SurveyUSA for KING-TV (8/6-9, likely and actual voters, 6/25-28 in parentheses):
Patty Murray (D-inc): 41 (37)
Dino Rossi (R): 33 (33)
Clint Didier (R): 11 (5)
Others: 10 (6)
Undecided: 4 (19)
(MoE: ±3.9%)
While Dino Rossi has been, in public, trying to stay above the fray and treat his advancing from Washington’s Top 2 primary as a given, he’s also been trying to consolidate support from various right-wing kingmakers (Jim DeMint, Tom Coburn), which suggests he’s at least somewhat sweating the challenge from various teabaggers on his right flank. SurveyUSA’s new poll (of likely and “actual” voters, the latter being those who’ve already sent in their mail-in ballots) shows that there his efforts may be warranted, as he’s flat while everyone else is gaining: principal Tea Party opposition Clint Didier, Democratic incumbent Patty Murray, and the vast hodgepodge that is “other” (partially fellow teabagger Paul Akers, who’s in the low single digits, but also 12 other assorted dreamers and cranks). Rossi, of course, is in no danger of losing his ticket to the big dance in November, but he probably wants to avoid an embarrassing finish in distant second.
As with the previous SurveyUSA poll, one red flag for Murray is that Rossi + Didier > Murray. PPP‘s recent poll of the primary is an interesting comparison point, because their numbers for the Republicans are pretty similar while finding Murray further along (Murray 47, Rossi 33, Didier 10, Akers 4)… but they don’t include an “Other,” suggesting that SurveyUSA is finding at least a handful of folks who prefer Murray to the GOPers but, given the full panoply of options, plan to waste their primary votes on one of the perennial candidates who are self-described Dems (like the ubiquitous Mike the Mover).
Murray better hope it goes up from there on election day. Remember what the Hotline said:
I think she probably ends up around 45, with enough undecideds going for her.
Can anyone imagine getting polled and having to listen to all those names? It must take forever! There are 14 people!
One question about the CA way, does it take top to winners or top two winners per party? if its top two per party, the GOP could easily clear the field for one of their dudes, and have CA votes vote for the less electable dem if there was more than one of them on the ballot.
Ugggg
does anyone like this system?