DCCC Announces First Frontline List for 2011-12

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee just put out its first list of vulnerable incumbents for its “Frontline” program for the 2011-12 cycle:


















































































District Incumbent O/K
AZ-08 Gabby Giffords 46/46
CA-11 Jerry McNerney 54/45
IA-03 Leonard Boswell 54/50
KY-06 Ben Chandler 43/41
MI-09 Gary Peters 56/49
MN-01 Tim Walz 51/47
MO-03 Russ Carnahan 60/57
NC-07 Mike McIntyre 47/44
NC-08 Larry Kissell 53/45
NY-01 Tim Bishop 52/49
NY-23 Bill Owens 52/47
OR-05 Kurt Schrader 54/49
PA-12 Mark Critz 49/51
UT-02 Jim Matheson 39/31
VA-11 Gerry Connolly 57/49

One note: The “O/K” column refers to the share of the vote that Obama and Kerry respectively got in the district. In any event, the vagaries of redistricting obviously make selecting endangered incumbents a difficult enterprise, but there are still some notable names missing on this list. Who else do you think should be on here?

KS-02: The Hard Way

Chris Van Hollen announced today at a press conference that no House Dem freshman turned down help from the DCCC’s Frontline program. Last cycle, Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (NH-01) initially spurned Frontline but later had the sense to change her mind, which is why she’s still in Congress. Meanwhile, the only member who strong-armed the DCCC until the bitter end apparently learned her lesson the very, very hard way:

Van Hollen also said [former KS-02 Rep. Nancy] Boyda left him a regretful voicemail that she told him to play for any other vulnerable member toying with the idea of skipping out on Frontline.

“All of our new members have learned from the mistakes of two in the former class who did not participate,” Van Hollen said. “Nancy Boyda has been very clear about the fact that she made a mistake.

“It’s a great message, because she clearly felt that not participating was a good part of the reason she failed.”

Good, at least, that she is putting herself out there as a cautionary tale for others. The DCCC is quite skilled at incumbent protection. It’ll be long time before anyone forgets that.

DCCC Unveils Frontline Program For Defense

Yesterday the DCCC introduced its Frontline program for the 2010 electoral cycle. These are the 40 incumbents considered to be most vulnerable, who are targeted for independent expenditures as needed to keep their seats in the D column.

Not all of these incumbents will stay vulnerable; in the previous cycle, between solid Dem fundraising out of the gate and an auspicious political landscape, only 10 of the initial 34 wound up needing funding. This cycle may be a little different, though; we’re playing more defense in more Republican-leaning seats, and fighting the usual midterm tendencies to recoil against the party in power.

Here’s the list of 40; rather than listing them alphabetically, I’m listing them according to the difficulty of the district’s estimated presidential lean in 2008 (and also including each rep’s margin of victory in 2008):

District Rep. 2008 Pres.
margin
2008 House
margin
AL-02 Bright – 27 1
ID-01 Minnick – 26 1
MS-01 Childers – 24 11
AL-05 Griffith – 23 4
MD-01 Kratovil – 18 1
AZ-01 Kirkpatrick – 10 17
PA-10 Carney – 9 13
AZ-08 Giffords – 6 12
AZ-05 Mitchell – 5 10
VA-05 Perriello – 3 0
NY-29 Massa – 3 2
OH-16 Boccieri – 2 11
FL-24 Kosmas – 2 16
NY-13 McMahon – 2 28
CO-04 Markey – 1 12
NM-02 Teague – 1 12
IN-09 Hill – 1 19
PA-03 Dahlkemper 0 2
VA-02 Nye 2 5
NY-24 Arcuri 3 4
TX-23 Rodriguez 3 14
NJ-03 Adler 5 4
NH-01 Shea-Porter 6 6
MI-07 Schauer 6 2
NC-08 Kissell 6 11
FL-08 Grayson 6 4
IL-11 Halvorson 8 24
OH-15 Kilroy 9 1
CA-11 McNerney 9 11
WI-08 Kagen 9 8
IA-03 Boswell 10 14
OR-05 Schrader 11 16
OH-01 Driehaus 11 5
IL-14 Foster 11 15
NV-03 Titus 12 5
NY-25 Maffei 13 13
MI-09 Peters 13 10
VA-11 Connolly 15 12
CT-04 Himes 20 4
NM-01 Heinrich 20 11

Take a moment to compare this with the House Vulnerability Index that we compiled last month. Pretty solid overlap: 18 of the 20 on the Index are also in the Frontline program. The two who aren’t are Chet Edwards, who’s well ensconced in his bright-red district, and Jim Marshall, who seems to finally be getting settled after a number of rocky cycles.

Note, also, the large number of sophomores who quickly locked down their iffy districts and have already graduated from their training wheels: Brad Ellsworth, Heath Shuler, Jason Altmire, John Yarmuth, John Hall, and Zack Space, among others. (Also observe who got the training wheels slapped back on: Mike Arcuri and the perpetually tottering Leonard Boswell.)

Who’s in the reddest districts without needing Frontline help? It’s all long-time representatives from the Blue Doggish end of the party, starting with Gene Taylor (36-pt McCain margin) and Chet Edwards (35). The rest of the top 10 includes some Tennessee and Arkansas reps who watched their previously safe districts fall out from under them, at least at the presidential level:  Dan Boren (32), Lincoln Davis (30), Bart Gordon (25), Charlie Melancon (24), Ike Skelton (23), Marion Berry (21), Mike Ross (19), and Rick Boucher (19).

And who had the narrowest margins in their own House races, without requiring Frontline help? Top of the list is Paul Kanjorski, who most people seemed to have left for dead and who escaped with a 3-point victory; apparently, the consensus seems to be that he was uniquely vulnerable to Lou Barletta and there aren’t any other threats on PA-11’s GOP bench. Following him are Chet Edwards (8), Ron Klein (9), Chellie Pingree (10), Jason Altmire (12), Jim Marshall (14), Paul Hodes (15), John Murtha (16), Dennis Moore (17), and Tim Bishop (17).

Finally, not to be outdone, the NRCC is about to roll out its counterpart, the “Patriots” program. (Apparently they don’t feel so sanguine as to call it ROMP, or Regain our Majority Program, any more.) No word on who the recipients are yet. One key difference seems to be while Frontline offers a lot of carrots, the Patriots program seems to involve a whole lot of stick:

As one Republican source put it Monday, the effort is also designed to “end the welfare state that the NRCC has become over the past six to eight years” by setting strict benchmarks for Members and adding one big stick to the process. Namely, those candidates who aren’t working to help themselves will be cut off from NRCC financial assistance.