Research 2000 for the Daily Kos (1/11-13, likely voters):
John Hickenlooper (D): 43
Scott McInnis (R): 43
Undecided: 14Ken Salazar (D): 42
Scott McInnis (R): 44
Undecided: 14Andrew Romanoff (D): 40
Scott McInnis (R): 45
Undecided: 15Ed Perlmutter (D): 38
Scott McInnis (R): 46
Undecided: 16
(MoE: ±4%)
Most of those match-ups are moot at this point, as the path for the Democratic nomination seems secure for Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper. Sure, Andrew Romanoff may or may not bail on his Senate primary to take a crack at the gube race, but he’d have an even harder time in that race than he would against the newbie Bennet. Effectively, this resolves any potential doubt that Hickenlooper begins the race in the best starting position than any other Democrat out there — even Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who was briefly (and bizarrely, in my opinion) touted as the heir apparent for retiring Gov. Bill Ritter.
If anything, though, this poll also reaffirms that, while Hickenlooper probably would have won an ’06 race with ease, he won’t be able to rest on his laurels this year. This should be one hell of a race.
And for the Senate side of the equation:
Michael Bennet (D-inc): 40
Jane Norton (R): 39
Undecided: 21Michael Bennet (D-inc): 42
Tom Wiens (R): 38
Undecided: 20Michael Bennet (D-inc): 41
Ken Buck (R): 38
Undecided: 21Andrew Romanoff (D): 39
Jane Norton (R): 41
Undecided: 20Andrew Romanoff (D): 41
Tom Wiens (R): 39
Undecided: 20Andrew Romanoff (D): 40
Ken Buck (R): 39
Undecided: 21
(MoE: ±4%)
This poll is actually the most optimistic portrait of the Senate race that we’ve seen lately. Over the weekend, Rasmussen gave us their take, which consisted of huge leads for Jane Norton and smaller leads for the other Republican pretenders. The Bennet campaign responded with their own poll, which showed Norton ahead by “only” three points. Whether or not R2K’s likely voter sample is reasonable is up in the air. The poll purports to have a sample of 38% Republicans, 30% Democrats, and 32% independents. That’s doesn’t seem wild-eyed for a state with a slight Democratic voter registration advantage, but if you take a closer look at the “N” for each sub-sample, the math doesn’t add up — numerically, there are more Democratic voters listed as poll participants than Republicans. (In fact, if you recalculate, this might be a 40D-38R-22I poll.) Bennet’s internal poll had a Republican advantage of about five points, so this is a pretty crucial issue to be resolved.
A transcription error is probably to blame here, but we’ll let you know if we find out anything more definitive.
UPDATE: Research 2000 guru Del Ali writes to us to tell us that the actual sample of the poll is 40% Democratic, 37% Republican, and 23% independent. Somehow, I suspect that that may be an optimistic view of the 2010 electorate.
Doesn’t the guy have enormous approval ratings as mayor of Denver? I just don’t see how he wouldn’t be the prohibitive favorite to sweep the suburbs and drive up turnout from the base and win this easily. Is having a D next to your name really that bad in Colorado right now?
He’s scheduled a press conference at his campaign headquarters for noon on Tuesday!…. No reason for him to do this other than to:
A) Pull out of the Senate race entirely (big disappointment)
B) Switch to the Gub race against Hick (Highly ill-advised)