MO-Gov: Blunt Won’t Seek Second Term

A shocker out of Missouri:

Missouri Gov. Matt Blunt, a Republican, just announced that he’s not running for re-election this fall.

In a statement that shocked political leaders in both parties, Blunt released a TV address “announcing that having achieved virtually everything he set out to accomplish when he ran for governor, he will not seek a second term.

Still waiting to see how this one shakes out, but Blunt seemed doomed against state AG Jay Nixon (D) in the general election this year.  Could the GOP find a strong contender to make this race safer for them?

MO-Gov: Blunt Gets Sued – What is he trying to hide?

Missouri’s most endangered Republican, Governor Matt Blunt just got served!

A lawsuit that is, by Scott Eckersley, his former deputy legal counsel, who is suing Blunt and four current and former aides.

From the Kansas CIty Star:

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. | Gov. Matt Blunt ducked questions Thursday about a lawsuit alleging his office intentionally deleted e-mails in violation of open-records laws but defended the firing of the former staff attorney who sued him. A whistleblower and defamation lawsuit filed Wednesday by former Blunt attorney Scott Eckersley claims that top Blunt aides directed staff in his office and other agencies to destroy e-mails to avoid providing information sought under public records requests.

The real question is, “What are they trying to hide?” Looks like the deletions are just the tip of the iceberg!

Here’s Blunt’s approval numbers: 46% approve, 48% disapprove. The crosstabs show 36% of the sample were Democrats, 29% Republicans, and 28% Independents. If that’s how party affiliation is lining up in Missouri, we’re in very good shape.

Democratic AG Jay Nixon is running strong – last I heard he was up 51% to 42%. I’m betting we can paint this one as “Democrat Favored”.

Governor Rankings: Only a few competitive races

Few people are paying attention to the 14 gubernatorial races that will be decided in the next 15 months (3 are happening this fall, and the 11 remaining are set for 2008). Yet, these contests will play a major role in deciding who holds control of Congress in the next decade: The governors who will be elected in those 14 states will hold control of redistricting after the next census, and each party wants to be ready for maximal gerrymandering in 2011.

With that in mind, let’s rank these races, from the most vulnerable to turnover to the one where the incumbent party feels the safest. It immediately appears that very few of these races are likely to be contested at all, especially the ones that will be decided in 2008. Democrats and Republicans will swap Louisiana and Kentucky this fall, and then fight in only  two-three states next year. A stark contrast to the 2006 cycle.

The first 3 races are listed after the jump. The full rankings and detailed descriptions of all 14 races is available here, on CampaignDiaries.com

  • Likely Takeover

1. Kentucky (Gov. Fletcher)
The first of the 2007 races. Fletcher has been facing huge allegations of misconduct and has even been indicted. This pushed Anne Northup, a congresswoman defeated in 2006, to challenge him in the primary last spring, but Fletcher inexplicably survived. He is now almost assured of going down in this November’s election against Democrat Steve Beshear, who has led every opinion poll by an average 20%. Democrats are now running ads using Northup’s words against Fletcher. Count on Fletcher losing his executive immunity in less than two months.

2. Louisiana (Open)
The second of the 2007 races. Republican Bobby Jindal almost became Governor in 2003 but came short against Blanco, who chose earlier this year to not run for re-election given her low approval ratings post-Katrina. Jindal became a House member in 2004, and he now looks unstoppable. Louisiana has no primary system, and the first round will take place in late October. Democrats have fielded weak candidates, and their only hope is to hold Jindal under 50% to force him into a one-on-one runoff in early December, but they would have little chance even then. Louisiana is rapidly drifting Republican.

  • Toss-up

3. Missouri (Gov. Blunt)
Blunt barely won his first term in 2004 against Democrat McKaskill, who since then became Senator. The 2008 campaign started almost immediately, as it became clear that AG Nixon intended to take Blunt on. The race has been nasty for months already. Given Nixon’s statewide recognition and Blunt’s unpopularity, Nixon might have the slightest of edges.

The rest of the rankings, and detailed descriptions of all 14 races, available here, on CampaignDiaries.com

MO-Gov: Nixon, (D) Crushing Blunt

In the Missouri Governorship race that is set to heat up soon, it appears that despite a recent upturn in highly unpopular Matt Blunt's approval ratings, (they're in the forties instead of the thirties), he's still crushed by highly popular Democratic Attorney General Jay Nixon. It looks like this about to be a likely pick up, and a very sweet at that, as Blunt beat McCaskill by barely 3 percentage points in 2004, and it seemed to top off the Republuican trend in Missouri, (the MO-GOP having just come off a narrow, narrow victory over Sen. Jean Carnahan in the 2002 special election). Winning this would oddly reverse the situation, and having a popular Democrat at the helm of the Missouri Government would probably greatly help the State Democratic Party. Democrats are on a roll as it is, they took two state Senate seats in 2006, and six state house seats as well, (though they still have hearty defecits in both houses). We easily held the position of State Auditor against a strong GOP candidate and a slightly less than superb Democrat, and in a collosal victory, we took Sen. Jim Talent, one of the best funded GOP incumbents and savvy campaigner by the standards of media pundits.

The one thing we need to do to cap it off is to win back the Governorship and hold the position of Attorney General, which I feel Robin Carnahan would likely run for. The only tricky part would holding the position of Secretay of State, which in Missouri holds slightly more power than it does in other states.

Blunt is highly unpopular, for many reasons. The best way to characterize it is that he just hasn't hit it off. He was slammed unmercifully in the beginning of his term when he tried to balance the state budget without raising taxes by eliminating the states First Steps program, and slashing Medicaid, (after heavy pressure the Legislature reinstated First Steps). Slightly less controversial were his reforms to the state tort system, and worker compensation laws in order to make the state a more “business friendly environment”, which is Republican for going along with what the corporate business interests want. Not only that but he's faced a two pronged sword, and been hurt from both ends of the political spectrum. His rather laudable refusal to let the Missouri State Legislature, controlled by the wingnut faction of the Republican party, completely ban all stem cell research in the state, and his tactit support of  minimum wage balot inniative, have hurt him with the far right. Not only that, but Democrats have a strong, united position against him. So his approval ratings have flatlined around the low forties, and his disapproval ratings are averaging around 56-59 percent. hardly a popular guy.

But, I still figured that his support level would around 45-48 percent in early polling, him being an incumbent, and with the far right of the Republican always falling into line in close elections, (especially when their opponent is a strong Demcrat like Attorney General Jay Nixon). I'll also admit, I was thinking Missouri's large fundamental faction and small Republican lean would help him as well. But, in a recent Survey USA Poll, (and I tell you these guys are good, some of the top notch pollsters in the industry), he lost 57-38, (http://www.surveyusa… 1544). That's some news. We're crushing governors in comebacks that are so sweet in states with Republican leans, (I'm talking about the SUSA polls on Fletcher and Beasher in KY), comebacks in places where most us want to win the most.

However, I think the biggest part of this lead has to do wit the likely Democratic candidate, Jay Nixon, who would truly be an almost perfect candidate. Jay Nixon is the four term incumbent Attorney General, the only person ever to be elected to four consecutive elections. He's won his last three elections with sixty percent or so of the vote. He's had 23 three percnetage point victories each time, defeating his opponents by 550,000-600,000 votes. He's also quite young, having first been elected to the position at age 36, and would be 52 when inaugerated. On an interesting note he won his initial election by defeating then current State House Minority Leader Dan Steelman, husband of current State Treasurer Sarah Steelman, in a narrow race. He's a pretty straightforward, standard Demcorat. He's pro-choice, has labor sympathies, and conversationalist ideas. He's a highly experienced, and qualified candidate who I feel could be a great, highly popular Governor who could help finish pulling the State Democratic party out of a very big rut, (as Dean described it after the 2004 elections, the State party was like a car with four flat tires, and if not for the DNC's generous help to boost it we might not have won the MO-Sen race in 2006).

He's actually been a champion of the environment through his position as AG. and he's worked hard on health care issues, per a non partisan source, Wikipedia.org:

Nixon’s victory in the U.S. Supreme Court in Nixon v. Shrink reinstated Missouri’s campaign contribution limits and cleared the way nationally for campaign finance reform. In two other cases of significance, Nixon’s work in the Blue Cross and Blue Shield and the Health Midwest cases have resulted in the formation of the state’s two largest health care foundations, which will use more than $1.5 billion to help provide health care services to underserved populations of the state. Litigation by Nixon against tobacco companies for illegally marketing cigarettes to young people resulted in the largest settlement in the history of the state.

As Attorney General, Nixon has created the Environmental Protection Division to enforce Missouri’s environmental laws. Attorneys in this division take legal action to stop the pollution of the state’s air, water and soil and to look after Missouri’s agricultural interests. Successful litigation by the division has resulted in the cleanup of polluted sites and millions of dollars awarded to the state. Nixon also has led the fight to protect the state’s interests in the management of the Missouri River as well as to preserve some of the state’s most valuable natural resources, such as Church Mountain and the waterways of the White River basin.

In fact he's been so dedicated to the environment that he has been recognized Conservation Federation of Missouri for his environmental works as a State Senator. This is definitely needed in a state like Missouri, which has some of the worst environmental ratings in the country. It's per-person carbon emissions are among the fastest growing in the country, partly due to the state's dependance on coal for energy, something which it's governors have not addressed. The best things about is taht there's little doubt he will won. He filed the necceassry paperwork almost two years ago, on November 10, 2005, only eight months after Blunt got into office. He's been raising early money and setting up a possible early foundation to jump into the race with a strong start.

This has the beginnings of a great race for Democrats, so lets hope it stays this way. I'm going to keep falling developments in this race very, very closely, and try to keep posting on it, and MO-07, (a hot congressional race where have former Kansas City Mayor runing against conservative four term incubment Sam Graves in a district McCaksill won 50-47), occassionally. Thanks for reading up on it, hope you liked, and I hope it gets some attention, becuase this is going to be one of the two major Gubernatorial races in the upcoming cycle.

P.S. Please vote in the poll. I use it as an indicator of how many people have read this, and I just really like to know that for curiousity's sake.

Update: I'd just like to say that a Misouran has clarified for me. Nixon is definitely running and other major Demopcrats are already vyign for the AGship. Republicans meanwhile have a primary on their hands. Links: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MO_ATTORNEY_GENERALS_RACE_MOOL-?SITE=MOSTP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

http://www.electjeffharris.com/

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

MO-Gov: Despite Climbing Favorability, Blunt Lags Badly in New Poll

Since taking office in 2005, Republican Governor Matt Blunt of Missouri has had a bumpy ride in his first term.  He started off with a thud by cutting Medicare coverage to nearly 90,000 people, decimating a crucial service to many of his state's most vulnerable citizens.  Things were slow to improve for the boy Governor, but the startlingly high disapproval ratings that he attracted throughout 2005 and 2006 have begun to subside a bit, and, for the first time in the last two years of SurveyUSA's monthly polling, he has a net positive approval rating of +2 (48% approve, 46% disapprove).

If Democrats are getting anxious that Blunt may be rehabilitating himself into a second term, they should take comfort by today's SUSA poll gaging support for Blunt's re-election against his likely Democratic challenger, Attorney General Jay Nixon (registered voters; 07/24-07/25):

Jay Nixon (D): 57%
Matt Blunt (R-inc.): 38%
MoE: ±4.4%

So maybe Missouri voters don’t despise Blunt with the same intensity that they did two years ago, but they’re still primed to return the Governor’s office to Democratic control.