Matt Singer over at Left in the West has a good summary of the latest Montana-At-Large House race rumors:
So what’s going on with the Congressional race here in Montana? Recently, I’ve been hearing three names over and over again:
- Bill Kennedy — Bill is the lone Democratic County Commission in Yellowstone County. I’m hearing that he’s definitely throwing his hat into this ring, but there’s been no announcement, so take it with the same grain of salt that you take anything in the political rumor mill. That said, Bill brings some strengths to this race. He represents a swing county that is Dennis Rehberg’s base. He lost the race for Secretary of State in 2004, but I hear he appreciates the reasons for that defeat and has vowed to not repeat the mistakes. If there are “factions” in the Democratic Party, Bill and I are from different ones. I worked for and supported Jon Ellingson for S.O.S. in 2004. Bill was John Morrison’s primary treasurer in 2006, while I supported Jon Tester. All that said, Bill has always struck me as a genuinely nice guy and good human being. With the right kind of campaign, he could be a formidable opponent to a huckster like Rehberg.
- Jim Foley — A former top aide to both Pat Williams and Max Baucus, Jim Foley has flirted with running for office for years. A recent Roll Call article said rumors were spreading that he was eyeing a race for Congress. Both the DCCC, which works on recruiting for these campaigns, and Jim himself refused to comment. That said, the story wouldn’t have mentioned him if someone hadn’t placed it and it wouldn’t have been placed for no reason. He’s probably feeling out the waters. His strength? A huge percentage of members of Congress are former staff people who understand the grueling work it takes to get there. His weakness? He’s been based for years in Missoula, so he’ll have to deal with the (often exaggerated) implications of being tied to the progressive hotbed of Montana, but he’ll do it with few of the benefits. Jim himself is not beloved by the Missoula ‘roots. Final Note: I don’t have this on any authority, so don’t quote me, but I’d guess Jim Foley would not jump into this race until after Rehberg explicitly says he’s running for re-election. Jim knows the tougher race Rehberg expects, the more likely he is to jump into the Senate race. Jim is loyal and he wouldn’t look to set up a tougher race for his former boss. Again, this is just my gut, so take it with a half a grain of salt.
- Dennis McDonald — The current chair of the Democratic Party in Montana, Dennis may find his background as a rancher and relative political outsider comes in more useful as a candidate than as a behind-the-scenes manager. Dennis is a founder of R-CALF, has deep connections across rural Montana, and could undermine part of Dennis’s base. He’d continue the successful formula that has worked for Montana Democrats — run a rancher or farmer who is good on gun issues and can be forceful on trade, keep the base unified, and win. What’s his biggest weakness? He’s never been a candidate, much less a statewide one in a high-profile race. And he doesn’t receive the natural political benefit of that, since as chair of a political party, he’s relatively easy to paint as a typical insider.
Here’s my dream scenario: an aggressive, credible Montana Democrat tosses his hat in the ring, giving Republican Denny Rehberg an extra incentive to vacate his House seat and take on Democratic Senator Max Baucus that same year. Baucus beats back Rehberg, like he did in 1996, and Democrats have a serious shot to reclaim the House seat that Democrat Pat Williams held until 1996. Two stones to kill one bird–that sort of thing.
Of course: A) this is extremely wishful thinking, and B) I’m sure that neither Max Baucus nor the DSCC would look upon such a strategy with good humor. Baucus has what it takes to beat Rehberg, but I’m sure he’d prefer to take on someone a bit lower down the totem pole.
should rehburg win, which, realistically he’ll probably do (don’t shoot the messenger, i want him out as much as anyone, but he coasted to re-election in a VERY democratic year, and Burns barely lost) missoula mayor john engen might run in 2008/2010. sure he’ll be seen as a liberal, but with missoula’s growing demographics and the support of baucus, tester, and the gov he might be able to pull it off.
so as to prevent his running against Baucus. I’m one who thinks that a Baucus-Rehberg race would be miserable. Conrad F’n Burns nearly got reelected last year, and that was without a presidential race at the top of the ticket. And the DSCC will be overcautious about protecting incumbents, so they’ll spend well more than is necessary to win the race (if we do win it), diverting resources from challengers. (OTOH, Montana is a cheap state.)
Anyway, not thrilled about a Baucus-Rehberg race. Would be happy to run at him in 2010 instead. I assume we’ll go soft on Shelley Moore Capito this cycle for the same reason, though I kinda doubt she’d make the leap to a race against Rockefeller.
Of course, if you wait until 2010 to go after Rehberg, then you could set him up to challenge Tester in 2012. If he wins a hard race he’s strengthened, and if he loses a close race he could still pull an Ensign and try again. 2012 is also a pesky presidential year. I suppose if Rehberg has got to be beaten sometime, sending him up against Baucus might be the safest possible option. Still doesn’t sound fun though.
I lived there for nine months, but never saw anything outside of Missoula, which as we all know, ISN’T a good representation of the state. On paper it looks like a very good state for us, 2 dem senators, dem gov and voted for Clinton in 92 and nearly did in 96. After that things start to get tricky. The 92 Clinton win was Perot assisted, as was 96’s near win, Baucus is a relic from another era and tester managed a win against a man horrendously ill-suited to be any type of politician, much less a senator. The gov is the only dem to get a real good win. Because of montana’s late (unless they move it up) primary I’d say the race will depend on our prez nominee. Should Clinton get it, keep Rehburg away from Baucus! He barely hung on while Clinton nearly won, Clinton in that part of the state would be a landslide for the republicans. Edwards however, (should he truly remain in the race, our prayers are for Mrs. Edwards) could make the race competitive. There’s one other factor different from 1996, the gov. with a dem gov in office, it might provide a boost to either the dem nominee and/or Baucus. I’d say if Edwards, or Richardson gets the nom, hope for Rehburg, otherwise pray he stays FAR away from the race.