Let’s just say that I hope Obama finds someone else:
Barack Obama’s choice for secretary of Agriculture could take one Democrat from the 20-seat pickup the party gained by way of the recent elections. (Three House races have yet to be called and two seats in Louisiana will be filled on Dec. 6.)
According to reports, Obama is considering Reps. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) and Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-S.D.) for the USDA post. His transition team declined to comment on Cabinet speculation.
Should either of these seats open up, they would both be tough holds for Democrats, but Herseth’s in particular would be even harder. Obama did improve on past Democratic performances considerably in South Dakota, losing the state by 8 points (compared to Kerry’s 22-point loss here in 2004), but the Dem bench in South Dakota, by my estimation, is pretty thin. However, The Hill notes that state Senate Minority Leader Scott Heidepriem might be the Dems’ best bet in such a scenario.
Minnesota’s 7th District is also a pretty conservative area, although one with a stronger Democratic tradition. Kerry lost this CD by a 55-43 whipping in 2004, but McCain only won the district by a 50-47 margin earlier this month. If a popular state legislator with conservative creds in the mold of Peterson could be tapped, Democrats might be able to hold onto this seat, but it will undoubtedly be an expensive battle.
While I’m not automatically opposed to Obama tapping Congress for his Cabinet needs, I don’t think Obama should run the risk of giving the Republicans something to crow about with a special election victory in either of these seats. Surely another qualified candidate can be found for this job.
UPDATE (David): So I’ve done a little back-of-the-envelope math and I think the new PVI for MN-07 will be about R+8 (old PVI: R+6), while SD-AL will become R+11 (old PVI: R+10). This may seem counter-intuitive, given that Obama performed far better in both districts than Kerry & Gore did.
But given how the PVI formula works, Kerry’s 2004 performance in the district now gets compared to Obama’s 2008 nationwide results. Therefore, Obama’s strong national showing can make lagging districts – even those where we did better than in 2004 – look redder by comparison.
That said, the fact that we lost South Dakota by 8 points rather than 22 is a reason to cheer, even if the PVI now looks worse. But I still wouldn’t look forward to a special election here, no sir.