Rasmussen (9/15, likely voters):
Michael Bennet (D-inc): 36
Jane Norton (R): 45
Some other: 7
Not sure: 12Andrew Romanoff (D): 34
Jane Norton (R): 42
Some other: 8
Not sure: 15
(MoE: ±4.5%)
Rasmussen (9/14, likely voters):
Paul Hodes (D): 38
Kelly Ayotte (R): 46
Some other: 5
Not sure: 12
(MoE: ±4.5%)
Rasmussen (9/14, likely voters):
Harry Reid (D-inc): 40
Sue Lowden (R): 50
Some other: 4
Not sure: 5Harry Reid (D-inc): 43
Danny Tarkanian (R): 50
Some other: 4
Not sure: 3
(MoE: ±4.5%)
Rasmussen offers up a bunch of polls of various Senate races, and as we’ve pretty much come to expect from Rasmussen, it’s bad news for Democrats all around. They take their first looks at Harry Reid’s re-election bid in Nevada and the open seat in New Hampshire. While they looked at Colorado last week (and found Michael Bennet losing even to lesser opposition there), this is also their first look at the Colorado race since it was upended by the entry of Republican former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton and Democratic former state House speaker Andrew Romanoff.
Recent polling from other pollsters in each of these races has shown Democrats trailing narrowly (R2K in New Hampshire, and R2K in Nevada) or barely holding on (PPP in Colorado), so Rasmussen isn’t way out in right field here. However, the GOP spreads seem wider than other pollsters; they may be using a more aggressive likely voter screen than their rivals.
and Im moving on.
Noriega is tied with Cornyn and Slattery with Roberts. The guy only seems to poll Repub leaning indies and conservative Dems.
Hodes has 81% of Dems, Ayotte 81% of Repubs and leads indies by 14.
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/po…
Turnout in 2008 was D29-R27-I45.
a new Quinnipac poll of OH-Sen has good numbers for the good guys
Fisher over Portman by 11 and Brunner by 5
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x132…
I’ve been saying for a while Hodes is a bad candidate and that race is probably gone. Republicans have someone who people THINK is moderate and Democrats have nominated someone who is eh at fundraising and has zero charisma.