MO-Sen, OH-Sen: Looking For Challengers

Our friends over at Public Policy Polling are once again opening the floor for you to suggest Democratic candidates to include in their 2010 Senate match-up polls of Missouri (Kit Bond) and Ohio (George Voinovich). PPP has previously tested Robin Carnahan and Susan Montee against Bond in Missouri, so it’ll be interesting to see who they’ll choose next. Former Gov. Roger Wilson or Rep. Russ Carnahan, maybe?

In the 2010 race against Ohio Sen. George Voinovich, PPP has previously tested Betty Sutton, Tim Ryan, Mike Coleman, and Jennifer Brunner — all of whom posted competitive numbers. Who should be next?

If you feel so inclined, please swing by Public Policy Polling and drop them a note with your suggestions.

KY-03: Northup Fires Campaign Manager

This cannot be good news for Ann Northrup.

Republican Anne Northup, trying to regain her 3rd District congressional seat, has parted ways with her campaign manager, Scott Will, after disagreements that made it difficult for them to work together.

Anne and I have different personalities that really didn’t mesh real well,” Will said. “Anne is a great candidate, and I had a great experience here but it was just time to move on.”

Ted Jackson, Northup’s campaign chairman, said the issues appeared to “manifest themselves over a long period of time” and the two finally agreed yesterday that it wasn’t going to work.

Translation: She is losing. Look, you rarely fire your campaign manager when things are going well, even if you have “stylistic differences” (reminds me of the term “creative differences”). This is a bad time for her to be in disary. Perhaps she should realize it is also a bad time to be a Republican.

CO-Sen: NEA Spends $400K on New Ad Opposing Schaffer

The National Education Association’s PAC has just filed a $400,000 media buy against Republican Bob Schaffer in Colorado’s Senate race. That’s a pretty hefty buy, and together with the League of Conservation Voters, we’re seeing a lot of third-party money spent on Udall’s behalf so far this year. Anything that helps free up the DSCC’s hands to take care of other races is a good thing.

I haven’t seen a copy of the ad yet, but we’ll keep you posted.

TN-09: Ooops, One More Dive Into the Dumpster

Yesterday I discussed the ad from Nikki Tinker, the challenger in the TN-09 primary on Thursday, which made a visual linkage between Steve Cohen and a KKK rally. I assumed this was the Tinker campaign’s closing argument, ending the campaign on the most distasteful note possible.

Well, I was wrong. They’ve released another ad. In a race that’s been about gender and race, they’re back where they started: religion.

CHILD’S VOICE: “Now I lay me down to sleep…” ANNCR: “Who is the real Steve Cohen anyway?” CHILD’S VOICE: “I pray the Lord my soul to keep…” ANNCR: “While he’s in our churches, clapping his hands and tapping his feet…” CHILD’S VOICE: “If I should die before I wake…” ANNCR: “He is the only senator who thought our kids shouldn’t be allowed to pray in school.” CHILD’S VOICE: I pray the Lord my soul to take. ANNCR: “Congressman, sometimes apologies just aren’t enough.” TINKER: “I’m Nikki Tinker, and I approve this message.”

Note the narrator’s remarkably ham-fisted emphasis on “our” churches. (Cohen is Jewish.) Nice anti-Semitic dog-whistle… although it seems the Tinker campaign accidentally grabbed the bullhorn instead of the dog-whistle on the way out the door.

MO-GOV, MO-06, MO-09: Good Turnout for Democrats

For all the talk of “Red State Missouri”, Democrats did not do too shabbily when it came time to turn out and vote in the key state and congressional primaries last night.

First, if you look at the vote for governor Republican voting in a hotly contested party primary, only outperformed Jay Nixon and a minor opponent by 38,081 votes. In the Republican leaning MO-09 where both parties had contested primaries, Republicans outperformed Democrats by 3,312 votes.

The most important result, in my opinion, came out of the MO-06 where, with only 84% of the Democratic vote reporting, was running ahead of Sam Graves by 578 votes. Does primary turnout necessarily predict general election results? Not always. But it is a good measure of enthusiasm of party voters and, and when you take into account a number of factors, it looks like it is on our side.

FL-Sen: You’ve Got a Friend in Bob Graham

That’s what everybody’s sayin’.

Public Policy Polling takes another look at the 2010 Senate race (7/30-8/2, likely voters):

Bob Graham (D): 51

Mel Martinez (R-inc): 31

Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D): 38

Mel Martinez (R-inc): 37

(MoE: ±3.5%)

These are match-ups that you helped pick, although I’m not sure if there’s anyone who really thinks that Bob Graham would bust out of his retirement in order to run again for the Senate. Still, it would be a romp if he was willing.

A late June poll from PPP showed Martinez tied with Dem Rep. Robert Wexler and trailing Florida CFO Alex Sink by six points. It looks like this one will be a top tier race in 2010.

The importance of a ground game – down-ballot drop off

21st Century Democrats is excited about the extraordinary amount of enthusiasm Barack Obama’s nomination has generated. The Pew Research Center is suggesting increased voter turnout in the general election bodes well for Democrats. However, some stats from the primary season show that increased turnout for the presidential election doesn’t always help down-ballot races.

In fact, assuming a strong Presidential ticket will pull Democratic candidates in the House, the Senate, and local offices to victory is dangerous. This assumption is not in line with electoral empirics or America’s personality. Splitting tickets will always occur in our nation which prides itself on having a “maverick spirit” and values competence over loyalty. More importantly, many Americans will rightfully not vote for candidates they are unfamiliar with. Why would anyone put someone they know nothing about in a tremendous position of power? In the midst of all the excitement generated by the Obama campaign, we cannot forget that voters need to have face to face contact with canvassers for all our candidates, not just our candidate for President.

Looking at this year’s primaries, there is a substantial discrepancy between the number of people who voted for Democratic Presidential Candidates and the number of people who voted for other Democrats. Across the board, significantly less people voted for other Democratic candidates than voted for Democratic Presidential Candidates.

In Pennsylvania there was a stark disparity between votes accumulated by Democratic Presidential Candidates and Democrats running for other state-wide offices. There were only two contested statewide primaries in Pennsylvania this cycle. Below are two charts comparing the number of votes for Democratic Presidential candidates in April’s Primary with votes for Democrats running for State Treasurer in PA.

Candidate Votes Percent
CLINTON, HILLARY 1,275,039 54.6%
OBAMA, BARACK 1,061,441 45.4%

Total votes for Obama and Clinton in Pennsylvania = 2,336,480

*Obama and Clinton were the only Democrats on the ballot in PA

Candidate Votes Percent
MCCORD, ROBERT 783,675 43.2%
CORDISCO, JOHN F. 472,027 26.0%
MANN, JENNIFER L. 441,745 24.3%
MORRISON-WESLEY, DENNIS 118,696 6.5%

Total Votes for Democrats running for PA State Treasurer 1,661,549

There was a 674,931 vote or 29% disparity between Democrats who voted for our party’s candidates for State Treasurer and our parties candidates for President in Pennsylvania. That means nearly 3 out of every 10 people who voted in the presidential primary, gave the State Treasurer a pass.

In Ohio, two 21st Century Democrats’ endorsed candidates also were victims of down-ballot drop off. In the 1st Congressional District, there were a total of  115, 387 votes for Obama , Edwards and Clinton. Steve Dreihaus ran an uncontested and only got 60,454 votes, a 57,840 vote difference.  Nearly 1 out of every two voters who cast a vote for the Democratic nominee decided to not cast a vote for their Congressman.

In the 15th CD, Mary Jo Kilroy was also uncontested and received 85,840 votes. All the Presidential Candidates received 91,233 votes in total. That’s a 5, 393 vote drop off. Given Mary Jo’s 2006 election results, she can’t afford to have that sort of drop off.

Out in Oregon,  remember those Obama crowds? All that excitement generated 641, 499 total votes in the Democratic Presidential Primary. One would think that the heated primary for the Democratic Senatorial nominee would have little drop off. In spite of intense competition between two well funded campaigns less people voted for our Senatorial candidates than voted for our Presidential Candidates. In fact there was an almost 14% or 91,523 vote difference between total votes for Democratic Presidential Nominees and total votes for Democratic Senatorial Candidates in Oregon. How will Merkley beat Smith if he has to get 115% of Obama’s take in Oregon?

Why am I telling you this? Because at 21st Century Democrats, we believe that in order to have a true progressive revolution in America we’ll need a bottom up, not a top down, approach to elections and campaigns. We have been training and placing field organizers for two decades now. We know that many down-ballot races cannot depend on Obama’s team. They have a big enough task ahead.

21st Century Democrats is endorsing over fifty down-ballot candidates all over the country. For example Jim Roth is running for Corporate Commissioner in Oklahoma, and Andy Meisner is running for Oakland County Treasurer in Michigan. These candidates need resources to get field organizers hitting the doors, and cannot rely on Barack Obama’s field team to do it for them. The nation will not be changed without your help. We already have organizers in critical races across the country, but we need you to partner with us to get down-ballot candidates like Darcy Burner (WA-08), Dan Maffei (NY-25), Jim Himes (CT-4), Judy Baker (MO -9) and other progressives near you elected.

——-

Big thanks to Corey Goldiner, 21st Century Fellow, for doing most of the legwork and tracking down all these statistics.

PA-11: Barletta Posts Another Lead in New Internal Poll

Susquehanna Polling and Research for Lou Barletta (6/27-29, likely voters, 3/27-29 in parens):

Paul Kanjorski (D-inc): 41 (42)

Lou Barletta (R): 45 (47)

(MoE: ±5%)

Barletta coughs up another lead in a new internal poll, and although the numbers are probably best served with a grain of salt, it’s sort of telling that we haven’t seen rival numbers from Kanjorski or the DCCC. In fact, Kanjorski’s response to the poll doesn’t exactly inspire confidence:

A Kanjorski campaign spokesman declined to comment on the poll.

That’s the exact same response that Kanjorski’s camp gave in June. Weak, sir.

Kanjorski isn’t used to competitive campaigns, and the rust has clearly been showing in recent months with one gaffe after another. (Check out his latest bumbling interview with CBS news for his latest smash hit on the issue of earmarks.)

While it might be hard to believe that Barletta is leading (or will hold onto his lead) in a D+5 district, his aggressive populist campaign appears to be catching Kanjorski on the wrong footing.

SSP is changing its rating of this race from “Likely Democratic” to “Lean Democratic“.

VA-01: We have a challenger! Bill Day (D) enters race

After Keith Hummel dropped out, Democrats were left without a candidate for a while.  Well, no more.  From the Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star:

Democrats met Monday and nominated Warrenton businessman Bill Day, who last year unsuccessfully ran against Del. Scott Lingamfelter for a House of Delegates seat.

Day replaces Keith Hummel, a Westmoreland County doctor who withdrew from the race last week after his multiple past bankruptcy filings became an issue in the campaign.

Day holds an MBA from Harvard and spent several years as a mental health counselor. He owns interests in office buildings in Prince William County and said he holds the mineral rights to land in Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana, where he owns royalty interests and enters into lease agreements for companies to drill for oil and gas.

2010 FL-SEN

A new PPP of Florida just came out it showed the Presidential race within the MOE(McCain up 3) but readers of this site are more interested in the two potential 2010 senate matchups.

It shows Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz up one on Sen. Martinez but that Sen. Bob Graham would be up 20, 51-31 on Martinez. Also Martinez has an abominable 24/40 Approval/dissaproval rating.

It seems like Sink, Wexler and Schultz are all basically tied with Martinez while Graham would beat him soundly.

The moral of the story, Martinez is absolutely beatable by anyone but if we want to definitely win then get Graham in the race.

Edit: a link to the poll

http://www.publicpolicypolling…