The plethora of opportunities for House Democratic challengers in Ohio next year is a topic that both CQ Politics and MyDD’s Jon Singer looked at recently. Between both sources, we can identify no fewer than seven potential offensive targets for Democrats this cycle. The following chart lists each possible targeted district by its PVI, the incumbent’s margin of victory in 2006, and the Kerry/Bush and Gore/Bush margins in 2004 and 2000, respectively:
CD | Incumbent | PVI | ’06 Margin | Kerry ’04 | Bush ’04 | Gore ’00 | Bush ’00 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OH-01 | Chabot | R+0.5 | 4 | 49 | 51 | 46 | 51 |
OH-02 | Schmidt | R+13.1 | 1 | 36 | 64 | 34 | 63 |
OH-03 | Turner | R+2.9 | 17 | 46 | 54 | 45 | 52 |
OH-12 | Tiberi | R+0.7 | 15 | 49 | 51 | 46 | 52 |
OH-14 | LaTourette | R+2.2 | 18 | 47 | 53 | 44 | 52 |
OH-15 | Pryce | R+1.1 | <1 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 52 |
OH-16 | Regula | R+3.6 | 17 | 46 | 54 | 42 | 53 |
With the exception of the 3rd, these districts have been trending more Democratic on the Presidential level since 2000. Despite shrewd gerrymandering by Ohio Republicans, with the right challengers, each of these seats could come into play.
- OH-01: The DCCC thinks it has their man to finish what John Cranley started in his challenge to Republican Steve Chabot in 2006. State Rep. and Minority Whip Steve Driehaus, “a Democrat with a history of winning over Republican voters”, has thrown his hat in the ring. On the one hand, Driehaus has a suburban political base that can help wear down Chabot in his strongest territories. On the other hand, Driehaus may lack the broader name recognition of Cranley, who was an at-large councilor in Cincinnati. On balance, though, Driehaus’ resume looks good, and he should prove to be another credible challenger.
- OH-02: No doubt about it; Jean Schmidt is a political time bomb set to go off every six months or so with another bizarre comment about bringing nuclear waste into her district or deriding the outrage over the Walter Reed scandal as “overblown” criticism. Jean Schmidt could very well be the worst politician of the decade, which is the only reason why Team Blue has a shot at winning this R+13 district. 2006 candidate Vic Wulsin is game for a rematch, and while it doesn’t seem to take much to incite Schmidt into inflicting another wound on herself, the Democratic nominee in this district will have to deal with running against the Presidential headwind of a solidly Republican district. A tough challenge, to be sure, but Schmidt is destined to underperform, especially if she gets another primary challenge.
- OH-03: This Dayton-based district was represented by Democrat Tony P. Hall from 1978-2002, but has since been occupied by Republican Mike Turner. Whatever hope Democrats had in sparking an upset last year unfortunately went down in flames after the Democratic nominee, Stephanie Studebaker, was arrested in a domestic dispute just three months before election day. Prosecutor Dick Chema was the last-minute replacement, and perhaps unsurprisingly fell short by roughly 17 points. Given that this district’s Republican lean is less than heavy, a well-organized challenger with a good profile could perhaps do to Turner what Democrat Jason Altmire did to “rising star” Republican Melissa Hart in Pennsylvania last year, who held a similarly Republican-leaning seat with a long history of voting for Congressional Democrats.
- OH-12: Republican Pat Tiberi convincingly repelled Swing State Project hero and near-octogenarian Bob Shamansky by a 15-point margin last November, but he did have to empty his $3 million war chest to do it. Tiberi shouldn’t be able to escape 2008 with a free pass, especially in a trending Democratic district like this one.
- OH-14: Democrats have an eager challenger to Republican Steve LaTourette: William O’Neill, a judge on the 11th District Court of Appeals in Ohio. O’Neill’s recent claim to fame was winning 41% of the vote for the Ohio Supreme Court on a $1 budget in 2006, in principled opposition to the mixing of campaign contributions and judicial service. However, O’Neill claims he won’t be nearly as stingy in his campaign against LaTourette. He intends to raise $1 million for the race, and will resign from the bench on June 15th and has already been in contact with the DCCC, according to comments attributed to him on the Buckeye State Blog. LaTourette, despite some family values hypocrisy and a district trending more Democratic on the Presidential level, has yet to face a top-shelf challenge this decade (no, Capri Cafaro doesn’t count). If Judge O’Neill can bring the noize, this might be another unexpected defense for Republicans next year.
- OH-15: After watching the disappointments of Lois Murphy and Diane Farrell in their four-year campaigns last cycle, I’ve become rather skeptical of the viability of most House rematches, barring special circumstances like scandal (e.g. Pombo/McNerney), and major strategic reorientation (e.g. Hodes/Bass, Boyda/Ryun). But Democrat Mary Jo Kilroy ran a strong challenge against Deborah Pryce last year, which is why I’m somewhat ambivalent about the brewing primary battle between her and fellow Franklin County Commissioner Paula Brooks. Pryce could be on unstable ground in 2008, but we’ll need to sort out our side of the fence first.
- OH-16: At age 82, Republican Ralph Regula is ripe for retirement. But even if this seat doesn’t open up, Democrats plan on making an aggressive challenge after the no-profile, no-money Democrat Thomas Shaw scored a surprising 41.6% against the 34-year incumbent. According to the Buckeye State Blog, State Senator John Boccieri, an officer in the Air Force Reserve and a veteran of four tours in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom, is strongly considering a bid for this seat. With a strong electoral track record and an excellent profile, Boccieri could prove to be a top-tier Democratic recruitment in the next cycle.
Seven districts, seven pressure points. Democrats probably won’t win all of them, or even many of them, but that doesn’t mean that it wouldn’t be wise to push on all of these targets hard to keep Congressional Republicans focused on putting out as many brushfires as possible.
Race Tracker: Ohio
OH-12 is literally in my backyard (5 houses away) and with the state legislative campaigns we do in this area, we know it well.
The problem with this district is that while the district has been slowly trending Democratic (see our page on the numbers here) that the population shift isn’t working in our direction.
The 12th district is eastern and northern Franklin County, along with all of Delaware county and half of Licking County.
Delaware county is probably still the fastest growing county in the state and the housing boom is huge up there. Licking county is also growing in its western side (the part in OH-12).
The share of the overall district vote coming from Franklin County has been slowly declining, from 61.38% in 2002, to 61.14% in 2004 and recently 59.05% in 2006.
The key to winning this district is to build up the farm team in the state legislature and other races and we hope to do a lot of that in 2008, including races that we’re personally involved in.
Until we get a real strong Democrat who has a history in the district, we will continue to struggle in that district.
There’s a lot of winnable GOP seats left in Ohio, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, and Illinois, and heck, there’s still four seats left in Pennsylvania! I think the 08 cycle is the best time to go after these, with Bush rejectionism still high, but the 10 cycle and then the post-redistricting cycle should be good too.
The Senate is more difficult in the very long term, cause we just don’t have as many states as they do, but if we remain strong in the 08 and 10 elections, we look to be in a very good position when the House remapping is done, and if we do that right we might not need to worry too hard about the House for a long time.
It’s gonna take a ton of money to win all those House seats, and with the apolitical presidental donors not being involved, it’s gonna take a ton of insider money. You have to make some sketchy non-Jim-Webb concessions to get money like that, which is kindof alarming.
It’ll be interesting to see how we remap too. Do you extend yourself into many seats, all of which are eminently loseable if Wall Street turns on you and funds a GOP takeover again? Or do you (can you) carve out a smaller but less vulnerable majority?
I’d favor a bunch of swing seats nationwide, since it’s more democratic and I think our message wins in a fair fight, but campaigns are expensive and the money chase is anti-progressive. The alternative extreme would be a California system mapped nationwide: a bunch of democratic-leaning and republican-leaning districts, with the former somewhat outnumbering the latter. In California that has given us two very extreme parties, but being an actual liberal, I guess I should be ok with that.
who should run, but I’m open to supporting to the extent I am able.
we have incredible pick-up opportunities here in the buckeye state with a strong line of challengers already waiting in the wings. at the very least, the NRCC is going to have to pour millions into Ohio again in 2008. It will be a considerable strain on their resources defending 5 or 6 seats in one state. Please keep blogging about Ohio’s congressional potential. I worked the 15th this past year, and I can tell you we will need any help we can get.
maybe 1/2 these elections are already won.
are all districts that in past were historically Democratic. It looks like they have done a good job targetting OH-01 and OH-14. I would be great if they could get Tony Hall to run for his old seat again(OH-03).
While I will agree that John Boccieri is a fabulous candidate for US House and will win a LOT of swing voters, I must contest one point in your summary.
Boccieri’s Senate District does not represent a good chunk of the 16th. In fact, it barely covers even a sliver of one county.
http://ohiosenatedem…
Boccieri is in the 33rd district, and you can see from the above map that it is far to the east of the 16th Congressional District. Stark, Wayne, Ashland, and Medina are the four counties of the 16th.
However, John has been a part of Stark County politics for a long time, and is well known throughout the county…which is over 50% of the district. He’ll be the best candidate for the race.
I just thought I should clarify that one mistake.
Peter Goldmark is very close to a decision on whether he will run again in WA-05 (Incumbent: Cathy McMorris Rodgers).
Sorry about WA-05 post – I’m in the wrong thread.
Because of prez turnout, Kilroy will make up votes. Pryce is still voting out of touch w/ the district.
Lois Murphy and Dianne Farrell each gave their Republicans tremendous battles the first time, over performing expectations. Paula Brookes represents a more conservative and suburban area than Kilroy, giving her a more strategic base. She won her first reelection in 2004 with a larger percentage than Kilroy, despite being in only her first term, and despite representing a district that Bush won on the Federal level, while Kilroy’s was in Kerry’s category.