Tag: Polls

Mason-Dixon (9/20-22, likely voters, no trend lines):

Alex Sink (D): 47

Rick Scott (R): 40

Undecided: 11

(MoE: ±4%)

Mason-Dixon actually has polled this race before, but I left out the trend lines due to Bud Chiles’ presence in their August poll. In that one, Sink led Scott by 40-26, with 17% going to Bud. Before that, all the way back in May, Sink had a 38-36 lead on Scott.

The Senate numbers yield much better results for Republicans (8/9-11 in parens):

Kendrick Meek (D): 23 (18)

Marco Rubio (R): 40 (38)

Charlie Crist (I): 28 (33)

Undecided: 9 (11)

(MoE: ±4%)

This is starting to look like an impossible needle for Charlie Crist to thread. Witness the roll out of Charlie Crist 9.0:

The new boiled down platform for an independent Crist? “Tax cuts? Hell yes,” Crist said. “Government in your bedroom? Hell no.”

Incoherency? Hell yes!

SurveyUSA for WHAS-TV and the Louisville Courier-Journal (9/21-23, likely voters, 8/30-9/1 in parentheses):

Jack Conway (D): 47 (40)

Rand Paul (R): 49 (55)

Undecided: 4 (5)

(MoE: ±4%)

That’s a fat bounce for Jack Conway – a change dramatic enough to make this his best performance in a SUSA poll since November 2009. Of course, SUSA’s last poll came under a great deal of scrutiny for its likely voter model that only gave Democrats a 47-42 partisan advantage over Republicans. When that poll was released, SUSA spokesperson Ken Alper pushed back on any suggestions that the model was flawed, arguing that the numbers (which are out-of-whack with historical realities) were a reflection of shifting partisan identification and a burgeoning enthusiasm gap in the state. But now, SUSA’s likely voter sample seems more realistic at 51D-36R. So which is it?

I find SUSA head Jay Leve’s explanation a little… unconvincing:

“There is a natural ebb and flow to party composition,” said pollster Jay Leve of Survey USA, “I would not make more of this than there is.”

It seems to me that a ten point shift in party ID in three weeks is something other than mere “natural ebb and flow”, but what do I know.

Braun Research for cn|2 (9/21-22, likely voters, 7/26-27):

Ben Chandler (D-inc): 51 (46)

Andy Barr (R): 37 (32)

Undecided: 13 (21)

(MoE: ±4.4%)

Yet another good poll for Ben Chandler. For those keeping score, Chandler was up by 20% in his latest internal, by 14% in a DCCC internal, and by 7% in Barr’s internal. I like all of those numbers!

Meanwhile, Braun also polled the Senate race, and finds that Jack Conway has a 47-41 lead on Rand Paul in the 6th CD. Unfortunately, Braun didn’t test the Senate race in their July poll of this district, so no trend lines there. (Though note that Braun’s last statewide poll had Paul leading Conway by 10% in the 6th, but of course the standard caveats about high-MoE sub-samples apply here.) You’ve got to figure that this is a must-win district for Conway this fall.

• DE-Sen: One more Real World alum in the political news: that’s first-season vet Eric Neis debating Christine O’Donnell in this new 90s video that’s surfaced. Ooops, I’m burying the lede: the point of the video is that O’Donnell answers in the affirmative when asked if she wants to stop the whole country from having sex.

• KY-Sen: Benenson Strategy Group for DSCC (9/14-19, likely voters, early Sept. in parentheses):

Jack Conway (D): 42 (45)

Rand Paul (R): 45 (47)

Undecided: 13 (8)

(MoE: ±3.7%)

The newest Benenson poll from the DSCC shows things pretty stable in the Kentucky race, with Jack Conway hanging back within striking distance of Rand Paul. They also find Conway leading 48-45 among those who actually know both candidates (and find Paul with greater name recognition: 84%, to 72% for Conway).

• MO-Sen: The DSCC is also out with an internal poll in Missouri, one of the other races where they’d like you to know they’re still playing offense, courtesy of Garin Hart Yang (no mention of the dates, MoE, or any of that useful stuff, though… just a leak to the Fix). The poll has Robin Carnahan trailing Roy Blunt 45-41 (and only 41-40 without leaners). Roy Blunt, meanwhile, is engaging in typical frontrunner behavior, trying to limit debates (to avoid any grist for the negative ad mill); there will only be two debates, neither in a network TV setting.

• NC-Sen: National Research for Civitas (9/15-17, likely voters, 7/19-21 in parentheses):

Elaine Marshall (D): 29 (37)

Richard Burr (R-inc): 49 (44)

Mike Beitler (L): 3 (3)

Undecided: 17 (15)

(MoE: ±4%)

Thanks to a big lead with unaffiliateds (48-21), Richard Burr has a big lead in North Carolina. With a big financial disparity, unless there’s some outside assistance, that lead’s probably going to continue (although I’d be surprised if it’s actually a full 20 points). One other interesting note: Civitas hires out third-party pollsters, and this is their first poll since they switched to Republican internal pollster National Research.

• NV-Sen, NV-Gov: The only evidence we have of this poll is a Jon Ralston tweet, but apparently there’s a poll rumbling around behind the scenes from a reputable Republican pollster that gives a 5-point lead to Harry Reid, 42-37 (among RVs). That’s quite plausible; the real shock here, though, is that it also finds Rory Reid trailing only by 6 in the governor’s race.

• WV-Sen: The big news here is probably that the NRSC is plowing $1.2 million into this race, hoping for the upset (as this race seems to be increasingly taking the place of Washington and California) or at least to pull DSCC fire away from elsewhere. That’s just to run one new ad, tying Joe Manchin to Barack Obama; part of the expense is that the ad is running in the DC market, so it can reach the Panhandle. (You can see the IE filing here.)

One more plus, though, for Joe Manchin, is that he’s getting the NRA’s endorsement (one more in a seemingly endless parade of ConservaDems getting backed this week). Also, some details about John Raese are surfacing that may lead to ads that write themselves: photos of his marble-driveway Florida mansion, where it turns out his family lives full-time (presumably because of Florida’s big juicy homestead exemption, but also because of the schools, as he wants a school system he “believes in”)… and Raese’s own description, in a radio interview yesterday, of how hard he worked for his riches:

RAESE: I made my money the old-fashioned way, I inherited it. I think that’s a great thing to do. I hope more people in this country have that opportunity as soon as we abolish inheritance tax in this country, which is a key part of my program.

• AZ-Gov: Here’s a look at the financial situation in Arizona, where both gubernatorial candidates are relying on clean elections public financing in their bids. Dem Terry Goddard has about $1 million left to spend, while Jan Brewer has $860K left. Goddard also spent more in the last reporting period, spending $477K to Brewer’s $291K.

• MA-Gov: If you’re shedding your main campaign strategist with 40 days to go, that’s probably a sign that you’re not going to win. That’s what happened with the Tim Cahill camp, who said goodbye to John Weaver. Having seen Cahill’s share plunge into the single digits, Weaver said (in a parting shot) at this point, Cahill’s candidacy is just hurting Charlie Baker’s chances.

• NY-Gov: Marist (9/14-19, likely voters, no trendlines):

Andrew Cuomo (D): 53 (67)

Carl Paladino (R): 34 (22)

Rick Lazio (C) : 9 (NA)

Undecided: 6 (11)

(MoE: ±4%)

I don’t know if the Marist poll exactly qualifies as a tie-breaker in the New York gubernatorial race, but it’s a likely voter poll (instead of an RV poll, like Siena), and it doesn’t have that outlier-ish whiff that Quinnipiac had. Also adding to its potential credibility: it’s about halfway between the two, if erring somewhat on the side of Andrew Cuomo’s safety. (It looks like they’ll release Senate numbers later, separately.)

• CA-47: This is the first time I’ve ever used the scary all-caps to put words in the mouth of a Democratic candidate, but Loretta Sanchez just sent up the alarm that THE VIETNAMESE ARE COMING FOR HER SEAT!!!1!! Not just Van Tran, but apparently all of them!!! I suppose that’s a dog-whistle of sorts to her Latino base in this seat that has a Latino majority (though not a lot of actual voters among them) and a politically active Asian minority, where her Republican challenger is Vietnamese. Kind of a faceplant moment for Sanchez, who has had good outreach to the Vietnamese community in the past (up until now, I’d imagine) and has relied on their votes to stay in office.

• MI-01: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner for Gary McDowell (9/21-22, likely voters, no trendlines):

Gary McDowell (D): 38

Dan Benishek (R): 41

Glenn Wilson (I): 12

Undecided: 9

(MoE: ±4.4%)

Here are some not-bad numbers from an internal for Gary McDowell, showing this is one of the few Republican-leaning open seats where we’re still in fighting shape right now. McDowell’s offering some pushback against a Dan Benishek internal that gave Benishek a 39-25 lead in a race that also includes wealthy independent Glenn Wilson.

• MI-07: It’s a little late in the game for ex-Rep. Tim Walberg to be jumping on the birther train (that’s so 2009…) but he just said that he doesn’t know if Obama was born in the U.S. Meanwhile, his incumbent Dem opponent, Mark Schauer, is out with an internal poll in response to the Rossman Group poll that gave a 4-point lead to Walberg. Schauer’s poll, taken 9/21-22 by Myers Research, finds a mirror-image 4-point lead for Schauer, 49-45 (or if you’d prefer inclusion of all third-party candidates, he’s up 45-43).  

• NRCC: The NRCC is wading into six more districts that they haven’t been in before, with IE ad buys. Most (except for WA-03) of these districts feel like “Lean Dem” districts right now, but where the GOP thinks it can make some inroads: Ike Skelton’s MO-04, Chris Carney’s PA-10, Steve Kagen’s WI-08, Martin Heinrich’s NM-01, and the open seats in MA-10 and WA-03.

• AFF: The financially-disadvantaged NRCC can’t win this all on its own, so AFF is keeping up its IEs, too. They’re going on the air in four new districts, two of which overlap the above list. They’re hitting SD-AL ($360K), TX-17 ($117K), NM-01 ($290K), and WA-03 ($875K).

• SSP TV:

• CO-Sen: The softer side of Ken Buck? He’s out with a positive ad with testimonials from senior citizens

• FL-Sen: Charlie Crist simultaneously hits both his opponents on corruption issues in one ad, hitting Kendrick Meek’s real estate dealing and Marco Rubio’s enthusiastic use of RPOF credit cards

• NC-Sen: It seemed to work well the first time for Richard Burr, so the rocking chair guys are back for another round

• NV-Sen: The newest ad from Harry Reid hits Sharron Angle for not supporting requiring health insurers to cover mammograms and colonoscopies

• NY-Sen-A: Chuck Schumer’s running his first ad of the cycle, a bio spot, on local cable

• PA-Sen: Pat Toomey’s newest ad is a hard negative one linking Joe Sestak to Barack Obama; interestingly, it’s not running in the Philadelphia market

• WA-Sen: Dem group Commonsense Ten is out with an anti-Dino Rossi ad throwing the kitchen sink at him, including the foreclosure seminars

• CA-Gov: The latest Meg Whitman opus attacks Jerry Brown over Oakland schools during his tenure as mayor

• CA-47: Loretta Sanchez launches a negative ad against Van Tran, featuring him asleep on the job (during an Assembly budget all-nighter)

• LA-03: Bet you’d forgotten there’s still one race where the field isn’t set? (There’s still a GOP runoff here.) Anyway, Hunt Downer is out with an ad full of adorable babies… to make the point that Jeff Landry is insufficiently pro-life

• PA-03: Kathy Dahlkemper engages in some fat-cat bashing, tying Mike Kelly to Wall Street

• Rasmussen:

• FL-Gov: Alex Sink (D) 44%, Rick Scott (R) 50%

• FL-Sen: Kendrick Meek (D) 21%, Marco Rubio (R) 40%, Charlie Crist (I) 31%

• MN-Gov: Mark Dayton (D) 41%, Tom Emmer (R) 42%, Tom Horner (I) 9%

• OK-Gov: Jari Askins (D) 34%, Mary Fallin (R) 60%

• SC-Gov: Vincent Sheheen (D) 33%, Nikki Haley (R) 50%

• TX-Gov: Bill White (D) 42%, Rick Perry (R-inc) 48%

Field Poll (9/14-21, likely voters, 6/22-7/5 in parentheses):

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 47 (47)

Carly Fiorina (R): 41 (44)

Undecided: 12 (9)

(MoE: ±4.1%)

The Senate half of the Field Poll is out today, giving Barbara Boxer an increased lead over Carly Fiorina from the previous poll in early July. Oddly, though, the lead doesn’t come from gains for either candidate, but from voters moving from Fiorina to “undecided.” To me, that’s pretty suggestive that Boxer’s ad campaign so far (which includes a spot hitting Fiorina for her tenure at HP) has been effective at driving up Fiorina’s negatives.

Compared with the gubernatorial race, where both candidates are playing to the center and courting swing voters, this is one about base agitation, and there’s just a much larger Dem base in California. On top of that, Boxer leads 48-29 among Latinos (a much bigger spread than in the governor’s race, where Meg Whitman has spent a lot on Latino outreach), and even leads 46-40 among independents. Unless Fiorina can find a way to either take a huge lead among indies or to get a lot of Democrats to stay home, she’s not on track to win this.

Quinnipiac (9/16-20, likely voters, 8/23-29 in parens):

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc): 48 (43)

Joe DioGuardi (R): 42 (28)

Other: 2 (1)

Undecided: 9 (25)

(MoE: ±3.6%)

SurveyUSA:

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc): 45

Joe DioGuardi (R): 44

Other: 8

Undecided: 4

(MoE: ±4.2%)

Siena (PDF) (9/16-17 & 9/19-21, registered voters, 8/9-12 in parens):

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc): 57 (54)

Joe DioGuardi (R): 31 (29)

Undecided: 12 (17)

(MoE: ±3.5%)

You tell me.

CT-Sen: It feels as thought we’ve been partying like it’s 1994 in more ways that one this cycle. One major throwback has been Republicans who can’t control teh crazy and insist, Newt Gingrich-style, on calling for the abolition of the Department of Education. In fact, Linda McMahon did `em one better, telling some teabaggers that she would also consider getting rid of the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency. I don’t understand whatever cultural bug Republicans have up their ass about the Dept. of Education, but suffice it to say that when you say you want to get rid of it, it sounds like you want to cut education funding, period. So please, keep saying that.

DE-Sen: A GOP source tells Politico that Mike Castle is fielding a poll to test his chances as a write-in. Castle has until Sept. 30th to file a statement with the elections board, something a spokesman said is an “under 5%” chance.

AL-Gov: We’ve seen all kinds of unexpected touting of seemingly sucky internal polls this cycle, but this may be one of the roughest. Dem Ron Sparks is saying that a poll by Capital Survey Research Center showing him down 52-39 to Republican Robert Bentley is “good news,” because a July survey had Sparks behind by 22. (Technically this isn’t an internal, but rather was produced by Dem-allied teachers union Alabama Education Association.)

FL-22: Allen West is out with what the Palm Beach Post is terming a “brushfire” poll (n=300) from Wilson Research Strategies that has him up 48-42 over Ron Klein. A recent Klein internal had almost opposite numbers, 48-40 for the Dem.

NC-04: This is a couple of weeks old, but repeat Republican candidate B.J. Lawson claims to have an internal poll from robopollster Action Solutions, purporting to show him up 47-46 over Rep. David Price. But, cautions Dave Wasserman of the Cook Political Report: “This isn’t your standard polling outfit. This is an outfit that most in Washington would not consider reputable.” Lawson only has $50K on hand (though Price only has $300K), and got crushed last time out, 63-37. His fundraising also seems to be off from his 2008 pace, when he took in half a million (he’s raised just $150K this cycle).

RI-01: Dem David Cicilline is out with a comforting poll from the Feldman Group, showing him up 53-38 over Republican John Loughlin.

VA-05: I’m almost getting tired of keeping track of these, but anyhow… the NRA is expected to endorse Dem Tom Perriello.

NY-AG: A couple of pollsters also took a look at the AG’s race in their recent New York polling packages. Quinnipiac, unsurprisingly, finds a close race: Dem Eric Schneiderman is at 37 while Republican Dan Donovan is at 36. Siena (PDF) paints a somewhat different picture, showing Schneiderman up 45-32 over Donovan. Both men have very low name rec in both polls, and the both hold voters of their own parties equally well. Donovan has small leads among independents in both surveys.

SSP TV:

• AR-02: Tim Griffin (R)
• AZ-08: Jesse Kelly (R)
• FL-25: Pro-Joe Garcia (D) airs ads attacking David Rivera (R) (if you find links to the actual ads, let usk know in comments)
• IL-11: Adam Kinzinger (R)
• IL-14: Rep. Bill Foster (D)
• KS-04: Raj Goyle (D)
• MI-09: Rep. Gary Peters (D)
• NV-03: Joe Heck (R)
• OH-01: Rep. Steve Driehaus (D)
• VA-09: Rep. Rick Boucher (D)

Independent Expenditures:

• Women Vote!: Aka EMILY’s List puts in $80K (TV) against Joe Heck (R) in NV-03, $23K (mail) for Julie Lassa (D) in WI-07, and $32K (mail) against Roy Blunt (R) in MO-Sen
• MI-07: The Communications Workers of America put in $100K (TV) against Tim Walberg (R)
• OR-04: Conservative front group Concerned Taxpayers of America puts in $86K (TV) for Art Robinson (R)

So whenever I see a house poll here I always check it against 538’s house forecasting model, in hopes that Nate is underestimating our chances of keeping the house. Lately, I have been noticing some fairly sharp divergences between the poll numbers and his calls. He’s got KY-6 as a 56% chance of a GOP take-over. The GOP candidate just released an internal showing himself down 7. Nate’s got us with a 47% chance of keeping PA-8. Today’s poll shows us down 14 there. Nate shows a 68% chance of a takeover in MI-7. Rossman group shows the race within the margin of error.

Anyone with two brain cells to rub together can figure out half a dozen reasons this isn’t a knock on Nate Silver, who, frankly speaking, is the single baddest motherf*cker on the planet. These include: the polls I just named were all disclosed after the model was released; structural factors may have more to do with the outcome than the polls; 538’s model is designed to estimate the probability of a certain number of seats, not the likelihood of each individual outcome.

But it does get me thinking, if all we knew were the poll-numbers, how would things look in the house? So humor my ghetto-ass statistical talents a moment and come scratch around on my cocktail napkin…

In order to determine the predictive power of polling about a month outside of a midterm election, I examined 46 races polled between Tuesday October 3, 2006 and Thursday October 5, 2006, as reported here http://www.realclearpolitics.c…  

I excluded Foley/Mahoney (because of name-on-ballot-hijinks, and what I can only imagine would be a fairly massive Foley-related Dinkins effect), and all 3 way races. I didn’t exclude internals and partisans (since that is a lot of the contemporaneous house data), and I simply didn’t have enough data from this period of 2006 to limit the review to house races. Some of the included races were Reuters/Zogby, (though I dont think this was part of Zogby’s experimental non-euclidean polling phase). I also heard a rumor that it isn’t October 3, 2010 yet, but this was as far back as this particular web-site reported historical data, so, you know, welcome to my cocktail napkin. The margins of error in the polls were generally in the neighborhood of 5%.

Anyway, I calculated the difference between the polling numbers from this little window in 2006 and the ultimate outcomes, averaging if a race were polled twice. I probably got some math wrong, but I found the following potentially helpful facts:

the average distance (in either direction) between a candidate’s polling lead in this period and the outcome of the election was 6 points (6.3, actually, but Lord Holy-F*cking Jesus God Almighty, you do not want to know the abominations I have perpetrated against the concept of significant figures in this process).

Candidates with leads between 1% and 6% at this point (and by “lead” I mean “lead in the polls conducted on these three days”), won nine out of sixteen races. Candidates with leads in excess of 6 points won 87.5% of their races (though they were only 6 out of 9 if the lead was between 7 and 12 points).

The races were identically likely to move in the direction of either the candidate winning or the one losing.

72% of the races “moved” less than 6% in either direction.

91% of the races “moved” less than 12% in either direction.

Anyway, so I’m all ears with what to do with all this, but it seems to me that it would be worthwhile to take a look at the 68 races 538 ranks as “lean, even, or possible takeover” and see how many have been polled in spitting distance of the right-ish-now-ish era (a concept operationally defined by the cocktail napkin). Then I’d like to know how many are within 6 and 12 points right now, and would probably call anything within 6 a toss-up, and keep anything within 12 on the board.

And that’s probably part 2. I guess I have till October 3. Unless anyone wants to pitch in…

(Please keep comments in the spirit of the cocktail napkin. My cat took over the keyboard, and he’s not that great with margins or error. Meow.)

• CO-Sen: Ken Buck is running back to the middle, or at least the far right field instead of completely out of the ballpark, as he faces a close race in the general. He’s backing down on his previous support of Colorado’s “personhood” amendment (granting legal rights to embryos) that’s on Colorado’s ballot again, saying he’s against it despite loudly touting it during his primary bid.

• NV-Sen: Observers are wondering if this is Sharron Angle’s true chickens-for-checkups moment (in a campaign that’s already littered with quotes that contend for that honor). A video from a 2009 tea party rally by a Dem tracker shows Angle taking issue with a recently passed Nevada state law requires insurance carriers to cover “autism.” (And yes, she makes exaggerated air quotes while saying “autism.”) I suppose she thinks it’s nothing a good massage, sauna, and some aromatherapy can’t fix.

• CO-Gov: While John Hickenlooper seems to skate toward the Governor’s Mansion, Dan Maes and Tom Tancredo are descending even more comically into fighting to see who can garner a smaller share of the minority. Maes just called Tancredo “an illegal immigrant” (given Tanc’s fixations, probably the single worst thing he could be called) in the gubernatorial race, seeing as how he “cheated his way in the back door.”

• ID-01: Another day, another endorsement for Walt Minnick from another conservative organization looking to back one token Dem as a badge of bipartisanship. Today, he became the only Dem with the seal of approval from the Citizens Against Government Waste PAC.

• KY-06: Republican challenger Andy Barr, having been on the very wrong end of a couple Democratic polls in the last few weeks (giving Ben Chandler 20 and 14 point leads), comes out with his own internal to demonstrate that he’s not that dead yet. His own poll, from the Tarrance Group, gives Chandler only a 49-42 lead, in the wake of Chandler attack ads tying Barr to his previous boss, disgraced ex-Gov. Ernie Fletcher.

• PA-08: Franklin & Marshall (9/14-19, likely voters, no trendlines):

Patrick Murphy (D-inc): 35

Mike Fitzpatrick (R): 49

(MoE: ±4.5%)

It’s unexpected to see Patrick Murphy, in the friendlier confines of the 8th, in worse shape than Kathy Dahlkemper in the 3rd (trailing narrowly in a different F&M poll with the same timeframe). He’s down 46-36 among RVs.

• PA-11: The Realtors® ride to Paul Kanjorski’s rescue yet again! I’m not sure why they have such love for Kanjo in particular among Dems, but today they’re slapping down $243K on his behalf. Recall that they spent over $1.3 million saving his hide in 2008.

• TX-17: Wow, that’s a big lead. Republican pollster OnMessage, on behalf of Bill Flores, gives their client a 55-36 lead over Dem incumbent Chet Edwards, over 9/19-20. I wonder if this’ll motivate Edwards, who notoriously holds his cards close to his vest, to roll out a response (if he has one). The article also notes that AFF is going on the air in the district with a new ad tying Edwards to (gee, guess who) Nancy Pelosi.

• DSCC: Reid Wilson has three new big buys from the DSCC in key states: $335K in Colorado, $235K in Illinois, and $470K in Pennsylvania.

• Redistricting: Here’s an interesting piece from Josh Goodman, for those of you among us who like looking at long lists of population figures. (I know I do.) It suggests that the redistricting axe is going to have to fall hardest on rural areas, which is a positive note for Dems; Census data (based on the 2009 ACS… you’re going to have to wait a few more months for 2010 data!) shows that the almost all of nation’s largest cities have grown (some remarkably so) or at least held steady.

• SSP TV:

• CA-Sen: Carly Fiorina calls Barbara Boxer “arrogant,” citing her notorious examination of Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh

• NY-Gov: Andrew Cuomo has a target-rich environment for negative ads with Carl Paladino; one hit from his new ad includes Paladino’s job creation record (or lack thereof)

• OH-Gov: Ted Strickland belatedly tries out “You want angry? I’ll give you angry!”

• OR-Gov: The SEIU hits Chris Dudley on his proposed income tax cuts for the wealthy

• PA-06: Manan Trivedi does the jujitsu move on Jim Gerlach’s hits on his residency, pointing he was busy, y’know, serving the military overseas during the years in question

• AJS: Americans for Job Securities targets four Dem-held seats with cookie-cutter neg ads: IN-08, OH-18, PA-04, and PA-07.

• Rasmussen:

• AL-Gov: Ron Sparks (D) 35%, Robert Bentley (R) 55%

• GA-Gov: Roy Barnes (D) 39%, Nathan Deal (R) 45%, John Monds (L) 5%

• MO-Sen: Robin Carnahan (D) 44%, Roy Blunt (R) 52%

• ND-AL: Earl Pomeroy (D-inc) 45%, Rick Berg (R) 48%

SurveyUSA for KING-TV (9/19-21, likely voters, 8/18-19 in parentheses):

Patty Murray (D-inc): 50 (45)

Dino Rossi (R): 48 (52)

Undecided: 3 (3)

(MoE: ±4.1%)

Aside from the occasional Rasmussen poll showing a small Dino Rossi lead, most of Rossi’s strength in polling this cycle has come from SurveyUSA (who’ve, rightly or wrongly, become something of our preferred punching-bag among pollsters in the last few months). Well, SurveyUSA still seems to be outlying to the right by a few points, among the latest round of polls (also from Elway, CNN/Time, and Rasmussen), but they’re also moving along with a definite movement in the Democratic direction in this race in the last few weeks, to the extent that even they’re now showing a Patty Murray lead. Check out the movement in visual form (cheating slightly, by dialing the smoothing up to “more sensitive”):

Part of the flip in Murray’s favor may be that SurveyUSA actually got some young people to pick up their phones this time: Murray leads Rossi 54-46 among the 18-34 set. Rossi’s only pocket of strength left is those cynical members of Generation X (he leads 55-41 among the 35-49 demographic). Rossi also leads 54-41 among self-described “Independents” (kind of a silly question, since there’s no party registration in Washington), although he’s down 63-33 among self-described “moderates,” suggesting that “moderates” tend to identify pretty strongly Democratic these days, at least in Washington.