Redistricting Texas, y’all!

Ok, so I decided to take on Texas. My mindset for this map was that Republicans would be controlling it, but they would be exercising rationality, realizing their time of statewide domination may be nearing a close, and that throwing Democrats a few bones now is much better than throwing Democrats the entire map later in the decade. If you don’t think Republicans will wake up and smell the coffee and just gun for a dummymander, get your grain of salt ready now.

Of course, a special thanks goes out to Dave and his amazing Redistricting App for making this all possible.

North Texas:

South Texas:

Zoom-ins

Dallas-Fort Worth:

Houston:

San Antonio/Austin:

Photobucket

In detail:

Texas’s 1st Congressional District (Medium Blue)

-Tyler, Longview, Lufkin

67% White, 17% Black, 14% Hispanic

Texas’s 2nd Congressional District (Dark Green)

-Beaumont, Port Arthur, La Porte

64% White, 17% Black, 16% Hispanic

—Picks up Chambers & east Galveston Counties, along with some of the Whiter parts of the old TX-22’s portion of Harris County, while ceding part of the Spring area to the new TX-34

Texas’s 3rd Congressional District (Purple)

-Most of Plano, McKinney, Allen

65% White, 15% Hispanic, 10% Asian

—This area has grown ridiculously and is rapidly Dem-trending. It does shed some of south Collins County to shore up the TX-32, but staves off the coming demographic disaster by dropping the Garland area as well. To help compensate, it picks up some of exburban Collins County from the TX-4.

Texas’s 4th Congressional District (Red)

-Sherman, Texarkana, Paris

75% White, 11% Hispanic, 11% Black

Texas’s 5th Congressional District (School Bus Yellow)

-West Dallas, most of Mesquite, Most of Garland

57% White, 24% Hispanic, 13% Black

—This picks up most of the Garland area, and while that helps boosts the minority population significantly, it should be more than compensated by the uber-conservative rural population (though it drops some of that as well).

Texas’s 6th Congressional District (Teal)

-College Station, Huntsville, Corsicana

66% White, 18% Hispanic, 14% Black

—I ended up pulling this completely out of Tarrant County, making this an entirely exburban/rural district, which makes it more conservative and helps facilitate the creation of a new conservative-leaning district in south Tarrant County.

Texas’s 7th Congressional District (Light Grey)

-West Houston, Bellaire

58% White, 27% Hispanic

—Picks up some of the Katy area while dropping some Hispanic-majority blocks. The long-term prognosis for keeping this district Republican still isn’t fantastic, but it’s that much better than it was.  

Texas’s 8th Congressional District (Steel Blue)

-The Woodlands, Conroe

75% White, 15% Hispanic

Texas’s 9th Congressional District (Cyan)

-Southwest Houston, part of Missouri City

36% Black, 35% Hispanic, 15% White, 12% Asian

—Keeping this plurality African-American was not fun (though admittedly it would have been easier if I weren’t trying to keep Hispanics out of the TX-7). What are the odds this ratio holds out until 2020? Is there precedent for congressional districts transitioning from one protected group until the other?

Texas’s 10th Congressional District (Rose)

-Part of Austin, Pflugerville, Gonzales

64% White, 23% Hispanic

—Pulling out of Harris County doesn’t really help Michael McCaul, but dropping some heavily-Hispanic parts of Austin and picking up several heavily-Republican rural counties and the more conservative parts of the old TX-21’s section of Travis County, so this should be a net-gain. The time is coming when the premise of having a Republican-leaning district taking in a large portion of Austin is ridiculous, but this is probably the best bet for holding on in the meantime.

Texas’s 11th Congressional District (Chartreuse)

-Midland, Odessa, San Angelo

60% White, 35% Hispanic

—With Charlie Stenholm long gone, I went ahead and smoothed out the west Texas districts because none of them are electing a Republican any time remotely soon.

Texas’s 12th Congressional District (Cornflower Blue)

-West Fort Worth, Haltom City

60% White, 29% Hispanic

—Takes in a little more of inner-city Fort Worth, but Granger is (relatively speaking) fairly moderate so it should be a non-issue.

Texas’s 13th Congressional District (Coral Pink)

-Amarillo, Wichita Falls, Pampa

65% White, 26% Hispanic

Texas’s 14th Congressional District (Olive)

-Victoria, Lake Jackson, Seguin

53% White, 36% Hispanic

—Pulls out of Galveston County and picks up more rural counties in Central Texas that the Rio Grande Valley districts have to drop, which does increase the Hispanic population notably. It doesn’t appear to have a major impact on the Republican performance.

Texas’s 15th Congressional District (Orange)

-McAllen, Harlingen, Edinburg

87% Hispanic, 11% White

—This area has grown a ton, so it officially gets to stop being a strip. Neato.

Texas’s 16th Congressional District (Green)

-El Paso, Socorro

81% Hispanic, 14% White

Texas’s 17th Congressional District (Ultramarine)

-Waco, Kileen, Temple

57% White, 22% Hispanic, 17% Black

—The Democratic performance improves significantly here, as the district picks up part of Williamson County and all of Bell County to take the heat off of John Carter and to provide Joe Barton with an entirely non-Metroplex district. I’d guesstimate that McCain still won this district with about 59%-60%, so it hardly leans Democratic (if anything, Chet Edwards might be in more danger from a Republican who can outperform in Bell and Williamson Counties) but it’s not like the Republicans would be interested in helping Edwards out anyway. Realistic? What are your thoughts?

Texas’s 18th Congressional District (Yellow)

-Central Houston

41% Black, 38% Hispanic, 15% White

—Has to shed several Hispanic areas to the TX-29 District to keep African-Americans in the driver’s seat.

Texas’s 19th Congressional District (June Bud)

-Lubbock, Abilene, Big Spring

62% White, 30% Hispanic

—Again, Charlie Stenholm will be but a memory by 2012, so smoothing out these lines and making this district vaguely more Democratic shouldn’t be an issue.

Texas’s 20th Congressional District (Pink)

-Central San Antonio

72% Hispanic, 20% White

Texas’s 21st Congressional District (Maroon)

-North San Antonio, New Braunfels, Universal City

62% White, 28% Hispanic

—Becomes more San Antonio-based than ever taking in most of Bexar County’s predominately White areas. It drops the Austin area and some of its rural Counties.

Texas’s 22nd Congressional District (Chocolate)

-Sugarland, most of League City, part of Missouri City

56% White, 22% Hispanic, 11% Asian

—This drops its portions of Pasadena, La Porte and most of Pearland while picking up more of Galveston County.  Should be a bit more Republican overall.

Texas’s 23rd Congressional District (Aqua)

-South San Antonio, Del Rio, Pecos

70% Hispanic, 21% White

—The Hispanic population goes up because it now takes in a greater share of South San Antonio along with a few more Hispanic neighborhoods on the east side. Probably still not totally out of reach for Republicans, but it’ll be a little harder than it was. They could make this district more conservative but they’d probably be kinda hesitant given its legal history.

Texas’s 24th Congressional District (Royal Purple)

-Most of Carrollton, Euless, Grapevine,

62% White, 17% Hispanic, 12% Black

—Dropping the Grand Prairie area is a big help to Kenny Marchant, though this district does have to pick up some kinda-competitive areas in north Arlington and central Fort Worth. Still should be conservative enough to hold up through 2020.

Texas’s 25th Congressional District (Salmon Pink)

-Part of Austin, San Marcos

43% White, 42% Hispanic

—Shrinks considerable, mostly to help Michael McCaul. It might actually be plurality Hispanic by 2010, though it would likely still be dominated by liberal Whites, so I don’t know if it would qualify as a protected district.

Texas’s 26th Congressional District (Gray)

-Denton, Frisco, Lewisville

72% White, 16% Hispanic

—Drops central Fort Worth which, along with the new exburban Collins County portion, which makes it much more conservative. Maybe too much so? Should these lines be altered to somehow take the heat off of Pete Sessions? Is that even possible?

Texas’s 27th Congressional District (Spring Green)

-Corpus Christi, Brownsville, Kingsville

71% Hispanic, 25% White

Texas’s 28th Congressional District (Mauve)

-Laredo, Mission, Eagle Pass

91% Hispanic

—Would a 91% Hispanic district even be legal? This really isn’t that gerrymandered; it moves out of its awkward chunk of Bexar County and consolidates the voices in the Central Rio Grande Valley. But still, as one of (the?) least White districts in the nation, would this count as packing even if it makes geographical sense?

Texas’s 29th Congressional District (Tea Green)

-East & North Houston, Galena Park

63% Hispanic, 21% White, 13% Black

—The percentage of the population which is Hispanic actually drops somewhat in part because of the new TX-33 to the immediate South which takes the old TX-29’s portions of north Pasadena and east Houston, but Hispanics are still the decisive majority.

Texas’s 30th Congressional District (Carnation Pink)

-South Dallas, DeSoto

44% Black, 37% Hispanic, 17% White

—This district had actually slipped to plurality Hispanic as of 2007, so give that I was creating a new Hispanic-protected district next door, the goal here was to make this district plurality African-American again.

Texas’s 31st Congressional District (Cream)

-Round Rock, Copperas Cove, Cleburne

72% White, 18% Hispanic

— The Austin suburbs are looking fairly purple, and it looks pretty plausible that Williamson County will follow the tradition of other suburban areas of “creative class” cities like Clackamas and Washington Counties outside Portland and eastern King County outside Seattle and turn a nice shade of blue as the young, well-educated city dwellers begin to “grow up” and move to suburbs, yet still maintain a lot of their liberal values. The current TX-31 is holding up better than some other Texas districts right now, but I think, if left in the same basic iteration, it would probably be the 2nd or 3rd district to slip out of Republican hands in the next decade after the current TX-32 and maybe the current TX-10. So, in short, this picked up several rural counties from the old TX-11 and TX-17.

Texas’s 32nd Congressional District (Tangerine)

-North Dallas, part of Irving, Richardson

53% White, 29% Hispanic

—More than any other district, the TX-32 was looking at imminent catastrophe. Demographically speaking, as of 2007, Whites were only about 1% more of the population than Hispanics, and Obama made an impressive 46% showing here. The creation of the new TX-33 District allowed the TX-32 to cede several Hispanic areas in west Dallas, south Irving and Farmer’s Branch, and instead picks up some conservative areas of south Collins County (it was needed to shrink in population somewhat anyway).  This district will probably still be competitive by the end of the next decade, but that’s better than leaning Democratic, which is would be with the current format.

Whew, anyone still with me? Ok. Let’s look at my ideas for the 4 new districts

Texas’s 33rd Congressional District (Persian Blue)

-Southeast Houston, part of Pasadena, most of Pearland

52% Hispanic, 28% White, 15% Black

—The idea behind this district is take the pressure off of Houston area Republican congressmembers, pretty much all of whom would be in various states of vulnerability in the next several years unless the Hispanic population in their districts stay static or are reduced. It gets kinda meandering at some points, especially as it goes down to take in its Galveston County portion, which actually for the most part is more African-American than Hispanic, but that helps TX-22.

Texas’s 34th Congressional District (Bright Green)

-Katy, Tomball, Brenham

64% White, 22% Hispanic

—Western Harris County is notorious for its sprawl, and this district should lean pretty strongly Republican, especially with its added rural counties. It should be Republican enough that taking in the Hispanic areas that it does from the 9th shouldn’t be a huge deal.

Texas’s 35th Congressional District (Lavender)

-Part of Dallas, part of Grand Prairie, part of Arlington

58% Hispanic, 22% White, 15% Black

—Even if Republicans aren’t as rational as the previous districts would suggest, they’d have to be stunningly foolish and short sided to not put up a Hispanic-majority district in the Dallas area. I’d be surprised if the Justice Department doesn’t order at least one new Hispanic-majority district anyway, and this would be the best place to put it. Anyway, this district vaguely resembles Martin Frost’s old district, taking in part of Arlington and Fort Worth, crossing over into Grand Prairie, west Dallas, south Irving, and then up to Farmer’s Branch and a shameful sliver of north Dallas. Frankly, this district is a little gross, but it takes Pete Sessions, Kenny Marchant, and Eddie Bernice Johnson (or, as far as what Republicans will actually care about, their asses if they don’t protect the African-America community of south and downtown Dallas) out of hot water, so there you go.

Texas’s 36th Congressional District (Gold)

-Part of Fort Worth, part of Arlington, Mansfield

58% White, 23% Hispanic, 13% Black

—Takes in south Fort Worth, south Arlington, a sorta awkward part of southwestern Dallas County, and in to most of rapidly growing Johnson and Ellis Counties. Should lean pretty strongly Republican, though maybe not as strongly as I’d like.

So there you go. Comments? Remember, this map, while certainly favorable to Republicans, assumes some rationality, and that they recognize that throwing us a few bones now will present  a world of hurt later, but do you think they’ll be dumb enough to shoot for a dummymander? Assume that Pete Sessions has his finger on the pulse of the Hispanic voice and that when Democrats in Austin move to the suburbs they’ll instantly become flat-out neo-con Texas-secessionists? And what might a compromise map look like if we do manage to pick up the Texas House or Texas Governor?

19 thoughts on “Redistricting Texas, y’all!”

  1. You got it right. I drew something very similar. More west Travis County than north, bit that was it. The Dems are going into the redrawing with 3 wishes at a minimum. A minority dem district in DFW, a safer Ciro (easy) and a safer Chet Edwards and this district does a lot, especially in preventing an endangered John Carter in 2018 or so.

  2. TX-2 – You gave Ted Poe NASA. Olson won’t let that happen with his Navy Vet profile picture that was on all his mailers dick of a congressman I got

    TX-6 – Barton lives in Tarrant county. I’d drop College Station in order to run up and grab some of the suburbs around Arlington.

    TX-10 – What you just made is more toss up than it was. McCaul also lives in Harris, so he’d be running in the new 34th. Give this district College Station, cause this is not staying R. You can morph it around by giving Chet Edwards some of Travis County.

    TX-22 – BAH! You found a way to keep Olson around for another 10 years. Seriously though, he’s gonna want the pcts. in Harris county that include NASA.

    TX-26 – More likely to grab Cooke County than Collin County. You got rid of the minority parts of Tarrant county, it doesn’t need the population rich safety of Collin.

    TX-31 – Ehh . . .  it works . . . Somehow.

    TX-33 – Really? Hispanic southeast Houston, bypassing Clear Lake going down to the island? This won’t fly.

    TX-36 – This is actually pretty good for Barton. Nice job making it.

  3. and my map was specifically designed to be a GOP gerrymander. The four new seats I created were:

    1 safe Dem VRA district in Dallas-Fort Worth like your 35th. It was 57% Hispanic and 21% black if memory serves.

    3 very Republican districts — one in north Houston/Montgomery County, one in North Texas connecting rural counties with DFW suburbs, and one between the Hill Country and the coast.

    I also did nothing to protect Chet Edwards, but also didn’t target him aggressively as I think Republicans would rather preserve what they have in Central Texas, and McCaul and Carter won’t benefit from a damaged Edwards. And the other major difference: I gave Gene Green a district that would be very, very likely to elect an Hispanic in the Democratic primary, with a Latino pop. of 76% (his current 29th is in the high 60’s, but I think Republicans will cram Latinos into this district to kill two birds with one stone: knock out a senior incumbent Democrat, and keep the Hispanic % low in Houston’s GOP districts).

    Good work! There seems to be an emerging consensus that GOP gerrymandering is nearly maxed-out in Texas and they will have to swallow a new Democratic seat in the Metroplex one way or another.

  4. and not think that the Republicans are going to try and take all of the new seats for themselves. I’m sure that, at least in the first instance, it’s possible.

    Whether it would hold up for the whole decade is a different question.  

  5. turn TX-14 into a Hispanic plurality district if you find someway to put Duval and Jim Wells into that district (and you could make TX-28 whiter too).

  6. I really like what you did with South Texas – expanding the 14th out to exurban San Antonio never occurred to me!  And I love that you managed to give the GOP a district a lot like they originally wanted for the 21st, but in such a way that Chet Edwards indirectly benefits the most.

    One final thought, and a question: first, I definitely appreciate that you’ve gone quite some ways towards getting rid of the fajita strips that the Texas GOP benefits so much from having around.  Second, did you intentionally split Fort Hood between Chet Edwards and John Carter?  I don’t whether or not Rep. Carter has parlayed the base in his district into appropriate chairmanships or other nice committee appointments, but I would imagine a more senior member in the majority party would be able to better advocate for the base.

    As for a compromise map, you have my creative juices going again to finish mine up!  Oooh, I love it when somebody posts something on Texas redistricting!

  7. about Republicans playing nice with this map, but for the wrong reasons.

    Much like California Dems after the 2000 Census, Texas Republicans will realize that they can’t really hope to gain much more than they already have.  Of course, they also should realize that Dems will be seeking payback for the 2004 re-redistricting the next time they’re in power, but…

    In any case, of the 11 remaining Democratic districts at least nine are VRA-protected.  Doggett’s may or may not be, but no Republican in his right mind wants any part of central Austin either way, so they’ll probably leave him alone.  And it’s hard to imagine how they could make Edwards’ district more Republican than it already is without endangering one of their own.  As it is, some of their incumbents are already on pretty shaky ground, so it’s not in their interest to get greedy this time around.

    As for the new seats… it’s hard to see how Republicans could do much better than a split with the changing demographics in the state.  The fastest-growing areas of Texas are either already Democratic (South Texas) or trending that way (Dallas, Houston, most of the I-35 corridor.)

  8. I’m glad we at least had the same idea on northern Texas, but aside from that our ideas look pretty different. I didn’t like my map when I realized, about 3/4ths of hte way through, I’d drawn the best gerrymander Republicans could ever hope for by trying to follow the compact rule with cities and realizing that in Texas the minorities just don’t tend to cluster in large areas but are more spread out, especially in Houston and Ft. Worth.

Comments are closed.