Van Hollen didn’t do such a spectacular job, especially when this was an election based on change. Some races where the DCCC spent were already decided beforehand. 25 Democrats win Republican seats (assuming Perriello and Kilroy win, yet Brown does not). Total gain is 21 seats, yet 13 required little to no effort. The end result is that Van Hollen helped gain twelve seats (Bright, Schauer, Minnick, Kratovil, Musgrave, Halvorson, Adler, Teague, Heinrich, Boccieri, Kilroy, and English), yet four Democratic seats were lost in the process, leading to a net effort gain of 8 seats. :
Shays (CT) – High turnout from Bridgeport (not DCCC spending) is what cost Shays. Also Himes had more than $3 million and the NRCC spent not a single cent to save Shays. Advertising on NYC stations didn’t make sense, especially considering that the district is covered by two media markets (Hartford and NYC).
Feeney (FL) – His “apology,” not DCCC attack ads are essentially what cost him his seat.
Keller (FL) – The DCCC stepped in at the last minute, yet Keller was defeated because constituents viewed him as ineffective, yet they also were not wowed by Grayson either, therefore it became a choice between the lesser of two evils. Demographics and a poor primary showing were also clues that Keller was going to lose. It was essentially a calf on the prairie without its mother seeking a way to survive without being seen.
Hayes (NC), Chabot (OH), and Drake (VA) – Turnout by African-Americans are what cost all three their seats.
AZ (1st), NY (13), NY (25) and VA (11) – All of these were easy WINS since Republicans recruited poor candidates.
NV (3rd) – The high unemployment, changing demographics, and the nation’s highest foreclosures are what cost Porter, not anything the DCCC did.
Knollenberg (MI) – Changing demographics cost him. Michigan Republicans in general struggled and most of the Republican seats lost in the state House occurred near or in Oakland County.
Goode (VA) – Eden’s Curve is what is costing him and what will cost him in the end.
Spending which did make sense:
Bright (AL)
Griffith (AL)
Musgrace (CO)
Mario Diaz-Balart (FL)
Sali (ID)
Halvorson (IL)
Kirk (IL)
Boswell (KY) – His problem is that he didn’t know how to raise money on his own.
Kratovil (MD)
Schauer (MI)
Madia (MN) – Wrong candidate (yet right district is the problem.
Esch (NE) – Another case of wrong candidate (yet right district). He came off as preppy and privileged.
Derby (NV) – However, spending came way too late.
Shea-Porter (NH)
Adler (NJ) – He seemed an easy win early on, yet he struggled greatly in the close. DCCC funding most likely made the difference.
Stender (NJ) – Another case of wrong candidate (yet right district). Her negatives for a non-incumbent were fairly high.
Teague (NM)
Heinrich (NM)
Kuhl (NY) – The incumbent cost himself the seat, yet DCCC funding did help.
Boccieri (OH)
Kilroy (OH) – Another case of wrong candidate (yet right district). Her negatives were high. She may slide through, but a primary challenge cannot be ruled out.
Dahlkemper (PA) – Labor unions essentially helped deliver this victory.
Brown (SC) – Very vulnerable Republican, yet Ketner being lesbian didn’t help in the South.
Reichert (WA)
Capito (WV) – However, it came somewhat late.
Races which should have been targeted yet were not:
Latham (IA)
Lungren (CA)
Calvert (CA)
Bilbray (CA) – DCCC was here early on, yet pulled out. Guess it was to waste money elsewhere.
Arcuri (NY) – This is a DEM seat which was almost lost.
Tiberi (OH)
Gerlach (PA)
Wilson (SC)
McCaul (TX)
Wasted Money:
Shadegg (AZ)
Young (AK)
Lampson (TX)
Scott (GA)
Open Seat (MO-9th) – Can’t be pro-choice in a rural conservative pro-life district.
Open Seat (MO-6th) – A city woman would have a difficult time winning over rural votes necessary for victory.
Lincoln Diaz-Balart – Once he showed a video of his opponent punching a youngster the DCCC should have concentrate all of its attention on Mario.
Souder – Sure he’s incompetent, yet his opponent barely lived in the district.
Bachmann – Sure it would be wonderful to have her gone, yet when Tinklenberg brought in more than $1 million he should have spent that on his own without the DCCC taking a calculated risk (the NRCC already had stepped out). The district is very Republican and Bachmann’s “I’m Sorry” ad saved her.
Schmidt – Another nut that needs to go, but Wulsin’s strong showing in 2006 can be attributed to a Dem sweep statewide.
Trauner – His strong showing in 2006 can be attributed to low approval ratings for Cubin and coattails from Freudenthal.
Open Seat (NY-26) – It’s a conservative area and Kryzan may have been too liberal for the mostly rural district. In addition, this district is most likely going to be split up in 2010 redistricting.
Murtha (PA) and Kanjorski (PA) didn’t help very much either.
Also, in an attempt to save Cazayoux the DCCC should have attacked Jackson, yet in a way which didn’t come off as being offensive to African-Americans.