SSP Daily Digest: 6/3 (Afternoon Edition)

CA-Sen, CA-Gov: There’s one more poll in California, courtesy of Capitol Weekly (done for them by Republican pollster Probolsky Research). They’ve polled a few times before, but they’re calling this a “tracking poll,” suggesting they’ll be putting out more numbers as we count down to the June 8 primary. At any rate, there aren’t any surprises here: they too see the Carly Fiorina surge on the Senate side: she’s at 40, compared with Tom Campbell’s 25 and Chuck DeVore’s 13. In the Governor’s race, Meg Whitman leads Steve Poizner 54-24.

The big news here, though, is that Campbell, after saying he was going dark earlier this week, apparently pulled together enough last-minute contributions for a final TV ad. His closing argument is all about electability, centering around the recent LA Times/USC poll that gave him a lead over Barbara Boxer while Fiorina trailed. A candidate making a calm, logical pitch based on quantifiable data, instead of throwing together a mish-mash of fearmongering, jingoism, and meaningless buzzwords? I think Campbell might be running in the wrong party’s primary for that kind of thing to work. Fiorina, for her part, may have some backtracking to do after her deriding Boxer’s push on climate legislation as worrying about “the weather.” Back in October, before Campbell’s entry forced herself to recast herself as a conservative, she had lots of praise for cap and trade.

KY-Sen: Rush disses Rand Paul! No, it’s not Rush Limbaugh; it’s just plain Rush, the pioneer 70s Canadian prog-rockers. They’ve told Paul to stop using Rush’s music at his rallies and in his web ads, citing copyright violations inasmuch as Paul has simply chosen his own Free Will and not asked them for, y’know, permission. The Paul campaign has used “The Spirit of Radio” pre-rallies (and here’s how big a Rush geek he is: he’s actually quoted that song’s lyrics on the stump). There’s always been a lot of overlap between Rush fans and libertarians, not just because many of Rush’s lyrics lean that way, but also because they both have a core audience of 14-year-old boys.

NY-Sen-B: The Senate primary, for the right to go against Kirsten Gillibrand, is turning out to be just as much of a clusterf@ck as everything else the NY GOP has done lately. The GOP convention has left them with yet one more contested primary, as Bruce Blakeman and David Malpass split the vote (a weighted 42% for Blakeman and 40% for Malpass), leaving them to fight it out in a primary. They’re still likely to be joined by Joe DioGuardi, who only got 18% (missing the 25% threshold) but who intends to petition his way on to the ballot. Remember that DioGuardi is already on the ballot on the Conservative line, though, so he’s participating in November regardless of whether he gets into, let alone wins, the primary.

CT-Gov: Here’s one advantage to running against a rich guy in a state with public campaign financing: every time your opponent pulls out more money, more money magically appears for you, too. Dan Malloy has raised $250K in contributions, which opens the door to another $1.25 million from the state, and on top of that, he’s entitled to a $938K bonus to match Ned Lamont’s spending. On the GOP side, Michael Fedele (with a rich guy problem of his own, in the form of Tom Foley) would like to do the same thing, but doesn’t look like he can rustle up $250K in contributions by the deadline.

AL-05: Parker Griffith apparently isn’t switching back to being a Dem after his party-switching chicanery blew up in his face; he congratulated Mo Brooks at a press conference yesterday and said he’ll vote for him in November. “I was rejected by the constituents, they did not accept me. I appreciate that because that is how America is supposed to work,” said Griffith.

CA-36: There are some internal polls floating around out there ahead of next week’s primary in the 36th. Jane Harman’s camp has a poll out giving her a 58-17 lead over Marcy Winograd (no word on the pollster, let alone any of the details). Winograd has her own internal, with even less detail: all they’re saying is that Harman is down at 43, although their silence about Winograd’s own number is pretty telling.

FL-19: The FEC is telling ex-Rep. Robert Wexler to give back an unspecified amount of the contributions he received for the 2010 general election — which makes sense, considering he isn’t a participant. (He left to become president of the Center for Middle East Peace, although ongoing chatter has him on track to become the next Ambassador to Israel.) Unfortunately, that means less cash that he can offload to the> DCCC or other Dems this cycle.

HI-01: I wasn’t aware that he hadn’t already weighed in in favor of Colleen Hanabusa, since most of the rest of the local old-guard Dem establishment had, but today ex-Rep. and gubernatorial candidate Neil Abercrombie endorsed Hanabusa. He also gave a hat tip to Ed Case for getting out of the way.

Blogosphere: The New York Times actually got something right! They’re going to be partnering with Nate Silver, bringing a relaunched 538 under the NYT’s online umbrella in August. We’re glad to see that the legacy media are realizing that not only is there serious political journalism (if not scholarship) going on in the blogosphere, but that their last gasp at relevance may be by moving in that direction. Congrats to Nate, too!

86 thoughts on “SSP Daily Digest: 6/3 (Afternoon Edition)”

  1. I don’t think anyone has posted on this yet: Brandstad leading Culver by 15 points 52-37. Roberts and Vander Plaats also beat Culver.

    Culver’s approval rating at 28%. Desmoinesdem, if you’re out there, how does Culver recover from this?  

  2. Looking around for potential GOP candidates in Boren’s district, in case his primary challenger wins, I discovered that Muskogee’s mayor is only 19 years old!  

  3. Does anyone think Boren’s primary challenger has a chance at winning? If he does, the seat would be a strong pick-up opportunity for us I assume? I’m trying to find potential candidates in the district, there aren’t many elected officials here. the party better get on it. The 2 best choices seem to be state Sen. Randy Brogdon, currently running a long-shot bid for gov, and state House Majority leader Tad Jones. other candidates:

    Rep. George Faught. These are just state legislators. Since I doubt the party takes this opportunity, I’m not going further than that.  

  4. I have to heartily agree with Griffith on this:

    “I was rejected by the constituents, they did not accept me. I appreciate that because that is how America is supposed to work.”

    Yeah, rejecting you is indeed how things were supposed to work, you ass! He does deserve credit for being more graceful today than on Election Night, when I read that he refused to talk to reporters or even come out and greet his supporters, but good riddance!

    As for 538, I presume they’ll be hidden behind a pay wall soon, and I also have to wonder whether being part of the Times could compromise the blog’s coverage of New York Times reporting, such as the hit job on Blumenthal that at first seemed credible and important to me. Too bad; I’ve got that site hotlinked on my dashboard (is that what it’s called?). How relevant do you think a hidden, possibly compromised 538 will be?

  5. of senators with mustaches? I guess at the start of the next congress their will only one John Hoeven. Stupid question I was just debating with some buddies.  

  6. A primary is ridiculous, I have no idea who in this state actually supports Malpass or Blakeman. Particularly not Blakeman, he reeks of corruption. DioGuardi got the conservative line, and he stands to gain the most traction out of the 3. Maybe then the GOP will finally unify against Gilly. Probably not though, our GOP is a mess.  

Comments are closed.