lead mean when the margin of error is 5.7%?  It means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

    CA-19 is still pathetic, with only 350 people for a 5.2% margin of error.

    Hey, at least the CA-44 poll managed to get a margin of error under 5%, at 4.9% with 400 people interviewed.

    So I wouldn’t put much stock into any of those internal polls, when so few people were interviewed to really make sense of anything at all.

Comments are closed.