On Election Night, I stood by while State Senator-elect Joe Addabbo gave his acceptance speech. I turned to a girl I met that night who worked on his campaign and was close to Malcolm Smith, the incoming majority leader.
“Looks like we control the State Senate” I said
“No, not really.” she explained, “Only Joe and Brian Foley won.”
“But that’s 32 seats, that’s a majority.” I said
She only rolled her eyes at me and walked away.
We didn’t really win the New York State Senate. We won it in name only. In votes, we may be able to get through progressive economic policies, but thanks to socially conservative Democrats. Unfortunately, and I said this as someone who supported, worked for and donated to LGBT causes in New York, the LGBT community is going to find itself under a bus…again…and there’s nothing we can do about until 2010.
I knew Diaz would threaten to bolt in February when I was working for PBS. Malcolm Smith told one of our producers in June that he needed four or more wins in the State Senate for marriage equality. On Monday, I spoke with a friend of mine in Albany who tells me Smith only has 28 votes for marriage equality; No Republicans are on our side. Four Democrats also opposed. I dind’t get their names (though three names are obvious) but I was told they’re all from the city. Ironic, huh?
If we go into these districts in the Bronx and argue that we need Democrats who will vote with us on gay rights, we WILL lose. Trust me on this, I’ve been there. In 2007, I canvassed the neighborhood as part of a local LGBT activist community. The response I got in these heavily Democratic neighborhood was disgusting and scary (more than one young Democrat used the “f” word and there were threats of violence)
Don’t think this is an ethnicity thing either. When marriage equality came up for a vote in 2007, we lost Democrats in Italian-American communities in Brooklyn, Orthodox Jewish communities in Brooklyn and African-American communities in Brooklyn and Queens. Here too, constituencies do not tow the progressive line on gay rights.
Diaz and Esparada will probably vote with us on economic issues. They won’t survive in their districts if they don’t. That’s really more important right now.
They can be anti-gay and survive there.
Malcolm Smith is a good man. I spoke with him thoroughly about marriage equality and he is a full-fledged supporter. I am willing to bet my bank account on it. If he knew he could get it through despite Diaz and Esparada, he would do it. Let’s face it, what would’ve been the response if Smith told Diaz and Esparada, “Nope, I’m bringing marriage equality to the floor” and they bolted for the GOP? Would we be hailing Smith as a hero? Or a moron for giving up our majority in the middle of an economic crisis for a bill that was never going to pass this session anyway?
How do we get around this? Well, for starters, we reach out to these Bronx communities and try to beat these thugs in primaries in 2010…but also, head upstate and out to Long Island and fight for progressives. We nearly picked up seats in Nassau County (Kristen McElroy) and another in Queens (Jim Gennaro) that would have made Diaz/Esparada’s bigotry moot. If we can elect a black man President of the United States, then by God we can elect a progressive Democrat to represent Rochester in the State Senate.
all of your efforts.
It’s not over, and we’re going to win at the end of the day.
Let Diaz caucus with the Republicans. We can be rid of him in two years, once and for all.
nrafter writes about opposition from blacks (it is a subset, a part of the “black church” group). Orthodox Jews, and Italian Americans. The common thread in the opposition groups is religiously “inspired” bigotry. I am not sure if working with some of these church groups will have any effect.
It is clear, at least to me, that God is so much bigger than we like to portray Him. It is also clear that the happiness of many gay and lesbian couples in those states that had gay marriage was legitinate. Who is this majority to take away that happiness and for what purpose?
Taking away gay marriage does not take away gays. Duh. It just imposes legal barriers that makes life for many people more difficult than it needs to be.
The strongest message possible is a combination of the joy and the unneccesary barriers (hospital visitations, etc.) Go get em nrafter. These groups are on the wrong side of history and eventually you will overcome somday.
and think, let’s see, who do I think are stupider for being against gay marriage, them or the Christian right.
At least the Christian right has a logical argument, we think you’re scary so we’re going to use the Bible to put you in your place.
Ethnic minorities against the gay cause, what fools. Such obvious parallels to the plight they’ve gone through and what the GLBT community’ currently is trying to overcome and when they tear our rights down, they certainly don’t help their own desire for inclusiveness. It’s why they are confined to certain neighborhoods in the first place! (I’m assuming the history of NYC is similar to that of other major cities where neighborhoods have ethnic traditions starting from the 1900’s because these people got red lined into these neighborhoods so whites wouldn’t have to live by them. An assumption possibly false as NYC is not like other cities.)