OH-Sen: Game Over

Lee Fisher mails it in (the rest of his campaign cash, that is):

As the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported  yesterday, Fisher — the Democratic nominee for Senate — decided to turn what little campaign cash he has left — $100,000 — over to the state Democratic Party for general GOTV efforts.

Two weeks ago, “Fisher’s campaign for U.S. Senate was down to $308,631 in its bank account,” the paper reported. “Sums like that don’t last long and replenishing it is a challenge when a candidate lags in the polls.”

Though Fisher has promised “he is not abandoning the campaign or giving up” against former Rep. Rob Portman (R), the Columbus Dispatch reports that the move by Fisher “essentially drained his campaign treasury.”

This is the end. My only friend, the end…

As miserable a race as this was for Team Blue despite such great hopes when George Voinovich announced his retirement, at least Fisher is using what little change he has left for a good cause. There are some retiring Democrats who refuse to do the same!

FL-Gov, FL-Sen: Sink Up In Two Polls, Crist Gains Ground

Quinnipiac (10/18-24, likely voters, 10/6-10 in parens):

Alex Sink (D): 45 (44)

Rick Scott (R): 41 (45)

Undecided: 11 (9)

Kendrick Meek (D): 15 (22)

Marco Rubio (R): 42 (44)

Charlie Crist (I): 35 (30)

Undecided: 7 (4)

(MoE: ±3.5%)

Quinnipiac’s latest Florida poll is their most optimistic one for Alex Sink in a while; they’ve been one of the more bearish pollsters in Florida for the last few months, and this is their first poll with a Sink lead since August. While this boost might just be chalked up to float within the margin of error, if nothing else it shows that “debategate” (in which Sink got a text message during her debate) didn’t seem to affect the dynamics of the race one way or the other.

Even more interesting is that Charlie Crist seems to be busting a late move in the Senate race, although it’s probably still too far out of reach for him to pull it out, given the weirdness of the three-way race and the split among left-of-center votes. His five-point gain pulls him within 7 of Marco Rubio. Crist’s gain comes at Meek’s loss (down 7 since the last poll), so there might be some last-minute consolidation by Dem-leaning voters deciding that Crist is the best way to avoid the specter of Rubio. (Crist now gets 51% of Dems, while Meek gets 36% of them. Indies go 43% for Crist, 38% for Rubio, and 9% for Meek.)

Mason-Dixon (10/25-27, likely voters, 10/4-6 in parens):

Alex Sink (D): 46 (44)

Rick Scott (R): 43 (40)

Undecided: 7 (-)

(MoE: ±3.5%)

Mason-Dixon provides some confirmation today of Quinnipiac’s numbers with a poll taken slightly more recently, although they don’t see movement at all over the last few weeks (Sink led by 4, now by 3). Most interestingly, they find Scott’s unfavorables getting much worse: he’s now at 30/52, compared with Sink’s 49/44. It would be pretty remarkable to see anyone win with those kind of favorables, and a Scott win would obviously have a lot to do with the national climate. If there’s any doubt this is the nation’s closest major governor’s race, check out the trendlines from Pollster.com.

SSP Daily Digest: 10/28 (Afternoon Edition)

• CO-Sen: In case there was any doubt about where Ken Buck is on abortion, new video has come out from June that he’s not only against Roe v. Wade, but against the whole concept of a right of privacy (on the usual teabagger grounds that it wasn’t explicitly laid out in the Constitution).

• PA-Sen: Although there will be a Barack Obama appearance in Philly proper this weekend, Bill Clinton is left with the task of headlining rallies around the rest of the state. Today Clinton appears on Joe Sestak’s behalf in the Philly suburbs, in Bryn Mawr and Cheyney. Clinton also appears with Dan Onorato and John Callahan in Bethlehem today.

• WV-Sen: Good news for John Raese on two different fronts. The Palm Beach architecture commission approved his plans to replace a “giant dollhouse” in the yard of his Palm Beach mansion with a glass conservatory! (Just be sure to hide all the blunt objects when Colonel Mustard comes over for a visit.) Also, it turns out he’s a +13 handicap, occasionally getting down into the high 70s, so he’s definitely got some game on the links. (Unfortunately for Raese, the reason we know this is because somebody leaked his self-reported scorecards from the golf ladder at the Everglades Club, the all-white country club in Palm Beach about which he’s stonewalled on inquiries on whether he’s a member or not.)

• HI-Gov: Credit Mufi Hannemann for good sportsmanship. In response to evidence that his supporters from the primary (who tended to skew socially conservative) were tending to break toward Duke Aiona, Hannemann recently cut a TV ad urging his backers to vote for Neil Abercrombie. The ad’s part of a $200K buy by Hawaii labor unions.

• AZ-03: It’s sounding like that PPP poll that gave him a lead wasn’t a total fluke. Whatever Jon Hulburd is seeing is enough to get him to open up his personal checkbook and hand his campaign another $250K for a final push. No specific numbers are available, but the article says that his internal polling sees him “within the margin of error.” (That’s not usually the phrasing of someone who’s leading in his internals, but maybe he still can gut it out.)

• NC-11: A handful of Democrats in tough races have said that they’d rather vote for someone other than Nancy Pelosi for Speaker, but no one has actually stepped forward until now to volunteer himself as a receptacle for Blue Dog votes. Heath Shuler, previously declared as one of the “no” votes, said he’ll do it if no one else will. There’s not telling how this gambit would work out if the Dems keep the House, or if he’ll be running for minority leader if not.

• Passages: Condolences to the friends and family of Owen Pickett, the former long-time Democratic Rep. from VA-02. Pickett, who was 80, served there from 1987 to 2001.

• SSP TV:

• CT-Sen: Linda McMahon’s closing argument is an endorsement from her daughter, celebrexecutive (that should be a word, if it isn’t) Stephanie

• LA-Sen: Assuming Charlie Melancon loses, still give him credit for using all the material at his disposal: his TV spot hits David Vitter as hard as possible, saying his taxpayer-paid salary paid for prostitutes and it’s a “sin” he represents Louisiana at all

• WV-Sen: Credit to Joe Manchin, too, for not Coakleying this one up; once he found himself in an unexpected close race, he buckled down, found messages that worked, and hammered on them, as in his final ad

• FL-22: Ron Klein goes positive with his last spot, touting endorsements from a variety of citizen groups

• NH-02: Ann McLane Kuster’s ad is a combo platter of hitting Charlie Bass on his Wall Street ways and going positive on her own job creation plans

• Rasmussen:

• CA-Sen: Barbara Boxer (D-inc) 49%, Carly Fiorina (R) 46%

• CO-Sen: Michael Bennet (D-inc) 44%, Ken Buck (R) 48%

• FL-Gov: Alex Sink (D) 45%, Rick Scott (R) 48%

• GA-Sen: Michael Thurmond (D) 29%, Johnny Isakson (R-inc) 59%

• ME-Gov: Libby Mitchell (D) 26%, Paul LePage (R) 40%, Eliot Cutler (I) 26%

• OH-Gov: Ted Strickland (D-inc) 44%, John Kasich (R) 48%

• WA-Sen: Patty Murray (D-inc) 47%, Dino Rossi (R) 48%

(um, do you really want that to be your final answer on WA-Sen?)

Worried About 2012

Is anyone else extremely worried about President Obama’s reelection ? Because I know I am. I am not worried because of the economy, I am worried mainly because of health care and the fact that it could very well be declared unconstitutional by two federal judges by early next year. The first judge is named Henry Hudson and he is a federal judge in Virginia. His ruling is expected in December. Why I am worried so much about Judge Hudson’s ruling ? It is because in prior hearings he has said this

“Unquestionably, this regulation radically changes the landscape of health insurance coverage in America,” Hudson wrote in his 32-page decision.

And on top of that, Judge Hudson owns stock in a company that does campaign work for Republican candidates.

Then there is the Florida Judge, Roger Vinson, who in his written opinion said this,

Congress should not be permitted to secure and cast politically difficult votes on controversial legislation by deliberately calling something one thing, after which the defenders of that legislation take an “Alice-in-Wonderland” tack and argue in court that Congress really meant something else entirely, thereby circumventing the safeguard that exists to keep their broad power in check,” he wrote.

All of this sounds like he could be headed toward declaring the law unconstitutional and if so we be a serious blow to the president’s reelection efforts.

DC Advisory Neighborhood Commission

Although I rarely write diaries here, I read this blog every day and love how passionate and knowledgeable each one of you are about elections.

So, I am writing to tell you that I am currently managing a race in DC for 2 Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) seats in Ward 3 – SMD 3D02 and 3D07. 3D07 encompasses the south side of American University for the most part and 3D02 encompasses the north side of campus as well as the Spring Valley neighborhood.

If you are interested in learning more (any AU alumni or residents of NW DC here?), please visit our website: www.avoice4u.org and consider donating $5 or even voting if you live in one of the districts.

I know that most people are concerned with who keeps Congress and what these elections mean nationally, but the ANC has a say on many things that directly impact AU students so it is time for them to have a say in what their government does.

Thank you!

P.S. You can also see that Greater Greater Washington endorsed our candidates: http://greatergreaterwashingto…

AK-Sen: Unnamed Write-In Candidate Leads

Hays Research for IBEW (10/25-26, ? likely voters, 10/22 in parens):

Scott McAdams (D): 29 (25)

Joe Miller (R): 23 (26)

“Another candidate you have to write in”: 34 (31)

Undecided: 13 (17)

(n = 500)

Hays Research has apparently been polling the Alaska Senate race repeatedly without releasing the results, and the Mudflats got their hands on the newest batch of numbers, which are a real eye-opener. (Of course, that would suggest that they’re polling on someone’s behalf, and the writeup has no word of that, which seems like an important detail. It also doesn’t give an MoE or even state whether we’re dealing with LVs, RVs, or what here. But you can’t have everything.) (UPDATE: Thanks to Nate Silver, we now know the poll was paid for by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and is of likely voters.)

Most notably, this is the first poll released that gives Lisa Murkowski a sizable lead, or at least that gives “another candidate you have to write in” a sizable lead, but one would expect the vast majority of that go for Murkowski. (Unlike other polls, this one doesn’t even delve into who people plan to write in. There have been as many methods of polling this impossible-to-poll race as there have been pollsters trying it.) But also significantly, this is the first poll to show Joe Miller in third place and Scott McAdams leading among all named candidates. The memo has trendlines from four different polls, so the collapse of Miller is on full display over the course of October.

Suggestive of an “anti-incumbent” year is that most of the momentum seems to be with McAdams, not Murkowski, though. Does that mean that Miller votes are entirely flowing to McAdams, rather than to Murkowski? Maybe former Miller votes are also shifting to Murkowski and undecideds are breaking for McAdams. (That would certainly explain why the NRSC has been going anti-McAdams with its latest ad: they’re rightly worried he may be able to shoot the gap.) At any rate, Miller seems to be in a position he can’t recover from, especially as more damning revelations seem to trickle in every day: his favorables are now 26/68, including 60% “very unfavorable.” (If there’s any consolation for him from this, at least he’ll probably still perform better than fellow grifter Dan Maes.)

Here’s one other item that will help Murkowski: the Alaska Supreme Court promptly overruled a lower court that said that voters can’t use a list of potential write-in candidates. While the list approved by the Supreme Court will not actually be on display in voting booths, those asking for help at polling places can be shown the list. (UPDATE: There’s still a temporary restraining order against the lists for now, though, so this looks like it’ll be an ongoing story. H/t Adam B.) (YET ANOTHER UPDATE: Actually, the lists will be available, but with a few caveats. In Adam’s own words, “What it does is stays the effect of the TRO below — in other words, the Board is not forbidden from posting lists — but says that the lists can’t contain partisan identification for the write-in candidates, and if a voter is given the list, her ballot gets segregated.” Here’s the link to the Supreme Court’s order, if anyone actually wants to read the fine print.)

SSP Daily Digest: 10/28 (Morning Edition)

Yer gonna have to click the links….

AR-Sen: 54-35 Boozman

CO-Gov: 43-42 Bennet

FL-Gov: 47-45 Scott

GA-08: 47-44 Marshall

HI-Gov: 50-45 Abercrombie

HI-01: 50-45 Hanabusa

IN-02: 48-43 Donnelly

IN-03: 57-33 Stutzman

KY-03: 50-46 Yarmuth

LA-Sen: 50-38 Vitter

MI-07: 50-43 Schauer

MN-01: 50-41 Walz

ND-AL: 51-42 Berg

NH-01: 53-37 Guinta

NY-Sen-B: 57-34 Gillibrand

NY-Gov: 55-35

NY-19 (PDF): 47-46 Hall

NY-24 (PDF): 48-43 Arcuri

OH-Sen: 52-37 Portman

OH-Gov: 49-44 Kasich

OK-Gov: 56-38 Fallin

OR-Gov: 46-43 Dudley

OR-Gov (PDF): 49-45 Kitzhaber

PA-Sen: 43-36 Toomey

PA-Gov: 47-32 Corbett

RI-Gov: 35-28-25 Lincoln-Robitaille-Caprio

WA-03: 50-46 Herrera

WA-09: 49-46 Smith

Margins & Errors: A Barela internal with only toplines in NM-01… Toomey +5 and Corbett +14 in the Mule tracker… Another big blast of polls (PDF) from CNN/Time (CA, CO, KY, NV, PA)… this fucking Sean Bielat memo (nice scan!) doesn’t even give actual toplines… An internal for Republican Bill Marcy in MS-02 asks a weirdly axe-grindy question about taxation before getting to the toplines

California Race Chart 2010 (Part 3 of 3: State Legislature)

Here is Part 3, the last part of my analysis of this fall’s elections in California, which will cover the state legislative races.

Cross-posted at Daily Kos, Calitics, and Democracy for California.

STATE SENATE (District size: ~846,791) (Composition: 25 Democrats, 15 Republicans)

Districts to watch:

SD-12 (Part of Central Valley and inland Central Coast): Ceres Mayor Anthony Cannella (R) vs. St. Asm. Anna Caballero (D) – vacated by Jeff Denham (R)

Registration: 50.2% DEM, 31.1% GOP, 14.9% DTS, 3.8% Other

Profile: In spite of the hefty registration advantage, Denham managed to win twice in this district because many Democrats here are more conservative than most California Democrats. Nonetheless, this is still the best (and only) opportunity for a Democratic pickup in the State Senate for the first time in a decade. Caballero also got more votes than Cannella in the primary (neither had primary challengers), even though Republican turnout was higher due to competitive statewide office primaries on that side and few on the Democratic side. If Caballero could get more votes even in spite of lower Democratic turnout (though I’m not sure what the numbers in the 12th were), then she probably will be able to do so again in the general, with higher Democratic turnout.

10/27/2010 Outlook: Toss-up/tilt Caballero (Dem pickup)

SD-34 (Central Orange County): Lou Correa (D) vs. Anaheim Councilwoman Lucille Kring (R)

Registration: 44.5% DEM, 32.4% GOP, 19.3% DTS, 3.8% Other

Profile: This was a close call in 2006, with Correa hanging on by just about a thousand or so votes. The registration gap was also much smaller, with Democrats having only a 39%-37% edge, and for those that may remember, turnout in 2006 was depressed due to bitterness in the governor’s race. Now, though, with a 12-point Dem registration advantage and turnout likely to improve over 2006, Correa’s prospects for a second term look brighter.

10/27/2010 Outlook: Likely Correa

Safe:

SD-01 (Sierras): Special election to replace the deceased Dave Cox (R)

SD-02 (North Coast): Noreen Evans (D) – vacated by Pat Wiggins (D)

SD-04 (Sacramento Valley and Del Norte County): Doug LaMalfa (R) – vacated by Sam Aanestad (R)

SD-06 (Sacramento): Darrell Steinberg (D)

SD-08 (San Mateo, western part of San Francisco): Leland Yee (D)

SD-10 (Southern Alameda County, northern Santa Clara County): Ellen Corbett (D)

SD-14 (San Joaquin, Yosemite, eastern Fresno): Tom Berryhill (R) – vacated by Dave Cogdill (R)

SD-16 (Central Valley including parts of Fresno and Bakersfield): Michael Rubio (D) – vacated by Dean Florez (D)

SD-18 (Bakersfield, Tulare, Big Empty): Jean Fuller (R) – vacated by Roy Ashburn (R)

SD-20 (San Fernando): Alex Padilla (D)

SD-22 (South Pasadena, part of L.A.): Kevin de León (D) – vacated by Gil Cedillo (D)

SD-24 (Covina, Baldwin Park, part of L.A.): Ed Hernandez (D) – vacated by Gloria Romero (D)

SD-26 (Culver City): Curren Price (D)

SD-28 (Beach Cities): Vacant (Jenny Oropeza (D) died October 20, 2010. If she “wins”, a special will be held)

SD-30 (Eastern L.A. suburbs): Ron Calderon (D)

SD-32 (Pomona, San Bernardino): Gloria Negrete-McLeod (D)

SD-36 (Eastern San Diego County): Joel Anderson (R) – vacated by Dennis Hollingsworth (R)

SD-38 (San Juan Capistrano, Oceanside, Carlsbad): Mark Wyland (R)

SD-40 (Imperial County, southeastern Riverside and San Diego Counties): Juan Vargas (D) – vacated by Denise Ducheny (D)

STATE ASSEMBLY (District size: ~423,388) (Composition: 50 Democrats, 29 Republicans, 1 Independent)

Districts to watch:

AD-05 (Northern Sacramento suburbs): Businessman Andy Pugno (R) vs. Dr. Richard Pan (D), Elizabeth Martin (PF) – vacated by Roger Niello (R)

Registration: 40.1% GOP, 37.7% DEM, 17.9% DTS, 4.3% Other

Profile: In this evenly-divided district just outside Sacramento, we have a very formidable candidate in Pan against Prop. 8 author Pugno. This district overlaps the 3rd congressional district and will likely see a lot of activity.

10/27/2010 Outlook: Toss-Up

AD-10 (Eastern Sacramento suburbs): Alyson Huber (D) vs. businessman Jack Sieglock (R), Janice Bonser (L), Albert Troyer (PF)

Registration: 40.9% DEM, 39.1% GOP, 16.1% DTS, 4.0% Other

Profile: In another evenly-divided Sacto-area seat that also happens to partly overlap CA-03, we have another exciting race, where in 2008 Huber won by under 500 votes and was declared the winner after her opponent went to the capital for orientation. He is back for a second round, and while Huber doesn’t have coattails working in her favor, she does have incumbency (no incumbent in the state legislature has lost reelection in a decade) and a Democratic trend in registration on her side.

10/27/2010 Outlook: Toss-Up/tilt Huber

AD-15 (Inner East Bay): Joan Buchanan (D) vs. San Ramon Mayor Abram Wilson (R)

Registration: 41.5% DEM, 35.3% GOP, 19.3% DTS, 3.9% Other

Profile: This district includes parts of San Joaquin County and conservative parts of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, much of which overlaps the hotly-contested CA-11 race. Buchanan ran in the CA-10 special election last year, so that may be a liability for her, but she is still favored to win because of an increasing Dem advantage in registration, incumbency, and the fact that rematches rarely succeed for the challenger.

10/27/2010 Outlook: Tilt/Lean Buchanan

AD-30 (Southern San Joaquin Valley): Farmer David Valadao (R) vs. businesswoman Fran Florez (D) – vacated by Danny Gilmore (R)

Registration: 45.7% DEM, 36.1% GOP, 14.3% DTS, 3.9% Other

Profile: This was the only legislative gain for the GOP in 2008 because the outgoing Democrat Nicole Parra endorsed Gilmore. This time Gilmore is not running, while Florez is again, having defeated Nicole Parra’s father Pete in the primary. Parra endorsed Valadao, plus a poll has shown him with a double-digit lead, so I’ll leave it as a retention for Team Red.

10/27/2010 Outlook: Lean Valadao

AD-33 (Part of southern Central Coast): SLO County Sup. Katcho Achadjian (R) vs. Santa Maria Mayor Pro Tem Hilda Zacarias and Paul Polson (L) – Vacant; Sam Blakeslee (R) was elected to the State Senate

Registration: 40.6% GOP, 35.4% DEM, 18.4% DTS, 5.6% Other

Profile: In this open seat on the Central Coast, we have another formidable Democratic challenger. The registration gap does make things a little challenging for us here, but from what I heard Hilda has had a strong ground campaign.

10/27/2010 Outlook: Lean Achadjian

AD-36 (Lancaster, Palmdale): Steve Knight (R) vs. school board member Linda Jones (D)

Registration: 39.1% GOP, 38.6% DEM, 17.0% DTS, 5.2% Other

Profile: This race was closer than expected in 2008 due to presidential coattails and many minorities moving into the Antelope Valley area. This time around, though, the lack of coattails and incumbency will make this race less competitive than last time.

10/27/2010 Outlook: Lean to Likely Knight

AD-68 (Garden Grove, Costa Mesa): (D) – Costa Mesa Mayor Allan Mansoor (R) vs. entrepreneur Phu Nguyen – vacated by Van Tran (R)

Registration: 41.0% GOP, 32.4% DEM, 22.0% DTS, 4.6% Other

Profile: Here is another strong candidate we have in Nguyen, who has the backing of public safety unions (even though Mansoor is a former deputy) and has led in campaign spending and cash-on-hand. While this is a very traditionally Republican area that has long been a tough nut for Democrats to crack, look for this to be the closest a Democrat has come to winning in this area in a long time if Nguyen can rally the Vietnamese and Hispanic communities in the district.

10/27/2010 Outlook: Lean Mansoor

AD-70 (Irvine, Laguna Beach): CC Trustee Don Wagner (R) vs. attorney Melissa Fox (D) and Deborah Tharp (L) – vacated by Chuck DeVore (R)

Registration: 43.0% GOP, 29.8% DEM, 23.2% DTS, 4.0% Other

Profile: In another OC district, Democrat Fox is mounting a strong, serious challenge, and Democrats are becoming more competitive here because of the bluing of Irvine (going from Bush by 8 in 2000 to Bush by 5 in 2004 to Obama by 16 in 2008).

10/27/2010 Outlook: Lean to Likely Wagner

Safe:

AD-01 (North Coast): Wesley Chesbro (D)

AD-02 (Sacramento Valley): Jim Nielsen (R)

AD-03 (Northeast): Dan Logue (R)

AD-04 (Tahoe): Ted Gaines (R)

AD-06 (North Bay): Jared Huffman (D)

AD-07 (Napa Valley): Michael Allen (D) – vacated by Noreen Evans (D)

AD-08 (Sacramento River Delta): Mariko Yamada (D)

AD-09 (Sacramento): Roger Dickinson (D) – vacated by Dave Jones (D)

AD-11 (Northern Contra Costa County): Susan Bonilla (D) – vacated by Tom Torlakson (D)

AD-12 (Western San Francisco): Fiona Ma (D)

AD-13 (Eastern San Francisco): Tom Ammiano (D)

AD-14 (Berkeley, Richmond): Nancy Skinner (D)

AD-16 (Oakland): Sandré Swanson (D)

AD-17 (Stockton, Merced): Cathleen Galgiani (D)

AD-18 (Eastern Oakland suburbs): Mary Hayashi (D)

AD-19 (Most of San Mateo County): Jerry Hill (D)

AD-20 (Southern East Bay): Bob Wieckowski (D) – vacated by Alberto Torrico (D)

AD-21 (Silicon Valley): Rich Gordon (D) – vacated by Ira Ruskin (D)

AD-22 (Western San Jose): Paul Fong (D)

AD-23 (Downtown San Jose): Nora Campos (D) – vacated by Joe Coto (D)

AD-24 (Southern San Jose): Jim Beall (D)

AD-25 (Mother Lode, Yosemite): Kristin Olsen (R) (unopposed) – vacated by Tom Berryhill (R)

AD-26 (Stockton, Modesto): Bill Berryhill (R)

AD-27 (Northern Central Coast): Bill Monning (D)

AD-28 (Inner Central Coast region): Luis Alejo (D) – vacated by Anna Caballero (D)

AD-29 (Eastern Fresno): Linda Halderman (R) – vacated by Michael Villines (R)

AD-31 (Western Fresno): Henry Perea (D) – vacated by Juan Arambula (I)

AD-32 (Bakersfield): Shannon Grove (R) – vacated by Jean Fuller (R)

AD-34 (Big Empty): Connie Conway (R)

AD-35 (Santa Barbara, Oxnard): Das Williams (D) – vacated by Pedro Nava (D)

AD-37 (Most of Ventura, small part of L.A.): Jeff Gorell (R) – vacated by Audra Strickland (R)

AD-38 (Santa Clarita): Cameron Smyth (R)

AD-39 (San Fernando): Felipe Fuentes (D)

AD-40 (San Fernando Valley, including Van Nuys): Bob Blumenfield (D)

AD-41 (Oxnard, Malibu, Santa Monica): Julia Brownley (D)

AD-42 (Beverly Hills, West Hollywood): Mike Feuer (D)

AD-43 (Burbank, Glendale): Mike Gatto (D)

AD-44 (Pasadena): Anthony Portantino (D)

AD-45 (East L.A.): Gil Cedillo (D) – vacated by Kevin de León (D)

AD-46 (East L.A., Huntington Park): John Pérez (D)

AD-47 (Culver City): Holly Mitchell (D) – vacated by Karen Bass (D)

AD-48 (Part of South Central L.A.): Mike Davis (D)

AD-49 (Inner Northeastern suburbs of L.A.): Mike Eng (D)

AD-50 (Bellflower): Ricardo Lara (D) – vacated by Hector De La Torre (D)

AD-51 (Inglewood, Hawthorne): Steven Bradford (D)

AD-52 (Compton): Isadore Hall (D)

AD-53 (Beach Cities): Betsy Butler (D) – vacated by Ted Lieu (D)

AD-54 (Palos Verdes, Long Beach, Avalon): Bonnie Lowenthal (D)

AD-55 (Carson, Long Beach): Warren Furutani (D)

AD-56 (Norwalk, Buena Park): Tony Mendoza (D)

AD-57 (Covina, Baldwin Park): Roger Hernandez (D) – vacated by Ed Hernandez (D)

AD-58 (Inner Eastern suburbs of L.A.): Charles Calderon (D)

AD-59 (Parts of L.A. and San Bernardino Counties): Tim Donnelly (R) – vacated by Anthony Adams (R)

AD-60 (Western Inland Empire): Curt Hagman (R)

AD-61 (Pomona, Ontario): Norma Torres (D)

AD-62 (San Bernardino, Fontana): Wilmer Carter (D)

AD-63 (Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands): Mike Morrell – Vacant; Bill Emmerson (R) was elected to the State Senate

AD-64 (Riverside, Palm Desert): Brian Nestande (R)

AD-65 (Yucca Valley, Big Bear): Paul Cook (R)

AD-66 (Temecula, Riverside): Kevin Jeffries (R)

AD-67 (Huntington Beach): Jim Silva (R)

AD-69 (Anaheim, Santa Ana): Jose Solorio (D)

AD-71 (Corona, part of inland Orange County): Jeff Miller (R)

AD-72 (Inland Northern Orange County): Chris Norby (R)

AD-73 (San Clemente, Oceanside): Diane Harkey (R)

AD-74 (Coastal Northern San Diego suburbs): Martin Garrick (R)

AD-75 (Inner Northern San Diego suburbs): Nathan Fletcher (R)

AD-76 (Northern San Diego City): Toni Atkins (D) – vacated by Lori Saldaña (D)

AD-77 (Most of inland San Diego County): Brian Jones (R) – vacated by Joel Anderson (R)

AD-78 (Chula Vista, Lemon Grove): Marty Block (D)

AD-79 (Southern San Diego City, Imperial Beach): Ben Hueso (D) – vacated by Mary Salas (D)

AD-80 (Imperial County, eastern Riverside County): Manuel Perez

California Congressional Redistricting if Prop 20 passes

In just a few days California voters will make final decisions on redistricting that will either expand the public commission process, or eliminate it entirely.  These competing ballot measures, Prop 20 and 27 respectively both have intensely waged campaigns with big bucks from conservative backers taking on incumbent legislators and congressional members.

The latest polling has Proposition 20 passing and 27 losing.  But what will that do for the state’s congressional delegation?

Using Dave’s Redistricting App I was able to draw these lines based on the criteria for the commission.  These include geographic compactness, maintaining city and county lines, working to preserve communities of interest.  What this avoids is looking at where incumbents live (the commission can’t know) or trying to draw lines based on any partisanship or competitiveness goal (the commission can draw no line to advantage or disadvantage a party).

Dave’s App is a bit dated in terms of its population estimates, so using current data the urban districts would likely expand a bit and rural districts would likely shrink.  This is only an approximation and presents some of the challenges if a commission were to handle the redraw.

The numbering is not relevant and can really serve to confuse.  Often times I will hear from a legislator or congressman “my district 18 is going to pick up this city” but under the commission both the numbering and the communities in a district will be determined by scratch.  This fallacy diminishes the extraordinary impact of California’s decision to go to a lay board for political redistricting and give them the rules/restrictions that we have.

For the purposes of reviewing this plan I am describing districts by their core city or county, and where there are arbitrary numbers I may reference them, but it is a waste to get caught up into a discussion of why the 11th is in Southern California… that doesn’t matter.

Statewide Map

Population Shifts

The biggest factor in redrawing California (either through the legislature, commission or courts) is the uneven growth between rural and urban communities.  Growth statewide for the past 10 years has been approximately 10%, with 5% growth in San Francisco, 3.5% growth in Los Angeles, and 35% growth in Riverside (inland southern California).  That means urban districts expand as they reach to gobble up 1/53rd of the state’s population, while rural districts contract for the same reason.

Boxed In

Aside from the obvious borders with Oregon, Nevada, Arizona and Mexico, plus a huge ocean, there are also two mountain ranges that provide some relatively impenetrable boundaries for map drawers.  In this map the central coast is drawn vertically because it doesn’t make sense to cross mountain ranges.  The central valley is more “boxy” then the high desert is again vertical and long to take in population.  San Francisco is in a way the easiest part to draw because map makers can start with an assumption that they will not cross a body of water and county/city lines in order to merge two communities (Marin and San Francisco) that do not share a lot of interests.  So, the Bay Area map is first constrained by this factor, and population within the city pushes districts southward.

The Channel

One of the most interesting parts of the state is the Central Valley, specifically San Joaquin County.  If mapmakers were to start in San Joaquin they could easily draw one congressional seat that would take it’s 687,000 residents.  But this is not possible when looking at the whole state.  

As the Bay Area gets drawn there are leftover residents in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, and as the Northern districts are drawn there has to be an outlet for those excess residents.  San Joaquin is perfectly located at the confluence of these two streams, and as overflow comes down the entire central valley acts as a channel for districts that need to expand to gain required population.  

Neatness

Overall the new congressional map is going to look neater.  Districts will take on odd shapes where that is the underlying geography or county / city lines, but where two cities or counties are combined they are adjacent.  Based on the new rules line drawers are not going to purposefully capture one community by going around or past another closer similar community.

This map gets the state’s 53 districts into sets of approximately 690,000 with a variation of +/- 2%.  Getting them perfect using projected 2009 data seemed an unnecessary headache.  When the 2010 census information becomes available the lines will be redrawn in real GIS software using the new data.

Bay Area Map

The Bay area begins in San Francisco, both figuratively and in this case literally.   Lines for the legislature and congress have crossed bodies of water, but under the commission rules it is extremely unlikely that they would draw a congressional district that crossed either the Bay Bridge or Golden Gate.  The political geography starts at the top of San Franciso and counts south until you run out of residents.  In this map I have favored geographic compactness, placing the south eastern portion of San Francisco into the San Mateo district.  Without any emphasis on drawing districts that are neat or compact the better choice would be to draw the San Francisco district as a crescent, with the south-eastern part of the city becoming part of the seat to the south.  

The San Mateo seat would take in 90% of San Mateo – and depending on the final census this district could grow to take more of San Mateo.  

Also seen in this picture are the Northern Santa Clara seat to include a number of smaller cities like Cupertino, Mountain View, Los Altos and Sunnyvayle.  This district goes up to the border of San Jose but should be able to avoid crossing that city line.  

The map also gives a peek at the Alameda seats – one that neatly places Oakland, the city of Alameda and Albany into one district, and Hayward, Fremont and Union City into another.  The casualties in Alameda County are San Leandro that is nearly impossible to keep whole, and Dublin and Livermore that have to be shipped into a Contra Costa district.  Keeping Alameda County together is impossible and Contra Costa became a pass thru for Alameda’s excess population.

Los Angeles Map

Los Angeles is a tough part of the state to draw.  There are long simmering changes in the core of the city where African Americans are being displaced by Latinos, conservative pockets of voters in the South Bay and San Gabriel Valley, extremely liberal white voters in Santa Monica, a strong LGBT population in West Hollywood, and a San Fernando Valley community that has sought to secede from the city.  

In addition to the principles of geographic compactness, preservation of city lines and traditional communities of interest, I have also followed some of the flow of the city as I understand it from living there most my life.  In the end I found that freeways were a significant geographic factor – which is appropriate or poetic for Los Angeles, the birthplace of freeway commuters.  There is a district along the 210 freeway, another along the 10, one that follows the 405.

I tried to avoid totally dividing the San Fernando valley, with an interest in treating it almost as if it was a city itself.   However, this had significant negative consequences in other parts of the County.  I may try to address this with different lines when new data is available.

South Bay and South LA districts

The driving factor in drawing the South Bay is Long Beach.  The city of LB plus a portion of LA that comes into the port, Wilmington, Harbor City and part of San Pedro makes a strong district with shared interests and neat following of city lines.

After drawing these lines there are several obvious districts to follow.  North/northeast of Long Beach is a strong Latino district (61% Latino) with small cities, to the North/northwest are is a traditionally African American base of Compton, Carson, Inglewood (30% African American), then to the west is a good coastal district.  

Santa Monica is a major LA area city and there are two options for drawing its congressional seat.  Mapmakers could take it up to Malibu and Ventura county based on a coastal community of interest, or it can draw the district into LA and absorb the strongly LGBT city of West Hollywood.  I chose the latter option.

Downtown LA districts

The LA city districts are shaped by the contours of the LA basin and some spillover population needs from the neighboring districts.  Both are over 60% Latino and the southern one is just 2% white.  Just to the east of downtown is a district that brings together several small cities, including the now world famous city of Bell.  This district is 87% Latino.  

San Fernando Valley districts

This map gives the San Fernando valley two congressional seats, one of which takes in the City of Burbank that is not technically part of LA city’s San Fernando Valley, but is often considered a “Valley” community.  Under this plan the Valley suffers from encroachment on all sides.  If the plan was started in the San Fernando Valley three congressional districts could be drawn, but that could be at the expense of other parts of the city.

San Gabriel Valley

The San Gabriel Valley is drawn horizontally, following the 210 freeway and foothills from Glendale to Pasadena and other smaller communities, then continues along the same plane to reach into San Bernardino.  Below the foothills there are districts that follow the 10 freeway and 60.  

Orange County districts

The conservative base of California, Orange County has in the last 20 years grown a strong Latino community of Democratic voters in and around Santa Ana and an adjoining conservative base of Vietnamese voters in and around Garden Grove.

The district begins in the south with the encroachment from Northern San Diego county.  This puts Laguna Niguel and southern Orange County in with Oceanside, following the 5 and 405 freeways and the new toll highway 73.  

The coastal district brings in Huntington and Newport beaches, and reaches up to Cypress in an attempt to go inland without dividing a major portion of the Vietnamese community.  

Inland Orange County has one district where Vietnamese will be an influence community, and another where Latinos will have a strong voice.  The Northern Orange County district bleeds out into San Bernardino and toward the Ontario airport.

I am happy to answer questions about any other parts of the state and discuss the challenges facing the commission if they are charged with drawing congressional lines.  Doing a from-scratch new map provides them with a huge opportunity and challenge.

Please leave comments and I will monitor/respond.

SSP Daily Digest: 10/27 (Afternoon Edition)

• AK-Sen: As is often the case, Alaska dominates our headlines today. Perhaps biggest in its implications is a hot-off-the-grill ruling from a judge that says that the state can’t provide a list of possible write-in candidates for people in the voting booth. Obviously, that hurts the cumbersome-named Lisa Mukrosky Morkoski Gibr Murkowski. Also, in the good news (well, maybe not, considering how far her star has fallen in-state) column for Joe Miller: Sarah Palin will be returning to the Last Frontier to stump for him tomorrow.

On the bad news front for Miller, though, first, he had to shout “I LIE!” yet again. That’s a confession from his own work e-mails, over his now-well-known reprimand for hijacking (and covering up his tracks) of co-workers’ computers to rig a local Republican online straw poll. That’s at the core of his Fairbanks personnel files, released last evening after he declined to appeal their release to the state supreme court. On top of that, now the Army is investigating his use of its soldiers from Fort Richardson to act as his personal paramilitary force during their off-hours; in addition to rules prohibiting active military members from involvement in political campaigns, it’s unclear whether they had their commander’s permission to seek outside employment.

• CA-Sen: Here’s some good news; Carly Fiorina bounced back quickly from her hospitalization yesterday for an infection associated with her breast cancer recovery, and left the hospital today. She’ll be back on the trail tomorrow, says her campaign.

• CO-Sen: Would you believe this is the biggest-money Senate race anywhere in the country? It is, if you go by outside group expenditures. 27 different IE groups have spent nearly $25 million in Colorado, with the NRSC leading the way. (Nevada will still probably wind up the most expensive overall, factoring in the candidates’ own accounts.) Meanwhile Ken Buck is in the news for two other reasons, first, his questioning of the separation of the church and state… handled more elegantly than Christine O’Donnell’s palm-to-forehead method, but still probably a liability as he seeks to downplay his extremism. And also, he’s now agnostic on whether he’ll support Mitch McConnell for GOP leader (Buck, of course, owes Jim DeMint big-time for getting him as far as he’s gotten).

• WV-Sen: Wow, this stuff literally writes itself. John Raese, under fire from Joe Manchin and the DSCC for his Florida mansion (and, for all practical purposes, residency), is now going to have to put some spin on this. The current item on the agenda for the Palm Beach planning commission: approval for Raese to replace a six-by-eight-foot “giant dollhouse” on his property with a fourteen-by-fifteen-foot “glass conservatory,” perfect for those real-life Clue re-enactments. I know that’s a problem that most West Virginians grapple with on a day-to-day basis.

• AZ-Gov: Now here’s an October Surprise that’s pushing the envelope (close to a November Surprise). Old documents reveal that Jan Brewer, a state Senator at the time, was involved in a 1988 auto accident where she was suspected at the time of driving under the influence. While she was immune from arrest at the time because the legislature was in session, it’s not clear why the case wasn’t pursued after that.

• MS-04: This might provide a small boost (dozens of votes?) to Gene Taylor: the Republican who lost the primary to state Rep. Steven Palazzo threw his backing to Taylor. Joe Tegerdine, interestingly, was the Tea Party candidate in the GOP race (with Palazzo the establishment pick), and finished with 43% of the vote; Tegerdine seemed to frame his decision very much in terms of pissing off the Republican establishment, in fact.

• Dark Money: If you look at only one link today, it should be this one, where a picture is worth way more than 1,000 words. It shows the octopus tentacles linking all the various shadowy outside groups that have poured in hundreds of millions of undisclosed dollars, and how they all kind of link back to Republican leadership. It’s almost worthy of Glenn Beck’s blackboard (well, if it had Woodrow Wilson and Diego Rivera on there somewhere).

• DNC: To quote Don Brodka, “if I wanted smoke blown up my ass, I’d be at home with a pack of cigarettes and short length of hose.” Nevertheless, the DNC is out with a memo today showing in various ways how the Republican wave hasn’t materialized, at least not in the form of early voting patterns so far, that’s worth a look-see (especially the graphs).

• SSP TV:

• CO-Sen: The DSCC has two spots in Colorado, both with citizens reciting the litany of why they can’t vote for Ken Buck

• IL-Sen: The DSCC links Mark Kirk to George W. Bush, while Alexi Giannoulias trots out the Obamas in his own ad

• MO-Sen: I seriously can’t summon up anything interesting to say about the last ads from Roy Blunt and Robin Carnahan; it’s been that sort of race

• NV-Sen: The DSCC finishes in Nevada by pointing out how Sharron Angle consistently brings teh crazy

• PA-Sen: The DSCC hits Pat Toomey on outsourcing yet again, while Pat Toomey goes blandly autobiographical for his closing spot

• WA-Sen: The DSCC’s parting shot is to hit Dino Rossi over his web of connections to unsavory real estate and lending partners

• WI-Sen: Both candidates close by ragging on each other; Ron Johnson hits Russ Feingold for only being fake “mavericky,” while Feingold asks why Johnson is being so vague and cagey about his agenda

• WV-Sen: The DSCC’s newest ad hits John Raese on the Florida residency issue yet again

• ND-AL: This may be the most interesting ad of the day: Earl Pomeroy faces the camera and says “I’m not Nancy Pelosi, and I’m not Barack Obama” (yeah, that’s pretty evident by looking at you); he pivots off people’s anger to say they’ll be even angrier, though, if Republicans go against the farm bill, Social Security, and so on

• WA-08: Suzan DelBene’s last ad beats the ‘change’ drum, and focuses on the Seattle Times endorsement again

• Rasmussen:

• IL-Sen: Alexi Giannoulias (D) 42%, Mark Kirk (R) 46%, LeAlan Jones (G) 5%

• MD-Sen: Barb Mikulski (D-inc) 56%, Eric Wargotz (R) 38%

• NV-Gov: Rory Reid (D) 35%, Brian Sandoval (R) 58%

• OR-Gov: John Kitzhaber (D) 46%, Chris Dudley (R) 49%

• WI-Gov: Tom Barrett (D) 42%, Scott Walker (R) 52%

• WV-Sen: Joe Manchin (D) 49%, John Raese (R) 46%

(ooops, time for Scotty to get in line with everyone else on this one!)