Best to Worst Senate Delegations

Based on the very scientific standard of my subjective opinion.

1. Vermont – Leahy (D) & Sanders (I)

2. Rhode Island – Reed (D) & Whitehouse (D)

3. Minnesota – Klobuchar (D) & Franken (D)

4. Oregon – Wyden (D) & Merkley (D)

5. Massachusetts – Kennedy (D) & Kerry (D)

6. Virginia – Webb (D) & Warner (D)

7. Wisconsin – Kohl (D) & Feingold (D)

8. New York – Schumer (D) & Gillibrand (D)

9. Maryland – Mikulski (D) & Cardin (D)

10. North Dakota – Conrad (D) & Dorgan (D)

11. New Mexico – Bingaman (D) & T. Udall (D)

12. Colorado – M. Udall (D) & Bennet (D)

13. California – Boxer (D) & Feinstein (D)

14. N. Jersey – Lautenberg (D) & Menendez (D)

15. Hawaii – Inouye (D) & Akaka (D)

16. Washington – Murray (D) & Cantwell (D)

17. Iowa – Harkin (D) & Grassley (R)

18. Montana – Baucus (D) & Tester (D)

19. Delaware – Carper (D) & Kaufman (D)

20. Michigan – Levin (D) & Stabenow (D)

21. W. Virginia – Byrd (D) & Rockefeller (D)

22. Ohio – Brown (D) & Voinovich (R)

23. Missouri – McCaskill (D) & Bond (R)

24. Illinois – Durbin (D) & Burris (D)

25. Arkansas – Pryor (D) & Lincoln (D)

26. Alaska – Begich (D) & Murkowski (R)

27. New Hampshire – Shaheen (D) & Gregg (R)

28. Pennsylvania – Casey (D) & Specter (R)

29. South Dakota – Johnson (D) & Thune (R)

30. Connecticut – Dodd (D) & Lieberman (I)

31. Maine – Snow (R) & Collins (R)

32. Indiana – Bayh (D) & Lugar (R)

33. Nebraska – Ben Nelson (D) & Johanns (R)

34. Nevada – Reid (D) & Ensign (R)

35. North Carolina – Hagan (D) & Burr (R)

36. Florida – Bill Nelson (D) & Martinez (R)

37. Tennessee – Alexander (R) & Corker (R)

38. Louisiana – Landrieu (D) & Vitter (R)

39. South Carolina – Graham (R) & DeMint (R)

40. Mississippi – Cochran (R) & Wicker (R)

41. Idaho – Crapo (R) & Risch (R)

42. Georgia – Isakson (R) & Chambliss (R)

43. Arizona – McCain (R) & Kyl (R)

44. Texas – Hutchison (R) & Cornyn (R)

45. Wyoming – Enzi (R) & Barrasso (R)

46. Utah – Hatch (R) & Bennett (R)

47. Kansas – Roberts (R) & Brownback (R)

48. Alabama – Shelby (R) & Sessions (R)

49. Kentucky – McConnell (R) & Bunning (R)

50. Oklahoma – Coburn (R) & Inhofe (R)

70 thoughts on “Best to Worst Senate Delegations”

  1. couple problems with your list though… First, Iowa and ND are waaay too high.  Even though Harkin is great Grassley is in no way a moderate republican.  To a lesser extent, NY (moderate dem and conservative dem) and Virginia (2 moderates) are too high as is Missouri(how are they above Illinois).  

    Meanwhile, Connecticut, much as I dislike Dodd and obviously hate Lieberman, should be bumped around 10 spots.  Again, much as I hate Burris, Illinois also deserves do be about 10 spots higher while Washington and Michigan should be about 7 spots higher.  How is ND 5 spots above Washington?

    I agree with most of the final 20 spots, though I would put Utah and Alabama above Idaho at 41/42.

  2. Is looking at the extremes.  I would say Vermont is far and away our best delegation and Oklahoma is obviously the worst (it’s kinda frightening how bad that delegation is… I would say the have 2 of the 3 worst senators with Vitter sandwiched between coburn and inhofe).

    Consider that Vermont, until Leahy, had never once had a democratic senator.  Until this decade, they’ve never been a straight D delegation and in the entire history of the state, they’ve elected 2 democrats as a senator (counting sanders, but not counting jeffords because I don’t think he was ever elected as a dem).

    Meanwhile, state politics in Oklahoma had traditionally been dominated by Democrats, and I think democrats may still hold a registration edge in the state.   As recently as 1987 the house delegation was 5-1 dem.

  3. We don’t know what Franken is like yet at all, and Klobuchar is WAY too moderate for a state like MN.

    I love the Oregon delegation though.

  4. I think you have Georgia too high and Utah too low.  Chambliss earns extra bad guy points for his campaign against Cleland.  Considering how red Utah is, Bennett and Hatch are not that bad and I can’t remember either ever doing anything reprehensible.  I might also move Texas down the list a little, as I really dislike Cornyn.  Oklahoma has a lock on 50.

  5. Which state has the biggest disparity in quality between it’s two Senators? I think that North Carolina (Hagan vs. Burr) and South Dakota (Johnson vs. Thune) would take the cake.

  6. Just for fun, and using my own completely subjective criteria, which seems at least somewhat aligned with yours:

    1.  Cornyn

    2.  Inhofe

    3.  Chambliss

    4.  Vitter

    5.  McConnell

    6.  Ensign

    7.  DeMint

    8.  Thune

    9.  Kyl

    10.  Sessions

    11.  Bunning

    12.  Shelby

    13.  Coburn

    14.  Gregg

    15.  Alexander

    16.  Cochran

    17.  Bond

    18.  Corker

    19.  Burr

    20.  Risch

    21.  Crapo

    22.  Enzi

    23.  Barrasso

    24.  Roberts

    25.  Wicker

    26.  Isaaakson

    27.  Johanns

    28.  Brownback

    29.  Hatch

    30.  McCain

    31.  Graham

    32.  Martinez

    33.  Bennett

    34.  Murkowski

    35.  Voinovich

    36.  Hutchison

    37.  Specter

    38.  Collins

    39.  Grassley

    40.  Lugar

    41.  Snowe

  7. 1.  Coburn

    2.  Vitter

    3.  Inhofe

    4.  DeMint

    5.  Chambliss

    6.  Kyl

    7.  McConnell

    8.  Cornyn

    9.  Ensign

    10.  Brownback

    11.  Enzi

    12.  Risch

    13.  Thune  

    14.  Crapo

    15.  Barrasso

    16.  Isaaakson

    17.  McCain

    18.  Roberts

    19.  Johanns

    20.  Sessions

    21.  Bunning

    22.  Shelby

    23.  Burr

    24.  Gregg

    25.  Cochran

    26.  Wicker

    27.  Corker

    28.  Graham

    29.  Grassley

    30.  Alexander

    31.  Bond

    32.  Bennett

    33.  Martinez

    34.  Hutchison

    35.  Hatch

    36.  Lugar

    37.  Murkowski

    38.  Voinovich

    39.  Specter

    40.  Collins

    41.  Snowe

  8. from best to worst obviously:

    1.  Sanders

    2.  Franken

    3.  Whitehouse

    4.  Reed

    5.  Kennedy

    6.  Leahy,

    7.  Merkley

    8.  Feingold

    9.  Harkin,

    10. Wyden

    11. Durbin

    12. Brown

    13. Kerry

    14. Kohl

    15. Stabenow

    16. Akaka

    17. Murray

    18. Cantwell

    19. Mikulski

    20. Shaheen

    21. Boxer

    22. Warner

    23. Klobuchar

    24. Feinstein

    25. Bingaman

    26. Lautenberg

    27. Conrad

    28. Menéndez

    29. Dorgan

    30. Inouye

    31. Udall (NM)

    32. Dodd

    33. Schumer

    34. Gillibrand

    35. Udall (CO)

    36. Levin

    37. Kaufman

    38. Burris

    39. Webb

    40. Casey

    41. Tester

    42. Reid

    43. Johnson

    44. Bennett

    45. Begich

    46. Hagan

    47. McCaskill

    48. Carper

    49. Baucus

    50. Pryor

    51. Lincoln

    52. Landrieu

    53. Nelson (FL)

    54. Rockefeller

    55. Byrd

    56. Nelson (NE)

    57. Lieberman

    58. Bayh

    missing someone, bonus points to whoever points out who it is

    also, bonus points to whoever does this for the house

  9. It is Mark Udall and Bennett- Ken Salazar is now sec of Interior

    Udall will certainly be a more progressive Senator than Salazar was, so it remains to be seen if Bennett will be able to pull Colorado’s ranking a bit higher.

    And, as  Vermonter, I absolutely echo your choice of Leahy and Sanders as the best combo..

  10. Should be much higher.  Menendez (10th) and Lautenberg (16th) are only clearly surpassed by two state duos on Progressive Punch for lifetime scores: RI (Whitehouse , 6th and Reed, 7th) and IL (Burris, 2nd and Durbin, 14th).  They were confortably in the top mten once the newbies had established voting records last session and should return to that perch.

    IL belongs in the top ten.  Durbin not only votes well but is a major leader for progressive causes in the Senate.  Burris at least votes right.

    Bayh is worse than Lugar.  He not only undermines he leads the charge.  In my mind, he’s a bpttom 20 Srnator.  

  11. Your list is pretty solid.  Obviously I would switch a few of them around regardless of whether the context is ideology or performance.  I think it’s too early to assume Franken will be the reincarnation of Paul Wellstone as many seem to expect.  I actually think he’ll vote like a moderate given his lack of clear mandate from voters.

    I’d place North Dakota several positions higher, largely because their Senators are as progressive as they are even from this crimson red state.  While Conrad’s taking some deserved heat for his confusing obstruction of Obama’s budget proposals, I still like him alot and like Dorgan even more.  Dorgan may be my favorite Senator right now even though he got the war in Iraq wrong.  Alternatively, I think South Dakota’s too high as Johnson is only okay while Thune is awful.  I’d put North Carolina and Florida ahead of SD.

    McCaskill has been becoming more impressive all the time and could see the Missouri delegation rising in impressiveness in the next year and a half even with Bond as an anchor.  As others have pointed out, I’d switch Utah at Texas but otherwise agree with your bottom five.  Oklahoma owns the 50th position.

  12. per optimal classification based on the last congress

    MA   Kennedy (5) + Kerry (7) = 12

    RI   Whitehose (6) + Reed (11.5) = 17.5

    VT   Sanders (2) + Leahy (19) = 21

    NJ   Menendez (11) + Lautenberg (13.5) = 24.5

    IL   Obama (13.5) + Durbin (15) = 28.5

    WI   Feingold (1) + Kohl (30) = 31

    NY   Schumer (16) + Clinton (18) = 34

    CA   Boxer (4) + Feinstein (31) = 35

    CT   Dodd (3) + Lieberman (34.5) = 37.5

    WV   Byrd (8) + Rockefeller (38) = 46

    MI   Stabenow (21) + Levin (27.5) = 48.5

    WA   Cantwell (24) + Murray (25) = 49

    HI   Akaka (23) + Inouye (27) = 50

    OH   Brown (9) + Voinovich (58) = 57

    DE   Biden (10) + Carper (48) = 58

    MD   Cardin (29) + Mikulski (33) = 62

    MN   Klobuchar (20) + Coleman (55) = 75

    OR   Wyden (25) + Smith (54) = 79

    ND   Conrad (39) + Dorgan (40) = 79

    IA   Harkin (17) + Grassley (63) = 80

    MT   Baucus (42.5) + Tester (42.5) = 85

    NM   Bingaman (27.5) + Domenici (62) = 89.5

    PA   Casey (36) + Specter (56) = 92

    AR   Lincoln (45) + Pryor (47) = 92

    VA   Webb (37) + Warner (61) = 98

    ME   Snowe (52) + Collins (53) = 105

    NE   Nelson (50) + Hagel (56) = 106

    IN   Bayh (51) + Lugar (57) = 108

    MO   McCaskill (41) + Bond (70) = 111

    NV   Reid (19) + Ensign (98) = 117

    AK   Murkowski (59) + Stevens (60) = 119

    SD   Johnson (46) + Thune (79) = 125

    UT   Hatch (65) + Bennett (68) = 133

    FL   Nelson (34.5) + Martinez (69) = 133.5

    CO   Salazar (44) + Allard (93) = 136

    MS   Cochran (67) + Bond (70) = 137

    LA   Landrieu (49) + Vitter (91) = 140

    KS   Roberts (64) + Brownback (78) = 142

    TN   Alexander (71) + Corker (72) = 143

    NH   Sununu (75) + Gregg (86) = 161

    GA   Chambliss (80) + Isakson (81) = 161

    TX   Hutchison (73) + Cornyn (89) = 162

    AL   Shelby (76) + Sessions (87) = 163

    ID   Craig (82) + Crapo (83) = 165

    NC   Dole (77) + Burr (95) = 172

    KY   McConnell (85) + Bunning (92) = 177

    AZ   McCain (90) + Kyl (99) = 189

    SC   Graham (88) + Demint (102) = 190

    WY   Enzi (96) + Barasso (97) = 193

    OK   Inhofe (100) + Coburn (101) = 202

    There are more than 100 because of replacements mid-term

    Obviously some changes in the current senate.  I fear my own NY will drop a bit

Comments are closed.