Tag: Polls

Siena College (3-9/10, likely voters, 2/18-19 in parentheses):

Scott Murphy (D): 41 (34)

Jim Tedisco (R): 45 (46)

Eric Sundwall (L): 1 (n/a)

(MoE: ±3.7%)

Yesterday you may remember that the Scott Murphy camp came out with an internal poll showing a 7-point lead for Jim Tedisco, but I questioned whether the race was actually closer than that, given that the internal poll was more than two weeks old and the intervening weeks involved a lot of hammering on Tedisco for his inability to commit one way or the other to the stimulus package. I may have been on to something: Siena comes out with another poll (so finally we have some trendlines) of NY-20, and Murphy has shaved his previous 12-point deficit to 4.

As you can see from the trendlines, Tedisco is holding steady while Murphy is vacuuming up the undecideds. Tedisco also doesn’t seem to be impressing anyone new: his favorable/unfavorable is 49/30, which looks good on the surface, but two weeks ago he was at 47/20. (Murphy’s favorable/unfavorable is 40/25, up from 29/10, so his ad blitz is at least erasing his #1 problem, lack of name recognition.) The trajectory of the trendlines points to a very close race, and this being a special election, it’s likely to boil down to turnout, enthusiasm, and ground game.

This poll also breaks down the race by region within the district. Tedisco has a big edge in suburban Saratoga County, where he’s ostensibly from (he represents Schenectady in the state assembly, which is outside the district), while Murphy has a big edge in the district’s blue-collar northern counties (Murphy is from Glens Falls). The two are close in the Hudson Valley counties south of Albany, which looks to be the swing area where the real battle will be fought.

As I’m sure you’ve read elsewhere, this race is also turning into a bit of a behind-the-scenes referendum on RNC chairman Michael Steele. While I’m starting to look forward to winning this race, one unfortunate consequence of winning may be the end of the Steele chairmanship… which, at least in terms of driving the media narrative, has so far proven to be a much bigger gift to Democrats than one more seat in the House.

UPDATE: The RNC can read polls, too. They just transferred $100,000 to the New York GOP to buttress Tedisco’s campaign.

Benenson Strategy Group (D) (2-24/25, likely voters):

Scott Murphy (D): 37

Jim Tedisco (R): 44

Eric Sundwall (L): 4

(n = 400)

This is starting to look rather encouraging: never-before-elected venture capitalist Scott Murphy is within 7 points of state assembly minority leader Jim Tedisco in a Democratic internal poll in the race to succeed Kirsten Gillibrand in NY-20. Tedisco led by 21 in early February in his own POS internal and then by 12 in an independent poll in mid-February from Siena, so while there’s an apples and oranges problem here among pollsters, there’s an upward trajectory for Murphy as we approach the Mar. 31 special election.

One other observation: folks in the media are treating this poll as evidence that Tedisco’s hemming and hawing about voting for the economic stimulus package (and the ensuing broadside of criticism he received from the local papers’ editorial boards) hurt him. I’m sure that’s true. But look at the dates this poll was in the field: two and a half weeks ago, before Tedisco’s vacillations really started to define the race, and only a week after that Siena poll. I don’t know why they waited so long to release the poll, but given the age of this poll and intervening events, it’s quite possible that the real race is even closer. (Discussion is underway in conspiracy‘s diary.)

Quinnipiac (3/3-3/8, registered voters, no trendlines):

Chris Dodd (D-inc): 42

Rob Simmons (R): 43

Undecided: 12

Chris Dodd (D-inc): 47

Sam Caligiuri (R): 34

Undecided: 16

Chris Dodd (D-inc): 46

Larry Kudlow (R): 34

Undecided: 16

(MoE: ±2.8%)

I can’t say I’m surprised to see numbers like this. Over the last few years, Dodd has racked up a number of negatives: moving his family to Iowa only to garner 0% in the caucuses, for a presidential run he never adequately “explained” to his constituents; his iconoclastic stand against FISA which endeared him to liberal activists (myself included) but probably didn’t help him at home; and his seemingly preferential loan treatment from Countrywide which has earned him a lot of bad press.

On top of that, there seems to be a growing “throw the bums out mentality” in the face of the recession. It seems to mostly be afflicting governors for now, but the key thing is that it’s nailing both parties – look at approval ratings for Paterson and Schwarzenegger. Dodd’s vulnerability may well be increased just because he’s getting swept up in that wake.

On the plus-side, Dodd is a prodigious fundraiser with powerful friends in the financial services world who won’t want to see him toppled now that Dems control such a wide majority. (Though I wonder if Simmons will be able to use Dodd’s ties against him in the parts of CT which are anti-bailout.) Also, Simmons hasn’t yet decided to run, and I wonder how much money Big John Cornyn will be able to float him.

The bottom line, though, is that Dodd is at risk and will probably cost us a great deal even if Simmons loses. He needs to get out there early to start re-defining himself – and nuking his opponent if need be.

Field Poll (2/20-3/1, registered voters):

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 54

Arnold Schwarzenegger (R): 30

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 55

Carly Fiorina (R): 25

(MoE: ±3.6%)

Arnold Schwarzenegger (R): 31

Carly Fiorina (R): 24

Chuck DeVore (R): 9

Carly Fiorina (R): 31

Chuck DeVore (R): 19

(MoE: ±5.8%)

The bad news for Barbara Boxer is that she’s not terribly popular; only 42% of Californians are inclined to re-elect her, while 43% are inclined not to. The good news is, there’s nobody that Californians are inclined to like better. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has been considered the GOP’s best bet in this seat (despite his not having publicly expressed any interest in the race), but the new Field Poll shows him getting demolished. This is a much bigger margin than the R2K poll from two months ago that gave Boxer a 9-point edge, but that’s before the state-level budget crisis took him down (and, to be fair, just about every governor) a few pegs.

Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina doesn’t fare any better, and while her prognosis is supposedly good after breast cancer surgery last week, she’s hardly a lock for the race either. The GOP may be left with little-known and little-liked state assemblyman Chuck DeVore. Either way, Boxer doesn’t seem to be facing much danger any more.

Siena College (2/18-19, likely voters):

Scott Murphy (D): 34

Jim Tedisco (R): 46

(MoE: ±3.7%)

Here is the first public poll of the special election in NY-20 to replace Kirsten Gillibrand; compared with the Tedisco internal released a few weeks ago (which had Tedisco up 50-29), it shows Scott Murphy in a better position, although still in a pretty deep hole.

The good news is that Murphy, who has never held office before, is still little-known, giving him room to grow (his favorable/unfavorable is 29/10 with 61% undecided); Tedisco, by comparison, is much better known, although he’s viewed pretty favorably (47/20, with 34% with no opinion). The poll also asks an interesting question: whose endorsement will matter the most to you? The most common answer is Kirsten Gillibrand, who still maintains a stratospheric 75/15 favorability rating in the district. Gillibrand stumping in the district will go a long way toward helping Murphy here. Discussion is already underway in DTM,B!‘s diary.

Research 2000 for Daily Kos (2/16-18, registered voters):

Patty Murray (D-inc): 53

Dave Reichert (R): 40

Patty Murray (D-inc): 55

Rob McKenna (R): 39

(MoE: ±4%)

Research 2000 takes a look at the 2010 Washington Senate race for Daily Kos, and there’s really not much to see here. Patty Murray wins easily against two of the few Republicans that people in Washington actually like, Rep. Dave Reichert and Attorney General Rob McKenna. But neither of them have given any indication of running for the Senate, and if either of them had any urges, this poll is likely to squelch those.

McKenna has his sights set on the 2012 gubernatorial race (which will presumably be an open seat), while Reichert is (as I’ve talked about at length) the GOP’s only hope of holding onto the Democratic-leaning WA-08 and the state GOP won’t want to sacrifice him for a longshot bid against Murray. With Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers climbing the House leadership ladder and Dino Rossi having seen the extinction of his career, there just aren’t any top-tier elected GOPers in the state to make this race.

Expect them to take the route they took in 2006 with Mike! McGavick and pick some super-wealthy self-funder you’ve never heard of, who won’t break 40% but will at least be able to pay for his own funeral. (It’s been long-threatened, but it may finally be John Stanton‘s turn in the dunk tank.)

Public Policy Polling (2/6-8, registered voters):

Paul Hodes (D): 40

Charlie Bass (R): 37

Paul Hodes (D): 46

John Sununu (R): 44

Carol Shea-Porter (D): 42

Charlie Bass (R): 43

Carol Shea-Porter (D): 45

John Sununu (R): 46

(MoE: ±2.7%)

While all the matchups tested here by our friends at PPP are well within the margin of error, Hodes starts off the 2010 Senate race in the best shape — indeed, he even has more room to grow than Shea-Porter does. A full 24% of voters have no opinion of Hodes, while only 17% of voters don’t know enough about CSP to give an opinion.

Sununu has near-universal name recognition, which is hardly a surprise given his recent humiliating defeat at the polls, but that suggests that his numbers here may be something of a high water mark. Bass, on the other hand, has the least name recognition of the bunch, and those who do know him don’t seem to care for him all that much — his favorability score clocks in at 33-37. I’d be pretty surprised if the Bassmaster threw his hat into the ring.

Public Opinion Strategies (R) for Jim Tedisco (2/3-4, registered voters):

Scott Murphy (D): 29

Jim Tedisco (R): 50

(MoE: ±4.9%)

NY-20 was always going to be a tough hold, despite the fact that it narrowly went for Obama over McCain, because of its historically Republican nature (as seen in the GOP registration advantage and the utter lack of a convincing Democratic bench). Although this is an internal poll from Tedisco’s camp, it pretty clearly shows what kind of a hole we’re starting in.

Complicating matters is the name recognition factor: Tedisco, as Assembly Minority Leader and someone with deep roots in nearby NY-21, sports a 51% favorable/13% unfavorable rating, while local businessman Scott Murphy has never held office before. Murphy’s one advantage is self-funding: he’s already amassed $600,000 cash on hand, including a $250,000 loan from himself. Which is good… if Murphy’s going to be competitive in this race, in the face of a relatively short timeframe, it’s going to have to be through a lot of paid media.

Rasmussen (2/4, likely voters, 12/4 in parentheses):

Creigh Deeds (D): 30 (39)

Robert McDonnell (R): 39 (39)

Some other candidate: 6 (4)

Brian Moran (D): 36 (41)

Robert McDonnell (R): 39 (37)

Some other candidate: 4 (5)

Terry McAuliffe (D): 35 (36)

Robert McDonnell (R): 42 (41)

Some other candidate: 3 (5)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

Rasmussen polls the Virginia governor’s race a second time, meaning we now have trendlines… and, frankly, they don’t look very appetizing. Ex-Del. Brian Moran led AG Robert McDonnell last time by 4, but now he’s trailing by 3, while Del. Creigh Deeds fell from a tie to a 9-point deficit.

Part of the problem here may be that, while McDonnell has long since consolidated Republican support, the three Dem contenders are in primary attack mode, driving their numbers down as they target each other. The numbers in the McAuliffe/McDonnell matchup don’t seem to have budged much, which suggests that McAuliffe may be doing the best job right now of the three of getting his message into the media… although that still doesn’t seem to translate into a good performance in the general matchup.

UPDATE (James L.): Public Policy Polling’s Tom Jensen weighs in:

I think the answer here is in the timing of the poll being conducted. It was done Wednesday night. McDonnell resigned as Attorney General Tuesday and that was all over local tv news casts Tuesday, and then all over the state’s newspapers on Wednesday. That level of exposure is unusual for a 24 hour media cycle this far out from November, and I bet it helped McDonnell to lead in the poll. I certainly don’t think there was any nefarious intent in the timing of the poll but that sort of thing does have an impact.

Public Policy Polling (1/17-18, registered voters):

Jennifer Brunner (D): 34

Rob Portman (R): 42

Undecided: 24

Lee Fisher (D): 39

Rob Portman (R): 41

Undecided: 20

Tim Ryan (D): 34

Rob Portman (R): 40

Undecided: 26

(MoE: ±4.1%)

Portman begins the race with an early edge over the potential Democratic field, but it’s nothing insurmountable. Name recognition may be something of a factor here, but interestingly, Portman registers the highest percentage of ambivalence among voters of the four names tested; a full 49% have no opinion of him, while his favorable/unfavorable score clocks in at 28-23.

By comparison, Fisher’s numbers are 40-32, Ryan’s are 26-27, and Brunner (Ohio’s Secretary of State) has the highest unfavorables of the bunch at 34-36. Undoubtedly, Brunner’s involvement in a plethora of lawsuits during and after the election (most notably surrounding early voting, but also the drawn-out OH-15 saga) drew a good deal of scorn from the Ohio GOP. Perhaps those numbers might settle down some when the ’08 election fades farther away in our rear view mirrors — or perhaps not.

Portman also scores very highly among Republican voters — he draws in a full 80% of Republicans off the bat against Fisher and Brunner (and 74% against Ryan), while the potential Democratic candidates are only drawing between 59% (Brunner) and 68% (Fisher) of Democrats. Still, with the kind of baggage that Portman is carrying, a good campaign should be able to shore up these numbers over the next two years.