* She’s not technically in the race right now
* She’s not out of the race
* She’s not a quitter
* She is who she is
* She will likely not run as a Libertarian
* She will likely not run as a write-in
* She doesn’t know what she’s doing
SSP TV:
* She’s not technically in the race right now
* She’s not out of the race
* She’s not a quitter
* She is who she is
* She will likely not run as a Libertarian
* She will likely not run as a write-in
* She doesn’t know what she’s doing
SSP TV:
Comments are closed.
twice on NYC broadcast.
Disinterested means impartial, objective or neutral. The Libertarian Party is anything but disinterested. They have apparently decided that giving Murkowski their ballot line is not in their interest and are therefore uninterested in her overtures.
Carolyn Maloney although her opponent seems annoying too. I know someone who met Maloney and she was not very nice to him.
Like Isakson he will win but both still have to actually campaign.
Because the Senate and it’s secret holds and such, Angle could really run amok.
A lot of these fringe candidates the GOP is running could really cause problems in the Senate – Paul, Miller, Buck, Rubio, Toomey, Johnson.
The senate needs to move to get rid of the secret hold and maybe chance the hold system altogether.
She has made plenty of enemies in her own party, and IMHO most everyone in the Nevada Republican establishment here is either sitting on one’s hands or becoming a “Republican for Reid”. Sharron Angle says all her loner votes means she’s “principled”, but her colleagues in the legislature didn’t see it that way… Especially when she voted against things like foreclosure assistance, a rental car tax in Clark County to pay for the Smith Performing Arts Center (Btw, she voted against this but voted FOR the Washoe County rental car tax to pay for the Reno Aces stadium… HUH??!!), and the 1999-2000 state budget (which cost much less than the 2005-06 state budget she voted FOR). Angle was just hard to work with, and that’s why hardly anyone in Carson City liked her.
Add this to her 2006 primary against Dean Heller and Dawn Gibbons in NV-02, her 2008 primary challenge to State Senate GOP Leader Bill Raggio, and this year’s nasty primary against Sue Lowden, and it’s easier to see the BIG problem Angle has with her own party.
I mean how many Democrats are talking about reducing spending and talking about the deficit?
That ad should have been up a long time ago. It’s great.
Roy Herron is out with a new ad touting his record of being tough on crime and predatory lending. He also reiterates his pledge to cut “the spending” and create jobs. This ad could have been a lot better.
http://politicalwire.com/archi…
http://www.rasmussenreports.co…
Was Jerry Brown’s ad up by 9/6? If so, I suspect that explains the tightening here.
Answering those who try to disparage various polls for one reason or another. Wanted to make sure everyone saw it.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyo…
I know a lot of people on this site go to Kos anyway, but I figure the Republicans probably don’t.
9/2-9/6
LePage (R) – 43%
Libby Mitchell (D) – 29%
Eliot Cutler (I) – 11%
Other (I) – 6%
http://www.publicpolicypolling…
Saw his web ad on the Teague ad link. Wikipedia says he’s using the CT4L party line and trying to namespam onto the other party lines.
Any idea which side he’d pull from? Wikipedia also says he got 2% when he ran for a CT General Assembly seat in 2008.
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/…
Calls civil rights a local issue and the federal government should not be involved in it.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo…
http://www.publicpolicypolling…
What’s fascinating is I think their voter model is way off, with a massive oversampling of Republicans and undersampling of Independents. Currently, I’d peg this race at…
GOP – 37%
Independent – 32%
Democrat – 31%
Perry – 87/53/5 = 51%
White – 13/47/95 = 49%
http://capitaltonight.com/2010…
BTW, NY1 hosted an Attorney General debate last night. Consensus among the analysts seemed to be front-runners Eric Schneiderman and Kathleen Rice actually fared the worst, with Sean Coffey performing strongest. I get the sense this is actually a complete jump-ball, with practically any of the candidates able to win. And, any of them could easily lose to the Republican nominee. So, predix here…
Schneiderman – 30%
Rice – 29%
Brodsky – 18%
Dinallo – 12%
Coffey – 11%
says Schilling 41, Hare 38. An improvement from the Schilling internal showing a double digit lead.
http://weaskamerica.com/2010/0…