ME-Sen: $5 Million DSCC Ad Buy

Last week we mentioned the $6 million DSCC ad buy in North Carolina, which is already huge, but not out of whack with high media costs in heavily-populated North Carolina. But today, Advertising Age is reporting that the DSCC upped the ante in some other states too:

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has also made more than $15 million in buys in North Carolina, New Mexico, Minnesota and Maine, with the buys in Maine and North Carolina exceeding $5 million each. A committee official declined to comment.

$5 million in Maine?!?!?!? Given how cheap a media market Maine is and that there are only about 1.3 million Mainers to reach, that goes well beyond the firepower of “moneybomb.” Call it a “moneynuke,” maybe. Also, by subtraction, that leaves $4 million to be split between New Mexico and Minnesota, which isn’t peanuts either. (Given how well Tom Udall seems to have things in hand, hopefully most of that money will find its way to Minnesota.)

PA-05: McCracken for Congress — Weekly Update — July 20th, 2008

Reiterating My OPPOSITION to Tolling I-80 as PA Turnpike Commission Reveals Plans to Spend I-80 Toll Money:

This week the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission released details of their plans to repair Interstate 80 using the funds generated from tolls paid by users of the highway.  It was stated by the Turnpike Commission and their consultants that “An assessment of the interstate showed that more than half its length has not been repaved since it was built some 40 years ago”.  In press accounts, Barry J. Schoch, identified as Project Manager, also detailed plans to build a “cashless open road tolling system” that will utilize the EZ Pass system to collect a portion of the tolls.  Mr. Schoch also described how vehicles not equipped with EZ Pass will have their tolls collected saying “a driver without E-ZPass will have his or her license plate photographed, generating a mailed-out bill for the vehicle owner”.  He also stated that this non EZ Pass system “is not currently used on any U.S. highway.”

As a county commissioner in a county that is on the I-80 corridor I have been, and remain, strongly OPPOSED to the tolling of I-80.  The press barrage this past week from the Turnpike Commission only serves to make me more skeptical of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s decision, via legislation known as Act 44, to turn the operation of Interstate 80 over to the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission.  

There are many disturbing aspects of this week’s announcement.  First, the statement that “An assessment of the interstate showed that more than half its length has not been repaved since it was built some 40 years ago”, I find ridiculous.  Anyone who regularly traveled I-80 over the last 40 years knows that annual maintenance is done to the roadway for at least 9 out of the 12 months each year.  I also find it hard to believe that there are portions more than “half it’s length” that have not been repaved since I-80 was built.  How often do travelers on I-80 deal with lanes being shutdown for months at a time or the infamous “rumble strips” before the abrupt crossovers that lead to miles and miles of 2 way traffic separated by concrete barriers.   These stretches of crossovers and 2 way traffic are typically done while the other lane is completely torn up and replaced.  

I also find the “cashless open road tolling system” to be a major concern.  It sounds to me like the Turnpike Commission is trying to move toward privatizing the collection of tolls.  If I were an employee working collecting tolls on the existing Pennsylvania Turnpike, I would be very interested to know what future plans the executives at the Turnpike Commission have for “cashless open road tolling systems”.  I also have grave concerns about any government entity tracking the movements of our free citizens.  Isn’t this what they did in the former USSR?

It is clear that Harrisburg still isn’t listening to the citizens, businesses and elected leaders from the I-80 corridor.  How many times do we have to state “NO TOLLS ON I-80” before they get the message?  Rural counties that rely on Interstate 80 as the only route to deliver commerce to and from our counties have designed our economic development and tourism promotion plans, both long and short range, around a toll free I-80.  In many situations we are at a disadvantage and this ill conceived plan just adds to our problems.

While I was optimistic that the US Department of Transportation could put a stop to this plan, I found the following quote from an AP story dated June 27th 2008 from US Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters.  When questioned about giving approval to tolling I-80, Secretary Peters said “If that’s the decision that state leaders make, then I think we should be in a position to support that or allow them to make that decision,” Peters said, according to The Patriot-News of Harrisburg. “I do not think the federal government should make that decision.”



FEC Second Quarter Reports Filed — Fundraising Goals Met:

July 15th was the deadline for the FEC Second Quarter Financial reports for all candidates running for federal office.  Campaign Treasurer Tim Fannin filed our reports electronically on Monday July 14th and the reports were up for public review late that day.  I want to stress the goals the campaign committee set for the second quarter reports were met.  As a campaign team, we wanted to make sure that we raised funds that would allow us to conduct all campaign activities necessary over the summer months.  That goal was easily achieved and we have been able to purchase all the campaign materials necessary to hand out to voters including campaign badges, lapel stickers, pens, magnetic bumper stickers, balloons and about a ton of candy for the parades.  We’ve also been able to travel all over the district and have had several successful “Meet the Candidate” events.  I want to give special recognition to Campaign Chair Henry Guthrie and his wife Molly, fundraising consultant Keith Bierly and Centre County Coordinator Tim Wilson for their hard work and dedication during the second quarter.  

While we met our goals and we are able to do the summer events, I need to stress to everyone that the campaign needs your help in raising money for the fall campaign.  We have the best message, the best ideas and the best people working on the campaign — but it will mean nothing if we are unable to run a competitive media campaign in the fall.  2008 is a year of great promise and opportunity, we just have to pull together and get the job done.



Weekly Review:

Tuesday and Wednesday were County Fair Days.  On Tuesday evening, Kelly, Amanda and I attended the Jefferson County Fair and Wednesday afternoon we made the long trip to Hughesville for the Lycoming County Fair.  Wednesday in Lycoming County was very hot but we spoke with a number of people while working about 4 hours at the Lycoming County Democratic Committee booth.

Our campaign events in Clearfield and Tioga counties this week went very well.  Thursday night in Clearfield we had a good turnout for the dinner.  I had the chance to speak with the people who turned out and we had some very good feedback about the campaign.

On Friday, Henry Guthrie, Tim Wilson and I traveled to Hills Creek State Park in Tioga County to attend a picnic event organized by Ann Gazda, Sarah Davis, Bonnie Kyofski and Jean Leibatt.  Everyone had a great time and I got the chance to speak with group and did a Q & A session were we talked about gas and oil prices, wind power, public education issues and other issues of concern in Tioga County.  This was my 7th trip up to Tioga County and I really enjoy seeing the people up there.



Photo from the Tioga County Picnic



NOTE — We postponed the Sunday reception in Lock Haven, Clinton County until a later date.



Mark B. McCracken

Your Candidate For Congress

————————————————————————————————–

This diary is cross-posted at McCracken’s campaign blog, PA’s Blue Fifth

Mark McCracken for Congress

ActBlue page

It’s all about the $: Oregon

The following is the latest in my line of Oregon politics blogs and comes at the suggestion of one of my readers.  Simply put, I will analyze the current cash situation for major non-federal candidates in Oregon (since I believe that the federal races have been well covered here).  

For reference, my latest thoughts on the elections are posted at: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/7/10/12954/7313/791/549408.

Cross-posted from Loaded Orygun: http://www.loadedorygun.net/sh…

Oregon Campaign Finance Laws:

Oregon has a unique campaign finance system.  This is because Oregon’s first amendment has been interpreted by the Oregon Supreme Court to give equal protection to commercial and individual free speech, meaning that contribution limits are unconstitutional.  However, Oregon does have stringent reporting requirements, which include requiring all contributions/expenditures to be reported to the state’s new online system ORESTAR (https://secure.sos.state.or.us/eim/jsp/CEMainPage.jsp) within a particular period after the contribution/expenditure is made (it gets shorter the closer we get to the election).

Note: All totals are as recent as possible and are rounded to the nearest thousand.  I only do reports for contested races, so, for example, since the AG’s race has no Republican candidate, I will not report on it.  I exclude the state party’s themselves because their state reporting is not a full picture of their financial status since their contributions are split between federal and state races.

State Party Legislative PACs:

Democrats:

Future PAC (Oregon House):

COH: $627k

Contributions: $572k

Expenditures: $254k

Biggest Contributor: Opportunity PAC (Governor Kulongoski’s PAC)-$25K.

Senate Democratic Leadership Fund (Oregon Senate):

COH: $275k

Contributions: $165k

Expenditures: $77k

Biggest Contributor: Kurt Schrader for State Senate-$20k.

Republicans:

Promote Oregon Leadership (Oregon House):

COH: $46k

Contributions: $298k

Expenditures: $381k

Biggest Contributor: Friends of Bruce Hanna-$20k.

Leadership Fund (Oregon Senate):

COH: $151k

Contributions: $265k

Expenditures: $196k

Biggest Contributor: Roger Beyer for State Senate-$20k.

Oregon Victory PAC (Oregon Legislature):

COH: $142k

Contributions: $195k

Expenditures: $220k

Biggest Contributor: Nancy Lamatta-$30k

Statewide Candidates:

Secretary of State (D Open):

Democratic Candidate: Kate Brown.

COH: $10k

Contributions: $390k

Expenditures: $529k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Education Association-$50k.

Republican Candidate: Rick Dancer

COH: $70k

Contributions: $96k

Expenditures: $25k

Biggest Contributor: Seneca Jones Timber Company-$25k.

State Treasurer (D Open):

Democratic Candidate: Ben Westlund.

COH: $73k

Contributions: $191k

Expenditures: $127k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Education Association-$30k.

Republican Candidate: Allen Alley.

COH: $35k

Contributions: $193k

Expenditures: $178k

Biggest Contributor: Salem Attorney Mark Stevens (in-kind)-$25k.

State Legislature:

Note: Only candidates in contested races are discussed.  Where no information is available that means that the candidate has currently raised and/or spent less than $2k since the May primary and so is not required to report.  This is not so important, however, because of the free and easy transfers available between candidate committees and because many expenditures come from the party and its committees anyways.

District 9 (Stayton) (Republican Interim Defending):

Interim: Fred Girod (R)

No information available.

Challenger: Bob McDonald.

No information available.

District 12 (McMinnville) (Republican Open)

Republican Candidate: Brian Boquist

COH: $26k

Contributions: $15k

Expenditures: Less than $1k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Victory PAC (OR R’s)-$5k.

Democratic Candidate: Kevin Nortness

Nothing to report.

District 14 (West Slope) (D Interim Defending)

Interim: Mark Hass (D)

COH: $55k

Contributions: $62k

Expenditures: $31k

Biggest Contributor: IBEW-$3k.

Challenger: Lisa Michaels (R)

COH: $3k

Contributions: $3k

Expenditures: $1k

Biggest Contributor: Leadership Fund (OR R’s)-$2k.

District 27 (Bend) (D Open)

Democratic Candidate: Maren Lundgren

COH: $4k

Contributions: $5k

Expenditures: $1k

Biggest Contributor: Truman Club of Central Oregon-$1k.

Republican Candidate: Chris Telfer

COH: $14k

Contributions: $107k

Expenditures: $99k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Victory PAC and the Leadership Fund-$10k each.

Oregon House:

Note: Districts 9 and 29 have at least temporarily dropped off the competitive races list because Republican challengers were disqualified for filing in a district that they did not actually live in.

District 6 (Medford) (R Defending)

Incumbent: Sal Esquivel (R)

No information available.

Challenger: Lynn Howe (D)

COH: $5k

Contributions: $9k

Expenditures: $4k

Biggest Contributor: Eric Swenson-$750.

District 7 (Roseburg) (R Defending)

Incumbent: Bruce Hanna (R), Hanna is the Republican leader in the OR House, so his numbers are higher.

COH: $74k

Contributions: $111k

Expenditures: $111k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Forest Industries Council-$15k.

Challenger: Donald Nordin (D)

No information available.

District 15 (Albany) (R Defending)

Incumbent: Andy Olson (R)

COH: $115k

Contributions: $72k

Expenditures: $45k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Forest Industries Council-$10k.

Challenger: Dick Olsen (D)

COH: $2k

Contributions: $3k

Expenditures: $1k

Biggest Contributor: Benton County Democratic Party-$1k.

District 17 (Scio) (R Interim Defending):

Interim: Sherrie Sprenger (R)

COH: $6k

Contributions: $51k

Expenditures: $45k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Victory PAC-$10k.

Challenger: Dale Thackaberry (D)

No information available.

District 18 (R interim defending):

Interim: Vic Gilliam (R)

COH: $27k

Contributions: $65k

Expenditures: $64k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Victory PAC-$20k.

Challenger: Jim Gilbert (D)

No information available.

District 19 (Salem) (R Defending)

Incumbent: Kevin Cameron (R)

COH: $37k

Contributions: $51k

Expenditures: $23k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Forest Industries Council-$10k

Challenger: Hanten (HD) Day (D)

COH: $6k

Contributions: $13k

Expenditures: $6k

Biggest Contributor: Marion County Democrats (in-kind)-$5k.

District 20 (Independence/Monmouth) (R Defending)

Incumbent: Vicki Berger (R)

COH: $49k

Contributions: $46k

Expenditures: $32k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Beverage PAC (in-kind)-$10k.

Challenger: Richard Riggs (D)

COH: $5k

Contributions: $30k

Expenditures: $26k

Biggest Contributor: Marion County Democrats (in-kind)-$6k.

District 22 (Woodburn) (D Defending)

Incumbent: Betty Komp (D)

No information available.

Challenger: Tom Chereck (R)

No information available.

District 23 (Dallas) (R Open)

Republican Candidate: Jim Thompson

COH: $15k

Contributions: $52k

Expenditures: $43k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Victory PAC-$10k.

Democratic Candidate: Jason Brown

COH: $11k

Contributions: $14k

Expenditures: $6k

Biggest Contributor: Nancy and Gerald Brown-$5k.

District 24 (McMinnville) (R Open)

Republican Candidate: Jim Weidner

COH: $1k

Contributions: $52k

Expenditures: $54k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Victory PAC-$10k

Democratic Candidate: Bernt Hansen

No information available.

District 26 (Wilsonville) (R Open)

Republican Candidate: Matt Wingard

COH: $34k

Contributions: $52k

Expenditures: $27k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Victory PAC-$30k.

Democratic Candidate: Jessica Adamson

COH: $14k

Contributions: $60k

Expenditures: $56k

Biggest Contributor: AGC Committee for Action (Mainly Construction Companies)-$2.5k.

District 30 (Hillsboro) (D Defending)

Incumbent: David Edwards (D)

COH: $25k

Contributions: $26k

Expenditures: $22k

Biggest Contributor: Agency 76 LLC-$2.5k

Challenger: Andy Duyck (R)

No information available, he just came in to replace a Republican candidate who dropped out, so he would not have to report quite yet.

District 35 (Tigard) (D Defending)

Incumbent: Larry Galizio (D)

No information available.

Challenger: Tony Marino (R)

COH: Less than $1k

Contributions: $32k

Expenditures: $32k

Biggest Contributor: Promote Oregon Leadership PAC (in-kind)-$4k.

District 37 (West Linn) (R Defending)

Incumbent: Scott Bruun (R)

No information available.

Challenger: Michele Eberle (D)

No information available.

District 38 (Lake Oswego) (D Open)

Democratic Candidate: Chris Garrett

COH: $2k

Contributions: $118k

Expenditures: $132k

Biggest Contributor: FireFly Studios LLC (in-kind)-$7k.

Republican Candidate: Steve Griffith

No information available.

District 39 (Canby) (R Open)

Republican Candidate: Bill Kennemer

COH: $74k

Contributions: $112k

Expenditures: $59k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Victory PAC-$20k.

Democratic Candidate: Toby Forsberg

COH: $17k

Contributions: $53k

Expenditures: $38k

Biggest Contributor: David Forsberg-$10k.

District 49 (Gresham) (R Open)

Republican Candidate: John Nelsen

COH: $22k

Contributions: $104k

Expenditures: $83k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Victory PAC-$30k.

Democratic Candidate: Nick Kahl

COH: $8k

Contributions: $102k

Expenditures: $98k

Biggest Contributor: Oregon Trial Lawyers PAC-$5k.

District 50 (Fairview) (R Defending)

Incumbent: John Lim (R)

No information available.

Challenger: Greg Matthews (D)

COH: $38k

Contributions: $66k

Expenditures: $29k

Biggest Contributor: Various Firefighter PACs-$10k each, $40k total.

District 51 (Clackamas) (R Defending)

Incumbent: Linda Flores (R)

No information available.

Challenger: Brent Barton (D)

COH: $105k

Contributions: $84k

Expenditures: $44k

Biggest Contributor: William Barton and Oregon Trial Lawyers PAC-$10k each.

District 52 (Corbett) (R Open)

Republican Candidate: Matt Lindland (R)

No information available.

Democratic Candidate: Suzanne VanOrman (D)

No information available.

District 54 (Bend) (R Defending)

Incumbent: Chuck Burley (R)

COH: $27k

Contributions: $95k

Expenditures: $89k

Biggest Contributor: Friends of Bruce Hanna (in-kind)-$8k.

Challenger: Judy Stiegler (D)

COH: $18k

Contributions: $26k

Expenditures: $14k

Biggest Contributor: Truman Club of Central OR-$4.5k.

District 59 (The Dalles) (R Interim Defending)

Interim: John Huffman (R)

No information available.

Challenger: Mike Ahern (D)

COH: $10k

Contributions: $32k

Expenditures: $22k

Biggest Contributor: Jason Hale-$10k.

Let me know what you think.

WI-08: GOP Internal Poll Shows Close Race

(From the diaries – promoted by James L.)

New GOP internal poll in WI-08, h/t Politico, from Public Opinion Strategies (7/8-7/9, likely voters):

Steve Kagen (D-inc): 46

John Gard (R): 42

(N=400, MoE=±4.9%)

There’s reason for concern in this district; Gard’s a former Wisconsin Assembly Speaker and very narrowly outraised Kagen last quarter. The poll also shows Gard with very high name recognition (88%). McCain leads Obama in the district 46-41.

Kagen, however, has plenty of cash on hand and personal wealth he can dig into if necessary.

SSP currently rates this race as Leans Democratic.

Announcing “Nevada Bloggers for Jill Derby and Dina Titus”

With only three and a half month left before election day, Nevada bloggers have joined forces and today announce the creation of the “Nevada Bloggers for Jill Derby and Dina Titus” ActBlue fundraising page.  

Dean Heller and Jon Porter were almost beaten in 2006 in what were the closest races the 2nd and 3rd Nevada Congressional Districts have seen to date. Considering that Democratic voter registration has significantly increased since 2006 and that Nevada will be a battleground state in the presidential contest both Jill Derby and Dina Titus have a big chance of beating the Republican incumbents this fall.

However, both have one disadvantage: they have significantly less cash-on-hand than the incumbents. While they both reported good fundraising numbers in the last quarter it will be hard to make up the time and incumbency advantages of Heller and Porter. Therefore, Jill Derby and Dina Titus need all the help they can get. Whether you can give $5,$20 or $100 – anything helps!

The following blogs have been and will continue to cover one or both of these contests and today we are announcing that we stand together to help elect Jill Derby and Dina Titus: Blue Sage Views, Desert Beacon, Helluva Heller, My Silver State, Nor’Town, Nye – Gateway to Nevada’s Rurals, Reno and Its Discontent, and Vote Gibbons Out.

We support Jill Derby and Dina Titus for Congress! Help us in our effort!

AZ-08: Dueling Internals

Hot on the heels of President Bush’s $600,000 fundraiser for Tim Bee, we have two starkly different polls of freshman Democrat Gabrielle Giffords’ first re-election campaign.

First, we have Greenberg Quinlan Rosner (6/18-22, likely voters, including leaners):

Gabrielle Giffords (D-inc): 59

Tim Bee (R): 35

(n=502)

Lots of good news for Giffords here, including a very high 92% name recognition and a 57% favorability rating. But is it too good to be true? Tim Bee’s pollster thinks so.

Arizona Opinion for Tim Bee (5/15-23, likely voters):

Gabrielle Giffords (D-inc): 47

Tim Bee (R): 40

(MoE: ±4.4%)

Bee’s poll is staler and from (as far as I know) a less reputable polling outfit than GQR. However, if we fall back on the clichéd but time-tested method of locating the truth somewhere in the middle of these two spreads, Giffords is starting off in a solid place against one of the GOP’s few legitimately formidable recruits.

SSP currently rates this race as Leans Democratic.

SSP’s Competitive Senate Race Ratings (7/19/08)

Likely D Lean D Tossup Lean R Likely R
NM (Open) CO (Open)
LA (Landrieu)
NH (Sununu)
AK (Stevens)
MN (Coleman)
MS (Wicker)
NC (Dole)
OR (Smith)
KY (McConnell)
ME (Collins)

Safe D:

     VA (Open)

Races to Watch:  

     GA (Chambliss)

     KS (Roberts)

     NE (Open)


     NJ (Lautenberg)

     OK (Inhofe)

     TX (Cornyn)

Today’s Ratings Changes:

  • Virginia (Open): Likely Democratic to Safe Democratic

    Under the rubric we use, if a race is in a “likely” category, that means “an upset cannot be completely ruled out.” We no longer think an upset is imaginable in Virginia under any reasonably foreseeable circumstances. Mark Warner is still wildly popular while Jim Gilmore’s name is mud. Warner has a 44-to-1 cash advantage while Gilmore barely eked out a win at a party convention his supporters had orchestrated to favor him. Obama now leads by three in a state that Kerry lost by more than eight. Oh, and Warner himself, who has never led by less than twenty, has now staked out a nearly thirty-point advantage.

    Obviously in politics, anything is possible. A hidden scandal could always destroy a candidate at the last minute. But such unknowns can’t factor into race ratings – if they did, no race could ever go into the “safe” category. What’s more, Warner is a highly skilled politician who is adept at playing it safe; he is probably among the least likely to get ambushed by a late-breaking surprise. If he were to somehow lose at this point, it would be one of the biggest shockers in political history. But we feel quite confident that nothing like that is going to happen, and that Warner will cruise to victory.

  • New Mexico (Open): Lean Democratic to Likely Democratic

    Democrats, already in the driver’s seat here, got an added boost when winger Steve Pearce narrowly edged out “moderate” Heather Wilson for the GOP senate nomination. And the more New Mexico gets to know Steve Pearce, the less it seems they like him – Tom Udall is about thirty points ahead in the latest polling. And it’s more than shown in fundraising, where Udall now has five times what Pearce has on hand. What’s more, NRSC chief John Ensign all but admitted his commimttee was writing off this race. There’s no question that Udall has a strong lead here now.

  • New Hampshire (Sununu): Tossup to Lean Democratic

    Jeanne Shaheen has staked out a remarkably consistent ten-point lead in New Hampshire, leading many to ask if John Sununu is this cycle’s Rick Santorum. We think it’s certainly starting to look that way. No Republican, it appears, has ever come back from such a large deficit with this little time left on the clock. Sununu’s biggest advantage right now is that he’s the most endangered GOP incumbent, which means he’s first on the NRSC’s list of priorities. That’s not a place any Republican really wants to be, but it means that Shaheen can’t afford to let up, despite the advantages she now has.

  • Colorado (Open): Tossup to Lean Democratic

    This race is not as clear-cut as, say, New Hampshire, but we no longer feel that it’s a true tossup. It looks as though recent unrelenting attacks on Bob Schaffer have taken their toll, giving Mark Udall nine- and ten-point leads in four consecutive polls. Colorado, like Virginia, is another state that Kerry lost but where Obama shows a lot of promise. (And of course, we have our convention there.) However, Schaffer is pretty competitive in the cash department, and the NRSC hasn’t yet bailed here. Nonetheless, it’s hard to say that his chances of victory are equal to Udall’s, hence our change.

  • Oregon (Smith): Likely Republican to Lean Republican

    Jeff Merkley won a tough primary contest back in May and then went on to post far better fundraising numbers in the second quarter than he ever had before. His polling trend line looks good, and Obama has had consistent ten-point leads here. Gordon Smith’s “moderate” image still holds a lot of power, though, and he’s squeezing every advantage out of his incumbency. Merkley has a lot more work to do here, but this race is starting to get closer.

  • Georgia (Chambliss): Safe Republican to Races to Watch

    If two things happen here, this race might go from snoozer to potentially, maybe, possibly interesting: First, Jim Martin needs to win the August 5th Democratic run-off and second, Barack Obama needs to follow through on his plan to register a half a million new black voters in Georgia. If, however, the Bush-loving walking train-wreck that is Vernon Jones is the Democratic nominee, then this will still be a race to watch – but for all the wrong reasons.

  • Top 15 Exciting Republican Primaries

    This year has seen come very competitive primaries, yet I have to admit, those on the Republican side were far more memorable.  Here’s a highlight of the fifteen most exciting Republican primaries (compliments of a party in despair):

    AL 2nd – Harri Anne Smith (Ronnie Gilley, George Jones, and Club for Growth) vs. Jay Love

    Summary: Jay Love visits Ronnie Gilley, a developer in the city of Enterprise and asks for financial support.  Gilley, unconvinced in whatever was discussed, decides to host a fundraiser for Smith.  Love, feeling betrayed, then attacks Smith for taking money from the gambling industry (Gilley is developing a bingo hall in the district, yet is has yet to open).  Gilley then returns fire by financing ads against Love, featuring no one other than country singer George Jones, a friend of Gilley’s.  The GOP tries to broker a love fest between the two campaigns, yet Gilley, holds a press conference proclaiming that Love has no moral character and is not a true Christian.  The family fest ends with Love coming out the victor.

    CA 4th – Tom McClintock & Club for Growth vs. Doug Ose

    Summary: John Doolittle finally see’s the writing on the wall: an indictment is forthcoming, therefore resign.  However, the two Republicans vying for the seat had one thing in common: neither lived in the district.  Tom McClintock, an ultra-consevative lives six hours away and Doug Ose, a liberal tax spender, according to McClintock and the Club for Growth, lived just outside the district lines.  The campaign amongst the two became so heated that McClintock’s wife joined the fray after her husband was attacked for accepting a $170 daily allowance to cover additional living expenses.  Unlike most lawmakers, who mainted a second home, McClintock had given up on his second home in Thousand Oaks months prior.  The new occupant of the home: McClintock’s mother.  The Club for Growth spent millions attacking Ose, yet had no worries that McClintock was accepting a daily allowance that he clearly did not need.  McClintock came out on top thanks to the Club.

    GA 10th – Paul Broun vs. Barry Fleming (Georgia GOP)

    Summary: Paul Broun was never the top choice of the Republican establishment, therefore they drafted Barry Fleming.  The fireworks started right away with Fleming attacking Broun for a decade old bankruptcy, a contempt of court order hearing regarding child support, and past tax liens.  He also tried to paint Broun as a liberal that protects child predators, gay marriage, illegal immigrants, and terrorists.  Fleming argued that Broun was not morally fit to hold office, even though the information he compiled was from 20 years previous.  Broun also felt that Fleming was not fit to hold the office either because he was not a true Christian.  In the end it was Fleming that was bruised and battled, losing at a greater percentage than many expected.

    IN 5th – Dan Buron vs. John McGoff

    Summary: The main issue of the campaign: golfing.  Yes, indeed Burton was attacked vigorously for deciding to golf in California, missing a dozen votes in the process.  He also didn’t help his case by being the sole vote against banning members of Congress from accepting gifts and free trips from lobbyists.  Maybe mixing Republicans and golf together may be a bad thing after all (Case in point: Jack Abramoff and Bob Ney and their infamous Scotland golfing adventure).  

    MD 1st – Wayne Gilchrest vs. Andy Harris (Club for Growth)

    Summary: Gilchrest became the first incumbent of the cycle to be defeated.  A primary featuring three strong candidates, the third being state senator EJ Pipkin, guaranteed that the moderate vote would be split, allowing the ultra-conservative Harris to succeed.  Gilchrest was attacked for actually favoring a timeline for troop withdrawal and voting against the Bush agenda repeatedly.  He was branded a liberal by the Club for Growth which spent heavily attacking both Gilchrest and Pipkin.  Harris also brought up illegal immigration, stating that Gilchrest favored allowing illegals to stay here freely.  Something tells me that Maryland voters will not allow this Scott Garrett wanna-be to find his way to Washington.  Expect Gilchrest to campaign against Harris and his ultra-conservative platform.  

    NJ 7th – Leonard Lance vs. Kate Whitman (Christie Todd Whitman)

    Summary: State Senator Lance found himself battling a crowded primary field that also featured Kate Whitman, daughter of former governor Christie Todd Whitman.  Throughtout the debates and television ads, Whitman accussed Lance of increasing property taxes (NJ property taxes are consistently the highest nationwide) and taking donations from lobbyists.  Lance fired back saying Whitman was inexperienced and that her mother ran a reckless government based on bonds and borrowing.  In the end it was Lance, who defeated Whitman and six other challengers.  Lance has had a problem since the primary (fundraising).  He currently has $81K compared to $1.2K for Linda Stender.  Anyone ready to say Democratic Pick-Up?

    NM 2nd – Ed Tinsley vs. Aubrey Dunn vs. Monty Newman (National Assoc. of Realtors)

    Summary: All three candidates provided their campaigns with thousands in self-funding, thereby making it a three-way race.  Tinley accussed Dunn of standing with liberal Democrats in his opposition to the Patriot Act, contending that he was supporting terrorists.  He also said that Dunn was a former Democrat that had only changed parties months prior.  Dunn accused Tinsley of wanting to “hand over the keys to our country to illegal aliens and terrorists” while also living in liberal Santa Fe, where Tinsley maintains a second home.  Both campaigns attacked Newman following an endorsement by the National Association of Realtors, calling him a tax and spend liberal while he served as mayor of Hobbs.  In short, the arguments made by both campaigns were this: Tinsley supports amnesty and does not live in the district.  Dunn supports liberal Democrats and terrorists.  Newman is a tax and spend liberal.  Therefore, the primary can be summed up as terrorists, illegals, and liberals.  Economy?  What economy?  In the end, it was Tinsley that prevailed.

    NC 3rd – Walter Jones vs. Joe McLaughlin

    Summary: Very few in the Republican caucus have been as outspoken against the war as Walter Jones.  Former Onslow County Commissioner Joe McLaughlin felt that Jones opposition to the war would work against him (the district includes Camp LeJeune).  He also sought to paint Jones as being a liberal, yet it didn’t not gain much traction.  In the end, it was Jones that defeated McLaughlin, rather easily.  Since then, Jones has gone on to support impeachment proceedings against Bush.  Anyone want to consider Jones as the first Republican to ditch the GOP post Bush?

    NC 10th – Patrick McHenry vs. Lance Sigmon

    Summary: Retired Lt. Colonel Sigmon claimed that a video McHenry shot in Iraq, while on a congressional tour, may have aided the enemy.  Sigmon claimed that McHenry’s video, which was posted on his congressional website, showed where US missiles struck.  Shortly after posting the video, enemy forces attacked the Green Zone from where McHenry filmed.  Sigmon also took McHenry to task for classifying a security personnel in Iraq as a “two-bit security guard” after a defiant McHenry refused to return to barracks after being prohibited from using the gym.  McHenry eventually was escorted back to his room by higher command.  McHenry eventually won the race, yet any future visits to Iraq are unlikely.

    OR 5th – Kevin Mannix vs. Mike Erickson

    Summary: The Oregon Republican Party had insisted that both run a civil campaign, yet any guarantee was short lived.  Realizing that Erickson had sufficient funds to buy the seat, Mannix had released a mailer claiming that Erickson used cocaine, got his girlfriend pregnant, and then drove her to an abortion clinic.  Erickson’s response was quite unusual: he accussed Mannix of being a tax and spend liberal.  Mannix’s timing of the revelations may have been too late since Oregon has a mail-in ballot election.  As a result, Erickson won the primary.  Since then Erickson has had to deal with his reputation and newspaper interviews with the alleged girlfriend.  Erickson’s response: we had a relationship, yet I didn’t know she was pregnant.  A perfect GOP response.

    PA 5th – Derek Walker vs. Matt Shaner

    Summary: The primary featured three Republicans, yet Walker who self-financed $927K and Shaner who self-financed $1.67K, viewed themselves as the top two contenders.  Walker attacked Shaner for pleading guilty to running a stop sign and failing to report a crash a year previous.  Walker then found himself under attack after the Associated Press released details of him being charged with a felony count of burglary and trespassing for confronting his girlfriend outside her apartment six months prior.  In the end, it was the third candidate Glenn Thompson, who raised a mere $151K, that won the primary.  

    PA 10th – Chris Hackett vs. Dan Meuser

    Summary: The battle of the millionaries featured Hackett self-financing $1.18K and Meuser self-financing $1.9K.  The election was based on illegal immigration.  Hackett attacked Meuser for hiring illegal immigrants at his business.  It was then Meuser who discovered that Hackett’s own maid was illegal.  Meuser also relished the support he had from failed Sen. Santorum and Hazleton mayor Lou Barletta.  Hackett and Meuser then continued to fight back and forth over who was the real Republican and who was the real Democrat based on campaign contributions to candidates in the past.  Hackett said that Meuser’s PAC donations to the Democrats were proof that he was not the real conservative.  In the end it was Hackett, just another self-financier, that won the primary.

    TX 14th – Ron Paul vs. Chris Peden

    Summary: Conservatives had become irritated with Paul’s denouncement of Bush and the war in Iraq.  Friendswood Councilman Peden accussed Paul of signaling retreat in Iraq, protecting gay marriage, and oppossing free trade.  Paul for the most part ignored the self-financed Peden and did more than limp across the finish line.  He beat Peden soundly.  While pundits thought for a second that Paul could indeed be in trouble, it was an overreaction at best.

    TX 22nd – Shelly Sekula-Gibbs vs. Pete Olson

    Summary: After losing a write-in election, Sekula-Gibbs wanted another chance against Lampson, yet this time with her name on the ballot.  Unfortunately, John Cornyn protege Pete Olson was not going to allow that to occur.  Sekula-Gibbs said she was the true conservative in the race, while Olson attacked her for supporting illegal immigrants (hardly possible).  Revelations that her entire staff quit during her short stint in Congress also didn’t help Sekula-Gibbs.  Olson also boasted that his nine years in the Navy, all during non-combat, proved he was the best candidate as it relates to national security.  Conservatives, illegal immigrants, and national security.  Only in Texas.

    UT 3rd – Chris Cannon vs. Jason Chaffetz

    Summary: Chris Cannon almost lost during the Republican Party convention, yet sealed enough votes to force a primary.  His opponent was Gov. Huntsman’s Chief of Staff Jason Chaffetz.  The fight was on to determine who was more conservative.  Chaffetz attacked Cannon for allowing the federal budget to double, supporting illegal immigration, and No Child Left Behind (something anti-Bush coming from a conservative).  Cannon didn’t take Chaffetz as much of a threat due to close races in the past, yet in the end it was social issue voters that finally threw Cannon to the curb, making him the third incumbent to lose this year.  

    Fifteen more interesting battles still to come:

    AZ 5th – A 7-way primary between seven underfunded candidates, all seeking the opportunity to be defeated by Harry Mitchell this November.

    CO 5th – Lamborn vs. Crank vs. Rayburn (Round two from 2006).  This year Crank seems more cranky with Rayburn, for not dropping out, then he seems with Lamborn, who has largely ignored both of them.

    CO 6th – Secretary of State Mike Coffman vs. William Armstrong (son of former US Senator Bill Armstrong) vs. State Senator Ted Harvey vs. State Senator Steve Ward.  The last two will battle for third place while the first two will truly battle.  Who’s more conservative here?

    FL 16th – The battle of the have and have nots: State Representative Gayle Harrell, Pittsburgh Steelers heir Tom Rooney, and Councilman Hal Valeche.  The fireworks have already started between the top two contenders, Rooney and Valeche.  Maybe they’ll beat eachother up so much between now and the primary that Harrell will slide through for the touchdown.    

    FL 24th – An early sign of Tom Feeney’s vulnerability heading into November will be how many Republicans he loses in a primary featuring John Davis, a candidate with no funds.

    KS 2nd – The battle between Kansas’s conservatives and moderates features recently defeated Jim Ryun vs. State Treasurer Lynn Jenkins.  The odds are in Ryun’s favor, yet expect payback this November from the moderates.  After all, Republican moderates were partially responsible for Sebelius being elected Governor twice and former arch-conservative Attorney General Phil Kline being defeated soundly by a Democrat.  The battle continues into November (hopefully it brings Senator Roberts down with it).    

    LA 4th – Another battle featuring the have and have nots: Physician John Fleming and Businessman Chris Gorman have flooded their campaign war chests with personal funding.  However, the choice of the NRCC, former Chamber of Commerce President Jeff Thompson has not been able to self-fund as much.  The main issue so far: Thompson argues he’s running against two people who want to buy their way into office.  The primary will ultimately be decided on who is most conservative.  Beat eachother up and have a ball while you’re at it.

    MO 9th – If you could place five people from various backgrounds onto Gilligan’s island, then this is what you would get: a former building inspector, former tourism director, a standout football player, and two state representatives.  The likely nominee appears to be Dr. Bob Onder, a social issue candidate, the best Democrats could ask for when the economy is heading downward.

    NH 1st – Jeb Bradley wants to come back to Washington, yet he is experiencing turbulence in his quest.  Former state Health and Human Service Commissioner John Stephen, a former primary loser himself, now thinks he is most qualified to lose this November.  Something tells me that Bradley will not be able to pull this one off.

    NH 2nd – A little less exciting, yet interesting to watch, is the five-way Republican primary amongst poorly funded candidates.  The only one who really has money is state senator Robert Clegg and that is half of what he self-funded.  Paul Hodes will have a breeze against any of these five.

    NY 13th – Fossella resigned after baby news was announced and then the nominee to replace him died.  Now the race comes down to Dr. Jamshad Wyne, finance Chairman of the Staten Island GOP and former Assemblyman Bob Straniere.  Wyne was in the race, then out of the race and supporting Democratic nominee McMahon, then he was back in the race.  As for Straniere, he was never even considered a possible candidate.  Guy Molinari, long seen the head of the Staten Island GOP, would never even consider Straniere, yet a GOP committee did.  The easiest pick-up of the year is in the nation’s most expensive media market and not a single cent has to be spent.  The only interesting aspect of the primary is how low the turnout will be.  

    NY 20th – Sandy Treadwell has already spent $1.8 million of his own money in a quest for his own seat in Congress.  Will that be enough to win a three-way primary?

    TN 1st – Freshman David Davis is finding himself in another race with Johnson City mayor David Roe.  The race should be quite interesting, yet Davis may have the advantage.

    TN 7th – Marsha Blackburn, spokeswoman for Big Oil, finds herself in a primary fight against Shelby County Register Thomas Leatherwood.  Leaterwood is broke, literally, and according to Blackburn he is from Memphis.  Big Oil is taking care of their spokeswoman.  It’s just a question of how well her margin of victory will be.

    WY AL – Many expect former state treasurer Cynthia Lummis to take the nomination, yet businessman Mark Gordon has other plans.  Let’s see who’s ultimately right.

    If the 15 most competitive Republican primaries have anything to offer it is this: most of those primaries were based on social issues.  If Republicans think they can continue a 2006 campaign style in 2008, ignoring economic issues and the war in Iraq, then maybe a loss of 20 Republican seats may be an underestimate.  We might have to revise it more toward the 30-50 range.  An angry American electorate is prepared to throw out George Bush’s puppets.

    ME-Sen: No Wind Shaking the Branches in the Pine Tree State

    A new Rasmussen poll shows a static Senate race since last month (June 15 in parens):

    Tom Allen (D): 42 (42) 
    Susan Collins (R, inc): 49 (49)
    (MoE: ±4%)

    These numbers are identical to last month's, and, when leaners are included, Collins leads by ten points, 53 to 43.  That concerns me, and I certainly hope Tom Allen is running as many ads as possible tying Collins to the unpopular and mistaken war that she supported from the start.  I know that the conventional wisdom is that voters in Maine only start paying attention to politics after Memorial Day.  Last month, Allen's movement in the poll bore that out . . . but what does this month's stagnation mean?