Author: DavidNYC

Public Policy Polling (PDF) (6/17-19, registered voters, 1/17-18 in parens):

Ted Strickland (D-inc): 44 (45)

John Kasich (R): 42 (39)

Undecided: 14 (16)

(MoE: ±3.9%)

Those numbers certainly ain’t pretty, but then again, PPP’s first batch of results weren’t exactly a thing of beauty for Teddy Ballgame either. And they’re a stark contrast to Quinnipiac, which has given Strickland twenty-point leads in its last two polls.

So what gives? F.O.S. (Friend of SSP) Tom Jensen takes stock of the situation:

Four pollsters have released approval numbers on Ted Strickland since last November.

Two of them – Quinnipiac and the Ohio Poll – show Strickland in a strong position. The most recent Quinnipiac showed Strickland at 57/29 for a net of +28. The latest Ohio Poll showed it at 56/34, or +22.

SurveyUSA and PPP show a very different picture. SUSA’s most recent numbers were 45/44, or +1 and our release tonight finds 43/42, also +1.

It’s worth noting that Quinnipiac and PPP are showing the same trend. In January Quinnipiac had Strickland at +38, so his +28 now is a ten point drop. We had him at +13 in January and now at +1 for a similar 12 point drop. So while we show very different pictures on Strickland’s overall popularity we do both find it declining.

Tom notes that PPP and SUSA both use IVR, while Quinnipiac and the Ohio Poll use live telephone interviewers – but he’s not sure what accounts for the wide discrepancy. Hopefully some other pollster will get in the mix here soon.

RaceTracker: OH-Gov

Research 2000 for Daily Kos (6/15-17, likely voters, no trendlines):

Gov primary (Dems):

Neil Abercrombie (D): 42

Mufi Hannemann (D): 22

Undecided: 36

(MoE: ±5%)

Gov general:

Neil Abercrombie (D): 45

James “Duke” Aiona (R): 36

Undecided: 19

Mufi Hannemann (D): 44

James “Duke” Aiona (R): 34

Undecided: 22

(MoE: ±4%)

For those of you not familiar with the players out here, Neil Abercrombie represents HI-01 in Congress, Mufi Hannemann is the Mayor of Honolulu, and Duke Aiona is the current Lt. Gov. Abercrombie has already pulled the trigger on a run; Hannemann has formed an exploratory committee. It’s pretty interesting that Abercrombie has a material lead in the primary test, given that Hannemann has the better favorables (56-20 vs. 55-33).

I had thought that Hannemann wasn’t too likely to run, but his recent activities indicate otherwise. He does have $660K left over from his mayoral campaign last year he can transfer over to a gov account. On the flipside, he’s 16 years younger than the 70-year-old Abercrombie, and there’s a decent chance Sen. Dan Akaka’s seat will be open in 2012, if Hannemann’s interested in that alternative.

One interesting side note: These two have faced off before, and are 1-and-1 in an unusual set of circumstances. Both men ran for HI-01 in 1986 when the incumbent, Cecil Heftel, ran for governor. Hannemann won the primary, but Abercrombie won the special election to fill the final two months of the term. Hannemann wound up losing to the Republican in the general election.

Speaking of Republicans, Duke Aiona has a decent 44-26 favorability rating, and has already raised $1.5 million. However, he’s charging against the blue tide here – Hawaii’s only ever had one Republican governor (the current incumbent, Linda Lingle), and gave the highest vote percentage to Obama of any state last year. SSP currently rates this race Lean Democrat.

And speaking of Linda Lingle, we also have some Senate numbers:

Dan Inouye (D-inc): 52

Linda Lingle (R): 40

Undecided: 8

(MoE: ±4%)

I don’t think anyone expects her to run, but she’s almost certainly the only Republican on any of Hawaii’s islands who could give Inouye a serious challenge. And even still, she trails by double digits with Inouye over 50. She sports better favorables than most governors, but at 51-43, they aren’t great, and are considerably weaker than Senator Dan’s 56-38 rating. SSP currently considers this a Race to Watch, but if Lingle doesn’t bite, it will move to Safe D.

RaceTracker: HI-Gov | HI-Sen

Come senators, congressmen

Please heed the call

Don’t stand in the doorway

Don’t block up the hall

UPDATE: We’ve added a neat little feature to the site. If you post an HTML table, you can make the columns sortable by putting the phrase class="sortable" in the opening table tag. See our Open Seat Watch for some examples.

Looks like we can already add a new name to the House Open Seat Watch:

While he is not ready to make a public announcement, John Maginnis reports Rep. Charlie Melancon (D-LA) has decided to run for the U.S. Senate. Sources say he “he has told national Democratic campaign officials” he will challenge Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) in 2010.

“While Melancon earlier this year seemed to have ruled out running, a renewed press by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, armed with a poll showing Vitter’s vulnerability, got Melancon to reconsider.”

This is a tremendous get for the DSCC, though of course holding Melancon’s R+12 seat in LA-03 will probably be an extreme challenge.

UPDATE (James): Melancon is staying mum, but he says that he will be making a formal announcement “in the coming weeks”.

RaceTracker: LA-Sen | LA-03

Rasmussen Reports (6/16, likely voters, no trendlines):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 50

Pat Toomey (R): 39

Undecided: 7

Joe Sestak (D): 41

Pat Toomey (R): 35

Undecided: 18

(MoE: ±5%)

This is the second half of the Rasmussen poll from yesterday which tested the Dem primary. I don’t really love it when pollsters dribble out results over the course of several days… though I’m sure that if I were in the polling business myself, I’d do exactly the same thing. Anyhow, this survey shows what we all know: Pat Toomey is a Dead Man.

RaceTracker: PA-Sen

Rasmussen Reports (6/16, likely voters, no trendlines):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 51

Joe Sestak (D): 32

Other: 4

Undecided: 13

(MoE: ±5%)

This is the first time Rasmussen is dipping its toe in the water here, so we don’t have any kind of trendline to work with. But Specter’s 19-point lead is the smallest any pollster has shown to date. (A GQR survey put Specter up 55-34). Given how far off Pennsylvania’s primary is, that doesn’t strike me as a terribly formidable margin, especially since Specter is so much better-known.

Rasmussen’s favorability numbers are a bit surprising, though. Among Dems, Specter clocks in with a 72-26 rating, not too different from a six-week-old R2K poll. However, Sestak’s 57-21 favorables seem way high. By comparison, that same R2K survey (which was also of likely voters) showed 56% having no opinion of the guy, as opposed to just 22% here. A more recent Quinnipiac poll (of RVs) showed even bigger d/ks, as did a Republican survey of LVs.

My guess is that this difference comes down to methodology. All prior polls taken of this race used live interviewers; Rasmussen uses IVR. Obviously the discrepancy is because the DOG COULD HAVE BEEN ANSWERING THE CALL. Alternately, it could just be that lower undecideds across the board, whether for favorables or head-to-heads, are simply a hallmark of the push-button nature of robopolls. You decide.

RaceTracker: PA-Sen

UPDATE: I thought this was pretty great (and hilarious) framing – Joe Sestak branded Arlen Specter a “flight risk” in a fundraising email.

Suck:

Rep. Roy Blunt’s path to the Republican nomination in Missouri’s Senate race got clearer last week, and it could become crystal-clear soon.

Former state Treasurer Sarah Steelman appears increasingly less likely to run against Blunt, and she acknowledged Monday that she is looking at a possible campaign for Blunt’s open House seat as an alternative.

Steelman said shortly after Sen. Kit Bond’s (R-Mo.) retirement announcement in January that she was leaning toward entering the Senate race, and for a while, it was a foregone conclusion.

But after unleashing a string of Blunt criticisms and opening an exploratory committee in April, she has grown quieter and begun evaluating other options. …

“I am always willing to fight for what I believe in, but I would certainly prefer to do it without further destruction to our party,” Steelman said, adding: “I want to find a positive avenue to move our party forward.”

I was really rooting for some hot wingnut-on-wingnut action here, but alas. The fact that Steelman herself is talking to The Hill about this suggests it’s just about over.

RaceTracker: MO-Sen

(Hat tip: the incomparable Political Wire)

The story just keeps getting crazier and crazier:

Sen. Hiram Monserrate has switched sides – again.

“I’m coming home,” the Queens Democrat told the Daily News in an exclusive interview on Sunday. …

His decision creates an astonishing 31-31 deadlock in the Senate and further muddles the question of which party controls that body.

“I said I wouldn’t return to the caucus without a leadership change among the Democrats, and that has happened,” Monserrate told The News.

On Friday, Senate Democrats settled on Brooklyn’s John Sampson to replace Malcolm Smith as leader of their conference, but to keep Smith as the majority leader.

It’s very hard to say what might happen next, though Elizabeth Benjamin at the Daily News tries to game things out. Needless to say, if traitor ringleader Pedro Espada doesn’t crack, he will almost assuredly get his ass primaried if there’s any sense left in this universe. Monserrate’s twice-in-a-week side-switching probably isn’t healthful to his future, either. And if this whole coup falls apart, it’ll also be nice to see Tom Golisano get humiliated.

For some related and entertaining history, check out this post at The Thicket which chronicles Willie Brown’s attempts to block the GOP from controlling the California state Assembly in 1995 by seducing a series of dissident Republicans. Two of them were quickly recalled by voters – an option not available to Dems in New York – and the GOP eventually seized power. But a year later, Dems gained an outright majority in the chamber.

Remember, you heard it here first.

P.S. Be sure to check out the new Race Tracker Wiki. More info on it here.

I’ve found the overarching tradmed coverage of the New York State Senate debacle to be depressingly uninformative – no one really seems to know what’s going on. But there have been a few developments that bear noting. First off, a state judge refused to grant Dem Sen. Malcolm Smith’s request for an injunction to stop the GOP from conducting Senate business, saying he lacked the authority to do so. The GOP + Pedro Espada + Hiram Monserrate proceeded to conduct a brief, do-nothing session, which more or less came to an end when Monserrate walked out after giving a speech, denying the Skelos-Espada faction a quorum to do anything further.

Monserrate’s behavior has been unusual – under considerable pressure, he’s been playing footsie with his Democratic frenemies, making it seem like he’s not totally committed to the coup. He better decide soon, though, because of couple of folks are already starting to sound a bit like potential primary challengers: Assemblyman Jose Peralta and NYC Councilwoman Julissa Ferraras, his former CoS. Meanwhile, the chief advocate of gay marriage in the state, Thomas Duane, briefly considered switching sides as well – Espada said he’d like to see Duane’s marriage equality bill come to the floor. But later reports have said he’s staying put.

Undoubtedly there will be much more to come in the days ahead.