It looks like predictions that Young would bail won’t pan out this cycle. From the St. Petersburg Times:
But before he stood up to speak, U.S. Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas, let the news slip: “I will say to you, this is not Bill Young’s swan song tonight.”
That brought a round of applause. And shortly after that, Young shed a little more light on his decision to run for a 21st term in Congress by referring to his outspoken wife Beverly, an activist for supporting U.S. troops.
“Beverly told me that if I didn’t run, she was going to,” Young said. So he thought, “maybe I better stay on the job.”
Young told the crowd of about 500 that he wasn’t trying to be coy about his decision whether to run for re-election. He simply doesn’t believe in long campaigns or even in raising campaign money during non-election years.
But now that it’s 2010, he said, he’s excited about running again.
Democrats had badly hoped that Young would decide to hang up his spurs in order to give state Sen. Charlie Justice a clean shot at the seat, but they’re probably better off with Young deferring his decision to retire to another cycle. Justice is no great shakes, having proven a major fundraising bust. Barring a major injection of hustle, Justice would have a tough time winning this tossup district with the current Republican headwind in place. Moreover, who knows what this district will look like post-redistricting. Democrats will probably be better off dealing with Young’s retirement in a more neutral year.
RaceTracker Wiki: FL-10
Ras needs to ASAP get a FL-10 poll showing Young leading any and all potential Dem challengers by at least 40 points.
Oh well, I was really expecting this would be an open seat.
But nice job of spinning away the disappointment, James L.
What’s the explanation for this? As State Senate Minority leader, you’d have thought he’d have the right connections, and as a strong challenger, he should be generating excitement.
Just a theory here. Is it possible that Bill Young’s fundraising had a knock-on effect? He was speculated to retire because his fundraising was slow, now he’s explained that he is running, but simply doesn’t like long campaigns and non-election year fundraising. Maybe the belief that Bill Young was either retiring or would be underfunded if he ran led to complacency among Democratic donors, and maybe Young’s announcement might kick Democrats into a gear. A Coakley situation, essentially, except there’s eight months to correct it here. Like I said, it’s just a theory, but its possible.
Those fundraising numbers are teh suck! =( WTF happened?