A Seriously Overdue Update: Redistricting New York

(From the diaries – promoted by DavidNYC)

This redistricting map has really been a long time coming, but trying to match up the 36,000 census blocks of NYC and the 20,000 blocks of Nassau County (among many, many others) with a precinct and creating a consolidated population-political data file tends to take a while. But unquestionably, I also think this is my best map yet. I used 2008 population estimates by city/town, projected forward to 2010. I also worked painstakingly hard for population equality, which I think is evident in that the total deviation for all 28 districts is 86, or 0.012% of a single district.

At a whopping 26-3, our NY delegation is already pretty maxed out. With the loss of a district in 2010, there’s a good opportunity to consolidate and create what could possibly be a 27-1 delegation. I chose to do this by eliminating John McHugh’s district and then employing some old-fashioned cracking of Nassau County to defeat Peter King. Side goals included strengthening Massa, Arcuri, Murphy, Hall, and McMahon, while preserving VRA districts for Meeks, Towns, Clarke, Velazquez, Rangel, and Serrano.

My district maps later. First, some eye candy:

I’m sure there’s enough in these maps to make for its own diary, but that’s for another time….

(Sidenote: Yes, I am sending my dataset to Dave and David, so hopefully this can be incorporated into DRA. I do have a ‘tutorial’ on how I do my redistricting where I used Wisconsin as an example that I will hopefully post shortly.)

Now, here’s my map:

Starting upstate:

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
28 700,339 201,234 133,976 59.32% 39.50% 13.23% 5.28% 2.54%
Livingston 16,497 4,721 3,483 56.67% 41.81% 1.38% 1.87% 1.87%
Monroe 683,842 196,513 130,493 59.39% 39.44% 13.52% 5.36% 2.55%

As is the case with a lot of my districts, I took some inspiration from the districts of yesteryear (or… 1993-2003). This would still be Louise Slaughter’s district, recentered around Monroe County (with an arm to grab Geneseo out of Livingston County). The percentage drop seems daunting at first (down from 68.47%), and there’s not a good reason for Buffalo and Rochester to be packed into the same district. Anyways, Slaughter is familiar with the area and would be solid for any Rochester Democrat should Slaughter choose to retire.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
27 700,326 184,327 130,941 57.52% 40.86% 10.02% 3.79% 1.66%
Erie 429,193 127,515 72,116 62.87% 35.56% 12.69% 5.06% 2.36%
Monroe 15,048 2,895 2,769 50.22% 48.03% 3.39% 2.85% 1.06%
Niagara 214,319 47,303 46,348 49.65% 48.65% 5.78% 1.29% 0.57%
Orleans 41,766 6,614 9,708 39.87% 58.53% 6.82% 3.88% 0.32%

I think a lot of times, we overestimate the Democratic strength of Brian Higgins’ district – he was only elected in 2004, and Obama only scored 54.19% here. I’ll admit, I shuffled around this district quite a bit, with it going from Buffalo north instead of south. We add all of Niagara and Orleans Counties, with a sliver of Monroe for population balancing, but we do retain all of Buffalo’s South District, which Higgins represented in the Buffalo Common Council before getting elected to Congress. From this we get slightly more than a 3% boost to 57.52%; this should be safe for a long time to come.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
26 700,339 171,771 144,151 53.52% 44.91% 9.24% 2.02% 0.64%
Allegany 34,270 5,028 7,071 40.66% 57.18% 0.95% 0.93% 0.86%
Cattaraugus 65,144 12,365 14,715 44.91% 53.44% 1.15% 0.98% 0.52%
Chautauqua 133,249 29,129 28,579 49.54% 48.60% 2.00% 4.12% 0.35%
Chemung 55,777 12,400 10,904 52.67% 46.31% 8.20% 2.35% 0.65%
Erie 373,522 105,070 73,706 57.88% 40.60% 14.92% 1.62% 0.64%
Steuben 38,377 7,779 9,176 45.29% 53.42% 1.71% 0.83% 1.59%

Granted, I shifted around Massa’s district quite a bit too, with it now going to Buffalo instead of Rochester. I did this in the interest of centering the 28th in Monroe County and leaving room for the sprawling 23rd. However, I think it retains its Southern Tier character (roughly 40%). The nastier bits of Steuben and Allegany counties are carved out. The Democratic boost from the remaining parts of Buffalo doesn’t hurt either, leaving this district 5 points better at 53.52%.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
25 700,324 181,879 137,622 55.94% 42.33% 6.42% 2.23% 1.51%
Cayuga 52,661 11,864 9,433 54.62% 43.43% 4.07% 1.79% 0.43%
Monroe 7,352 2,159 2,440 46.39% 52.43% 1.26% 1.06% 1.93%
Onondaga 427,685 122,984 78,566 59.93% 38.29% 9.11% 2.44% 2.12%
Ontario 39,862 9,316 10,334 46.78% 51.89% 0.70% 1.33% 0.73%
Oswego 71,434 15,429 12,598 53.90% 44.01% 0.78% 1.77% 0.55%
Seneca 9,816 1,943 2,012 48.32% 50.04% 0.83% 1.72% 0.35%
Wayne 91,514 18,184 22,239 44.37% 54.27% 3.08% 2.37% 0.47%

This district doesn’t substantially differ from Maffei’s current version, though I do take out a chunk of southern Onondaga county to make room for the 24th to pass through. Since we’re dismantling the current 23rd, the section of Oswego County begins to pick up some of the pieces. Still centered on Syracuse and DeWitt, this district has a marginal improvement of 0.2%, leaving it still a touch short of 56% Obama.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
24 700,337 156,841 139,301 52.08% 46.25% 2.99% 2.25% 1.68%
Cayuga 26,714 6,264 5,810 50.92% 47.23% 2.97% 2.09% 0.43%
Cortland 36,312 9,545 6,707 57.75% 40.58% 0.94% 1.30% 0.50%
Herkimer 38,842 8,096 8,639 47.56% 50.75% 0.57% 1.07% 0.46%
Jefferson 70,332 12,923 14,011 47.32% 51.30% 3.67% 2.89% 0.66%
Livingston 12,089 2,473 3,589 40.15% 58.27% 0.63% 0.98% 0.37%
Madison 50,197 10,990 10,961 48.96% 48.83% 0.55% 0.82% 0.32%
Oneida 167,933 33,209 33,409 49.08% 49.37% 6.05% 3.34% 1.40%
Onondaga 24,405 6,333 6,406 48.72% 49.28% 0.93% 0.77% 0.55%
Ontario 65,884 15,787 14,837 50.78% 47.73% 2.47% 2.52% 0.65%
Oswego 49,797 9,348 10,973 45.11% 52.95% 0.27% 0.62% 0.22%
Schuyler 6,613 1,678 1,737 48.50% 50.20% 0.60% 0.77% 0.26%
Seneca 24,097 5,479 5,026 51.11% 46.88% 3.44% 2.26% 0.81%
Tompkins 102,388 29,826 11,927 70.23% 28.08% 3.39% 3.06% 7.15%
Yates 24,734 4,890 5,269 47.57% 51.25% 0.53% 0.92% 0.27%

Tompkins County saved Arcuri from defeat in 2008, and this district helps on that front. It now incorporates all of Tompkins. Arcuri’s base in Utica remains as well, though the rest of Oneida County is surprisingly hostile to Democrats. Eastern Oswego and western Jefferson Counties are added, again to compensate for the elimination of the current 23rd. Overall, this district improves modestly to 52.08% from 50.33%. Obama only narrowly lost the district outside of Tompkins, but Ithaca is really what anchors the district.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
23 700,324 131,014 186,390 40.58% 57.73% 1.66% 1.39% 0.50%
Allegany 15,466 1,988 3,942 32.91% 65.26% 0.30% 0.96% 0.50%
Broome 15,843 2,632 3,600 41.45% 56.69% 0.34% 0.72% 0.27%
Cattaraugus 13,217 1,942 3,055 38.20% 60.09% 0.15% 0.69% 0.16%
Chemung 31,750 6,488 8,460 42.83% 55.84% 0.91% 0.68% 1.02%
Chenango 25,884 4,900 5,668 45.45% 52.58% 0.87% 1.19% 0.17%
Cortland 11,844 2,316 2,971 42.96% 55.11% 0.44% 0.75% 0.12%
Erie 100,883 23,714 32,993 41.19% 57.31% 1.06% 0.89% 0.71%
Fulton 21,025 3,488 5,203 39.37% 58.72% 0.43% 0.84% 0.25%
Genesee 56,754 10,762 15,705 40.02% 58.40% 2.00% 1.48% 0.49%
Greene 5,903 1,106 1,785 37.68% 60.82% 0.15% 1.66% 0.29%
Hamilton 4,960 1,225 2,141 35.89% 62.73% 0.46% 1.05% 0.16%
Herkimer 20,130 3,273 4,982 38.92% 59.25% 0.26% 0.58% 0.28%
Livingston 34,477 6,461 8,958 41.26% 57.21% 4.08% 2.80% 0.40%
Madison 19,533 3,702 3,473 50.33% 47.21% 3.01% 1.68% 1.19%
Monroe 27,722 5,804 8,560 39.84% 58.76% 1.26% 1.17% 0.69%
Montgomery 16,597 2,609 3,665 40.61% 57.05% 0.39% 1.09% 0.40%
Oneida 63,476 10,297 15,847 38.66% 59.49% 3.58% 2.66% 0.44%
Otsego 8,641 1,400 2,085 39.41% 58.70% 0.46% 0.91% 0.28%
Saratoga 5,523 1,039 1,664 37.71% 60.40% 0.11% 0.91% 0.24%
Schenectady 7,568 1,684 2,196 42.35% 55.23% 0.41% 0.75% 0.25%
Schoharie 31,906 6,009 8,071 41.72% 56.04% 1.15% 1.86% 0.38%
Schuyler 12,142 2,255 2,805 43.77% 54.44% 1.80% 1.47% 0.30%
Steuben 57,995 9,369 15,027 37.88% 60.75% 1.09% 0.80% 0.47%
Tioga 49,806 10,172 12,536 43.98% 54.20% 0.52% 0.98% 0.57%
Wyoming 41,279 6,379 10,998 36.11% 62.25% 5.54% 2.97% 0.35%

I’ll be the first to say it, this district is pretty disgustingly drawn. Communities of interest went flying out the window – the only thing the parts of this district have in common are their Republican political dispositions. We go from the Buffalo suburbs (Clarence, Lancaster), across Western New York and the Southern Tier to near Binghamton, through to the Capital District (Schenectady, Saratoga) and also north to the Adirondacks and even parts of Rome. The 24th and its misshapen bird form was bad, but I really challenge you to tell me what the 23rd looks like.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
22 700,336 179,738 122,708 58.56% 39.98% 8.05% 7.81% 1.97%
Broome 178,230 44,572 36,477 54.12% 44.29% 3.31% 2.09% 3.03%
Chenango 24,736 5,200 4,669 51.65% 46.38% 0.69% 0.95% 0.40%
Delaware 29,939 5,974 6,707 46.18% 51.85% 1.20% 1.56% 0.57%
Dutchess 124,272 33,064 18,781 63.00% 35.78% 15.57% 8.08% 2.68%
Orange 108,913 24,453 14,091 62.87% 36.23% 15.33% 21.18% 1.74%
Sullivan 65,142 14,357 11,288 55.25% 43.44% 8.71% 10.23% 1.17%
Ulster 169,104 52,118 30,695 61.90% 36.45% 4.85% 6.21% 1.25%

With Ithaca out of the picture shoring up the 24th, and with the 23rd cutting off any access route, I had to scrounge for Democratic votes to keep Hinchey at a comparable level. We get a vaguely frog-like district (facing east), in my opinion. One leg is for Binghamton, another for the less-Republican areas not in the 23rd and for population balance. Retained is Hinchey’s base in Ulster and Sullivan counties, with arms for Newburgh and Middletown in Orange County. Also of note is the string along the Hudson in Dutchess County, from Red Hook through Poughkeepsie down to Beacon. The lack of Ithaca still shows, but with some effort, there’s only a 0.7% drop.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
21 700,326 188,251 129,091 58.22% 39.93% 7.33% 3.35% 2.00%
Albany 297,374 93,937 50,586 63.85% 34.39% 10.38% 3.03% 2.73%
Delaware 15,716 3,488 3,817 46.79% 51.21% 0.97% 2.98% 0.46%
Fulton 34,115 6,207 6,506 47.88% 50.19% 2.46% 2.05% 0.69%
Greene 42,995 8,744 10,274 45.07% 52.96% 5.90% 4.66% 0.56%
Montgomery 32,041 6,471 7,046 47.06% 51.24% 1.17% 9.69% 0.59%
Otsego 52,911 12,170 9,941 53.92% 44.05% 1.84% 2.06% 0.69%
Rensselaer 84,179 21,354 14,358 58.70% 39.47% 7.50% 3.02% 2.55%
Schenectady 34,115 6,207 6,506 56.33% 41.70% 6.59% 3.23% 1.85%

With problematic Schoharie County out of the way, Tonko’s 21st can look to some greener (bluer?) pastures. Mostly, this is just some housekeeping down in Otsego, Delaware, and Greene counties. Tonko’s residence in Amsterdam stays in, as well as the entirety of Albany County, and Rensselaer and Troy. The net is a very marginal (less than 0.1%) improvement.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
20 700,334 160,398 136,431 53.18% 45.23% 2.33% 1.93% 0.78%
Clinton 81,880 20,216 12,579 60.64% 37.73% 3.26% 2.39% 0.66%
Essex 37,584 10,390 7,913 55.88% 42.55% 2.73% 2.24% 0.41%
Franklin 50,695 10,571 6,676 60.34% 38.11% 2.02% 1.44% 0.37%
Herkimer 2,891 725 998 41.36% 56.93% 0.59% 0.76% 0.21%
Jefferson 48,322 5,243 6,209 45.30% 53.64% 8.44% 6.12% 1.28%
Lewis 25,862 4,986 5,969 44.77% 53.59% 0.38% 0.63% 0.24%
SaintLawrence 109,499 23,706 16,956 57.36% 41.03% 2.16% 1.73% 0.72%
Saratoga 209,673 54,492 50,170 51.26% 47.19% 1.36% 1.42% 1.07%
Schenectady 4,452 1,047 999 50.12% 47.82% 1.53% 1.24% 7.75%
Warren 66,201 16,281 15,429 50.49% 47.85% 0.57% 1.04% 0.54%
Washington 63,275 12,741 12,533 49.52% 48.71% 2.72% 1.98% 0.27%

You look at this district and you ask, can this really be called Scott Murphy’s and not Dede Scozzafava’s district? I say yes for two reasons. First, Murphy lives in the northern part of the current 20th, which is also included here. Second, slightly more than half the population is from the current 20th, including Saratoga Springs. Tedisco did quite well in Saratoga, but the more Republican parts are stripped out for the 23rd. For our efforts, we’re rewarded with a 2.5% boost to 53.2% from 50.7%.

We’re getting into Westchester now, so I’m guessing you’ll want a more detailed map:

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
19 700,332 164,609 146,591 52.27% 46.55% 6.63% 7.77% 2.17%
Columbia 61,582 17,556 13,337 55.91% 42.47% 4.22% 2.50% 0.77%
Dutchess 169,953 37,996 40,847 47.64% 51.21% 3.38% 5.05% 2.37%
Orange 172,819 35,267 35,438 49.33% 49.57% 4.61% 7.90% 1.48%
Putnam 20,848 5,977 5,071 53.54% 45.42% 1.16% 5.12% 0.89%
Rensselaer 71,703 18,399 18,482 48.93% 49.15% 0.58% 0.91% 0.60%
Rockland 109,519 25,986 16,657 60.58% 38.83% 18.49% 17.54% 5.22%
Saratoga 4,956 1,114 1,021 51.55% 47.25% 0.30% 1.31% 0.59%
Sullivan 10,975 2,493 2,612 48.14% 50.43% 4.24% 3.91% 0.62%
Ulster 12,751 2,202 2,605 45.21% 53.48% 7.87% 6.96% 0.89%
Westchester 65,226 17,619 10,521 62.04% 37.04% 11.90% 12.73% 2.47%

John Hall’s district also gets quite the makeover. However, it retains Hall’s residence in Dover Plains and most of Dutchess County, as well as the Democratic-leaning parts of Putnam and Cortlandt/Peekskill in Westchester. There’s also an arm into Rockland, nabbing the heavily Democratic parts of Ramapo town. Notable removals include the heavily Republican towns of Monroe in Orange County (including Kiryas Joel village) and Carmel in Putnam County. In order to accomodate the 22nd, the 19th doesn’t get as much of a boost, only to 52.3%, up 1.6%.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
18 700,332 189,437 128,831 59.04% 40.15% 7.77% 12.94% 4.37%
Putnam 78,561 15,636 20,074 43.38% 55.70% 1.58% 6.55% 1.29%
Westchester 621,771 173,801 108,757 61.02% 38.18% 8.55% 13.75% 4.76%

To help Hall, Nita Lowey’s district picks up the eastern half of Putnam County. With Hall’s district shifted northward, most of Westchester gets put here, all the way from Somers to White Plains to New Rochelle and the Bronx line, with a nice arm into Yonkers to hold the Democratic percentage up. There’s still a 2.5% drop though, thanks to Carmel. Not that Lowey has to worry.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
17 700,336 165,083 99,430 62.00% 37.35% 22.39% 14.76% 3.84%
Bronx 81 44,915 9,298 2,447 78.76% 20.73% 29.10% 26.99% 5.46%
Bronx 83 84,609 23,232 829 96.44% 3.44% 71.80% 18.74% 1.53%
Orange 104,370 18,606 22,513 44.81% 54.22% 2.47% 6.09% 1.22%
Rockland 191,832 43,557 45,095 48.81% 50.53% 6.11% 6.35% 5.52%
Westchester 274,610 70,390 28,546 70.69% 28.67% 25.01% 20.70% 4.12%

Finally, we’ve broken the city barrier. But first, the district takes in a lot of Rockland and Orange counties that didn’t get lumped into the 19th. There are some pretty Republican (or at least anti-Obama) pockets in the towns of Monroe and Ramapo – most likely owing to the Orthodox Jewish communities in Kiryas Joel, Monsey, and Viola. I do think there’s a good chance they’d vote for Engel, though. In Westchester, I kept the riverside villages of Hastings-on-Hudson, Dobbs Ferry, and Irvington whole (though the district still jumps the Tappan Zee). Yonkers and Mount Vernon are still here, as well as Wakefield and Woodlawn in the Bronx. Engel still lives here, though the district is less Bronx-centric (and yes, 10% less Democratic at 62.0%) than before.

Now that we’re in the city, here’s a map of the city districts.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
16 700,335 160,042 8,640 94.69% 5.11% 29.87% 63.04% 1.66%
Bronx 76 16,403 4,306 251 94.22% 5.49% 21.58% 74.86% 0.80%
Bronx 77 127,997 31,128 1,170 96.17% 3.61% 39.90% 55.31% 1.00%
Bronx 78 110,205 20,538 1,921 91.17% 8.53% 19.09% 62.20% 4.43%
Bronx 79 127,999 35,507 1,417 95.99% 3.83% 42.31% 53.94% 0.39%
Bronx 84 127,997 30,857 1,699 94.59% 5.21% 25.07% 70.72% 0.94%
Bronx 85 61,719 12,703 886 93.29% 6.51% 21.25% 73.89% 1.12%
Bronx 86 128,015 25,003 1,296 94.96% 4.92% 26.71% 66.15% 2.29%

She’s still Jenny from the Block, and this is pretty much the old 16th district centered on SoBro the South Bronx. More than 95% of the new and old 16ths overlap, and the result shows at 95% Obama. From Mott Haven through to Fordham, this district remains heavily Hispanic at 63.04%.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
15 700,335 223,266 14,911 93.16% 6.22% 30.51% 47.95% 2.89%
Bronx 85 13,501 0.00% 0.00% 60.57% 26.94% 0.26%
NewYork 67 20,661 8,617 1,290 86.29% 12.92% 5.69% 12.38% 5.60%
NewYork 68 134,547 40,792 2,347 94.18% 5.42% 37.39% 50.66% 2.59%
NewYork 69 117,783 46,205 3,749 91.72% 7.44% 19.76% 25.37% 7.68%
NewYork 70 137,564 49,640 1,160 97.26% 2.27% 59.76% 33.83% 1.02%
NewYork 71 137,943 44,088 3,729 91.54% 7.74% 29.00% 50.09% 2.42%
NewYork 72 137,956 33,657 2,572 92.31% 7.05% 6.18% 83.94% 1.25%
NewYork 73 380 267 64 79.94% 19.16% 9.74% 32.89% 8.68%
Queens 36 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

I’m not sure when the tradition of putting Rikers into the 15th was started, but it’s been that way since at least 1993, and I’ve kept it that way. Again, the vast majority of the district is the same, from Inwood to Washington Heights to Harlem, Spanish Harlem, and Morningside Heights. I tried for clean lines in the city: the border with the 14th remains straight on 96th street. The west side is a bit harder for population balancing. Still ridonkulously Democratic, giving the 16th a run for its money. (Note how Obama got 97.26% in the 70th Assembly District. That’s… almost Detroit-level.) Still plurality-Hispanic.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
14 700,333 215,909 56,278 78.60% 20.49% 4.40% 14.02% 11.71%
NewYork 64 17,277 5,776 750 87.33% 11.34% 3.46% 19.10% 27.11%
NewYork 65 137,938 46,042 14,076 76.02% 23.24% 3.54% 5.91% 7.40%
NewYork 66 31,803 11,929 1,284 89.00% 9.58% 5.81% 8.99% 13.86%
NewYork 67 8 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
NewYork 68 3,694 1,345 394 76.64% 22.45% 1.60% 4.22% 3.11%
NewYork 69 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
NewYork 73 137,545 46,638 15,890 74.06% 25.23% 2.42% 5.78% 6.56%
NewYork 74 98,736 36,782 7,748 81.75% 17.22% 5.15% 9.43% 11.03%
NewYork 75 51,307 18,930 4,551 79.92% 19.21% 3.20% 6.03% 11.60%
Queens 30 63,151 12,192 3,763 75.52% 23.31% 1.10% 29.61% 22.63%
Queens 36 111,978 24,400 6,200 78.80% 20.02% 1.53% 24.98% 13.99%
Queens 37 46,896 11,875 1,622 87.42% 11.94% 23.36% 35.58% 14.37%

Again, not much different here either. Maloney keeps all of Central Park and the East Side of Manhattan through to Houston Street. Again, I tried for clean lines, with Central Park West/8th Ave., then 7th Ave. (with a bump-out in Midtown to balance population). On the Queens side, still essentially the same areas of Astoria and Ravenswood, though Long Island City/Hunters Point is shifted to the 12th. Again no news here, just a slight bump up from 78.2%.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
13 700,335 112,193 105,598 51.16% 48.16% 8.90% 12.68% 8.89%
Kings 46 75,728 14,610 6,628 68.29% 30.98% 21.03% 19.35% 8.78%
Kings 47 15,158 2,234 1,593 58.01% 41.37% 9.24% 11.99% 13.74%
Kings 48 19,788 2,335 1,517 59.89% 38.91% 0.49% 10.09% 35.83%
Kings 49 47,090 4,644 3,754 54.87% 44.35% 0.28% 9.98% 28.22%
Kings 51 4,769 716 298 70.13% 29.19% 0.84% 21.95% 23.13%
Kings 60 41,556 8,343 5,746 58.84% 40.52% 0.87% 11.30% 10.44%
Richmond 60 89,565 11,844 16,708 41.16% 58.07% 1.80% 10.87% 4.75%
Richmond 61 135,561 29,614 14,247 67.02% 32.24% 24.78% 20.62% 4.30%
Richmond 62 135,557 16,097 33,590 32.20% 67.20% 0.78% 5.46% 3.22%
Richmond 63 135,563 21,756 21,517 49.98% 49.43% 6.00% 10.92% 9.79%

McMahon keeps his Staten Island-centric district. I tried to make the Brooklyn parts as Democratic as possible, losing Dyker Heights, Bensonhurst, and Gravesend in favor of Democratic Coney Island. A 2.4% boost to 51.2% results, though I don’t think McMahon was really in any danger.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
12 700,333 161,348 26,946 85.12% 14.22% 11.02% 50.43% 8.56%
Kings 44 4,773 675 221 74.59% 24.42% 1.32% 47.77% 15.50%
Kings 50 104,489 20,414 8,279 70.53% 28.60% 2.47% 20.15% 2.91%
Kings 51 103,568 18,135 2,742 86.33% 13.05% 7.22% 62.98% 13.34%
Kings 52 42,116 17,874 1,863 89.90% 9.37% 8.55% 21.82% 5.95%
Kings 53 127,288 33,118 2,768 91.66% 7.66% 9.57% 72.76% 4.62%
Kings 54 99,941 21,611 1,442 93.54% 6.24% 28.68% 59.08% 3.85%
Kings 55 13,774 2,943 152 94.94% 4.90% 38.04% 52.70% 2.46%
Kings 56 9,315 2,705 86 96.54% 3.07% 50.42% 45.12% 0.74%
Kings 57 1,105 395 31 92.51% 7.26% 18.46% 32.40% 2.99%
NewYork 64 37,350 10,272 2,641 79.08% 20.33% 10.12% 36.81% 33.17%
NewYork 74 39,183 13,030 1,011 92.17% 7.15% 13.81% 57.05% 10.02%
Queens 23 912 139 16 89.68% 10.32% 7.79% 65.13% 7.46%
Queens 30 7,175 950 428 68.30% 30.77% 1.20% 44.10% 8.15%
Queens 37 74,428 13,235 3,106 80.14% 18.81% 2.48% 48.07% 12.88%
Queens 38 34,916 5,852 2,160 72.57% 26.79% 3.69% 46.74% 8.95%

Really, nothing new here either, except we’ve shifted it from plurality to majority Hispanic. Same neighborhoods, from Sunset Park to Red Hook, Loisaida, Greenpoint, and Bushwick. A notable shift is that Chinatown is removed and Williamsburg is added, dropping Obama’s performance by 1% (to a still-astronomical 85%).

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
11 700,339 202,773 25,773 88.34% 11.23% 56.82% 11.34% 4.19%
Kings 40 6,943 1,721 26 98.46% 1.49% 80.27% 9.92% 2.87%
Kings 41 1,590 183 189 48.67% 50.27% 1.45% 5.72% 9.18%
Kings 42 123,943 31,418 3,872 88.70% 10.93% 65.91% 14.26% 2.82%
Kings 43 126,615 35,833 3,218 91.54% 8.22% 78.31% 6.99% 1.04%
Kings 44 105,672 28,613 7,250 79.02% 20.02% 10.57% 14.95% 14.31%
Kings 45 24,782 1,815 4,221 29.94% 69.63% 0.93% 6.71% 10.98%
Kings 48 15,572 962 3,158 23.28% 76.43% 3.05% 4.41% 8.63%
Kings 52 68,581 31,571 2,616 91.73% 7.60% 13.45% 18.99% 4.03%
Kings 55 48,759 12,928 184 98.54% 1.40% 82.82% 13.72% 0.48%
Kings 56 25,329 7,701 175 97.62% 2.22% 86.05% 9.26% 0.62%
Kings 57 59,576 22,183 383 97.90% 1.69% 75.48% 12.22% 1.86%
Kings 58 92,977 27,845 481 98.20% 1.70% 89.57% 4.98% 0.81%

Not much new here either, still a central-Brooklyn based district for Yvette Clarke centered in Flatbush, Prospect Park, Park Slope, and Crown Heights. The district does move farther south into Ocean Parkway though, mostly to relieve stress on the 9th. Still majority-Black, though the southward shift lowers the Democratic percentage by 2 points.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
10 700,332 206,787 27,897 87.83% 11.85% 56.83% 13.79% 4.13%
Kings 40 108,940 34,597 1,662 95.30% 4.58% 66.19% 24.03% 1.09%
Kings 41 109,242 25,843 9,181 73.44% 26.09% 45.03% 6.98% 6.80%
Kings 42 3,339 664 237 73.29% 26.16% 40.40% 12.37% 10.36%
Kings 43 694 299 5 97.71% 1.63% 92.07% 3.75% 1.01%
Kings 45 47,518 4,496 5,422 44.93% 54.19% 1.62% 5.42% 18.05%
Kings 50 22,794 7,420 191 96.96% 2.50% 54.47% 26.52% 3.00%
Kings 52 16,586 7,784 676 91.21% 7.92% 14.75% 16.03% 5.97%
Kings 54 24,729 7,248 199 97.09% 2.67% 55.53% 38.19% 1.74%
Kings 55 64,751 21,406 315 98.45% 1.45% 78.93% 18.14% 0.31%
Kings 56 92,645 31,257 363 98.61% 1.15% 85.93% 9.76% 0.74%
Kings 57 66,599 27,698 564 97.56% 1.99% 66.92% 14.18% 3.94%
Kings 58 34,297 10,915 473 95.76% 4.15% 75.18% 7.34% 3.55%
Kings 59 108,198 27,160 8,609 75.76% 24.01% 40.95% 8.21% 4.21%

Same story for Ed Towns, with an arcing district from Brooklyn Heights to Bed-Stuy, East New York, and south to Canarsie. Again a slight southward expansion to boost the 9th. Still majority Black, a slight drop to 88% Obama (oh the humanity).

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
9 700,331 112,711 76,412 59.14% 40.10% 5.49% 17.19% 14.44%
Kings 40 11,398 3,791 136 96.44% 3.46% 66.46% 20.06% 2.32%
Kings 41 16,449 2,384 2,460 48.79% 50.35% 2.16% 4.20% 7.45%
Kings 45 54,991 4,440 8,420 34.28% 65.01% 1.18% 5.66% 7.79%
Kings 46 43,147 4,404 6,345 40.65% 58.56% 2.15% 12.36% 10.04%
Kings 47 41,476 3,618 4,713 43.08% 56.12% 0.64% 7.71% 17.89%
Kings 48 1,663 100 267 26.95% 71.97% 0.30% 4.51% 1.44%
Kings 54 2,612 435 48 90.06% 9.94% 7.89% 31.36% 35.99%
Kings 59 19,076 2,245 3,884 36.52% 63.18% 0.77% 3.69% 2.12%
Queens 22 2,138 366 149 70.52% 28.71% 0.70% 14.45% 49.67%
Queens 23 50,558 8,463 5,688 59.47% 39.97% 2.92% 25.78% 9.36%
Queens 25 36,705 6,244 3,037 66.86% 32.52% 9.61% 22.41% 27.91%
Queens 27 96,518 17,999 9,552 64.81% 34.40% 8.44% 20.51% 14.52%
Queens 28 128,913 26,850 16,192 61.73% 37.23% 1.56% 11.04% 15.96%
Queens 30 49,919 7,176 6,377 52.53% 46.68% 0.56% 15.35% 12.11%
Queens 34 8,476 1,031 446 69.29% 29.97% 0.72% 31.34% 42.08%
Queens 35 38,332 7,618 1,942 79.22% 20.20% 23.62% 21.51% 25.61%
Queens 37 7,595 988 578 62.49% 36.56% 0.45% 23.67% 6.11%
Queens 38 90,365 14,559 6,178 69.77% 29.61% 4.12% 31.23% 12.98%

Weiner was never in any danger, really, but it was just odd to have an only 55% Obama district in the city. (IMO, Staten Island doesn’t count.) The district becomes more Queens-centric, while retaining Weiner’s home in Forest Hills, as well as taking in Middle Village, Maspeth, Kew Gardens, parts of Ridgewood, and Ozone Park. Same deal in Brooklyn, keeping Gerritsen, Sheepshead Bay, and Brighton Beach. It does lose parts of Ocean Parkway and Borough Park, picking up slightly-less Republican Gravesend. The boost helps, bringing this to 59% Obama, up roughly 5%.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
8 700,334 180,156 61,502 73.91% 25.23% 3.26% 10.96% 17.70%
Kings 44 16,832 1,565 1,810 46.00% 53.20% 4.30% 21.86% 13.59%
Kings 46 8,410 1,005 1,621 37.91% 61.15% 0.07% 4.38% 5.27%
Kings 47 70,647 6,430 6,978 47.49% 51.53% 0.39% 8.77% 21.67%
Kings 48 90,253 4,252 13,982 23.21% 76.31% 0.63% 7.96% 14.08%
Kings 49 80,195 6,270 9,006 40.75% 58.54% 0.26% 7.69% 18.61%
Kings 51 18,949 1,819 1,141 61.08% 38.31% 1.46% 31.98% 29.91%
Kings 60 1,628 455 271 62.24% 37.07% 13.33% 17.63% 8.29%
NewYork 64 83,292 18,436 5,488 76.26% 22.70% 3.12% 7.94% 58.80%
NewYork 66 106,110 47,097 5,946 87.96% 11.10% 3.12% 6.24% 7.30%
NewYork 67 117,297 48,690 8,807 84.01% 15.20% 5.32% 11.40% 6.46%
NewYork 69 20,096 8,878 1,059 88.66% 10.58% 11.90% 21.68% 3.08%
NewYork 75 86,625 35,259 5,393 85.88% 13.14% 6.93% 18.26% 8.74%

Nadler’s district, again, is mostly unchanged. Upper West Side, Chelsea, Greenwich Village, TriBeCa, SoHo, the FiDi, etc stay in the Manhattan parts. In Brooklyn, there’s Borough Park and Dyker Heights. Obama only scored 38% in the Brooklyn section. This is countered by the 84.8% Manhattan section, averaging out to 73.9% Obama (+0.2%).

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
7 700,334 169,540 44,870 78.67% 20.82% 21.69% 33.45% 7.24%
Bronx 76 102,281 35,512 1,360 91.58% 8.04% 30.13% 54.16% 5.16%
Bronx 78 17,738 3,906 514 87.87% 11.56% 12.70% 54.97% 8.63%
Bronx 80 127,990 25,850 7,729 76.58% 22.90% 17.43% 34.20% 6.17%
Bronx 81 83,053 22,193 6,377 77.05% 22.14% 10.59% 30.14% 6.67%
Bronx 82 127,982 33,335 11,167 74.61% 24.99% 21.28% 26.51% 2.98%
Bronx 83 43,382 13,808 460 96.65% 3.22% 74.85% 16.50% 0.86%
Bronx 85 52,777 16,525 881 94.82% 5.06% 41.55% 52.88% 0.74%
Queens 25 10,735 1,833 1,701 51.49% 47.78% 0.36% 11.51% 18.98%
Queens 26 45,860 8,518 7,486 52.82% 46.42% 0.34% 7.86% 13.41%
Queens 27 25,344 3,569 2,407 59.19% 39.92% 1.48% 23.50% 16.64%
Queens 30 8,662 2,535 570 81.12% 18.24% 16.01% 31.55% 13.16%
Queens 34 26,437 3,684 1,263 73.89% 25.33% 0.97% 36.91% 39.77%
Queens 35 1,524 557 56 90.13% 9.06% 65.16% 23.10% 2.10%
Queens 36 16,402 3,113 1,587 65.55% 33.42% 0.68% 14.22% 5.51%
Queens 39 859 42 33 56.00% 44.00% 0.00% 32.25% 50.41%

Most of the creative districting in the city came in Queens, I think, and the 7th is a good example. The Bronx portion doesn’t change too much, except it stretches to the Hudson now that the 17th is more suburban. Otherwise, Co-op City, Pelham Bay, Soundview, and Parkchester stay in, jumping Long Island Sound at Throgs Neck. It takes in more suburban areas of Queens than before, including Whitestone and Beechhurst. Crowley does live in Woodside, but there’s an arm for that.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
6 700,342 193,435 48,975 79.52% 20.13% 50.16% 13.15% 5.79%
Nassau Hempstead 103,588 21,866 26,891 44.56% 54.80% 3.12% 8.28% 2.65%
Queens 23 77,443 13,299 13,020 50.16% 49.11% 16.37% 13.73% 2.47%
Queens 24 16,528 4,735 1,160 79.85% 19.56% 31.17% 16.65% 21.70%
Queens 25 20,693 2,866 585 82.90% 16.92% 11.06% 23.53% 33.37%
Queens 29 129,059 41,182 2,096 94.97% 4.83% 67.24% 12.70% 6.69%
Queens 31 128,767 35,403 2,612 92.92% 6.86% 58.39% 19.05% 5.17%
Queens 32 118,350 37,979 1,112 96.98% 2.84% 72.75% 12.77% 4.18%
Queens 33 102,281 35,512 1,360 96.16% 3.68% 77.68% 8.35% 4.18%
Queens 38 3,633 593 139 80.79% 18.94% 11.70% 19.60% 24.75%

Gregory Meeks’ district gets quite the change as well, and becomes the first of three Nassau-Queens hybrid districts. The district remains centered on East Queens, though, from Jamaica and Ozone Park east to the Nassau line. In Nassau, we try to grab the most Republican parts in southwestern Hempstead, including Woodmere and Lawrence. Also of note is the shift of the entire Rockaway Peninsula (the western part of which is quite Republican) to the district. Broad Channel is also no longer split in two. Amazingly, the district is still majority-Black (just barely at 50.16% non-Hispanic-or-Latino Black). The Nassau parts do bring down the Democratic percentage 9.5% to 79.5%.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
5 700,332 133,441 82,791 61.36% 38.07% 4.36% 30.94% 17.76%
Nassau Glen Cove 26,819 6,231 4,491 57.68% 41.57% 6.05% 20.04% 4.06%
Nassau NHempstead 100,663 26,480 20,617 55.87% 43.50% 3.24% 7.45% 7.51%
Nassau Oyster Bay 70,799 17,422 18,547 48.08% 51.18% 1.38% 4.84% 5.45%
Queens 22 50,470 5,897 2,400 70.50% 28.69% 4.89% 22.12% 51.94%
Queens 24 7,228 1,273 1,008 55.42% 43.88% 0.33% 4.87% 37.85%
Queens 25 16,832 2,690 1,891 58.25% 40.95% 1.09% 18.42% 29.98%
Queens 26 61,785 13,292 8,316 60.99% 38.16% 1.46% 9.40% 20.70%
Queens 27 6 1 100.00% 0.00% 83.33% 16.67% 0.00%
Queens 34 94,000 15,790 4,262 78.27% 21.13% 2.49% 56.82% 17.86%
Queens 35 89,057 14,167 2,599 84.21% 15.45% 16.30% 47.03% 24.10%
Queens 36 541 102 53 64.97% 33.76% 0.74% 39.56% 16.45%
Queens 39 128,059 15,993 3,527 81.50% 17.97% 3.04% 64.80% 20.23%
Suffolk Huntington 54,073 14,103 15,080 48.32% 51.67% 0.58% 2.68% 1.63%

This district is pretty hideous, too. With a lot of suburban Queens in the 7th, the 5th can pick up more of the more-Democratic inner neighborhoods of Queens. So, we get a district that stretches from Elmhurst and Jackson Heights to Huntington. Again, harking back to the olden days, the district grabs out some choice precincts in Suffolk County, relieving pressure on the 1st and 2nd. In Nassau, it keeps Great Neck and Port Washington, but also adds Old Westbury, Syosset, and Glen Cove. In Suffolk, we avoid Huntington (the hamlet), since Steve Israel lives there, but we do get Cold Spring Harbor and Fort Salonga, all the way to the Huntingtown-Smithtown line. All this results in a 2% drop to 61.2% Obama, buoyed by the 74% Democratic section of Queens. Regardless, Ackerman will be fine.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
4 700,334 161,268 113,858 58.19% 41.08% 8.97% 12.17% 18.22%
Nassau Hempstead 298,688 78,085 62,541 55.12% 44.15% 13.72% 9.41% 5.48%
Nassau NHempstead 110,727 27,053 24,773 51.79% 47.43% 2.20% 8.92% 11.41%
Queens 22 76,306 10,171 4,522 68.83% 30.60% 4.62% 19.26% 53.70%
Queens 24 105,163 23,741 13,004 64.06% 35.09% 5.29% 8.51% 28.19%
Queens 25 43,952 7,915 2,893 72.73% 26.58% 8.95% 19.89% 31.85%
Queens 26 21,277 4,959 2,614 65.02% 34.27% 5.11% 9.09% 24.00%
Queens 27 7,034 1,897 501 78.58% 20.75% 14.90% 23.49% 17.44%
Queens 32 10,560 1,640 176 90.11% 9.67% 18.29% 56.70% 12.10%
Queens 33 26,627 5,807 2,834 66.82% 32.61% 8.61% 19.85% 23.95%

Here’s the third of the Queens-Nassau districts. The current 4th gets its Democratic strength from Uniondale and Hempstead, but those would fit well in a newly Democratic 3rd district. Thus, two prongs into Queens, one into Briarwood and one into Flushing, which meet in Briarwood. In Nassau, this district includes closer-in Democratic areas like Elmont and Valley Stream balanced by swing areas like Mineola and extremely Republican Garden City. In total, the Queens section again anchors the district, leaving it at 58.2% Democratic, up 0.2%.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
3 700,333 173,270 145,755 53.90% 45.34% 11.26% 10.91% 2.78%
Nassau Hempstead 357,522 96,465 66,066 58.94% 40.37% 17.97% 14.09% 2.07%
Nassau Long Beach 35,596 9,900 5,991 61.71% 37.34% 5.84% 12.79% 2.29%
Nassau NHempstead 14,810 4,539 268 94.21% 5.56% 55.06% 32.73% 2.29%
Nassau Oyster Bay 207,997 45,920 53,387 45.87% 53.33% 1.71% 5.46% 4.69%
Suffolk Babylon 60,933 11,620 13,213 46.33% 52.68% 1.23% 7.45% 1.45%
Suffolk Islip 23,475 4,826 6,830 41.03% 58.07% 0.39% 3.14% 1.15%

My favorite district, really. You might look at the map and say… is that really an improvement? Yes, Massapequa, Bethpage, and Levittown are still here, as Amityville, Copaigue, and West Islip. However, in picking up Uniondale, Hempstead, and Freeport in the Town of Hempstead, and parts of Syosset, Jericho, and Plainview, the Democratic performance improves quite a bit. It would have been higher had I not included the South Shore in Suffolk County and instead grabbed Plainview, but I wanted to hold the 2nd constant. All in all, up 6.6% to 54.0% Democratic. Perfect for someone like Dave Mejias who can keep the margins in Massapequa down.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
2 700,333 161,736 124,818 56.14% 43.32% 9.88% 14.76% 2.59%
Nassau Oyster Bay 22,604 8,224 5,204 60.82% 38.49% 0.68% 2.11% 4.19%
Suffolk Babylon 159,088 36,443 22,697 61.18% 38.10% 20.38% 11.04% 2.04%
Suffolk Brookhaven 58,579 11,900 11,352 51.15% 48.79% 1.48% 11.15% 1.59%
Suffolk Huntington 147,345 38,687 32,517 54.31% 45.65% 5.33% 8.01% 4.17%
Suffolk Islip 312,717 66,482 53,048 55.16% 44.02% 8.91% 21.44% 2.20%

Steve Israel’s district is mostly unchanged, still centered on the towns of Huntington, Islip, and Babylon, including Melville, Dix Hills, and Ronkonkoma. It also takes in a small section of Nassau (parts of Woodbury, Plainview, and Old Bethpage), keeping the Democratic performance up. Instead of Republican Smithtown, the district takes out Patchogue, Holtsville, and Farmingville from the town of Crookhaven. Democratic performance is essentially unchanged from 56.13%.

County/Division 2010 Pop Obama McCain Obama% McCain% Black% Hisp% Asian%
1 700,334 162,488 152,284 51.52% 48.28% 4.13% 7.00% 2.47%
Suffolk Brookhaven 432,826 97,765 86,672 52.99% 46.97% 4.41% 7.62% 3.05%
Suffolk East Hampton 22,388 7,786 3,993 66.07% 33.88% 3.44% 14.78% 1.19%
Suffolk Riverhead 35,929 7,540 7,968 48.59% 51.35% 10.34% 6.06% 0.90%
Suffolk Shelter Island 2,560 1,086 786 57.98% 41.96% 0.51% 2.38% 0.47%
Suffolk Smithtown 121,316 26,114 34,409 42.78% 56.37% 0.59% 3.33% 2.37%
Suffolk Southampton 62,595 15,862 11,967 56.98% 42.99% 6.34% 8.56% 0.82%
Suffolk Southold 22,720 6,335 6,489 49.36% 50.56% 2.81% 4.77% 0.43%

Lastly, we arrive at the 1st district, again, mostly unchanged. It contains the Hamptons, Southold, Riverhead, all of Smithtown, and most of Brookhaven. Obama’s performance is up just a tad to 51.52%.

And there we have it, my 27-1 plan for New York. Comments and questions (and witty remarks!) welcome, as always. (That tutorial is coming up, I promise!)

49 thoughts on “A Seriously Overdue Update: Redistricting New York”

  1. I only really have two concerns.

    One, just how much of a “house of cards” might upstate be? New York is a pretty Democratic state, of course, and at the Presidential level we’ve been winning nearly 2:1 for 10-15 years. But Obama’s performance upstate was considerably better than Kerry’s, and I think better than Gore’s (who was stronger in parts of the suburbs and city). Is it really reasonable to expect to hold on to all but one of the upstate CDs? I ask you this all of the time, but what’s the picture of your proposed districts in the 2004 election? My guess is that there are several “Bush by 5s.”

    Two, I wonder whether you’ve done enough to get rid of Peter King. My guess is that more would be possible if you went all spaghetti strand on the city and long island.

    In any case, this is really superb, and I want to spend some more time poring over it.

    Thanks.

  2. …then the finished product would have been better (haha).  Wow, what a lot of information.

    I’m not sure how we could possibly swing the 23rd looking as it does, but its an interesting concept.  I think technically, to andgarden’s point, you could probably put more effort in getting rid of King but I think his time is coming (he’s not really “young” now is he?) and we don’t need to get nuts right now.

    I don’t have a map of my own, but I think 26-2 is just fine and I’m guessing that’s what might happen in 2012.  It just seems like we could leave King for now and one upstate dist (just not as crazy as your 23) ad be fine, and just rig King’s dist to be a potetnial takeover in 2012 and tossup when he retires.

    Of course then again, I’m not as liberal as this blog in general, but given that upstate NY is about 40% republican in voting, I think making 40% of upstate NY unhappy might not be the best thing in terms of true democracy.  Of course the opposite happens in Texas which ticks me off.

    Thanks for all the work…well done.  I’m sure some of our more at-risck reps (arcuri???) would love you to be helping re-draw maps in 2010.

  3. I notice that many of those Republican parts have very low voter turnout. For example a division with 90,000 people had only 18,000 voters. Most of the Republican voters in NYC (besides Staten Island) are Orthodox Jews, who tend to vote like conservative Christians. Apparently they don’t vote in large numbers.

  4. I had the same thing happen when I tried redistricting NY. Most of Queens in put in the leftovers of districts that are based in Brooklyn, Manhattan, the Bronx, or Nassau. The only Queens-based district is the 6th. I don’t know how to fix it, but a borough of 3 million people probably should have more than 1 Congressman.

  5. I calculated the PVI for each of your districts.

    1 R+ 2

    2 D+ 3

    3 D+ 1

    4 D+ 5

    5 D+ 8

    6 D+26

    7 D+25

    8 D+21

    9 D+ 6

    10 D+34

    11 D+35

    12 D+32

    13 R+ 2

    14 D+25

    15 D+40

    16 D+41

    17 D+ 9

    18 D+ 6

    19 R+ 1

    20 D+ 0

    21 D+ 6

    22 D+ 6

    23 R+12

    24 R+ 1

    25 D+ 3

    26 D+ 1

    27 D+ 5

    28 D+ 6

    Your NY-23 is awesome.  It’s the perfect payback for the current NY-28.

  6. This is coming from someone that HATES gerrymandering, but damn, that is a seriously fine piece of work!!!! I glanced at the map, without actually absorbing everything, then when I saw the % of McCain’s victory, I was like, wow, how did he manage that, I looked, and I just started laughing!!!

  7. Great work, and great diary!

    A couple of observations and questions:

    1) Do you have any special method of producing tables so that SSP will accept them and the HTML is less tedious?

    2) Pete King’s district is probably about as Democratic as you can make it while keeping it fairly compact. I also like very much that you were able to make serious trouble for King without hurting the 1st, 2nd, and 4th districts. I am all for trying to get rid of King, but I think it is important not to make those relatively swingy seats any more Republican in so doing.

    3) But it seems to me that there is a general disconnect in your map between how you treated upstate New York and downstate, particularly Long Island. Upstate, you have wild gerrymanders going all over the place, crossing county lines at will, disregarding previous district lines, etc, all for partisan gain. I am not saying that is a good or a bad thing. I can see merit in both the wild gerrymander and the more compact approaches. But it contrasts with the approach downstate where the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 13th could all potentially be won by Republicans in a big GOP wave year. It looks like the 10th and the 11th could both take on some more GOP turf without violating the VRA, and any of the 14th, 8th, and 7th could take on some GOP turf without any difficulty. At the very least, couldn’t the 3rd take the heavily Dem portions of the Rockaways, in exchange for some GOP turf?

  8. Wow!  I had really wanted to try to cook up a 28-0 map, parsing out the current 26th and nibbling around the edges on the 23rd (as you did), but now I’m almost convinced it’s impossible.  Slaughter could take the hit, but I always assumed Higgins and Hinchey could be vote-sinks too.  Maybe Hinchey still can, but now I’m doubting whether Higgins could absorb any GOP votes at all and whether the Hinchey/Slaughter pairing could siphon off enough.  I’m beginning to think not based on the PVIs calculated and just looking at your map (though I find the “earmuff district” way over the top.  Do you think 28-0 is even close to feasible even in the short term?  If not, what GOP counties would be left hanging and unabsorbed.

  9. These guys are really ridiculously vulnerable considering the 90+ PVIs you have lying around in NYC.  Bishop may lose as early as this coming cycle, and McMahon didn’t even have a decent opponent in 2008 — that will change in the future.  I’d like to see a bit of a better district for Hall, too, but I’m not sure that can be managed.

    Fantastic work, by the way.  You really are the best of the redistricters at this site.

  10. Shift Putnam County into 18, 19 more into 17, and 17 to take some more of the East Bank of the Hudson.  Should make 19 stronger, while 18 is pretty strong and should take more Repubs.  I suppose it depends where on the East Bank 17 takes population as to its effect, but it is based in NY City proper and should have no trouble.

  11. Change the system completely to make Congressional representation an all-or-nothing proposition. Whatever party gets the most votes gets all the seats (preferably using a single transferable vote system to enable voters to list their party choices in order rather than just picking one). Poof! Reliable all-Democratic bloc.

    I’m under the impression that this wouldn’t actually be possible due to federal legislation mandating single-member Congressional districts rather than state-wide allocations, but I could be wrong; that might be a guideline rather than an enforceable law. I don’t actually think it would be a good idea, but it does make that 28-0 bloc easy to produce (and wipes out all the California Republicans… and leaves the Texas Republicans leery of trying it there, given the Hispanic growth with its increasing Democratic strength).

    If widely adopted, going to state-wide party-based elections would probably do a good job locking in Democratic dominance for a while, considering how many states are currently considered ‘safe’ at the federal level (basically, Democrats would have to, as in 2000 and 2004 at the presidential level, lose virtually every swing state to not wind up with a majority). And depending on how it was implemented, you would probably end up with a stronger party-line affiliation, since each member would be dependent on the party for statewide campaigning and ballot positions.

    The downside would be the loss of ‘Person X is my Congressman’ familiarity and a probable degradation in constituent service, and almost completely lock out third parties. And a distinct decline in voter-preference representation, the lines being blurred into generic state-wide preferences.

Comments are closed.