StephenCLE’s House Predictions 2010 – June Ratings Update

So here’s the other side of Capitol Hill, and the view from it this month.  Since starting this projection back in February, the red wave has grown marginally every month that I’ve gone forward.  This month, at the margins, the wave is continuing to grow higher even though the ratings changes were much more split.  There were fewer ratings changes this month than last month as well, 17 of them in total.  I’ll run through them quickly, but first a bit of housekeeping.  

Up to this point, I have been purposely keeping on the watch list (likely D to likely R range) races in which an incumbent is facing a PVI of more than 13 points in favor of the opposite party.  This month I do away with that rule, which impacted a few races.  Also, up to this point I’ve been following Charlie Cook’s custom of never putting an incumbent in a worse position than tossup unless their PVI was overwhelmingly in favor of the opposition party.  This month I’ve thrown that rule away as well, although there were only a few cases in which I thought about moving an incumbent into underdog status.

So from now on, it’s all gut instinct.  Onto this month’s ratings changes:

1.Minnesota-7 – Likely Democrat to Solid Democrat – I was holding out on this race because of the toughness of Peterson’s district, but seeing how the republicans didn’t get any solid candidates of note into this race, it’s moving off the board.  

2.California-11 – Lean Democrat to Toss Up – This race kinda caught me off guard, but I do think Jerry McNerney is in a lot more trouble than I would have thought a few months ago.  David Harmer, who performed very well against John Garamendi in CA-10 last year, steamrolled to a victory in the republican primary here yesterday.  I think he’s very legitimate.  Worse, since both of the statewide races are closer than the presidential race was in 2004 or 2008, it’s likely that Whitman/Fiorina will carry this district up-ballot, which will put a lot of pressure on McNerney to get voters to split their tickets.  The way I see it, this race is right in the same boat as CA-3 now.

3.Illinois-11 – Lean Democrat to Toss Up/Dem Retention – I’m really not feeling bullish about Debbie Halvorson’s chances in this district anymore, not necessarily because of what she’s done personally, but because the democratic brand in Illinois seems to be going to hell in a handbasket.  With the top of the ticket of Quinn and Giannoulias likely to get demolished here in November, I think as a freshman, Halvorson is really going to have to hustle to offset the coming red wave here.  Also, the Illinois districts could be particularly vulnerable to a wave because of the home state effect in 2008 making the PVIs here look better than they really are.  And then there’s the fact that polling has her behind republican challenge Adam Kinzinger

4.Illinois-14 – Lean Democrat to Toss Up/Dem Retention – See Illinois-11 above.  Bill Foster’s district is politically very similar to Halvorson’s, and if she’s losing to a ragtag operation like Adam Kinzinger’s campaign, you know Foster can’t be in a much better position.  Thus, he gets dropped as well.

5.New York-13 – Lean Democrat to Likely Democrat – Mike McMahon’s position has greatly improved in the past month.  Facing a challenge from the working family’s party and a unified attack from the right, things didn’t look good.  But now the GOP and conservative parties in New York are now fighting again, and the WFP doesn’t to be in a position to mount much of a challenge.  It’s possible that the republican and conservative lines will be split a la NY-23 in 2009.

6.Ohio-16 – Lean Democrat to Toss Up/Dem Retention – This one I’m moving mostly based on what I’m seeing on the ground here in northeast Ohio.  The Medina County GOP’s infamous mailer about nearby congresswoman Betty Sutton “getting thrown out of the house and into the kitchen” seems to be a reflection of how things are going in the rural reaches of Boccieri’s district.  Though that crap is hugely unpopular in metro Cleveland, this district is a little further out, exurby type, and the tea party seems to be organizing well here.  Republican candidate Jim Renacci has been strong to this point.  I now think that despite Boccieri’s almost star status in the Ohio GOP, that this district might be shifting under his feet a bit, and his vote for HCR really sent some people into a tizzy.  Toss up.

7.Ohio-13 – Lean Democrat to Likely Democrat – While we’re talking about it, that controversial and sexist mailer from the Medina County GOP was an unexpected punch to the gut for Tom Ganley in his bid to unseat Betty Sutton.  Sutton has now picked up a lot of sympathy from locals here in Ohio-13, particularly from women voters.  OH-13, my home district, is a mix of upscale suburbs and working class industrial areas south and west of Cleveland, and this kind of stuff doesn’t play well here.  While Ganley’s favorables probably haven’t been affected, Sutton’s have probably seen a nice bump.

8.California-3 – Toss Up/Dem Takeover to Toss Up/Rep Retention – I admit it, from the start I was perhaps a little too bullish on this district.  I think that even though California is blue and likes Obama, and even though Ami Bera is still out-campaigning and out-fundraising incumbent Dan Lungren, the inevitable wins at the top of the ticket here by Whitman and Fiorina are going to be very tough to overcome.  So I dial down the enthusiasm a bit here.

9.Idaho-1 – Toss Up/Rep Takeover to Toss Up/Dem Retention – This is a very unusual race to look at.  On one hand, the district is extremely conservative, and really all the republican nominee should have to say is “he voted for Pelosi” and it’s over.  But strangely, and I know his voting record has been conservative but still, Walt Minnick has been able to get most of ID-1 to like him enough to where they look beyond his party affiliation.  The great thing is that the GOP has botched this one up from the beginning too, as NRCC pick Vaughn Ward went Bill Sali 2.0 and went up in flames.  At this point, I gotta like Minnick’s chances at a retention.

10.Iowa-3 – Toss Up/Rep Takeover to Toss Up/Dem Retention – Walt Minnick isn’t the only incumbent looking better today.  Leonard Boswell’s chances went up following Tuesday night’s primary as the NRCC and the republican establishment screwed the pooch here too.  Their fave, and probably their best candidate, wrestling coach Jim Gibbons, fell against state senator Brad Zaun, who was reportedly a target of republican offers as power brokers tried to get him out of the race.  Given this dynamic, I wonder if the republican electorate could end up somewhat divided.  Either way, Boswell is probably the favorite now to retain the seat despite what could be a scary situation up-ballot with Terry Branstad and Chuck Grassley zooming to victory.

11.New Mexico-2 – Toss Up/Dem Retention to Toss Up/Rep Takeover – Once again, here’s a race that’s less about the candidate than what is going on around him/her.  A month ago, it appeared that Harry Teague would be getting some nice up-ballot coattails from Diane Denish in the governor’s race.  But now that race has turned into a toss up thanks to the emergence of Susana Martinez on the GOP side.  That means that she’ll be carrying NM-2 in that race, probably handily, and that puts Teague on the defensive against Pearce, who has lots of money and will likely be hammering Teague over his cap-n-trade vote, which was very unpopular here.

12.Pennsylvania-6 – Toss Up Dem Takeover to Lean Republican – This race has changed a lot in the past month as well.  I rated this race a great chance for a democratic takeover mostly because of Gerlach’s getting out and flip-flopping, as well as Doug Pike’s strong financial backing.  But now that his campaign flamed out miserably and Minan Trevedi won the democratic nomination, I don’t see a pickup as very likely anymore.  Maybe Trevedi could win an open seat, but in this environment, beating Gerlach is going to be an uphill climb.

13.Pennsylvania-12 – Toss Up/Dem Retention to Lean Democrat – I had figured that Mark Critz would defeat Tim Burns in the special election last month, but I wouldn’t have expected a 9-point cruise.  In the wake of that result, I feel good enough moving this race to lean.

14.Arkansas-2 – Lean Republican to Likely Republican – With Joyce Elliott’s win in last night’s AR-2 runoff, I really don’t feel good about this race anymore.  Tim Griffin’s road just got a lot easier, presumably because Elliott is more liberal than Wills would have been, and there’s also that sticky fact of her being a black woman in one of the most racist states in the nation in terms of voting habits.

15.Illinois-13 – Likely Republican to Solid Republican – The bad top of the ticket for Team Blue kills it for Scott Harper, who couldn’t even beat Judy Biggert in a solidly democratic year, much less a bad one.

16.Arkansas-1 – Toss Up/Dem Retention to Lean Republican – I think I erred on this seat a bit when I moved it back into the democratic column.  The way things are going in Arkansas, Generic R could beat just about any democrat.  The red wave is going to crest really, really high in Arkansas this year, and Boozman will be providing coattails.  Chad Causey will have to run a perfect campaign and make things local in nature to have much of any shot.

17.Utah-2 – Likely Democrat to Solid Democrat – I was holding out on this race to see if the Republicans could put up a halfway decent challenger to Jim Matheson.  Well, they haven’t, and even in a district this conservative, I feel good about moving this one off the board.  You have to wonder if Matheson will go for the Senate in 2012, especially if Orrin Hatch gets teabagged and/or retires.

Total House Math for June:

Old House – 256 Democrats, 179 Republicans

New House – 231 Democrats, 204 Republicans

National Swing – Republicans +25

Democratic Pickups (4) – DE-1, IL-10, LA-2, HI-1

Republican Pickups (29) – WV-1, AR-2, LA-3, TN-6, IN-8, KS-3, NH-2, NY-29, AL-2, CO-4, FL-2, MD-1, MI-1, MI-7, MS-1, NV-3, NH-1, NY-24, ND-1, OH-1, PA-11, TN-4, TN-8, TX-17, VA-2, VA-5, WA-3, AR-1

Pickup Changes from last month:

Democrat to Republican – AR-1, PA-6, CA-3, NM-2

Republican to Democrat – IA-3, ID-1

2010 House Big Board (as of June update)

Solid Dem – 165 seats:

AL-7, AZ-4, AZ-7, AR-4, CA-1, CA-5, CA-6, CA-7, CA-8, CA-9, CA-10, CA-11, CA-12, CA-13, CA-14, CA-15, CA-16, CA-17, CA-18, CA-20, CA-23, CA-27, CA-28, CA-29, CA-30, CA-31, CA-32, CA-33, CA-34, CA-35, CA-37, CA-38, CA-39, CA-43, CA-51, CA-53, CO-1, CO-2, CT-1, CT-2, CT-3, FL-3, FL-11, FL-17, FL-19, FL-20, FL-23, GA-4, GA-5, GA-12, GA-13, HI-2, IL-1, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-12, IL-17, IN-1, IN-7, IA-1, IA-2, ME-2, MD-2, MD-3, MD-4, MD-5, MD-7, MD-8, MA-1, MA-2, MA-3, MA-4, MA-5, MA-6, MA-7, MA-8, MA-9, MI-5, MI-12, MI-13, MI-14, MI-15, MN-4, MN-5, MN-7, MN-8, MS-2, MO-1, MO-5, NV-1, NJ-1, NJ-6, NJ-8, NJ-9, NJ-10, NJ-13, NM-3, NY-2, NY-4, NY-5, NY-6, NY-7, NY-8, NY-9, NY-10, NY-11, NY-12, NY-14, NY-15, NY-16, NY-17, NY-18, NY-21, NY-22, NY-27, NY-28, NC-1, NC-2, NC-4, NC-7, NC-12, NC-13, OH-9, OH-10, OH-11, OH-17, OK-2, OR-1, OR-3, OR-4, PA-1, PA-2, PA-13, PA-14, RI-2, SC-6, TN-5, TN-9, TX-9, TX-15, TX-16, TX-18, TX-20, TX-25, TX-27, TX-28, TX-29, TX-30, UT-2, VT-1, VA-3, VA-8, WA-1, WA-2, WA-6, WA-7, WA-9, WV-3, WI-2, WI-4

Likely Dem – 28 seats:

Arizona-1 (Kirkpatrick)

California-36 (Harman)

California-47 (Sanchez)

Colorado-7 (Perlmutter)

Connecticut-4 (Himes)

Connecticut-5 (Murphy)

Delaware-1 (Open)

Indiana-2 (Donnelly)

Kentucky-3 (Yarmuth)

Louisiana-2 (Cao)

Maine-1 (Pingree)

Michigan-9 (Peters)

Minnesota-1 (Walz)

Missouri-3 (Carnahan)

New Jersey-12 (Holt)

New Mexico-1 (Heinrich)

New York-20 (Murphy)

New York-25 (Maffei)

North Carolina-11 (Shuler)

Ohio-6 (Wilson)

Ohio-13 (Sutton)

Ohio-18 (Space)

Pennsylvania-3 (Dahlkemper)

Pennsylvania-4 (Altmire)

Pennsylvania-17 (Holden)

Rhode Island-1 (Open)

Virginia-11 (Connelly)

Wisconsin-3 (Kind)

Lean Dem – 22 seats:

Arizona-5 (Mitchell)

Arizona-8 (Giffords)

Colorado-3 (Salazar)

Florida-8 (Grayson)

Georgia-2 (Bishop)

Georgia-8 (Marshall)

Kentucky-6 (Chandler)

Mississippi-4 (Taylor)

Missouri-4 (Skelton)

New Jersey-3 (Adler)

New York-13 (McMahon)

New York-23 (Owens)

North Carolina-8 (Kissell)

Oregon-5 (Schrader)

Pennsylvania-8 (Murphy)

Pennsylvania-10 (Carney)

Pennsylvania-12 (Critz)

South Carolina-5 (Spratt)

South Dakota-1 (Herseth)

Texas-23 (Rodriguez)

Virginia-9 (Boucher)

Wisconsin-8 (Kagen)

Toss Up – 39 seats:

Alabama-2 (Bright)

California-3 (Lungren)

California-11 (McNerney)

Colorado-4 (Markey)

Florida-2 (Boyd)

Florida-22 (Klein)

Florida-24 (Kosmas)

Florida-25 (Open)

Hawaii-1 (Djou)

Idaho-1 (Minnick)

Illinois-10 (Open)

Illinois-11 (Halvorson)

Illinois-14 (Foster)

Indiana-9 (Hill)

Iowa-3 (Boswell)

Maryland-1 (Kratovil)

Massachusetts-10 (Open)

Michigan-1 (Open)

Michigan-7 (Schauer)

Mississippi-1 (Childers)

Nevada-3 (Titus)

New Hampshire-1 (Shea-Porter)

New Mexico-2 (Teague)


New York-1 (Bishop)

New York-19 (Hall)

New York-24 (Arcuri)

North Dakota-1 (Pomeroy)

Ohio-1 (Driehaus)


Ohio-15 (Kilroy)

Ohio-16 (Boccieri)

Pennsylvania-7 (Open)

Pennsylvania-11 (Kanjorski)

Tennessee-4 (Davis)

Tennessee-8 (Open)

Texas-17 (Edwards)

Virginia-2 (Nye)

Virginia-5 (Perriello)

Washington-3 (Open)


Wisconsin-7 (Open)

Lean Rep – 12 seats:

Arkansas-1 (Open)

California-45 (Bono Mack)

Indiana-8 (Open)

Kansas-3 (Open)


Minnesota-6 (Bachmann)

Nebraska-2 (Terry)

New Hampshire-2 (Open)

New York-29 (Open)


Ohio-12 (Tiberi)

Pennsylvania-6 (Gerlach)

Pennsylvania-15 (Dent)

Washington-8 (Reichert)

Likely Rep – 18 seats:

Alabama-5 (Open)

Alaska-1 (Young)

Arizona-3 (Open)

Arkansas-2 (Open)

California-19 (Open)

California-44 (Calvert)

California-48 (Campbell)

Florida-12 (Open)

Indiana-3 (Souder)

Kansas-4 (Open)

Louisiana-3 (Open)

Michigan-3 (Open)

Missouri-8 (Emerson)

South Carolina-2 (Wilson)

Tennessee-6 (Open)

Texas-32 (Sessions)

Virginia-1 (Wittman)

West Virginia-1 (Open)

Solid Rep – 151 seats:

AL-1, AL-3, AL-4, AL-6, AZ-2, AZ-6, AR-3, CA-2, CA-4, CA-21, CA-22, CA-24, CA-25, CA-26, CA-40, CA-41, CA-42, CA-46, CA-49, CA-50, CA-52, CO-5, CO-6, FL-1, FL-4, FL-5, FL-6, FL-7, FL-9, FL-10, FL-13, FL-14, FL-15, FL-16, FL-18, FL-21, GA-1, GA-3, GA-7, GA-9, GA-10, GA-11, ID-2, IL-6, IL-13, IL-15, IL-16, IL-18, IL-19, IN-4, IN-5, IN-6, IA-4, IA-5, KS-1, KS-2, KY-1, KY-2, KY-4, KY-5, LA-1, LA-4, LA-5, LA-6, LA-7, MD-6, MI-2, MI-4, MI-6, MI-8, MI-10, MI-11, MN-2, MN-3, MS-3, MO-2, MO-6, MO-7, MO-9, MT-1, NE-1, NE-3, NV-2, NJ-2, NJ-5, NJ-4, NJ-7, NJ-11, NY-3, NY-26, NC-3, NC-5, NC-6, NC-9, NC-10, OH-2, OH-3, OH-4, OH-5, OH-7, OH-8, OH-14, OK-1, OK-3, OK-4, OK-5, OR-2, PA-5, PA-9, PA-16, PA-18, PA-19, SC-1, SC-3, SC-4, TN-1, TN-2, TN-3, TN-7, TX-1, TX-2, TX-3, TX-4, TX-5, TX-6, TX-7, TX-8, TX-10, TX-11, TX-12, TX-13, TX-14, TX-19, TX-21, TX-22, TX-24, TX-26, TX-31, UT-1, UT-3, VA-4, VA-6, VA-7, VA-10, WA-4, WA-5, WV-2, WI-1, WI-5, WI-6, WY-1

53 thoughts on “StephenCLE’s House Predictions 2010 – June Ratings Update”

  1. I know Matheson actually has a primary opponent this year as a result of his lackluster performance at the convention. Though I have no doubts he’ll crush there, it’d be interested to see how he does there before I write this race off.

  2. I think Fiorina is a joke of a candidate, and certainly won’t help CA Republicans.

    I think Toomey will drag down a lot of PA Republicans.

    And I’m not convinced that “this environment” is going to last until November.

  3. I think he’s verging on Solid-D, given the infighting in the Republican and Conservative Parties.

    I’m a little unconvinced that things have gotten so much worse for Democrats, nationally, as you feel they have.

  4. I was talking with a Congressional staffer, who’s tied into the DNCC. He said that in competitive races (an important caveat), if you ranked their takeover possibility based on the candidate quality of the challenger (which this cycle usually means GOP), you’d look smarter than Cook and Rothenberg on election day. He specifically mentioned the bad Republican candidate in ID-01 and the good one in IL-11.  

  5. I mentioned Bright last time you posted your House predictions. Considering the poll that showed Bright with a wide lead over any opposition, the fact that both sides agreed the poll was accurate, and now considering Roby and Barber are in a run-off, do you still really consider AL-02 a GOP pickup?

    I’ve picked up from your recent posts that you’re basically expecting some extreme fall-out in the South, but being from the area, I find some of these predictions kind of strange. Bishop is “Leans Dem” while Barrow is not even listed? AL-05 has not elected a Republican in something like 120 years, and I find it very difficult to say Mo Brooks is “Likely” to keep the seat in GOP hands, especially since Raby’s got deep ties to the district, having worked for some of Alabama’s most beloved members of Congress.

  6. IN-03: I’d have this as Lean R. Hayhurst is a good candidate, and one of the few Dems who can win that district. Obviously, I’d rather he were running against Souder (who probably wouldn’t have resigned when his scandal broke if he didn’t have a top-tier D opponent), but he can use the chaos of finding a successor on the GOP side to his advantage. Don’t count him out.

    IN-08: Brad Ellsworth is hugely popular in this district, will offer Van Haaften big Senate coattails, and, of course, endorsed him, too. I wouldn’t discount that. Call it a tossup at worst.

    NC-08: Larry Kissell screwed the netroots, but none of the Netroots live in NC-08. He represents his district well and seems to be reasonably popular down there, so I’d call it a Likely. Also, if Kissell goes down, so does Minnick. Same profile.  

    There are also a few races where I’d be a little more pessimistic:

    NY-24, NY-29 and OH-01 are gone. Arcuri is a major-league dumbass who barely survived re-election in 2008 against a barely-funded opponent, and compounded his problems by voting against HCR in a state with high union representation. We just don’t have anyone in NY-29, period. OH-01 is a Republican district unless its large black minority votes, and they’ll only turn out when Obama’s on the ballot.

    We’ve probably also lost MI-07 (for whatever reason, the voters want Walberg back – remind me never to move to Michigan). As you note, I’d be very surprised if we didn’t lose NM-02. The state elected more Democrats than it can handle in 2008, and the needle has to rotate back somewhere – plus Pearce is still pretty popular over there.

    I think it’d be a miracle if we held FL-02, MO-04, and TX-17. At least one of those districts will fall this year. I’m not as convinced that Pomeroy is in trouble. Voters in the Dakotas really like their incumbents, no matter what the polls say – this may be one race where, bizarrely, Hoeven’s coattails as a popular incumbent actually HELP Pomeroy. The dynamic of that race is way different from races in populated areas.

    Anyway, nicely thorough. I’m sure I’m missing a few nitpicks somewhere, but that’s most of them.  

  7. should be lean D not R or at worst tossup. Candidates matter and Van Haaften is very well liked in this district. Most everyone knows who he is and most everything I have heard about him is very positive. Remember the GOP nominee won a very, very weak primary victory. Van Haaften is actually reaching out to those upset baggers. Don’t worry though he is not a bagger himself, far from it. I would say he is slightly more liberal than Ellsworth. On the subject of Ellsworth we must remember he is still hugely popular and he will likely give good coattails. At worst go ahead and call it a tossup do to the nature of the district but lean R is just too far. I am putting this in the lean D column for now.  

  8. I totally missed that until I re-read the list to see what the KS brouhaha was all about.  The GOP candidate here is carpetbagger Mattie Fein, perhaps more recognizable as Mrs. Bruce Fein.  Bruce is not well liked in Republican circles these days with the exception of the Paulists, and I don’t see establishment donors opening up their wallets for his wife.  Money isn’t everything, of course, and somewhere out there is a Republican Carol Shea-Porter… but it’s not Mattie Fein.  Jane Harman, as much as I despise her, is one Safe D – barring a criminal indictment, she’ll win by 20.

  9. Tennessee- I agree with you for the most part. Republicans will be dominating with the governor’s race. But I still think Lincoln Davis has a chance, he’s pretty conservative for his part and actually won this open republican seat in the pro Republican 2002 midterms! I believe he once said something like “no republican is going to out fox me on conservative values”. As for the two open seats I agree with you wholeheartedly!

    Mississippi- Gene Taylor. I know what your thinking looking at the PVI of this district but at the same time you should look at his performance compared to the presidential election. Gene Taylor scored 74.5%! compared to Obama’s 32% and McCain’s 67%. That’s right Gene Taylor over performed obama by over 42 points! when he faced a no name candidate.

    That’s quite a landslide in my opinion. Gene Taylor faced his real test in 1992, 1994, and 1996 when he barely survived. Since then he has not faced a tough race. I don’t see how 2010 will be any different. Will score 74.5% this year? I doubt it but I still think he’s got a strong chance of pulling a victory.

    Also If we just look at the PVI for this district alone.

    The way gene Taylor has been performing he would only lose against a no name candidate if Obama could only get 8% of the vote. That’s right 8 percent!(8+42 point over-performance = barely 50)Consider that as an example why I think we can’t just look the PVI. Again I know that Taylor’s opponent is not a no name thus Taylor will most likely drop below the 70% mark

Comments are closed.