Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. (9/27-10/3, likely voters, no trendlines):
Chris Coons (D): 53
Christine O’Donnell (R): 36
Undecided: 8
(MoE: ±3.5%)
In case there’s any doubt what a bullet we dodged here, FDU runs the hypothetical on a Chris Coons/Mike Castle election, and finds Castle would’ve won 50-36. They also find that Christine O’Donnell is better known than Coons (97% know her), but she has horrifying 30/48 favorables. (Uh, maybe that “I am not a crook witch” ad didn’t have its intended effect? I can’t imagine that the decision to put her in a black dress in front of a purple velvet curtain and arching a mysterious eyebrow toward the camera had anything to do with that. I mean, c’mon, she might as well have had some gargoyle candle holders behind her.)
Univ. of Delaware (9/16-30, likely voters, no trendlines):
Chris Coons (D): 49
Christine O’Donnell (R): 30
Undecided: 13John Carney (D): 48
Glen Urquhart (R): 31
Undecided: 16
(MoE: ±3.5%)
The University of Delaware is also out with poll numbers here; they have an unusually long time frame, almost going back to the conclusion of the primary. Still, they come up with a pretty similar spread (19 pts), if with slightly more undecideds. Perhaps not a surprise, Coons fares better among Republicans (77-20 for O’Donnell) than O’Donnell fares among Dems (92-7 for Coons). They also look at the open seat House race, which is looking like almost as much of a layup (I’d say slam dunk, but nothing’s a slam dunk this year): Dem John Carney leads by 17, again thanks to the GOP rabble’s decapitation of the alleged moderate in the primary. (We reported on FDU’s DE-AL numbers yesterday, with Carney leading 51-36.)
The other polls out recently have margins of 15, 11, 18 and 17. If you extrapolate that to other Republican polls (obviously you can’t) then the House is safe.
For that matter, Endora would make a better Senator.
Uh, I might better shut up before I get turned into a toad.
She’s a doppelganger! I mean, she’s you!
Most of the witches I know are pretty live-and-let-live, unlike O’Donnell’s fundegelism.