Rasmussen (6/10, likely voters, 4/15 in parens):
Creigh Deeds (D): 47 (30)
Bob McDonnell (R): 41 (45)
Some other candidate: 2 (5)
Not sure: 10 (20)
(MoE: ±4.5%)
That was fast! Hot off his surprisingly strong victory in Tuesday’s Democratic primary, state Senator Creigh Deeds seems to have gotten quite a post-primary bounce, pulling into a 6-point lead against AG Bob McDonnell. This is the first poll I can find where Deeds led McDonnell in a head-to-head matchup (although if you go back to December, Rasmussen found them tied at 39 apiece), and a huge improvement from the 45-30 gap in April… not coincidentally at a time in the primary when Deeds seemed to be lagging, tortoise-like, and Terry McAuliffe was sprinting ahead, hare-like.
The question is how long this will last. Obviously, there’s a lot of media visibility for Deeds right now and good buzz as well (as seen in his 59/27 favorables), thanks to his dominant statewide performance and also thanks to T-Mac’s quick and effusive endorsement. This may settle back into a tied race during the summer doldrums… or, given that Deeds seems to have already made strong inroads among NoVa voters even while doing what he was expected to do (put the rural parts of the state into play), maybe this will be the new normal. (Discussion already underway in DCCyclone‘s diary, which also contains a little more information about the crosstabs.)
Check out my spreadsheet with data from 2005 (deeds vs McDonnell) compared to 2008 (obama vs Mccain).
http://spreadsheets.google.com…
Looks good, hopefully Deeds actually raises some money this time around.
It Is good for Deeds however when going to RAS’S homepage
and saw they claim Republicans are more trusted on
the Economy and more Issues Including Ethics makes me
disregard RAS’s polls especilly since no other pollster
will make that claim.
the post primary bounce this may not even be a year long barnburner.
I’d love to see the innards of this poll – like how well is Deeds doing in SoVA?
will not be on the ballot. For the first time since 1989, there will be no third-party option on the ballot for Governor. (In fact, no third-party candidates filed for any of the three statewide offices.)