Our next stop is the inland area of Central and Northern California. Back in the old days, while the Republicans dominated the cities, Democrats dominated the countryside. The shift to the Republicans began in the 1960s after Civil Rights, though some areas held out until the 1980s. The only counties to resist the rightward trend were heavily urban Sacramento and college town Yolo (home of UC Davis).
In recent decades, population growth began a reversal of the Republican trend in counties such as San Joaquin as well as the tiny ski-based counties of Alpine and Mono and to a lesser extent Inyo. Other counties (Butte, Merced), with significant college towns, also reversed course. Fresno and El Dorado (suburban Sacramento) are beginning to follow those counties. Fortunately for California Democrats, aside from Kern and Kings, none of the counties that are still trending Republican are growing very fast, and this region has never made up more than 21% of the state’s population so the Republican shift has been far outweighed by the dramatic Democratic shifts in the NorCal and SoCal megalopolises.
Alpine
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
243 |
-21.4% |
0.01% |
R+25.8 |
| 1930 |
341 |
40.3% |
0.01% |
R+21.6 |
| 1940 |
323 |
-5.3% |
0.00% |
R+15.4 |
| 1950 |
241 |
-25.4% |
0.00% |
R+33.0 |
| 1960 |
397 |
64.7% |
0.00% |
R+24.4 |
| 1970 |
484 |
21.9% |
0.00% |
R+8.7 |
| 1980 |
1,097 |
126.7% |
0.00% |
R+7.9 |
| 1990 |
1,113 |
1.5% |
0.00% |
R+3.7 |
| 2000 |
1,208 |
8.5% |
0.00% |
R+3.5 |
| 2008* |
1,061 |
-12.2% |
0.00% |
D+7.4 |
Amador
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
7,793 |
-14.2% |
0.23% |
D+1.9 |
| 1930 |
8,494 |
9.0% |
0.15% |
D+14.8 |
| 1940 |
8,973 |
5.6% |
0.13% |
D+12.8 |
| 1950 |
9,151 |
2.0% |
0.09% |
D+4.9 |
| 1960 |
9,990 |
9.2% |
0.06% |
D+6.8 |
| 1970 |
11,821 |
18.3% |
0.06% |
D+3.7 |
| 1980 |
19,314 |
63.4% |
0.08% |
R+3.2 |
| 1990 |
30,039 |
55.5% |
0.10% |
R+3.7 |
| 2000 |
35,100 |
16.8% |
0.10% |
R+9.4 |
| 2008* |
38,238 |
8.9% |
0.10% |
R+11.4 |
Butte
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
30,030 |
10.0% |
0.88% |
R+1.5 |
| 1930 |
34,093 |
13.5% |
0.60% |
D+3.6 |
| 1940 |
42,840 |
25.7% |
0.62% |
D+4.4 |
| 1950 |
64,930 |
51.6% |
0.61% |
R+6.3 |
| 1960 |
82,030 |
26.3% |
0.52% |
R+4.5 |
| 1970 |
101,969 |
24.3% |
0.51% |
R+6.1 |
| 1980 |
143,851 |
41.1% |
0.61% |
R+8.0 |
| 1990 |
182,120 |
26.6% |
0.61% |
R+2.9 |
| 2000 |
203,171 |
11.6% |
0.60% |
R+10.1 |
| 2008* |
220,337 |
8.4% |
0.60% |
R+3.1 |
Calaveras
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
6,183 |
-32.6% |
0.18% |
R+0.6 |
| 1930 |
6,008 |
-2.8% |
0.11% |
D+7.6 |
| 1940 |
8,221 |
36.8% |
0.12% |
D+7.1 |
| 1950 |
9,902 |
20.4% |
0.09% |
R+3.9 |
| 1960 |
10,289 |
3.9% |
0.07% |
R+1.7 |
| 1970 |
13,585 |
32.0% |
0.07% |
R+5.5 |
| 1980 |
20,710 |
52.4% |
0.09% |
R+6.3 |
| 1990 |
31,998 |
54.5% |
0.11% |
R+3.5 |
| 2000 |
40,554 |
26.7% |
0.12% |
R+10.2 |
| 2008* |
46,843 |
15.5% |
0.13% |
R+10.6 |
Colusa
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
9,290 |
20.2% |
0.27% |
D+7.1 |
| 1930 |
10,258 |
10.4% |
0.18% |
D+7.3 |
| 1940 |
9,788 |
-4.6% |
0.14% |
D+7.0 |
| 1950 |
11,651 |
19.0% |
0.11% |
R+2.1 |
| 1960 |
12,075 |
3.6% |
0.08% |
D+1.4 |
| 1970 |
12,430 |
2.9% |
0.06% |
R+1.9 |
| 1980 |
12,791 |
2.9% |
0.05% |
R+7.0 |
| 1990 |
16,275 |
27.2% |
0.05% |
R+9.5 |
| 2000 |
18,804 |
15.5% |
0.06% |
R+16.1 |
| 2008* |
21,204 |
12.8% |
0.06% |
R+14.9 |
El Dorado
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
6,426 |
-14.2% |
0.19% |
D+2.6 |
| 1930 |
8,235 |
28.2% |
0.15% |
D+15.5 |
| 1940 |
13,229 |
60.6% |
0.19% |
D+13.2 |
| 1950 |
16,207 |
22.5% |
0.15% |
R+1.7 |
| 1960 |
29,390 |
81.3% |
0.19% |
D+2.2 |
| 1970 |
43,833 |
49.1% |
0.22% |
D+0.1 |
| 1980 |
85,812 |
95.8% |
0.36% |
R+5.8 |
| 1990 |
125,995 |
46.8% |
0.42% |
R+7.5 |
| 2000 |
156,299 |
24.1% |
0.46% |
R+12.7 |
| 2008* |
176,075 |
12.7% |
0.48% |
R+10.0 |
Fresno
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
128,779 |
70.2% |
3.76% |
D+3.4 |
| 1930 |
144,379 |
12.1% |
2.54% |
D+8.7 |
| 1940 |
178,565 |
23.7% |
2.59% |
D+15.6 |
| 1950 |
276,515 |
54.9% |
2.61% |
D+7.4 |
| 1960 |
365,945 |
32.3% |
2.33% |
D+9.9 |
| 1970 |
413,329 |
12.9% |
2.07% |
D+6.1 |
| 1980 |
514,621 |
24.5% |
2.17% |
R+0.4 |
| 1990 |
667,490 |
29.7% |
2.24% |
D+0.4 |
| 2000 |
799,407 |
19.8% |
2.36% |
R+5.7 |
| 2008* |
909,153 |
13.7% |
2.49% |
R+4.7 |
Glenn
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
11,853 |
65.3% |
0.35% |
D+0.7 |
| 1930 |
10,935 |
-7.7% |
0.19% |
D+0.8 |
| 1940 |
12,195 |
11.5% |
0.18% |
D+2.6 |
| 1950 |
15,448 |
26.7% |
0.15% |
D+7.0 |
| 1960 |
17,245 |
11.6% |
0.11% |
D+1.1 |
| 1970 |
17,521 |
1.6% |
0.09% |
R+5.9 |
| 1980 |
21,350 |
21.9% |
0.09% |
R+10.2 |
| 1990 |
24,798 |
16.1% |
0.08% |
R+10.7 |
| 2000 |
26,453 |
6.7% |
0.08% |
R+19.4 |
| 2008* |
28,237 |
6.7% |
0.08% |
R+15.8 |
Inyo
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
7,031 |
0.8% |
0.21% |
D+0.9 |
| 1930 |
6,555 |
-6.8% |
0.12% |
D+4.5 |
| 1940 |
7,625 |
16.3% |
0.11% |
D+0.4 |
| 1950 |
11,658 |
52.9% |
0.11% |
R+12.1 |
| 1960 |
11,684 |
0.2% |
0.07% |
R+6.8 |
| 1970 |
15,571 |
33.3% |
0.08% |
R+9.9 |
| 1980 |
17,895 |
14.9% |
0.08% |
R+13.4 |
| 1990 |
18,281 |
2.2% |
0.06% |
R+11.4 |
| 2000 |
17,945 |
-1.8% |
0.05% |
R+14.6 |
| 2008* |
17,136 |
-4.5% |
0.05% |
R+8.7 |
Kern
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
54,843 |
45.4% |
1.60% |
D+10.8 |
| 1930 |
82,570 |
50.6% |
1.45% |
D+5.1 |
| 1940 |
135,124 |
63.6% |
1.96% |
D+10.2 |
| 1950 |
228,309 |
69.0% |
2.16% |
D+2.5 |
| 1960 |
291,984 |
27.9% |
1.86% |
D+2.8 |
| 1970 |
330,234 |
13.1% |
1.66% |
R+1.6 |
| 1980 |
403,089 |
22.1% |
1.70% |
R+6.6 |
| 1990 |
544,981 |
35.2% |
1.83% |
R+9.5 |
| 2000 |
661,645 |
21.4% |
1.95% |
R+13.6 |
| 2008* |
800,458 |
21.0% |
2.19% |
R+14.3 |
Kings
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
22,031 |
35.7% |
0.64% |
D+2.6 |
| 1930 |
25,385 |
15.2% |
0.45% |
D+9.8 |
| 1940 |
35,168 |
38.5% |
0.51% |
D+13.3 |
| 1950 |
46,768 |
33.0% |
0.44% |
D+7.6 |
| 1960 |
49,954 |
6.8% |
0.32% |
D+11.4 |
| 1970 |
66,717 |
33.6% |
0.33% |
D+2.8 |
| 1980 |
73,738 |
10.5% |
0.31% |
R+2.7 |
| 1990 |
101,469 |
37.6% |
0.34% |
R+4.1 |
| 2000 |
129,461 |
27.6% |
0.38% |
R+8.6 |
| 2008* |
149,518 |
15.5% |
0.41% |
R+12.8 |
Lassen
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
8,507 |
77.2% |
0.25% |
D+0.6 |
| 1930 |
12,589 |
48.0% |
0.22% |
D+7.6 |
| 1940 |
14,479 |
15.0% |
0.21% |
D+16.2 |
| 1950 |
18,474 |
27.6% |
0.17% |
D+12.1 |
| 1960 |
13,597 |
-26.4% |
0.09% |
D+12.3 |
| 1970 |
16,796 |
23.5% |
0.08% |
D+6.0 |
| 1980 |
21,661 |
29.0% |
0.09% |
R+0.1 |
| 1990 |
27,598 |
27.4% |
0.09% |
R+6.3 |
| 2000 |
33,828 |
22.6% |
0.10% |
R+18.2 |
| 2008* |
34,574 |
2.2% |
0.09% |
R+21.0 |
Madera
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
12,203 |
45.8% |
0.36% |
D+5.0 |
| 1930 |
17,164 |
40.7% |
0.30% |
D+8.9 |
| 1940 |
23,314 |
35.8% |
0.34% |
D+14.0 |
| 1950 |
36,964 |
58.5% |
0.35% |
D+6.7 |
| 1960 |
40,468 |
9.5% |
0.26% |
D+11.7 |
| 1970 |
41,519 |
2.6% |
0.21% |
D+5.3 |
| 1980 |
63,116 |
52.0% |
0.27% |
R+0.4 |
| 1990 |
88,090 |
39.6% |
0.30% |
R+4.8 |
| 2000 |
123,109 |
39.8% |
0.36% |
R+14.0 |
| 2008* |
148,333 |
20.5% |
0.41% |
R+12.0 |
Mariposa
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
2,775 |
-29.9% |
0.08% |
D+8.0 |
| 1930 |
3,233 |
16.5% |
0.06% |
D+7.5 |
| 1940 |
5,605 |
73.4% |
0.08% |
D+11.6 |
| 1950 |
5,145 |
-8.2% |
0.05% |
R+11.0 |
| 1960 |
5,064 |
-1.6% |
0.03% |
R+3.6 |
| 1970 |
6,015 |
18.8% |
0.03% |
R+1.2 |
| 1980 |
11,108 |
84.7% |
0.05% |
R+3.4 |
| 1990 |
14,302 |
28.8% |
0.05% |
R+2.5 |
| 2000 |
17,130 |
19.8% |
0.05% |
R+12.7 |
| 2008* |
17,976 |
4.9% |
0.05% |
R+10.2 |
Merced
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
24,579 |
62.3% |
0.72% |
R+0.9 |
| 1930 |
36,748 |
49.5% |
0.65% |
D+4.9 |
| 1940 |
46,988 |
27.9% |
0.68% |
D+9.9 |
| 1950 |
69,780 |
48.5% |
0.66% |
D+2.9 |
| 1960 |
90,446 |
29.6% |
0.58% |
D+9.9 |
| 1970 |
104,629 |
15.7% |
0.52% |
D+5.8 |
| 1980 |
134,558 |
28.6% |
0.57% |
D+2.0 |
| 1990 |
178,403 |
32.6% |
0.60% |
D+0.7 |
| 2000 |
210,554 |
18.0% |
0.62% |
R+3.7 |
| 2008* |
246,117 |
16.9% |
0.67% |
R+2.7 |
Modoc
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
5,425 |
-12.4% |
0.16% |
D+4.3 |
| 1930 |
8,038 |
48.2% |
0.14% |
D+7.1 |
| 1940 |
8,713 |
8.4% |
0.13% |
D+4.9 |
| 1950 |
9,678 |
11.1% |
0.09% |
R+3.3 |
| 1960 |
8,308 |
-14.2% |
0.05% |
D+1.1 |
| 1970 |
7,469 |
-10.1% |
0.04% |
R+3.7 |
| 1980 |
8,610 |
15.3% |
0.04% |
R+9.7 |
| 1990 |
9,678 |
12.4% |
0.03% |
R+9.2 |
| 2000 |
9,449 |
-2.4% |
0.03% |
R+21.7 |
| 2008* |
9,184 |
-2.8% |
0.03% |
R+22.8 |
Mono
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
960 |
-53.0% |
0.03% |
R+4.7 |
| 1930 |
1,360 |
41.7% |
0.02% |
D+0.8 |
| 1940 |
2,299 |
69.0% |
0.03% |
D+0.7 |
| 1950 |
2,115 |
-8.0% |
0.02% |
R+21.0 |
| 1960 |
2,213 |
4.6% |
0.01% |
R+16.5 |
| 1970 |
4,016 |
81.5% |
0.02% |
R+14.0 |
| 1980 |
8,577 |
113.6% |
0.04% |
R+13.9 |
| 1990 |
9,956 |
16.1% |
0.03% |
R+6.9 |
| 2000 |
12,853 |
29.1% |
0.04% |
R+7.8 |
| 2008* |
12,774 |
-0.6% |
0.03% |
D+2.2 |
Nevada
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
10,850 |
-27.4% |
0.32% |
D+0.3 |
| 1930 |
10,596 |
-2.3% |
0.19% |
D+6.4 |
| 1940 |
19,283 |
82.0% |
0.28% |
D+11.1 |
| 1950 |
19,888 |
3.1% |
0.19% |
R+5.8 |
| 1960 |
20,911 |
5.1% |
0.13% |
R+3.1 |
| 1970 |
26,346 |
26.0% |
0.13% |
R+1.5 |
| 1980 |
51,645 |
96.0% |
0.22% |
R+6.6 |
| 1990 |
78,510 |
52.0% |
0.26% |
R+5.6 |
| 2000 |
92,033 |
17.2% |
0.27% |
R+11.6 |
| 2008* |
97,118 |
5.5% |
0.27% |
R+2.0 |
Placer
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
18,584 |
1.9% |
0.54% |
D+5.3 |
| 1930 |
24,468 |
31.7% |
0.43% |
D+11.6 |
| 1940 |
28,108 |
14.9% |
0.41% |
D+14.2 |
| 1950 |
41,649 |
48.2% |
0.39% |
D+6.7 |
| 1960 |
56,998 |
36.9% |
0.36% |
D+8.8 |
| 1970 |
77,632 |
36.2% |
0.39% |
D+6.5 |
| 1980 |
117,247 |
51.0% |
0.50% |
R+2.0 |
| 1990 |
172,796 |
47.4% |
0.58% |
R+7.7 |
| 2000 |
248,399 |
43.8% |
0.73% |
R+13.0 |
| 2008* |
341,945 |
37.7% |
0.93% |
R+10.8 |
Plumas
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
5,681 |
8.0% |
0.17% |
D+0.8 |
| 1930 |
7,913 |
39.3% |
0.14% |
D+15.3 |
| 1940 |
11,548 |
45.9% |
0.17% |
D+17.7 |
| 1950 |
13,519 |
17.1% |
0.13% |
D+12.3 |
| 1960 |
11,620 |
-14.0% |
0.07% |
D+14.0 |
| 1970 |
11,707 |
0.7% |
0.06% |
D+10.8 |
| 1980 |
17,340 |
48.1% |
0.07% |
R+0.2 |
| 1990 |
19,739 |
13.8% |
0.07% |
R+0.3 |
| 2000 |
20,824 |
5.5% |
0.06% |
R+13.9 |
| 2008* |
20,275 |
-2.6% |
0.06% |
R+10.6 |
Sacramento
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
91,029 |
34.2% |
2.66% |
D+0.6 |
| 1930 |
141,999 |
56.0% |
2.50% |
D+9.9 |
| 1940 |
170,333 |
20.0% |
2.47% |
D+15.5 |
| 1950 |
277,140 |
62.7% |
2.62% |
D+7.2 |
| 1960 |
502,778 |
81.4% |
3.20% |
D+9.5 |
| 1970 |
634,373 |
26.2% |
3.18% |
D+8.3 |
| 1980 |
783,381 |
23.5% |
3.31% |
D+2.0 |
| 1990 |
1,041,219 |
32.9% |
3.50% |
D+2.0 |
| 2000 |
1,223,499 |
17.5% |
3.61% |
D+1.1 |
| 2008* |
1,394,154 |
13.9% |
3.81% |
D+3.7 |
San Joaquin
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
79,905 |
57.5% |
2.33% |
D+3.3 |
| 1930 |
102,940 |
28.8% |
1.81% |
D+2.1 |
| 1940 |
134,207 |
30.4% |
1.94% |
D+4.9 |
| 1950 |
200,750 |
49.6% |
1.90% |
R+2.1 |
| 1960 |
249,989 |
24.5% |
1.59% |
D+0.0 |
| 1970 |
291,073 |
16.4% |
1.46% |
D+0.5 |
| 1980 |
347,342 |
19.3% |
1.47% |
R+3.7 |
| 1990 |
480,628 |
38.4% |
1.62% |
R+1.2 |
| 2000 |
563,598 |
17.3% |
1.66% |
R+2.4 |
| 2008* |
672,388 |
19.3% |
1.84% |
R+0.4 |
Shasta
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
13,361 |
-29.4% |
0.39% |
D+1.7 |
| 1930 |
13,927 |
4.2% |
0.25% |
D+10.8 |
| 1940 |
28,800 |
106.8% |
0.42% |
D+11.1 |
| 1950 |
36,413 |
26.4% |
0.34% |
D+2.6 |
| 1960 |
59,468 |
63.3% |
0.38% |
D+12.2 |
| 1970 |
77,640 |
30.6% |
0.39% |
D+9.1 |
| 1980 |
115,613 |
48.9% |
0.49% |
R+3.7 |
| 1990 |
147,036 |
27.2% |
0.49% |
R+8.3 |
| 2000 |
163,256 |
11.0% |
0.48% |
R+17.9 |
| 2008* |
180,214 |
10.4% |
0.49% |
R+16.9 |
Sierra
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
1,783 |
-56.5% |
0.05% |
R+0.9 |
| 1930 |
2,422 |
35.8% |
0.04% |
D+10.4 |
| 1940 |
3,025 |
24.9% |
0.04% |
D+13.6 |
| 1950 |
2,410 |
-20.3% |
0.02% |
D+1.9 |
| 1960 |
2,247 |
-6.8% |
0.01% |
D+4.9 |
| 1970 |
2,365 |
5.3% |
0.01% |
D+6.9 |
| 1980 |
3,073 |
29.9% |
0.01% |
D+1.4 |
| 1990 |
3,318 |
8.0% |
0.01% |
R+1.5 |
| 2000 |
3,555 |
7.1% |
0.01% |
R+17.0 |
| 2008* |
3,263 |
-8.2% |
0.01% |
R+14.6 |
Siskiyou
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
18,545 |
-1.4% |
0.54% |
D+4.4 |
| 1930 |
25,480 |
37.4% |
0.45% |
D+7.8 |
| 1940 |
28,598 |
12.2% |
0.41% |
D+8.2 |
| 1950 |
30,733 |
7.5% |
0.29% |
D+1.4 |
| 1960 |
32,885 |
7.0% |
0.21% |
D+7.2 |
| 1970 |
33,225 |
1.0% |
0.17% |
D+3.9 |
| 1980 |
39,732 |
19.6% |
0.17% |
R+4.0 |
| 1990 |
43,531 |
9.6% |
0.15% |
D+1.9 |
| 2000 |
44,301 |
1.8% |
0.13% |
R+13.0 |
| 2008* |
44,542 |
0.5% |
0.12% |
R+9.7 |
Stanislaus
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
43,557 |
93.4% |
1.27% |
R+1.0 |
| 1930 |
56,641 |
30.0% |
1.00% |
R+3.3 |
| 1940 |
74,866 |
32.2% |
1.08% |
R+0.4 |
| 1950 |
127,231 |
69.9% |
1.20% |
R+1.7 |
| 1960 |
157,294 |
23.6% |
1.00% |
D+4.5 |
| 1970 |
194,506 |
23.7% |
0.97% |
D+5.3 |
| 1980 |
265,900 |
36.7% |
1.12% |
D+1.4 |
| 1990 |
370,522 |
39.3% |
1.25% |
R+0.3 |
| 2000 |
446,997 |
20.6% |
1.32% |
R+4.4 |
| 2008* |
510,694 |
14.2% |
1.40% |
R+5.4 |
Sutter
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
10,115 |
59.8% |
0.30% |
D+3.2 |
| 1930 |
14,618 |
44.5% |
0.26% |
D+9.2 |
| 1940 |
18,680 |
27.8% |
0.27% |
D+5.7 |
| 1950 |
26,239 |
40.5% |
0.25% |
R+9.2 |
| 1960 |
33,380 |
27.2% |
0.21% |
R+9.4 |
| 1970 |
41,935 |
25.6% |
0.21% |
R+9.2 |
| 1980 |
52,246 |
24.6% |
0.22% |
R+10.6 |
| 1990 |
64,415 |
23.3% |
0.22% |
R+15.0 |
| 2000 |
78,930 |
22.5% |
0.23% |
R+17.5 |
| 2008* |
92,207 |
16.8% |
0.25% |
R+14.4 |
Tehama
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
12,882 |
13.0% |
0.38% |
D+1.0 |
| 1930 |
13,866 |
7.6% |
0.24% |
R+1.9 |
| 1940 |
14,316 |
3.2% |
0.21% |
R+0.6 |
| 1950 |
19,276 |
34.6% |
0.18% |
R+7.6 |
| 1960 |
25,305 |
31.3% |
0.16% |
D+1.7 |
| 1970 |
29,517 |
16.6% |
0.15% |
D+2.5 |
| 1980 |
38,888 |
31.7% |
0.16% |
R+3.9 |
| 1990 |
49,625 |
27.6% |
0.17% |
R+3.5 |
| 2000 |
56,039 |
12.9% |
0.17% |
R+15.3 |
| 2008* |
61,550 |
9.8% |
0.17% |
R+16.2 |
Trinity
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
2,551 |
-22.7% |
0.07% |
D+2.3 |
| 1930 |
2,809 |
10.1% |
0.05% |
D+13.2 |
| 1940 |
3,970 |
41.3% |
0.06% |
D+7.9 |
| 1950 |
5,087 |
28.1% |
0.05% |
R+1.4 |
| 1960 |
9,706 |
90.8% |
0.06% |
D+9.2 |
| 1970 |
7,615 |
-21.5% |
0.04% |
D+4.4 |
| 1980 |
11,858 |
55.7% |
0.05% |
R+3.6 |
| 1990 |
13,063 |
10.2% |
0.04% |
D+2.5 |
| 2000 |
13,022 |
-0.3% |
0.04% |
R+10.9 |
| 2008* |
14,317 |
9.9% |
0.04% |
R+3.1 |
Tulare
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
59,031 |
66.6% |
1.72% |
R+0.8 |
| 1930 |
77,442 |
31.2% |
1.36% |
D+0.6 |
| 1940 |
107,152 |
38.4% |
1.55% |
D+4.0 |
| 1950 |
149,264 |
39.3% |
1.41% |
R+1.4 |
| 1960 |
168,403 |
12.8% |
1.07% |
D+0.4 |
| 1970 |
188,322 |
11.8% |
0.94% |
R+3.5 |
| 1980 |
245,738 |
30.5% |
1.04% |
R+6.7 |
| 1990 |
311,921 |
26.9% |
1.05% |
R+8.2 |
| 2000 |
368,021 |
18.0% |
1.09% |
R+12.9 |
| 2008* |
426,276 |
15.8% |
1.17% |
R+13.5 |
Tuolumne
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
7,768 |
-22.2% |
0.23% |
D+3.1 |
| 1930 |
9,271 |
19.3% |
0.16% |
D+6.2 |
| 1940 |
10,887 |
17.4% |
0.16% |
D+9.9 |
| 1950 |
12,584 |
15.6% |
0.12% |
R+3.7 |
| 1960 |
14,404 |
14.5% |
0.09% |
D+3.0 |
| 1970 |
22,169 |
53.9% |
0.11% |
D+1.7 |
| 1980 |
33,928 |
53.0% |
0.14% |
R+3.0 |
| 1990 |
48,456 |
42.8% |
0.16% |
R+1.3 |
| 2000 |
54,501 |
12.5% |
0.16% |
R+8.6 |
| 2008* |
55,644 |
2.1% |
0.15% |
R+9.9 |
Yolo
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
17,105 |
22.8% |
0.50% |
D+1.2 |
| 1930 |
23,644 |
38.2% |
0.42% |
D+6.0 |
| 1940 |
27,243 |
15.2% |
0.39% |
D+5.8 |
| 1950 |
40,640 |
49.2% |
0.38% |
D+2.0 |
| 1960 |
65,727 |
61.7% |
0.42% |
D+7.3 |
| 1970 |
91,788 |
39.7% |
0.46% |
D+13.9 |
| 1980 |
113,374 |
23.5% |
0.48% |
D+6.4 |
| 1990 |
141,210 |
24.6% |
0.47% |
D+11.8 |
| 2000 |
168,660 |
19.4% |
0.50% |
D+9.1 |
| 2008* |
197,658 |
17.2% |
0.54% |
D+13.3 |
Yuba
| Year |
Population |
Change |
% of state |
PVI |
| 1920 |
10,375 |
3.3% |
0.30% |
R+2.8 |
| 1930 |
11,331 |
9.2% |
0.20% |
D+11.0 |
| 1940 |
17,034 |
50.3% |
0.25% |
D+11.7 |
| 1950 |
24,420 |
43.4% |
0.23% |
R+3.1 |
| 1960 |
33,859 |
38.7% |
0.22% |
R+0.2 |
| 1970 |
44,736 |
32.1% |
0.22% |
R+1.2 |
| 1980 |
49,733 |
11.2% |
0.21% |
R+1.8 |
| 1990 |
58,228 |
17.1% |
0.20% |
R+8.8 |
| 2000 |
60,219 |
3.4% |
0.18% |
R+13.5 |
| 2008* |
73,067 |
21.3% |
0.20% |
R+14.0 |
I look forward to the next segment in the series.
I’m looking forward to the analysis of SoCal.
Least populous county in the U.S. and trending Democratic. It used to be Cowboys and Indians, now with added skiers it goes Dem. Also has highest turnout percentage in the state usually…