Cook shifts ratings for a slew of races

Pennsylvania-11

Lean Democrat –> Toss Up  

Pennsylvania-7

Solid Democrat <– Likely Democrat

New York-19

Solid Democrat <– Likely Democrat

Indiana-8

Solid Democrat <– Likely Democrat

Florida-25

Likely Republican –> Lean Republican

California-11

Lean Democrat <– Toss Up

Oklahoma-Senate

Solid Republican –> Likely Republican  

Nothing too surprising here.  Barletta has been pushing hard, I don’t think PA-07, NY-19, or IN-08 are on anyones radars.  

Nice to see Rice and Garcia making progress, while Cook is also seeing Andal’s laughable campaign in CA-11 fall apart.  

http://cookpolitical.com/ratin…

OH-16: Date Set for Fourth Boccieri-Schuring Debate

Boccieri Banner

Date Set for Fourth Boccieri-Schuring Debate

Schuring, Canton Chamber of Commerce Reject Additional Forums

Both 16th District congressional candidates have agreed to a fourth debate before the November election. This discussion will take place live on the WHBC radio show “Points to Ponder” on October 15.

Unfortunately, Sen. Kirk Schuring has refused a debate proposed by the AARP that was to take place at Stark State College of Technology. Sen. John Boccieri had agreed to this debate, but the AARP has canceled the event after Schuring rejected their offer.

Senator Major John Boccieri(D-Alliance) responded to the news as follows:

“It’s unfortunate that Senator Schuring refused to participate in an open discussion about the issues facing our seniors in this election. Social Security, pension protections, and the cost of health care and prescription drugs are vital concerns that the next Congress will have to address, and it’s disheartening that Senator Schuring is unwilling to do so.”

Don Singer, a representative of the Boccieri campaign, also responded to the Canton Chamber of Commerce’s cancellation of a debate that both candidates were willing to participate in:

“After much progress, I’m disappointed that the Chamber of Commerce suddenly closed the door on negotiations despite Senator Boccieri’s willingness to debate the candidate they had just endorsed.”

What gives? The Canton Chamber of Commerce endorses Schuring, plans a debate, but as soon as John Boccieri accepts they pull the plug? I might be wrong, but this just doesn’t pass “the smell test”. As for the AARP debate, I think we covered that here.

House and Senate Committees Post July Numbers

Here’s the damage:











































Committee July Receipts Disbursements Cash-on-Hand
DSCC (est.) $5,300,000.00 $8,500,000.00 $43,000,000.00
NRSC (est.) $3,700,000.00 $2,900,000.00 $25,400,000.00
DCCC $6,006,328.98 $4,202,329.17 $56,456,584.36
NRCC $9,194,028.93 $3,541,093.03 $14,117,767.55
Total Democrats $11,306,328.98 $12,702,329.17 $99,456,584.36
Total Republicans $12,894,028.93 $6,441,093.03 $39,517,767.55

The NRCC had a great July, but they’re still facing a huge disparity with the DCCC. Even at this clip, they’re never going to come close to running even with the D-trip.

On the Senate side, the DSCC is flexing its money advantage early, spending a generous $8.5 million in July. We’ll likely see similar (or perhaps even bigger) expenditures in August, with the DSCC going all-out in Oregon, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Colorado.

NM-Sen: Pearce Surges in New Poll

Rasmussen (8/20, likely voters incl. leaners, 7/24 in parens):

Tom Udall (D): 52 (61)

Steve Pearce (R): 44 (35)

(MoE: ±4.0%)

Big surge for Steve Pearce. But how does one spell “outlier”? This race has never been in single digits — with the exception of a lone Rasmussen poll from February. It looks like the “Rasmussen non-bounce” may have struck again.

Has anything changed since July to make this an 8-point race? Pearce has taken to the airwaves in recent weeks, slamming Udall on the energy issue, and the Club For Growth nutters have joined in on the fun. That might be enough to bring Tomnotmark down from the 65% range, but you still have to figure that Udall is in commanding control of this race.

SSP currently rates this race as Likely Democratic.

NJ-04 Video: Smith Votes to Criminalize ‘The Pill’

Cross-posted at Blue Jersey.

I’m Josh Zeitz, the Democratic candidate for Congress in New Jersey’s Fourth District. I want to talk to you about my strong support for reproductive rights, but first I want to tell you about the person I’m running against. My opponent, Chris Smith, is the leader of the anti-choice caucus in the House of Representatives.

Chris Smith has introduced legislation to criminalize the common, everyday birth control pill and IUD on twenty-two separate occasions. He wants to put millions of American women in jail for using the pill. We have to say no to this kind of extremism.

My campaign has produced a video outlining Smith’s attempt to criminalize birth control, and you can view it by clicking below.

I believe that access to basic birth control and family planning services is a fundamental right. By refusing to provide contraception and age appropriate sex education, Chris Smith’s policies increase the number of unintended pregnancies.

By providing women with a full range of information and health care options, we can help them make informed decisions about their lives and bodies. Together we can continue to provide women the right to choose.

I know how important reproductive rights are to all of you, and I want to thank you for taking time to learn more about this crucial Congressional race.

If you are able, please make a contribution at my ActBlue page.

If you’d like to volunteer, please contact steve_at_joshzeitz_dot_com. Please visit the campaign at www.joshzeitz.com to learn more about what I believe.

Sincerely,

Josh Zeitz

MO-09: Who Among Us Does Not Love NASCAR?

Not Judy Baker! She sure loves her some NASCAR:

It’s official: Carl Edwards is Columbia’s native son.

A billboard unveiled this week along eastbound Interstate 70 near Range Line Street brags that Columbia is the home of the 2007 NASCAR Busch Series winner.

About a hundred friends and family yesterday surprised the 28-year-old NASCAR star with a reception, showed off the billboard and also announced plans to rename a stretch of Route WW after Columbia’s biggest celebrity. […]

State Sen. Chuck Graham and state Rep. Judy Baker announced the plans to designate Route WW from Highway 63 to Olivet Road as “Carl Edwards Drive.” (emphasis added)

Which makes this deranged explosion from her opponent’s campaign in response to new poll results showing her leading Republican Blaine Luetkemeyer (which we noted below) look even more psychotic:

“Judy Baker’s poll is like a NASCAR driver bragging about being ahead after the first lap of this weekend’s Sharpie 500, which in case Judy didn’t know is a car race enjoyed by ‘those people’ often derided by liberal Democrats like herself,” said Luetkemeyer spokesman Paul Sloca in a statement.

Nice try. Keep on truckin’, little buddy.

MO-09: Baker Leads by 2 in New Poll

Momentum Analysis for Judy Baker (8/12-14, likely voters):

Judy Baker (D): 41

Blaine Luetkemeyer (R): 39

Tamara Millay (L): 3

Undecided: 16

(MoE: ±4.9%)

Nice numbers for Baker, whose strength among women voters (45-36) and stronger base support (78-12 among Dems, compared to Luetkemeyer’s 66-14 among Republicans) are propelling her to an early lead.

Luetkemeyer also appears to be a bit dinged up after his Club For Growth-tainted primary, as his favorability (33-16) is more mixed than Baker’s (30-8).

It’s a very solid start for Baker, but getting to 50% is the real challenge. SSP currently rates this race as Lean Republican.

(Big hat-tip to Wayne in Missouri for the catch.)

PS: Check out the Luetkemeyer campaign’s psychotic reaction to the poll:

“Judy Baker’s poll is like a NASCAR driver bragging about being ahead after the first lap of this weekend’s Sharpie 500, which in case Judy didn’t know is a car race enjoyed by ‘those people’ often derided by liberal Democrats like herself,” said Luetkemeyer spokesman Paul Sloca in a statement.

“Those people”?? Talk about grasping at straws and then some.

MO-09 Poll: Judy Baker 41% Blaine Luetkemeyer 39%

Baker has a 30% favorability to 8% unfavorabilty rating and has higher favorability than unfavorability even among Republican voters (especially Republican women).

Luetkemeyer’s favorability is 33% to 16% unfaovarbility.

This is a District that was Bush +19 in 2004 and that the Republican Hulshof won 61% to 36% in 2006.

The poll was a Baker internal poll conducted by Momentum Analysis. In the primaries Momentum analysis gave Baker a 6 point lead over Gaw in their only internal poll of the primary (she won by 13 in that race).

Full poll story here:

http://blogs.columbiatribune.c…

Donate to Baker at My ActBlue and I’ll match you (the first $400).

http://www.actblue.com/page/wa…

House Projection: 21 More Democrats

Taking into account the districts with open seats and the current generic ballot advantage held by Democrats, we would expect to see around 21 Republican-held House seats flip to Democrats this year if conditions are similar to the elections of 1994-2006.

Below, an explanation, as well as details on party identification, approval,  House retirements, and the generic ballot.  First up, party favorability ratings:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

Since the 2006 elections, Democrats have managed to hang onto a positive party image overall.  Republicans have kept digging a hole for themselves.  The news is not all good, however.  Approval of Democrats in Congress is low, and falling, following a peak just after the 2006 election.  It is still higher than the ratings of Republicans in Congress, but that is not much consolation:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

So why does the public still view Democrats favorably?  One possibility is the excitement of the primary race.  Identification with Democrats ticked up noticeably during the primary season.  Democrats now have nearly a 10-point advantage over Republicans in party identification, compared to just about even in 2004:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.usFree Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

The postive views towards Democrats are reflected in the generic ballot question for the House:  Democrats have led by about 10 points all year:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

Even in Republican districts, Democrats lead on a named ballot question among the most competitive House districts.  This is an improvement over 2006, where, obviously, Republicans won in all these districts.  Here, Tier 1 is the 15 or so most competitive Republican-held districts, and Tier 2 is the 15 or so next-most-competitive districts:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

Seeing this, Republican House members ditched their sinking ship this cycle.  There’s about 35 vacant house seats, and almost 30 of them are currently Republican-held.  This is a lot more than 2004 or 2006 for Republicans, and a little less for Democrats.  The graphs below show the pace of retirements for Republicans (left) and Democrats (right), with the 2008 cycle in yellow:

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.usFree Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

The Prediction

In the past seven House elections, the number of seats a party gained could be related to the generic ballot polling numbers and the partisan tendencies on a presidential level of each district.  Plugging in the current numbers, we get 21 seats changing from Republicans to Democrats (with 95% confidence that the number will be between 14 and 31) while only 1 switches from Democrats to Republicans (95% confidence 0 to 7).  This prediction does not attempt to analyze anything on a race-by-race basis.  Compared to the prediction I made last fall, it is slightly fewer seats because the generic ballot numbers are slightly worse, although there are now more open Republican seats, which are easier to pick off.  Also, don’t forget that Democrats have already picked up three more seats in special elections this cycle.

The following graph lets you watch how the numbers change as the Democrats’ generic ballot advantage changes.  The range shown is the range of generic ballot advantage values from recent polls.  

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge.

It’s quite possible that the generic ballot will increase as the result of the fundraising advantage Democrats have in House races this year (more on that soon).  Of course, the numbers could also go down following a national anti-Democrat smear campaign.

A detailed explanation of these predictions and the fine print is available here.

********************

Polling numbers can be found at pollingreport.com unless otherwiese noted. This is the third in a series looking at the evolution of the political scene since the 2004 and 2006 elections.  The first discussed Bush’s approval ratings.  The second looked at the economy and other issues important to the electorate.  Tomorrow, FEC willing, a look at fundraising.  Cross posted at Open Left and Daily Kos.

KS-01, KS-04: GOP Incumbents Post Big Leads

Here’s a pair of polls in deep red GOP districts that you don’t see polled every day: Kansas’ 1st and 4th CDs, the state’s two most conservative districts.

First, KS-01: SurveyUSA (8/17-19, likely voters):

James Bordonaro (D): 13

Jerry Moran (R-inc): 77

Other: 4

(MoE: ±3.5%)

At a PVI of R+20.3, Kansas’ sprawling 4th CD is the 9th most Republican district in the nation. Moran won by a 79-20 margin in 2006, and it looks like nothing much will change this year.

And now for the Wichita-based 4th district. SurveyUSA (8/17-19, likely voters):

Donald Betts (D): 30

Todd Tiahrt (R-inc): 61

Other: 5

(MoE: ±4.2%)

The 4th CD is a tough district for any Dem to crack, but it’s obviously not the hopeless case that the 1st is. At a PVI of R+12.2, the 4th CD hasn’t sent a Democrat to Congress since 1992, when voters gave Rep. Dan Glickman his final term in office.

Donald Betts, an African-American state Senator with a charmed political career in Kansas politics so far, is giving the district a go, but it’ll be very difficult for him to close the gap, especially with only $68K left in his campaign account. Still, anytime you have a state senator running for higher office, the race is worth watching.