WI-Sen: Univ. of Wisconsin Hammered for Partnering on Polls with Conservative Think Tank

Wow, this looks pretty ugly. Last year, the University of Wisconsin announced a partnership with the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, which offered the school and poli sci Prof. Ken Goldstein money to support their polling. The problem is that WPRI is a conservative think tank, and UW-Madison and Goldstein have started taking a lot of heat for for accepting interest group money in order to fund polling. This is something that other universities simply don’t do:

“It does compromise the independence and brings into question the accuracy,” said Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist College Poll. “It doesn’t mean that’s necessarily fair, but it does tend to do that in this very ideologically partisan time we live in.”

This shady alliance has already produced foul fruit:

Scot Ross, a liberal muckraker who runs the group One Wisconsin Now, was critical of the deal from the beginning. He said his “worst fears were confirmed” after he obtained e-mails under the open records law showing WPRI President George Lightbourn lobbied Goldstein to publicize results from one question in a way favorable to its agenda.

The question asked whether government funding should be used for school vouchers, which WPRI supports. A majority of residents statewide were opposed, but those surveyed from Milwaukee County were in favor.

Lightbourn wrote Goldstein he was concerned critics would portray the data as showing a lack of support for vouchers and asked for the Milwaukee County results to be emphasized. The university’s press release read: “School choice remains popular in Milwaukee.”

And there’s a horserace aspect to all of this as well:

That wasn’t the only question to generate controversy. Participants were asked if they supported former Republican Gov. Tommy Thompson in a matchup against Democratic U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold – even though Thompson had shown little interest in the race.

WPRI is run by Lightbourn, Thompson’s former administration secretary, and its board chairman is Jim Klauser, another former top Thompson aide. After receiving results showing Thompson was favored 43-39, WPRI sent a press release claiming the poll showed Thompson would defeat Feingold.

But Goldstein scolded Lightbourn for sending the release without his knowledge and not including his more balanced analysis. A release Goldstein later approved said the race would be competitive, that undecided voters may favor Feingold and Thompson would be re-evaluated after not running for office for years.

It’s digusting that Goldstein would engage in this kind of behavior. Unless and until UWM totally disavows its partnership with WPRI, it’s going to be very hard to take anything they produce seriously. I’m certainly not going to put much stock in their newest poll, that’s for sure.