I noticed he has MN back in the tossup area, too, with a 2pt lead for Coleman. Not really a lot of bad news, is there?
Given the state’s overwhelming preference for a GOP Presidential candidate, it makes sense for McConnell to link his opponent closely with the top of the Democratic ticket.
Clearly Republicans learned their lesson from three special elections in a row.
Rasmussen has been showing a lot of favorable polling for us lately, I won’t go jumping around over this till we see some agreement.
It is kind of odd that 67% of McCain voters say they will vote for McConnell, while 28% say they will vote for Lunsford. I don’t expect that number to stay so low.
I know that Bunning won narrowly in 2004, but how many of Daniel Mongiardo’s voters also voted for Bush in 2004? I’d guess roughly 25%, but I’d need to do some investigating. Many of these voters may be Democrats that don’t like Obama?
Thanks for looking that up! I guess 28% is somewhat higher then, but even if only 18% cross over, that still should put us in striking range.
I noticed he has MN back in the tossup area, too, with a 2pt lead for Coleman. Not really a lot of bad news, is there?
Clearly Republicans learned their lesson from three special elections in a row.
Rasmussen has been showing a lot of favorable polling for us lately, I won’t go jumping around over this till we see some agreement.
It is kind of odd that 67% of McCain voters say they will vote for McConnell, while 28% say they will vote for Lunsford. I don’t expect that number to stay so low.
I know that Bunning won narrowly in 2004, but how many of Daniel Mongiardo’s voters also voted for Bush in 2004? I’d guess roughly 25%, but I’d need to do some investigating. Many of these voters may be Democrats that don’t like Obama?
Thanks for looking that up! I guess 28% is somewhat higher then, but even if only 18% cross over, that still should put us in striking range.