2006 House Race Expenditure Round-up, Part Two

On Tuesday, we looked at the biggest non-party independent expenditures of 2006 in House races, and yesterday, we looked at expenditures of all kinds in 22 of the 23 races where Democratic challengers beat House Republican incumbents. Let’s pick up where we left off and take a look at the heartbreakers of 2006–34 competitive races where the Democratic candidate fell short of toppling an incumbent.

How do we define “competitive”? Well, in this study, I used a compromise of a number of metrics: races where either party committee made significant expenditures, races where the incumbent had a margin of victory under 15%, races with significant (usually $1M+) challenger expenditures, and races with significant independent expenditures. In most of these cases, there is significant overlap between those guidelines of “competitiveness”.

As usual, the “Spent” column indicates candidate expenditures, and “Other IEs” includes all independent expenditures made by PACs who filed with the FEC, but not 527 activity. I have also added a column on the far right indicating the incumbents’ margin of victory. In most cases I used Secretary of State numbers, but in a few races I relied upon CNN. All numbers were subject to rounding.

















































































































































































































































































































































































































































District Candidate Spent DCCC IEs Other IEs Incumbent Spent NRCC IEs Other IEs Victory Margin
AZ-01 Simon $1.5M (none) $128k Renzi $2.22M $24k $21k R+8
CA-04 Brown $1.65M (none) $53k Doolittle $2.35M $356k $10k R+3
CO-04 Paccione $1.93M $348k $237k Musgrave $3.18M $1.81M $16k R+2
CT-04 Farrell $2.94M $1.64M $183k Shays $3.72M $1.66M $2k R+3
FL-08 Stuart $992k (none) $5k Keller $1.66M (none) $102k R+7
IL-10 Seals $1.85M $158k $25k Kirk $3.48M (none) (none) R+7
IL-11 Pavich $526k (none) (none) Weller $1.84M (none) (none) R+10
IN-03 Hayhurst $691k (none) (none) Souder $634k $225k $1k R+8
KY-02 Weaver $878k $331k $104k Lewis $1.96M $42k $10k R+11
KY-04 Lucas $1.47M $2.71M $10k Davis $3.87M $2.31M $13k R+8
MI-08 Marcinkowski $551k (none) (none) Rogers $1.85M (none) $8k R+12
MI-09 Skinner $384k (none) (none) Knollenberg $2.78M (none) $3k R+5
NC-08 Kissell $683k (none) $200k Hayes $2.37M (none) $8k R+0
NE-01 Moul $979k (none) (none) Fortenberry $1.12M (none) $4k R+17
NE-02 Esch $411k (none) (none) Terry $962k (none) $1k R+9
NJ-07 Stender $1.89M $103k $3k Ferguson $2.92M $48k $16k R+1
NM-01 Madrid $3.32M $2M $1.17M Wilson $4.66M $2.03M $831k R+1
NV-03 Hafen $1.5M $308k $1.14M Porter $2.99M $476k $2k R+2
NY-03 Mejias $908k (none) (none) King $2.06M (none) $1k R+12
NY-25 Maffei $912k $446k $5k Walsh $1.77M $375k $51k R+2
NY-26 Davis $2.37M $423k $248k Reynolds $5.2M $1.03M* $32k R+4
NY-29 Massa $1.44M (none) $144k Kuhl $1.46M $233k $5k R+4
OH-01 Cranley $2M $1.28M $699k Chabot $2.95M $1.46M $21k R+5
OH-02 Wulsin $1.02M (none) $237k** Schmidt $750k $333k ? R+1
OH-12 Shamansky $1.64M (none) $3k Tiberi $2.97M (none) (none) R+15
OH-15 Kilroy $2.68M $1.62M $1.35M Pryce $4.63M $1.81M $82k R+0
PA-06 Murphy $4.04M $3.01M $222k Gerlach $3.46M $3.89M $52k R+1
PA-15 Dertinger $88k (none) (none) Dent $1.26M (none) (none) R+10
VA-02 Kellam $1.59M $1.16M $719k Drake $2.32M $1.36M $15k R+3
VA-10 Feder $1.54M (none) (none) Wolf $1.72M (none) $2k R+16
WA-05 Goldmark $1.15M $321k (none) McMorris $1.84M (none) $6k R+12
WA-08 Burner $2.98M $2.02M $727k Reichert $2.98M $2.36M $22k R+3
WV-02 Callaghan $614k (none) (none) Capito $3.07M $25k (none) R+14
WY-AL Trauner $927k (none) (none) Cubin $1.25M $249k $64k R+0
Total $50.1M $17.9M $7.6M $81.6M $22.1M $1.4M


Notes: *This expenditure was made by the RNC, not the NRCC.

**Due to the labyrinthian backstory of Jean Schmidt’s travails in OH-02 from 2005-06, it’s difficult to sort out which expenditures apply to which period of her career: the special election of 2005, the primary battle last spring, and the 2006 general. I did my best to sort it out, but the picture isn’t entirely clear. For that reason, take these figures with a grain of salt.

Unsurprisingly, Republicans enjoyed more of a financial edge in these races; combining all expenditures, there was a nearly $30 million gap between Republican and Democratic expenditures in these 34 districts. The NRCC did not swamp out the DCCC in these districts by a large margin. NRCC/RNC buys amounted to 55% of the party committee expenditures, while the DCCC was responsible for the remainder. This is very close to the 56-44 NRCC ratio in the seats that the Democrats did pick up from incumbents.

Obviously, this list will bring up some woulda-coulda-shouldas: imagine what Larry Kissell or Eric Massa or Linda Stender could have accomplished with more DCCC IEs, for instance. But it should also highlight some badly underperforming incumbents for next time: Knollenberg in MI-09, Terry in NE-02, and Dent in PA-15, for instance, all posted very underwhelming returns given the financial uncompetitiveness of each of their races.

Oh, and speaking of Linda Stender, here’s one maddening note from last November’s results: if the 3176 votes that the “Withdraw Troops Now Party” candidate won in NJ-07 had been cast for Stender instead, she would have won by about 250 votes. Sigh.

On the weekend, I’ll conclude this series with expenditure round-ups for competitive open seats and the select districts where Democratic incumbents were on the defensive.

2005/06 House Race Expenditure Round-up, Part One

Continuing our analysis of House race expenditures of the 05/06 elections cycle (we looked at the top ten non-party committee expenditures of the cycle on Tuesday), today I’ll be posting total expenditures from the 22 races where a Democratic challenger beat a Republican incumbent (with the exception of TX-23, where I haven’t been able to accumulate all the relevant data yet). And by total, I mean everything except expenditures from the shadowy 527s: candidate expenditures (listed under the “Spent” column), party committee expenditures, and independent expenditures from all sources.

Here’s what I’ve tallied up:






























































































































































































































































District Candidate Spent DCCC IEs Other IEs Incumbent Spent NRCC IEs Other IEs
AZ-05 Mitchell $1.89M $2.12M $1.02M Hayworth $2.94M $2.25M $7k
CA-11 McNerney $2.34M $216k $1.1M Pombo $4.51M $1.43M $18k
CT-02 Courtney $2.37M $2.07M $1k Simmons $3.09M $2.74M $14k
CT-05 Murphy $2.44M $2.08M $975k Johnson $4.98M $1.88M $456k
FL-22 Klein $4.14M $2.31M $25k Shaw $5.19M $3.35M $217k
IN-02 Donnelly $1.49M $918k $355k Chocola $3.39M $383k $43k
IN-08 Ellsworth $1.72M $2.21M $166k Hostettler $530k $1.87M $21k
IN-09 Hill $1.86M $3.08M $75k Sodrel $2.64M $3.25M $69k
IA-02 Loebsack $443k (none) (none) Leach $519k $21k (none)
KS-02 Boyda $655k $652k (none) Ryun $1.03M $272k (none)
KY-03 Yarmuth $2.2M $321k $5k Northup $3.4M $248k $1.01M
MN-01 Walz $1.23M $371k $722k Gutknecht $1.69M $409k $22k
NC-11 Shuler $1.75M $171k $267k Taylor $4.11M $1.54M $19k
NH-01 Shea-Porter $286k (none) (none) Bradley $856k $21k (none)
NH-02 Hodes $1.47M $1.12M $198k Bass $1.21M $472k $24k
NY-19 Hall $1.57M (none) $5k Kelly $2.46M $19k (none)
NY-20 Gillibrand $2.47M $789k $333k Sweeney $3.38M $592k (none)
PA-04 Altmire $1M $399k $739k Hart $2.17M $619k $19k
PA-07 Sestak $2.92M $1.93M $277k Weldon $2.89M $3.56M $13k
PA-08 Murphy $2.35M $1.72M $189k Fitzpatrick $3.13M $3.62M $11k
PA-10 Carney $1.51M $1.11M $683k Sherwood $2.27M $1.51M $10k
Total $38.1M $23.6M $7.1M $56.4M $30.1M $2M

Now, obviously, these numbers don’t tell anything close to the full story–they don’t discern between positive and negative expenditures, the nature of the expenditures, and the time frame of the expenditures. But the basic framework makes it a decent starting point for our discussion. Note that total expenditures from all sources gave the Republicans a nearly $20 million edge ($89M to $69M) in these 21 districts. Also note how the mediocre fundraising of former New Hampshire Reps. Bass ($1.2M) and Bradley ($0.86M) foreshadowed their surprise defeats last November. Another interesting fact: in this top tier of House races, Republican-allied PACs were almost nowhere to be found–in fact, if it weren’t for the $1 million spent by the National Association of Realtors PAC in support of Anne Northup (KY-03), Democrats would’ve enjoyed a 7-to-1 non-party IE advantage in these districts. Instead, they settled for 7-to-2.

Tomorrow I’ll be posting part two of this discussion, featuring expenditures from open seats, competitive races where Democratic challengers fell short, and the few races where Republican House challengers put Democratic incumbents on the defensive.