Quinnipiac (9/15-19, likely voters, 7/6-11 (using RVs) in parens):
Joe Sestak (D): 43 (43)
Pat Toomey (R): 50 (43)
Undecided: 7 (12)
(MoE: 3.8%)
Quinnipiac (9/15-19, likely voters, 7/6-11 (using RVs) in parens):
Dan Onorato (D): 39 (37)
Tom Corbett (R): 54 (44)
Undecided: 7 (18)
(MoE: 3.8%)
Say what you will about the Pennsylvania Senate race; it’s consistent if nothing else. Quinnipiac’s 7-point Pat Toomey edge is disappointing considering that their last look was tied, but that was using their registered voter model, and that’s actually a less drastic RV/LV shift than we’ve seen in a few other states (like Ohio) from them. And the 7-point Qpac lead is consistent with just about everyone else, who tend to see this race in the 6-to-8 point range for Toomey. (There’s a similar 7-point shift in the Governor’s race, which was already pretty solidly in Tom Corbett’s hands.)
Opinion Research for CNN/Time (9/17-21, likely voters, no trendlines):
Joe Sestak (D): 44
Pat Toomey (R): 49
Undecided: 3Dan Onorato (D): 44
Tom Corbett (R): 52
Undecided: 2
(MoE: 3.5%)
There’s also been a truckload of other pollsters releasing Keystone State results, perhaps most notably today from CNN/Time. These are LV numbers; as with last week’s wave, they also offer RVs, and they show that a similar-sized enthusiasm gap as the Quinnipiac polls (among RVs, the Sestak/Toomey race is tied 45-45, while Corbett leads 50-45 in the governor’s race — considering those are similar to Quinnipiac’s July RV numbers, this is a verrrry static race).
Critical Insights for the Times-Leader (9/14-16, likely voters, no trendlines):
Joe Sestak (D): 36
Pat Toomey (R): 40
Undecided: 24Dan Onorato (D): 37
Tom Corbett (R): 38
Undecided: 25
(MoE: 4%)
MuniciPoll for PoliticsPA (9/15-16, likely voters, no trendlines):
Joe Sestak (D): 36
Pat Toomey (R): 45
Undecided: 19
(MoE: 3.2%)
Finally, two other polls from first-time pollsters round out the pile, with MuniciPoll giving a slightly more pessimistic look and Critical Insights giving probably the best-looking numbers we’ve seen in either race in a while, including a probably-too-good-to-be true 1-point lead for Tom Corbett in the gubernatorial race.
Any wonder what’s behind the GOP dominance here? Well, aside from the obvious stuff about the nature of the year, Pennsylvania’s swing state status and clockwork 8-year gubernatorial flips, and so on, there’s also the money story. In the Senate race, it’s been all Toomey so far, with 72% of the ads running in the state’s two biggest markets (Philadelphia and Pittsburgh) being GOP spots so far. Sestak’s only starting to engage the Philly market this week, so we’ll see if his powder-saving/late-salvo strategy is anywhere near as effective in the general as it was in the primary. And in the somewhat-sleepier and less ad-saturated gubernatorial race, Tom Corbett is winning the money battle, holding $7.7 CoH in his report last week compared with $3.4 million for Dan Onorato.
do not foresake Sestak, regardless of what you think of him as a candidate. The CNN poll is especially encouraging, and there is still time for more movement.
I will stand by that prediction up until Election Day.
But it could go either way. Everything considered, I think Sestack is actually holding up pretty well.
As far as Senate races go, I think PA and MO are still winnable. Ohio, not so much.
With plenty of time on his side.
If Sestak wins he will run for president in 2016. I think he has been planning a run since he won the House seat in 2006.
I posted something similar before but I don’t think there were responses. How much to the right of Sestak is Casey? Casey is definitely more conservative than Sestak on social issues. How do they compare on fiscal issues and national security ones? Casey seems to have more of a moderate profile and that seems to be more effective than the one Sestak has for winning statewide in Pennsylvania.