Now that former state Rep. Suzanne Kosmas is formally in the race against Jack Abramoff’s golfing pal, Rep. Tom Feeney of Florida, the DCCC has just released some polling numbers that they commissioned from Garin-Hart-Yang back in July — and the results aren’t pretty for Feeney. The full polling memo can be viewed here (PDF file).
In a straight head-to-head match-up, here’s how Feeney fares (likely voters, no leaners):
Tom Feeney (R-inc): 42%
Suzanne Kosmas (D): 23%
MoE: ±5.0%
Mr. Feeney is well under that magical “50%” mark against an opponent who only has 19% name recognition in the district, according to the poll (vs. 86% for Feeney). Additionally, the poll finds that Feeney has a net negative job approval (46% fair/poor; 36% excellent/good).
After hearing a brief positive bio for each candidate, Feeney leads Kosmas by a 45%-40% margin. After informing voters of Feeney’s involvement with convicted felon Jack Abramoff, Kosmas jumps ahead to 45%-37%. Additionally, 58% “express major doubts after hearing about Feeney’s support for privatizing Social Security”.
And yes — I’m well aware that this kind of a “message testing” poll does not necessarily mean that Feeney is slated to lose the election. But with the race still in its formative stages, Kosmas has some seriously good material to work with in order to give Feeney a major challenge. I expect this to be a tight race.
Another note from the poll: while Bush won the district by 10% in 2004, on the generic presidential ballot, the Democratic candidate edges the Republican by a 42%-41% margin.
Update: The Politico picks up the poll, too, and gets a hilariously delusional comment from Feeney’s office:
Responding, Feeney’s chief of staff, Tonnie Wybensinger, said, “Feeney has always had a 24 percent unfavorable rating because 25 percent of the district is liberal – not enough to elect Kosmas. Kosmas’ appeal right now is that no one knows who she is and once people do know, that appeal will diminish.”
Tom Feeney: he’s not only out of his league — he’s out of his mind. I should take this opportunity to note that only 53% of voters knew of Feeney’s Abramoff connections, according to the poll. Can’t wait for some more “voter education” here.
Reminds me of a poll I saw on the Sweeney-Gillibrand race in New York late last year.
Gillibrand was about 20 points down, but Sweeney was under 50%. A couple of months later, she was a Congresswoman-elect.