NM-Sen: Pearce Surges in New Poll

Rasmussen (8/20, likely voters incl. leaners, 7/24 in parens):

Tom Udall (D): 52 (61)

Steve Pearce (R): 44 (35)

(MoE: ±4.0%)

Big surge for Steve Pearce. But how does one spell “outlier”? This race has never been in single digits — with the exception of a lone Rasmussen poll from February. It looks like the “Rasmussen non-bounce” may have struck again.

Has anything changed since July to make this an 8-point race? Pearce has taken to the airwaves in recent weeks, slamming Udall on the energy issue, and the Club For Growth nutters have joined in on the fun. That might be enough to bring Tomnotmark down from the 65% range, but you still have to figure that Udall is in commanding control of this race.

SSP currently rates this race as Likely Democratic.

NJ-04 Video: Smith Votes to Criminalize ‘The Pill’

Cross-posted at Blue Jersey.

I’m Josh Zeitz, the Democratic candidate for Congress in New Jersey’s Fourth District. I want to talk to you about my strong support for reproductive rights, but first I want to tell you about the person I’m running against. My opponent, Chris Smith, is the leader of the anti-choice caucus in the House of Representatives.

Chris Smith has introduced legislation to criminalize the common, everyday birth control pill and IUD on twenty-two separate occasions. He wants to put millions of American women in jail for using the pill. We have to say no to this kind of extremism.

My campaign has produced a video outlining Smith’s attempt to criminalize birth control, and you can view it by clicking below.

I believe that access to basic birth control and family planning services is a fundamental right. By refusing to provide contraception and age appropriate sex education, Chris Smith’s policies increase the number of unintended pregnancies.

By providing women with a full range of information and health care options, we can help them make informed decisions about their lives and bodies. Together we can continue to provide women the right to choose.

I know how important reproductive rights are to all of you, and I want to thank you for taking time to learn more about this crucial Congressional race.

If you are able, please make a contribution at my ActBlue page.

If you’d like to volunteer, please contact steve_at_joshzeitz_dot_com. Please visit the campaign at www.joshzeitz.com to learn more about what I believe.

Sincerely,

Josh Zeitz

MO-09: Who Among Us Does Not Love NASCAR?

Not Judy Baker! She sure loves her some NASCAR:

It’s official: Carl Edwards is Columbia’s native son.

A billboard unveiled this week along eastbound Interstate 70 near Range Line Street brags that Columbia is the home of the 2007 NASCAR Busch Series winner.

About a hundred friends and family yesterday surprised the 28-year-old NASCAR star with a reception, showed off the billboard and also announced plans to rename a stretch of Route WW after Columbia’s biggest celebrity. […]

State Sen. Chuck Graham and state Rep. Judy Baker announced the plans to designate Route WW from Highway 63 to Olivet Road as “Carl Edwards Drive.” (emphasis added)

Which makes this deranged explosion from her opponent’s campaign in response to new poll results showing her leading Republican Blaine Luetkemeyer (which we noted below) look even more psychotic:

“Judy Baker’s poll is like a NASCAR driver bragging about being ahead after the first lap of this weekend’s Sharpie 500, which in case Judy didn’t know is a car race enjoyed by ‘those people’ often derided by liberal Democrats like herself,” said Luetkemeyer spokesman Paul Sloca in a statement.

Nice try. Keep on truckin’, little buddy.

MO-09: Baker Leads by 2 in New Poll

Momentum Analysis for Judy Baker (8/12-14, likely voters):

Judy Baker (D): 41

Blaine Luetkemeyer (R): 39

Tamara Millay (L): 3

Undecided: 16

(MoE: ±4.9%)

Nice numbers for Baker, whose strength among women voters (45-36) and stronger base support (78-12 among Dems, compared to Luetkemeyer’s 66-14 among Republicans) are propelling her to an early lead.

Luetkemeyer also appears to be a bit dinged up after his Club For Growth-tainted primary, as his favorability (33-16) is more mixed than Baker’s (30-8).

It’s a very solid start for Baker, but getting to 50% is the real challenge. SSP currently rates this race as Lean Republican.

(Big hat-tip to Wayne in Missouri for the catch.)

PS: Check out the Luetkemeyer campaign’s psychotic reaction to the poll:

“Judy Baker’s poll is like a NASCAR driver bragging about being ahead after the first lap of this weekend’s Sharpie 500, which in case Judy didn’t know is a car race enjoyed by ‘those people’ often derided by liberal Democrats like herself,” said Luetkemeyer spokesman Paul Sloca in a statement.

“Those people”?? Talk about grasping at straws and then some.

MO-09 Poll: Judy Baker 41% Blaine Luetkemeyer 39%

Baker has a 30% favorability to 8% unfavorabilty rating and has higher favorability than unfavorability even among Republican voters (especially Republican women).

Luetkemeyer’s favorability is 33% to 16% unfaovarbility.

This is a District that was Bush +19 in 2004 and that the Republican Hulshof won 61% to 36% in 2006.

The poll was a Baker internal poll conducted by Momentum Analysis. In the primaries Momentum analysis gave Baker a 6 point lead over Gaw in their only internal poll of the primary (she won by 13 in that race).

Full poll story here:

http://blogs.columbiatribune.c…

Donate to Baker at My ActBlue and I’ll match you (the first $400).

http://www.actblue.com/page/wa…

House Projection: 21 More Democrats

Taking into account the districts with open seats and the current generic ballot advantage held by Democrats, we would expect to see around 21 Republican-held House seats flip to Democrats this year if conditions are similar to the elections of 1994-2006.

Below, an explanation, as well as details on party identification, approval,  House retirements, and the generic ballot.  First up, party favorability ratings:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

Since the 2006 elections, Democrats have managed to hang onto a positive party image overall.  Republicans have kept digging a hole for themselves.  The news is not all good, however.  Approval of Democrats in Congress is low, and falling, following a peak just after the 2006 election.  It is still higher than the ratings of Republicans in Congress, but that is not much consolation:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

So why does the public still view Democrats favorably?  One possibility is the excitement of the primary race.  Identification with Democrats ticked up noticeably during the primary season.  Democrats now have nearly a 10-point advantage over Republicans in party identification, compared to just about even in 2004:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.usFree Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

The postive views towards Democrats are reflected in the generic ballot question for the House:  Democrats have led by about 10 points all year:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

Even in Republican districts, Democrats lead on a named ballot question among the most competitive House districts.  This is an improvement over 2006, where, obviously, Republicans won in all these districts.  Here, Tier 1 is the 15 or so most competitive Republican-held districts, and Tier 2 is the 15 or so next-most-competitive districts:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

Seeing this, Republican House members ditched their sinking ship this cycle.  There’s about 35 vacant house seats, and almost 30 of them are currently Republican-held.  This is a lot more than 2004 or 2006 for Republicans, and a little less for Democrats.  The graphs below show the pace of retirements for Republicans (left) and Democrats (right), with the 2008 cycle in yellow:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.usFree Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

The Prediction

In the past seven House elections, the number of seats a party gained could be related to the generic ballot polling numbers and the partisan tendencies on a presidential level of each district.  Plugging in the current numbers, we get 21 seats changing from Republicans to Democrats (with 95% confidence that the number will be between 14 and 31) while only 1 switches from Democrats to Republicans (95% confidence 0 to 7).  This prediction does not attempt to analyze anything on a race-by-race basis.  Compared to the prediction I made last fall, it is slightly fewer seats because the generic ballot numbers are slightly worse, although there are now more open Republican seats, which are easier to pick off.  Also, don’t forget that Democrats have already picked up three more seats in special elections this cycle.

The following graph lets you watch how the numbers change as the Democrats’ generic ballot advantage changes.  The range shown is the range of generic ballot advantage values from recent polls.  

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

It’s quite possible that the generic ballot will increase as the result of the fundraising advantage Democrats have in House races this year (more on that soon).  Of course, the numbers could also go down following a national anti-Democrat smear campaign.

A detailed explanation of these predictions and the fine print is available here.

********************

Polling numbers can be found at pollingreport.com unless otherwiese noted. This is the third in a series looking at the evolution of the political scene since the 2004 and 2006 elections.  The first discussed Bush’s approval ratings.  The second looked at the economy and other issues important to the electorate.  Tomorrow, FEC willing, a look at fundraising.  Cross posted at Open Left and Daily Kos.

KS-01, KS-04: GOP Incumbents Post Big Leads

Here’s a pair of polls in deep red GOP districts that you don’t see polled every day: Kansas’ 1st and 4th CDs, the state’s two most conservative districts.

First, KS-01: SurveyUSA (8/17-19, likely voters):

James Bordonaro (D): 13

Jerry Moran (R-inc): 77

Other: 4

(MoE: ±3.5%)

At a PVI of R+20.3, Kansas’ sprawling 4th CD is the 9th most Republican district in the nation. Moran won by a 79-20 margin in 2006, and it looks like nothing much will change this year.

And now for the Wichita-based 4th district. SurveyUSA (8/17-19, likely voters):

Donald Betts (D): 30

Todd Tiahrt (R-inc): 61

Other: 5

(MoE: ±4.2%)

The 4th CD is a tough district for any Dem to crack, but it’s obviously not the hopeless case that the 1st is. At a PVI of R+12.2, the 4th CD hasn’t sent a Democrat to Congress since 1992, when voters gave Rep. Dan Glickman his final term in office.

Donald Betts, an African-American state Senator with a charmed political career in Kansas politics so far, is giving the district a go, but it’ll be very difficult for him to close the gap, especially with only $68K left in his campaign account. Still, anytime you have a state senator running for higher office, the race is worth watching.

Madia: “It’s time for a little more bravery in Washington”

Today is Ashwin Madia Blog Day and so as a supporter from pretty much the day the primary field settled. I thought I’d post a little bit about why I’ve been part of Madiamania for so long. It shouldn’t be two hard beacuse two blogs today, Ashin’s in The Hill and Howie Klein’s on DownWithTyranny, have spelled out my main reason pretty well. I’ve supported Ashwin Madia since the start beacuse he has courage.

Today in a blog for The Hill  Ashwin summed it up in one line

It’s time for a little more bravery in Washington.

Ashwin Madia has the courage to take on the war’s biggest cheerleader, Joe Lieberman

Today, the Republican Party announced that the loudest defender of status quo policies on Iraq, Senator Joe Lieberman, will be a prominent speaker at the Republican National Convention in my home state of Minnesota. Senator Lieberman and I do have one thing in common. We’ve both changed political parties. I left the Republican Party in 2002 after it replaced “balance our budget” with “borrow and spend” and after we started a war without a plan for success; a war we did not need.

With all respect to Senator Lieberman, talking tough about Iraq is not brave. Bravery is not demonstrated through words but instead through action.

Ashwin Madia has the courage to oppose the recent FISA bill.

I am troubled by the House passage of HR 6304, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008. There is much we can do to prevent terrorism, but such measures do not require the sacrifice of fundamental constitutional freedoms which our country was founded upon. This legislation demonstrates the need for leaders in Congress who have experience in the military and in Iraq, and who value the rule of law as we fight the War on Terror.

Ashwin Madia has the courage to stand for full equality for all Americans.

Ever since the start of my campaign, I have been reaching out to members of the LGBT community in Minnesota. That’s because I strongly believe in full equal rights for all lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans.

As a Marine Corps lawyer who served in Iraq, I was one of first attorneys to successfully defend a gay Marine from discrimination in the military. It wasn’t easy to stand in front of a jury made up of other U.S. Marines and argue against the military’s bigoted and shameful “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, but I was more than willing to do so. I would I would be proud to serve alongside anyone brave enough to put on the uniform.

As someone with a brother who is gay, I would advocate passionately for passage of a federal hate crimes law that recognizes the disproportionate number of threats on a daily basis faced by members of the LGBT community. Existing law already extends legal protections for a number of vulnerable minority communities. Every day that we do not have this protection, LGBT individuals remain at risk.

I support same-sex marriage and full equality under the law. Civil unions fall short and seem to be a way for politicians to avoid recognizing all people as equal.

Lastly, it is unacceptable that our nation continues to allow a form of discrimination to exist in the workplace based on a characteristic that is just as inherent as sex, race, or disability. I support efforts to prohibit job discrimination.

I’m running for an open seat which had been held by a moderate Republican. But my opponent, State Representative Erik Paulsen, has been a vehement opponent of equal rights for LGBT Minnesotans for more than a decade. He led the fight in 2004, and again in 2006, to write discrimination into the Minnesota state constitution. He even voted to prevent equal benefits from being provided to domestic partners of state employees even though many of Minnesota’s largest employers already have policies that promote equality.

I have been endorsed by the Human Rights Campaign and by Minnesota’s Stonewall DFL (Democrats). I hope you will consider supporting my campaign in the coming days and weeks. We need pragmatic problem solving not people who put their political ideology ahead of principles. It’s time for a few more patriots in Congress and a few less politicians.

::

Those are just three examples to give you a idea of what Ashwin is about. Ashwin is a fighter, if we send him to Washington he will not disappoint.

Here’s a great video of Ashwin

We won’t get a great progressive like that in Washington by wishing for it. We’ve got to work for it.

Want courage in Washington? Donate.

NY-13: McMahon Crushing Harrison in Dem Primary Poll

SurveyUSA (8/18-19, registered Dem voters):

Mike McMahon (D): 64

Steve Harrison (D): 18

Undecided: 18

(MoE: ±4.3%)

Big lead for McMahon. Keep in mind that this poll is of registered, and not likely Dem voters, so a different screen might produce a somewhat different result.

McMahon, an NYC Councilman, has a pretty consistent lead among all age brackets and both men and women. Somewhat amusingly, Steve Harrison’s strongest performance in the crosstabs comes from conservative Democrats, who give him 27% to McMahon’s 57%.

Primary: September 9th

MO-09 Luetkemeyer (R) unlikely to continue self-funding

In the primaries Judy Baker raised over 400K mostly from individual donations, while Blaine Luetkemeyer self-funded over 325K and raised 140K from donations.

http://www.opensecrets.org/rac…

It appears that Luetkemeyer having secured a primary victory where both he and Onder self-funded over 325K and then rapidly spent that money in a negative ad blitz, is unable to continue pouring hundreds of thousands of his own money into the campaign.

He is now hoping that outside groups and the NRCC can help bankroll his campaign.

In the interview below he says that he is unlikely to continue self-funding.

See story and interview here:

http://blogs.columbiatribune.c…

The DCCC and NRCC have both entered the race, but Baker seems more prepared to continue to raise money from individual donors than Luetkemeyer whose primary funding was below expectations. If you take out self-funding, Luetkemeyer was actually outraised by non-serious primary candidate Danie Moore (as well as Bob Onder) in the last fundraising quarter and was outraised by Baker nearly 3 to 1 in the last quarter.

If Luetkemeyer is unable to self-fund he will need to pick up his fundraising pace considerably to keep pace with Baker.

This is a Lean Republican district but Judy Baker should be able to outraise Luetkemeyer and make it very competitive.

Please feel free to donate to Judy Baker at my ActBlue page below if you’d like to help her continue to outraise Luetkemeyer.

http://www.actblue.com/page/wa…

To double the effectiveness of any swing state donations, I’ll match all small donations on my page and all total donations this week on my page up to $400.