Memo to U.S. politicians: 2010 is not evidently not the best year to be a party-switcher.
Yesterday, Suffolk County Executive Steve Levy, the Democrat-turned-Republican, who switched parties in the hopes of taking on Democrat Andrew Cuomo in the upcoming New York Guberntorial race, tanked at the state’s GOP convention. Levy’s support was so thin, he failed to secure a spot on the party’s primary ballot, ensuring fmr. Rep. Rick Lazio will be the official GOP nominee to challenge Cuomo.
Yes, THAT Rick Lazio.
The fmr. Long Island Congressman, who scored fifteen minutes of national fame a decade ago in the 2000 U.S. Senate race against Hillary Rodham Clinton, has returned for another statewide beating. Lazio became the subject of political notoriety for his debate performance against Clinton, in which he abandoned his debate podium and demanded, face-to-face, that the fmr. First Lady sign a pledge, aiming to ban soft money in political campaigns. Meant to strike a chord with Independent voters, who’d been weary of Clinton’s political ambitions, the move instead solidified Clinton’s support among female voters, who saw Lazio’s move as positively cringe-worthy.
A toss-up race quickly became Clinton’s to lose, and she did claim a strong, double-digit victory, sending Lazio forever into the dark, murky shadows of failed New York politicos. Or, so we thought.
Lazio’s bid against the sitting Attorney General is, to put it mildly, the mother of all long-shots. After all, Cuomo’s actually quite popular among even registered Republicans, and conservatives are raving over his policy positions, not too unlike those of Republican New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s. Plus, one has to consider why Steve Levy gave this race a shot in the first place. Lazio, while respected among the state’s conservative circles, is generally looked upon as a washed-up has-been, not to mention a personality who’s hardly of the most telegenic or exciting kind. Levy, despite his failings, at least had a sort of hammy, humorous demeanor which may have paid off come the face-to-face debates with Cuomo.
Alas, the GOP has sided with Lazio, and I must say, this race looks like a complete blow-out to me. How I currently see it playing out…
Democrat – 47%
Independent – 28%
Republican – 25%
Cuomo – 97%/70%/35% = 75%
Lazio – 3%/30%/65% = 25%
Such a race would even best the stellar showing of Elliot Spitzer in his 2006 bid against John Faso, which was a 69%-29% victory. Now, let’s pretend, for a moment, that Lazio actually runs a solid campaign, while Cuomo’s is surprisingly underwhelming. (For the record, I highly doubt this will be the case.) Presuming such, I suspect a best-case-scenario for Lazio looks something like…
Democrat – 44%
Republican – 30%
Independent – 26%
Cuomo – 93%/20%/65% = 64%
Lazio – 7%/80%/35% = 36%
This margin roughly mirrors that of the 2008 Presidential race. That is, the Republican wins a decent majority of GOP-ers and self-described “conservatives,” but “moderates” still flock to the Democrat, and the Dem base is still basically shored-up. No matter what, I can’t imagine Cuomo not winning about two-to-one over Lazio, especially given the Democrat’s aggressive willingness to work across-the-aisle. Lazio, on the flip side, will probably run a very anti-Democrat campaign, and try to win over the state on a platform of conservativism. Of course, one cannot win statewide in New York by doing this.
Christie. His dad was fine a Democrat. I hope Cuomo follows in those footsteps.
My main question is what did Steve Levy hope to accomplish? It seems unlikely that he would have even carried his home turf of Suffolk county.