Nominate your own Essential Race

As Crisitunity noted in this afternoon's Daily Digest, the DLCC recently unveiled the first wave of our “Essential Races” program – highlighting key legislative districts that we anticipate will show which way the political tide is turning this fall.

But the Essential Races program is a two-way street.

That's why we're so excited to announce that on October 13th, the DLCC will add 10 grassroots-nominated districts to the Essential Races list, determined by nominations from individuals like you.

Anyone can submit a nomination, and any state legislative campaign in 2010 is eligible.

Simply click here or visit www.dlcc.org/2010Races to nominate an Essential Race.

Back in 2008, the Essential Races chosen through public nominations included a lot of campaigns in battleground states, but they also included a few campaigns in states that weren't top targets, but where something about the district or the Democratic nominee made the race unique and deserving of special attention.

We might have overlooked some of those key races without help from supporters like you, and we'd be foolish not to ask for your help again this year.

Swing State Project is the place to go for information like that.  So if you know of a critical state legislative campaign that you think deserves special attention, please visit www.dlcc.org/2010Races to submit your nomination.

Sincerely,
The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee

OH St.-House: Campaigns Ramping Up

[cross-posted at DLCC.org – SSP has been paying a lot of attention to the Ohio House and Ohio redistricting, so we hope the latest campaign news is of interest to folks here.]

Part 1 of 2:

A relative handful of Ohio House contests offer Democrats an opportunity to unpack one of the worst GOP gerrymanders in the country, and they offer Republicans a chance to fine-tune their handiwork and wipe away the Democratic gains since 2006.

Last week was a busy one in the campaign to defend the Democrats' narrow majority, underscoring the two-month sprint that's all that remains between now and Election Day.

Democratic House Speaker Armond Budish started things off on a confident note, predicting that his Caucus’ successful legislative effort on job creation and other campaign advantages would allow House Democrats to localize their races and survive a tough climate:

Democrats will do well against the odds based on the strength of a significant fundraising advantage of roughly 3-to-1 and a strong ground game focused on door-to-door campaigning, he said.

“State rep races are local and even though you all know there is a strong headwind this year, we will keep and expand the Democratic majority in the House because we have a strong message of job creation,” Budish said. The Beachwood Democrat cited a film tax credit, a renewal of the Third Frontier program and a $100 million expansion of the Venture Capital Fund as job-creating efforts pushed by Democrats.

When told that GOP leaders were already predicting victory in the chamber, Budish gave a characteristically pithy response:

“At the local level, Ohioans understand that we have fought for them, and we've put their interest first,” Budish said. “We're hearing that people want common-sense solutions. They don't want extreme ideology.”

Talking to reporters, Budish gave the exact measurements of the windows in the speaker's office, suggesting that Minority Leader William G. Batchelder could now stop measuring the curtains and “maybe he can spend time working with us on policy for a change.”

That same day, the Dayton Daily News profiled two districts where observers feel Democrats remain on the offensive:

Republican Seth Morgan holds the 36th District seat but is not seeking re-election because he ran for the GOP nomination for auditor and lost. Democrat Carl Fisher, Jr., a Huber Heights school board member, is running against Republican Michael Henne of Clayton, an insurance agency co-owner.

Henne was a GOP “second choice” who won the nomination after frontrunner Joe Ellis had a bar fight, Budish said.

The 72nd is more competitive but Republican incumbent Ross McGregor, who’s seeking re-election, won in 2006 and 2008, great years for Democrats.

Democrat Gregory Krouse, a teacher and president of the Springfield Education Association, is challenging McGregor.

Winning either of these districts would complicate GOP electoral math, but it would also strongly suggest Democrats are doing well enough statewide to retain their majority.

Finally, as if to reinforce Speaker Budish’s original point, Democrats got two pieces of good news for their candidates. First, the GOP nominee in the Columbus-based 25th district withdrew from the race – leaving Democratic nominee Michael Stinziano unopposed this November. Stinziano was already considered the favorite in this race, but one fewer open seat to worry about is always good news for the defending party.

Second, the AFL-CIO has announced the start of its own Get Out the Vote operation targeting 650,000 union households in Ohio:

The Ohio union has established 16 call centers in cities across the state from which voluteers talk nightly with prospective voters about union-friendly candidates. Ohio AFL-CIO, which represents 650,000 workers from 1,600 local unions, also is targeting direct mail and worksite leafleting to union households and members.

Focused on helping the Democrats’ statewide ticket, this effort is also likely to boost down-ticket Democrats in vote-rich swing areas of the state – exactly the areas where swing legislative districts tend to be concentrated.

Part 2 of this series will look at the Democratic House Caucus’ field effort.

Redistricting Relay

[cross-posted at DLCC.org]

Late Friday afternoon, Politico’s Ken Vogel published an interesting assessment of the upcoming fight over redistricting.

“GOP lags in early redistricting race” is a broad look at the players in this year’s state-level elections and next year’s map-drawing, as well as at how those organizations fit together.

Yesterday morning's SSP Daily Digest touched on this briefly, but if you don’t have the time to peruse the three-page article at the moment (or even if you do), I thought you might enjoy some selected highlights.

Outmaneuvered by the GOP during the last round of redistricting a decade ago, Democrats appear to have an early advantage as the two parties gear up again for the expensive and high-stakes battle over redrawing state legislative and congressional districts.

“I do believe that the Democrats are much better organized at this stage,” said Ben Ginsberg, a top Republican election lawyer.

The GOP’s redistricting gains were wiped out by the electoral tidal waves that swept Democrats to power in Congress and the White House in 2006 and 2008. But Michael Sargeant, executive director of a top Democratic redistricting-related group called the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, said Democrats are “definitely playing catch up to Republicans as far as the maps — both at the state legislative and at the congressional level. But we’re more prepared than we were last cycle.”

[Ed] Gillespie has said he hopes to double the budget of the Republican State Leadership Committee, a 527 group formed in 2002 to help elect Republican attorneys general, lieutenant governors, secretaries of state and state lawmakers that he took over this year. With Gillespie at the helm, it absorbed the American Majority Project, and launched a reapportionment initiative called REDistricting MAjority Project or REDMAP, which is intended to target and win state legislative races that can tip the balance of legislatures that craft and vote on redistricting plans.

The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, a 527 run by Sargeant that was established in 1994 to help the party win state legislative seats, will target key races in an effort to protect or capture Democratic legislative majorities in states with pivotal redistricting battles.

I do recommend you read the entire article, though—it’s certainly worth the time.

At risk of being lost as a link on page two, though, is an interesting memo distributed last month to state Republican Party chairs nationwide.

The memo is written by GOP redistricting expert Dr. Thomas Hofeller and does a solid job of explaining why the state-level 2010 elections are vital and articulating what the stakes are in each state (with pictures!).

A money quote (replace “GOP” with “Democrats,” and the argument remains the same):

Why are these state-level contests so important to the GOP? It is because it is in the states where the results of the 2010 census will be used to redraw the boundaries of congressional districts which will be used in the 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020 elections. The outcome of this battle will determine the electoral playing field for the next decade.

It’s no surprise that the GOP is as acutely aware as we are of the stakes in this year’s state-level elections. The DLCC has labored tirelessly since the harsh redistricting of 2001 and has made solid gains in statehouses across the country. But we are by no means secure as we face the 2011 redistricting. One bad cycle can destroy everything we’ve accomplished, and we never forget that as we work to support and build infrastructure for local campaigns. The GOP may be “lagging” in this redistricting race, but they’re nowhere close to losing, and we have a long way to go.

PA-St. House: Primary results improve Democratic chances

With everything else on the ballot this past Tuesday (several high-profile congressional and gubernatorial primaries, as well as the PA-12 special election), the Pennsylvania State House primaries went somewhat under the radar.  But as the Pottstown Mercury explains, the results in some key races have put Democrats in a significantly better position to hold the chamber this November:  

Lehigh County Republican Rep. Karen Beyer lost to a 23-year-old upstart who attacked her for supporting budget deals negotiated by Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell and for collecting taxpayer-funded perks.

Rep. Mike Gerber, D-Montgomery, his caucus’ leading campaign strategist, said he was encouraged by the results in Beyer’s race, as well as the Republican primary for the Williamsport-area district currently held by freshman Rep. Rick Mirabito, D-Lycoming.

In the Williamsport race, the Republican who Mirabito beat two years ago defeated a more moderate candidate who last held the seat.

Gerber said he also was pleased with the quality of his party’s winners in multi-candidate races to fill vacancies. Those races will largely determine which party claims the majority come January. Republicans are working to regain majority control of the House, currently held 104-to-99 by the Democrats (…)

As a rule, the DLCC generally does not get directly involved in primary elections.  However, we share Rep. Gerber’s enthusiasm for the Democratic winners in open-seat contests (there are 19 open seats in the State House this year), and we agree that Democrats are more likely now to hold the House than we were two days ago.  

Rep. Gerber also serves as the Treasurer of the DLCC’s Board of Directors.

Holding the Pennsylvania House is one of the top Democratic priorities this year because of Redistricting.  Republicans dominated the state’s redistricting process in 2000 and drew one of the ugliest Republican gerrymanders in the country.  The Republican-drawn congressional maps forced six incumbent Democrats to run against each other and turned a one-seat Republican advantage in Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation into a five-seat advantage.    

Democrats fought back in 2006 and 2008, helped by demographic changes and a poisonous national climate for Republicans, but right now the Democratic State House is the key to preventing Republicans from wiping out those gains all over again.