• CA-Sen: What’s with the California politicians who are too busy to vote? Carly Fiorina has previously conceded that she didn’t vote in all elections, but today her camp is admitting that she didn’t vote at all in the period between 1989 and 1999.
• CT-Sen: After a mediocre fundraising quarter (of course, between prostate cancer and pinch-hitting at the helm of the HELP committee, he may have had better things to do), Chris Dodd is getting some high-level help. Barack Obama will appear on Dodd’s behalf at a fundraiser in Connecticut next week.
• FL-Sen: Two very different pictures of where Charlie Crist’s approval stands, from different pollster. Insider Advantage finds his approval at a puzzlingly low 48/41,and 55/38 among Republicans. (They didn’t poll the primary or general.) On the other hand, a poll by Republican pollster Cherry Communications on behalf of the Florida Chamber of Commerce finds 62/28. Meanwhile, Charlie Crist’s losing streak among the party base continued, as Marco Rubio racked up a big win with the Palm Beach GOP, winning their straw poll 90-17. (While most of the straw polls have happened in rural, teabaggy places, this is moderate, country club terrain, where Crist should play better.) Interestingly, ex-NH Senator Bob Smith, whose existence most people, me included, had forgotten about, pulled in 11 votes.
• NV-Sen: Facing bad poll numbers but armed with gigantic piles of cash, Harry Reid has already started advertising for his re-election. Despite his decades in office, he’s running a TV spot basically intended to introduce himself to Nevada, seeing as how many of the state’s residents have moved in since the last time he was elected in 2004.
• NY-Sen-B: Kirsten Gillibrand reported another large cash haul this quarter, bringing in $1.6 mil and sitting on $4.1 mil CoH. Nevertheless, she still needs to work on introducing herself to her constituents (granted, there’s a lot of them); a Newsday/Siena poll of Long Islanders find that she has a favorable of 23/27, with 50 saying they don’t know.
• OH-Sen: Ex-Rep. Rob Portman doubled up on Lt. Gov. Lee Fisher in the money chase in Ohio, raising $1.3 million to $620K for Fisher. Portman will still need to get past wealthy auto dealer Tom Ganley in the primary, though, who’s pledging to spend up to $7 million of his own money on the race, which could drain Portman nicely before he faces off against a Democrat. No word yet from Fisher’s Dem opponent, SoS Jennifer Brunner, although the fact that she just replaced her campaign finance team can’t be an encouraging sign.
• PA-Sen: This would be a big ‘get’ for Joe Sestak if he were running in Connecticut: Ned Lamont, whose successful primary defeat of Joe Lieberman in 2006 established some precedent for Sestak, gave Sestak his endorsement.
• CT-Gov: Jodi Rell is not looking much like a candidate for re-election, if her fundraising is any indication; she raised just $14K over the last quarter. The Dems in the race (who are running with or without a Rell retirement), Stamford mayor Dan Malloy and SoS Susan Bysiewicz, have each raised over $100K.
• FL-Gov: The poll paid for by the Florida Chamber of Commerce, mentioned above, also took a look at the Florida governor’s race. They see GOP AG Bill McCollum beating Dem state CFO Alex Sink, 42-35.
• NJ-Gov: Rasmussen polls the New Jersey gubernatorial race again, and there’s a pretty important distinction between their results with and without leaners pushed. Their topline numbers are 45 for Chris Christie, 41 for Jon Corzine, and 9 for Chris Daggett, a bit more Christie-favorable than what else we’ve seen this week. However, in Rasmussen’s words, “when voters are asked their initial choice,” it’s a 38-38 tie between Christie and Corzine, with 16 for Daggett. This should superficially cheer Democrats, but it also points to some hope for Christie, in that it shows just how soft a lot of Daggett’s support is. (Rasmussen also finds that 57% of Daggett’s supporters say they could change their minds before Election Day.)
• WY-Gov: Gov. Dave Freudenthal is at least offering some sort of timeline on deciding whether to seek a third term, but we’ll need to wait a long time. He says he’ll let us know after the end of the next legislative session, in March; the end of the filing period is May 28. He also didn’t offer much insight into when he’d set about challenging the state’s term limits law in court (a challenge he’d be expected to win, but one that could be time-consuming) if he did decide to run.
• FL-10: The retirement speculation surrounding 79-year-old Rep. Bill Young isn’t going to go away with his fundraising haul this quarter: only $4,500, with $419K on hand. He’s also giving away money (to the tune of $10,000) to the NRCC, despite facing a strong challenge next year. Unfortunately, his Dem challenger, state Sen. Charlie Justice, had a second straight lackluster quarter of his own, bringing in $77K for $101K CoH.
• FL-19: A roundup from the newly-merged CQ/Roll Call looks at the quickly developing field in the dark-blue 19th, for a special election to replace the soon-to-resign Robert Wexler. The big question is whether Wexler throws his support behind state Sen. Peter Deutch; Deutch won Wexler’s old state Senate seat (which covers more than half the 19th) in 2006 partly due to Wexler’s endorsement. West Palm Beach mayor Lois Frankel is another possibility; so too are Broward County mayor Stacy Ritter and state Sen. Jeremy Ring, although their Broward County bases don’t overlap as well with the 19th. Broward County Commissioner Ben Graber (who finished 3rd in the 1996 primary that Wexler won) is already in the race.
• LA-02: Um, what? GOP Rep. Joe Cao will be appearing with Barack Obama in New Orleans at several events today. While it’s apparently customary for presidents to invite local lawmakers to appearances in their districts, it’s also customary for members of the opposition party to decline. Cao, however, probably sees hitching his wagon to Obama as at least a faint hope of staving off defeat in this strongly Democratic district. Cao’s fundraising numbers for last quarter were pretty good, with $394K raised, but his burn rate was terrible, churning through nearly all of it ($382K) with high costs for direct mail fundraising.
• NY-01: We could have a real races on our hands in the 1st, where Democratic Rep. Tim Bishop’s Republican challenger Randy Altschuler reported $659K in the third quarter. Of course, $450K of that was from his own pocket, and a grand total of one donor was actually from within the 1st, with the bulk of the rest of the money coming from Manhattan.
• Census: David Vitter, who, with Robert Bennett, is leading the Republican charge to get the Census to ask respondents about their citizenship status, has decided to modify his amendment to this year’s appropriations package after one of the academics who he was relying on said that such a measure would scare off respondents from participating in the census at all. Not that it would matter, since it’s not likely to get an up-or-down vote, and Commerce Sec. Gary Locke already made clear that it’s way too late to make changes to the 2010 forms, which have already been printed and shipped.
• Polling: PPP’s Tom Jensen notes, that generally, Republicans aren’t picking up any new voters; the main problem with the upcoming New Jersey and Virginia elections is that Democrats have disproportionately lost interest. If the 2008 voter universes still applied in NJ and VA, Democrats would be winning both races handily.
He managed to come unscathed even without an Oscar. Just a misdemeanor
I was at President Obama’s townhall at the University of New Orleans. At it’s start he introduced local politicans. Bobby Jindal was loudly booed and Ray Nagin got a mostly negative response. Cao’s was pretty nice: I was afraid he’d get the same treatement as Jindal (I don’t like either but it’s pretty obnoxious to boo them). Granted, people weren’t jumping out of their seats for Cao (or either of the Landrieus and Melancon) but the response in this overwellmingly Democratic crowd was pretty good for a Republican.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes….
This is the first time I saw Daggett’s picture. And I thought that there must be a famine in NJ.
I am not a New Yorker so I may just be ill informed but Sen Gillibrand hasn’t been the rising star some claimed she would be. When she takes a position on an issue you can pretty much guarantee it’s a liberal/left position. And there’s nothing wrong with being liberal but it just seems like for her its not so much based on principle like many of the other liberal senators but expediency. I also don’t understand why if she’s so great at raising money she doesn’t spend at least some of it improving her poll numbers among democrats. Just my 2 cents.
here:
Huge numbers for Daggett. Christie is down 3, and Corzine is down 1. Corzine’s performance among blacks drops a bit, which is actually not terrible news–at the end of the day he will clean up with them.
Also, SUSA finds big movement in Central NJ.
http://blogs.ajc.com/political…
Carly Fiorina’s daughter, Laura, passed away on Monday at the age 35. http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo…
to re-introduce himself, especially since he has the cash to use.
NV is the fastest growing state in the nation, with a projected population growth of an insane 35% since the last census. So that’s lots of new voters since his 2004 election.
You fell for Rasmussen’s lie about the race.
The “topline number” you cite is what they show in the graphic alongside their narrative on the poll, but the 45-41-9 is not an honest straight-up topline.
What you missed is the that question on “initial preference” is the real topline, and that comes out 38-38-16.
Rasmussen then produces a GOP-friendly result by pushing only soft Daggett voters, without pushing soft Corzine or soft Christie voters. Rasmussen’s narrative says 57% of Daggett voters could change their minds, but the narrative then admits 27% of Corzine voters and 20% of Christie voters say the same…but soft Corzine and soft Christie voters aren’t pushed in the follow-up!
Now, it’s reasonable to think Daggett’s support could fall off. But the honest polling practice is to just note that a majority of Daggett’s support is soft while Corzine’s and Christie’s support is more solid, and leave it at that.
But Rasmussen has spent the year cooking GOP-friendly numbers rather than producing honest polls, and so they manipulated their questioning to get a skewed result that isn’t in line with polling reality. And, needless to say, it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison with all the other polls, none of which publishs a “result” after pushing Daggett voters to the major party nominees.
The relevant apples-to-apples result to take away from Rasmussen is 38-38-16, which is in line almost exactly with everyone else right now.
His new website is here.
This is an excellent get for the Democratic Party in AZ. Glassman is an Andrew Rice-style candidate: a young up-and-coming local officeholder who will raise a lot of money and use the race to raise his statewide profile, while forcing McCain to actually campaign in the state. This is basically the best we can get for this race, given that no Democratic politician in the state is capable of beating McCain — Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords loses 57-30 in the latest PPP poll, and the wildly popular AG Terry Goddard is definitely running for Governor instead.
The PPP poll linked above gives McCain a 55-25 edge over Glassman to start. Glassman apparently had the same reaction I had to that poll, which is that it gives him lots of room to grow and a real chance to break 40% or even 45%. To put this in perspective, McCain’s last opponent, perennial candidate Stu Starky, got only 20.6% of the vote.
Glassman’s trying an odd strategy for his exploratory phase: accepting only $20 donations. Apparently that worked for him when he ran for City Council, allowing him to demonstrate broad support throughout the city. However, I hope he gives up the idea after his exploratory phase, or even earlier, because in a federal race it’s pretty stupid.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10…
Grassley Would Beat Vilsack
A new DailyKos/Research 2000 poll in Iowa tests a rumored match up between Christie Vilsack (D) and Sen. Charles Grassley (R) and finds the senator leading by 11 points, 51% to 40%.
In the much-anticipated gubernatorial race, former Gov. Terry Branstad (R) holds a relatively small lead over Gov. Chet Culver (D), 48% to 43%.