A Survey of Anti-Escalation and Redeployment Bills

I am compiling a list of bills introduced in the 110th Congress dealing with ending, lessening, or keeping at the status quo, American involvement in Iraq. 

H.Con.Res.23: Offered by Dennis Kucinich
Expresses the sense of the Congress that troops not be escalated (note the use of the word “escalated”) in Iraq.  I may be wrong, but this appears to be a non-binding resolution.  Judging from the compartively high number of cosponsors and the fact that Lynch is a cosponsor, it appears this may become a “consensus” piece of legislation, basically hot air but no substance.  It has 21 cosponsors as of 12:28 PM EST on January 11: 

Rep Capuano, Michael E. [MA-8] | Rep Carson, Julia [IN-7] | Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] | Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]| Rep Cummings, Elijah E. [MD-7] | Rep Davis, Danny K. [IL-7] | Rep DeFazio, Peter A. [OR-4] | Rep Fattah, Chaka [PA-2] | Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [AZ-7] | Rep Holt, Rush D. [NJ-12] | Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. [IL-2] | Rep Johnson, Henry C. “Hank,” Jr. [GA-4] | Rep Kilpatrick, Carolyn C. [MI-13] | Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] | Rep Lynch, Stephen F. [MA-9] | Rep Moore, Gwen [WI-4] | Rep Serrano, Jose E. [NY-16] | Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-13] | Rep Watson, Diane E. [CA-33] | Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] | Rep Wu, David [OR-1]

H.R.353: Offered by Edward Markey
This one prohibits the use of funds for any escalation. Text of it is currently unavailable.  It has nine cosponsors as of 12:36 PM EDT:

Rep Abercrombie, Neil [HI-1] | Rep DeFazio, Peter A. [OR-4] | Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10] | Rep DeLauro, Rosa L. [CT-3] | Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [AZ-7] | Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. [NY-22] | Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] | Rep McGovern, James P. [MA-3] | Rep Meehan, Martin T. [MA-5]

S.233: Offered by Edward Kennedy
Appears to be very similar to the Markey bill (it’s probable, considering the sponsors are from the same state, that they are intended to be companion bills).  It prohibits funds for any escalation.  Text is currently not available.  It has six cosponsors as of 12:45 PM EST:

Sen Boxer, Barbara [CA] | Sen Harkin, Tom [IA] | Sen Kerry, John F. [MA] | Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT] | Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ] | Sen Sanders, Bernard [VT]

S.121: Offered by Russell Feingold
Calls for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq.  Text is currently not available.  There is one cosponsor as of 12:50 PM EST:

Sen Boxer, Barbara [CA]

Some things jump out.  First, there appears to be no consensus on what to do.  We have three strategies in four bills.  One states disapproval of the escalation, another bars funding, and a fourth says leave.  The first seems to tantamount to huffing and puffing.  The second sounds better but is also a major political liability.  I could just see the ads saying that Democrats want to leave our troops in the cold.  The third is the best strategy, in my opinion, but there are only two Senators currently supporting it.

Second, it appears that most of our prospective presidential candidates are willing to go out on a limb.  Only Kerry is willing to do something.  Obama, Clinton, Dodd, and Biden are conspicuously silent. 

Third, this seems to be a Democratic effort.  Even though some Republicans, for example, Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, have come out against the war, they are absent.  It would appear that many in the Republican Party are a) out of touch with reality and the American and still supporting the war or b) are only publicly condemning the war to save their own asses but not won’t do anything about it.

Fourth, it seems many of the “centrists” are spinless and out of touch as ever.

My Trip to Washington, DC, (Districts We Need to Defend in 2008!)

One of things that I love doing on my all too infrequent trips to Washington, DC; along with networking, kicking Rethugs to the curb whenever possible, is being able to pick up “Roll Call” and “The Hill” for free.  One of the articles in the 1/4/06 edition of “Roll Call” was an article from Rep. Tom Cole, the new head of the RCCC.  One of the things that he said was that the RCCC had a debt of around $16 million and that was more than they had realized previously (SNARK WARNING) couldn’t have happened to a nicer group of gals and guys.  He also talks about 60 congressional districts that president bush carried twice that are currently help by Democrats.  I won’t bother you with 39 of them, because they are held by long term, incumbent dedmocrats with large voting percentages.  But there are 21 districts; held by Democrats, who won with under 55%.  The list is as follows:

TX 22nd  Nick Lampson  52%
PA 10th  Christopher Carney  53%
IA 9th  Baron Hill  50%
KS 2nd  Nancy Boyda  51%
LA 3rd  Charlie Melancon  55%
NC 11th  Heath Schuler  54%
IL 8th  Melissa Bean  51%
IN 2nd  Joe Donnelly  54%
GA 8th  Jim Marshall  51%
WI 8th  Steve Kagen  51%
AZ 5th  Harry Mitchell  51%
CA 11th  Jerry McNerney  53%
FL 16th  Tim Mahoney  49%
NY 19th  John Hall  51%
PA 4TH  Jason Altmire  52%
AZ 8th  Gabrielle Giffords  54%
NY 24th  Michael Acuri  54%
MN 1st  Tim Walz  53%
NH 1st  Carol Shea-Porter  52%
IA 3rd  Lenoard Boswell  52%
OR 5th  Darlene Hooley  54%

These are prime cases of defense first along with the districts that Kerry took in 2004 that have elected rethugs.

Meet the Freshmen

Below is a chart which lists all the incoming freshmen in the 110th Congress. They are listed in order from the most Republican to the most Democratic district, according to PVI.

















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































State CD Member Party PVI Switch Status
NE 3 Smith (R) R+23.6 Open
ID 1 Sali (R) R+18.9 Open
CA 22 McCarthy (R) R+16.0 Open
CO 5 Lamborn (R) R+15.7 Open
TX 22 Lampson (D) R+14.5 R » D Open
TN 1 Davis (R) R+13.9 Open
OH 4 Jordan (R) R+13.6 Open
OK 5 Fallin (R) R+11.9 Open
IN 8 Ellsworth (D) R+8.5 R » D
NV 2 Heller (R) R+8.2 Open
PA 10 Carney (D) R+8.0 R » D
KS 2 Boyda (D) R+7.3 R » D
IN 9 Hill (D) R+7.1 R » D
NC 11 Shuler (D) R+7.1 R » D
OH 18 Space (D) R+6.1 R » D Open
MN 6 Bachmann (R) R+5.1 Open
FL 9 Bilirakis (R) R+4.3 Open
IN 2 Donnelly (D) R+4.3 R » D
FL 13 Buchanan (R) R+4.1 Open
AZ 5 Mitchell (D) R+3.7 R » D
WI 8 Kagen (D) R+3.7 R » D Open
CA 11 McNerney (D) R+3.0 R » D
IL 6 Roskam (R) R+2.9 Open
PA 4 Altmire (D) R+2.6 R » D
MI 7 Walberg (R) R+2.5 Open*
NY 20 Gillibrand (D) R+2.5 R » D
FL 16 Mahoney (D) R+2.4 R » D Open
NY 19 Hall (D) R+1.5 R » D
AZ 8 Giffords (D) R+1.4 R » D Open
MN 1 Walz (D) R+0.9 R » D
NY 24 Arcuri (D) R+0.6 R » D Open
NH 1 Shea-Porter (D) R+0.1 R » D
OH 6 Wilson (D) D+0.4 Open
CO 7 Perlmutter (D) D+2.3 R » D Open
KY 3 Yarmuth (D) D+2.4 R » D
NH 2 Hodes (D) D+2.7 R » D
PA 8 Murphy (D) D+3.4 R » D
PA 7 Sestak (D) D+3.6 R » D
CT 5 Murphy (D) D+3.7 R » D
FL 22 Klein (D) D+3.7 R » D
IL 17 Hare (D) D+4.6 Open
IA 1 Braley (D) D+4.8 R » D
OH 13 Sutton (D) D+6.4 Open
IA 2 Loebsack (D) D+6.9 R » D
MD 3 Sarbanes (D) D+7.1 Open
CT 2 Courtney (D) D+7.6 R » D
VT AL Welch (D) D+9.1 I » D Open
HI 2 Hirono (D) D+9.7 Open
FL 11 Castor (D) D+11.0 Open
TN 9 Cohen (D) D+18.1 Open
MN 5 Ellison (D) D+21.5 Open
GA 4 Johnson (D) D+22.0 Open*
NJ 13 Sires (D) D+22.9 Open
NY 11 Clarke (D) D+39.9 Open

Asterisk = defeated incumbent in primary.