The latest California Field Poll has Shwarzenegger up by double digits but still under 50%. Feinstein also up by double digits, with slight slippage within the MOE. Unfortunetly no polling on the “down the ticket” or Congressional races.
11/1/2006 MOE 3.5% Both Polls
Gov:
Shwarzenegger 49 (44)
Angelides 33 (34)
Other 6 (7)
Undecided 12 (15)
Angelides is only leading in LA County-42% to 36% and tied in the SF Bay Area, not good news. Looks like the Gropenator will pull this out but interesting that he still hasn’t popped 50%. 78% believe Shwarzenegger will win.
Sen:
Feinstein 55 (57)
Mountjoy 33 (29)
Other 4 (6)
Undecided 8 (8)
No regional info. Interesting slip though its within the MOE and I only just saw my first Feinstein TV Ad today.
AZ-08
Zogby(Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Graf (R) 41 (37)
Giffords (D) 54 (45)
CO-07
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
O’Donnell (R) 40 (34)
Perlmutter (D) 54 (45)
CT-02
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Simmons (R) 47 (44)
Courtney (D) 42 (41)
CT-04
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Shays (R) 44 (41)
Farrell (D) 51 (46)
IL-06
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Roskam (R) 40 (38)
Duckworth (D) 54 (43)
IN-02
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Chocola (R) 39 (39)
Donnelly (D) 52 (49)
IN-09
Zogby for Reuters. 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Sodrel (R) 46 (38)
Hill (D) 48 (46)
IA-01
Zogby(Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Whalen (R) 42 (34)
Braley (D) 49 (47)
KY-04
Zogby(Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Davis (R) 42 (42)
Lucas (D) 45 (36)
MN-06
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Bachmann (R) 52 (46)
Wetterling (D) 42 (43)
NM-01
Zogby for Reuters. 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Wilson (R) 44 (40)
Madrid (D) 53 (50)
NC-11
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Taylor (R) 43 (40)
Shuler (D) 48 (51)
OH-18
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Padgett (R) 33 (36)
Space (D) 58 (45)
PA-06
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Gerlach (R) 44 (41)
Murphy (D) 49 (43)
VIRGINIA (2nd CD)
Zogby (Reuters). 10/24-29. Likely voters. MoE 4.5% (9/25-10/2 results)
Drake (R) 51 (42)
Kellam (D) 43 (46)
I hope that is not an outlier, those are great numbers for Tammy Duckworth.
Field 2 for 2
1. CA Gov: Predicted +10%R, actual was +17%R, MOE was 3.5%, Undecided was 15%. Actual for “Others” was 5%, Predicted 6%.
2. CA Sen: Predicted +28%D, actual was +24%D, MOE was 3.5%, Undecided was 12%. Actual for “Others” was 6%, Predicted 4%.
occurred in a numberof Districts that Zogby called very wrong.
After having the personal experience of talking to three voters who had experienced this littlle form of hell, there is little doubt in my mind that these robocalls cost us some seats.
Not in Zogby Poll above, but an Exemplary Loss none the less:
I was wondering why the “Wave” results appeared so strange to me.
Why seats that should have fallen to us(given the comparables), seemingly went the other way. Factoring in the robcalls it all makes sense. It may not be a matter of Zogy being screwy, we may have to factor-in the impacts of robocalling dirty tricks into any polling we see in the future(unless we get it to go away that is).