University of New Hampshire (WMUR Granite State Poll): (9/14-21, likely voters, 7-11/20 in parens)
Jeanne Shaheen (D): 48 (46)
John Sununu (R-inc): 44 (42)
(MoE: ±4.3%)
The University of New Hampshire is back with new polls, and they show a continuation of Shaheen’s four-point lead from July. The July poll was considered a bit out-of-whack at the time, but this week’s poll seems more in line with overall polling trends: still a consistent Shaheen lead (with the exception of that recent wacky Rasmussen poll), but now within the margin of error instead of out in double-digit land. Encouragingly, Sununu’s favorables are dropping, down to 44% from over 50 in July. The same sample gives McCain a 47-45 lead.
University of New Hampshire (WMUR Granite State Poll): (9/14-21, likely voters, 7-11/20 in parens)
Carol Shea-Porter (D-inc): 42 (40)
Jeb Bradley (R): 45 (46)
Undecided 12 (14)
(MoE: ±6.2%)
Paul Hodes (D-inc): 38 (43)
Jennifer Horn (R): 26 (23)
Undecided 33 (32)
(MoE: ±6.0%)
UNH also takes a look at the two Congressional races in New Hampshire. Carol Shea-Porter continues to trail Jeb Bradley (now by 3) in the rematch of their 2006 race in NH-01. The gap has closed a bit from last time, probably as Jeb Bradley emerges from an acrimonious primary covered in mud. Shea-Porter has only a 44% favorable rating (up significantly from the previous sample), but Bradley is even worse at 36% favorable, down from nearly 50 last time, which indicates that his primary battle with John Stephen may have mortally wounded him. Shea-Porter maintains a financial edge and can count on DCCC help, but this still looks to be a close race come November.
The other freshman representative, Paul Hodes, is in much better shape in the more Dem-leaning NH-02, giving Hodes the tie-breaker in the battle of dueling internals we saw earlier this week. Hodes is up by 12, although note the huge number of undecideds in this race (which has only grown since the GOP primary was resolved).
Playing “spot the methodological weaknesses in the UNH poll” has become a favorite netroots pastime, and there are a few things to point out: each of the Congressional samples is only half of the statewide sample, leaving them with sample sizes of only 252 and 271, and enormous 6% MoEs. In addition, these samples seem especially heavy on the Republicans (although New Hampshire may be one state where old school New England Republicans retain their registration even as they increasingly vote Democratic as the national GOP devolves into Theocon Central). This is especially glaring in the 2nd District, where the sample includes 60 Democrats and 91 Republicans (50% more).
the reason is that many voters still think Bradley is the incumbent and he wont get the usual benefit of the “incumbent rule” that says that 67% of the undecided vote goes to the challenger.
1. What’s the partisan sampling for NH-01?
2. What’s the real partisan fractions in the state and in the first district?
in registration and that NH-01 has a slightly large Republican edge.
That’s what this poll is. Can’t wait until a real pollster polls NH-01. I’d imagine the real numbers are something like Shea-Porter ahead 50-43.
And as for NH-02 I’d be surprised if Hodes wins by less than 20 points.
Statewide they oversampled GOP by +7%.
My question is why is an outfit called the Granite State Poll polling some other faux state that isn’t New Hampshire?
In other news, a new poll from R2K which actually samples pretty accurately according to available party ID data from 8/08 is out tonight, showing Obama +4%, with the other federal races out tomorrow.