TX-07: Is This For Real?

Something is going on in the Houstin area that is making local and national Democrats take notice. Michael Skelly, Democratic candidate for the 7th Congressional District is seeking the seat once held by George H.W. Bush, according to the

Politico.

Democrats have been increasingly bullish about their ability to win over suburban, ancestrally Republican House districts that have been trending in their party’s direction over the past decade.

But their party’s latest target shows just how confident Democrats have become. Democrats are eyeing one of the most reliably Republican seats in the heart of Texas — Rep. John Culberson’s suburban Houston district, once held by President Bush’s father — and have a candidate who is causing a stir due to his prolific fundraising.

Businessman Michael Skelly is positioned to be at the top of the Democratic fundraising list for the year’s first quarter, according to a Democratic operative, raising about $750,000 from individual donors without even tapping into his substantial personal wealth. Another Democratic operative said it could be the “best first quarter ever” for any House Democrat in his first filing period.

Currently, the seat is rated “Safe Republican” by Congressional Quarterly, but we have a candidate who is taking the race seriously, and perhaps so should we.

NJ-5: Defeat radical right wing/religious fundamentalist Scott Garrett. Elect a progressive Rabbi!

Hi everyone

I live in PA’s 11th district, which is right next door to NJ’s 5th.  Scott Garrett is the incumbent Republican and one of the most right wing Republicans in the House.  His record is to the right of Attila the Hun!

How wingnutty is his record?

Scott Garrett was the only member of the

New Jersey delegation to vote for oil and gas drilling off the shore of New Jersey.

He voted against stopping big oil from gouging prices!

He voted against child safety locks on guns.

He voted against the emergency funding for the Hurricane Katrina victims.

He also voted against reauthorizing the landmark Voting Rights Act.

He votes again and again against the middle class (an F grade from the Drum Major Institute).

He has the lowest environmental rating among any member of Congress.

Scott Garrett the darling of religious fundamentalists.

Garrett wants children to be taught religious creationism in the public schools.

How can a man like this represent New Jersey you ask?

Let’s pray that the fifth district (which includes blue-leaning Bergen County) is beginning to wake up

Garrett is so out of touch with moderate New Jersey.

This year the candidate is Dennis Shulman, a blind Rabbi with a very distinguished resume.

We need to get the word out and make this race a major upset victory!

Dennis is the underdog but he can do it with the support of progressives!

MS-01: Runoff Results Open Thread

11:18 PM: The AP has called the runoffs for Travis Childers (D) and Greg Davis (R), who will face off on April 22nd in the special election primary to replace Roger Wicker. (Update: As per RBH in the comments below, Davis and Childers will face other nominal challengers on the 22nd.  If no candidate earns a majority, there will be a May 13 runoff.)

No joke about it: at a PVI of R+10, this is a pretty conservative district.  But perhaps it was premature to call this one a completely safe Republican hold.  With 100% of precincts reporting,  36,168 voters cast ballots in the Democratic run-off, while 33,135 GOP ballots were counted — a net turnout advantage of 3000 votes for Democrats.  And let’s not forget, while the Dem primary was a civil affair, the same cannot be said about the Republican battle:

But Davis, in the campaign’s final week, has attempted to make McCullough’s tenure at the TVA a major issue in the campaign. One of his latest ads accuses McCullough of laying off workers, raising electric rates and lavish spending while serving as chairman of the board.

“Sometimes the truth hurts. The fact that he made those expenditures while laying off people was a bad decision, in my mind,” said Davis. “While he was laying off people at TVA, we were creating 10,000 jobs here in Southaven.”

McCullough has called Davis’ allegations a negative smear and vigorously defended his record in an interview with Politico. McCullough said he increased rates only once during his tenure and brought economic development to the region.

“He’s smearing my lifestyle and character. People who know me and people who investigate me know that what he’s saying on television is not true,” McCullough said. “It’s what people do when they’re behind and they’re desperate.”

If Childers has enough funds to ride this one out, this one could be interesting.

10:25 PM: With 91% of precincts reporting, 33,440 Democratic votes and 31,551 GOP votes have tallied.

10:10 PM: A turnout update: With 79% of precincts reporting, 30,165 Democratic ballots have been cast, while 29,423 GOP votes have been tallied.  I’d say that this is an encouraging sign for Travis Childers.

10:06 PM: With 79% in, looks like Childers has this one wrapped up with a 3800 vote lead.  The GOP race still looks tight: Davis is leading by less than 700 votes.

9:55 PM: With 70% in, Childers is up by 56%-44% and 3000 votes.  Davis has a 4% lead in the GOP results.

9:39 PM: With 49% in, it’s Childers 54%, Holland 46%.  Southaven Mayor Greg Davis has a 400  vote lead over former TVA Chair Glenn McCullough in the GOP runoff.

9:28 PM: With 29% of precincts reporting, Childers has taken the lead by a 53%-47% margin.

9:19 PM: With 22% reporting, Childers has closed the gap to 90 votes.

9:17 PM: Just to take the pulse of the turnout so far, with 19% of precincts reporting, 8998 voters have cast their ballots in the Democratic primary, while only 5144 GOP ballots have been cast.

UPDATE (9:05 Eastern): With 14% of precincts in, it’s Holland 54%, Childers 46%.


Polls are closed in the runoff election to determine the Democratic and Republican nominees for the special election to replace GOP Rep. Roger Wicker in Mississippi.  This is an R+10 district, but it will be interesting to see if the high Dem turnout from last month’s primary will continue into the runoff.

The Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal has the results.  So far, it looks like state Rep. Steve Holland has a 56%-44% lead over Prentiss County Chancery Clerk Travis Childers for the Dem nod with 10% of precincts reporting.

The Politico offers some local color:

Some statewide Republicans warn that if Childers prevails, he could offer a credible challenge to the party’s nominee, despite the district’s strong Republican tilt. Childers campaigned as a conservative Democrat with a record that at times appears indistinguishable from the Republicans’ agenda. And he has a strong network of support among the legal community in the rural parts of the district.

“He’s more conservative than 85 percent of Republicans,” said one state GOP operative. “He’s a good old boy and a strong candidate.”

And while the 1st District has been reliably Republican, Democrats have shown the ability to win here: Former Gov. Ronnie Musgrove carried the district in 1999.

KY-01: Ed Whitfield Puts Partisanship Over Our Veterans

Our campaign is picking up steam and plowing right along at Ryan for Kentucky. It has been a great couple of weeks. The best part is that Exxon Ed Whitfield has noticed he has a little competition too. Although he didn’t have a website during the whole 2006 election, this time he feels the need for one!! Well, welcome to the race Eddie, Now lets look at some of your site:

http://www.whitfieldforcongres…

While we welcome Exxon Eddie to the information age, we would like to remind him that in the information age you just can’t say things that aren’t true and not get called on it. Exxon Eddie’s website seems to be one part spin, and two parts fantasy.

Take his statement in his “On the Issues” section on “Taking Care of Veterans”. Lets look at Exxon Eddie’s take on that essential issue:

Veterans fulfilled a commitment to our country and now we must honor our commitment to them. Congressman Whitfield has worked to ensure that our veterans have access to complete healthcare including three Veterans’ Administration Out Patient Clinics in the First District of Kentucky and a full service veterans nursing home in Hanson, KY. Congressman Whitfield has helped hundreds of veterans received the military medals they earned but were never awarded. He has also made sure that our veterans have a final resting place of honor with the creation of the veterans cemetery in Hopkinsville, KY.

Now, the last I heard Veterans here in Paducah have to drive 60 miles to Marion, IL to go to a VA hospital. I guess all those trips look good for Eddie’s Exxon and Chevron stock. While it is commendable that he helped veterans recieve the medals for their service, and that he helped in a getting a cemetary for their final resting place, Exxon Eddie hasn’t been quite as kind to our living veterans who are trying to get the benefits they earned from our country. From an email from Ryan for Kentucky:

Whitfield voted for budget that cut veteran’s programs.  Voted for final passage of the $2.6 trillion budget conference report for 2006.  The report cut Medicaid spending by $10 Billion, every penny of the Social Security surplus, increased the national deficit by $167.5 Billion over 5 years and paved the way for drilling in ANWR.  Furthermore, the conference report cut fudning for veterans’ healthcare by $13.5 Billion over 5 years.  Yet the budget still found room for $106 BILLION in tax breaks for those who need it least.  [HRC 95, Vote #149, 4/28/2005; Passed Republicans; 214-15: Democrats; 0-195; Independent; 0-1]

As you can see, Eddie cast a partisan vote, a rubber-stamp to President Bush and voted AGAINST respecting our veterans. I wonder how many of $106 billion in tax breaks went to Exxon and Chevron, in which he owns stock? Only in the delusional world of Mitch McConnell and Ed Whitfield does “Taking Care of Veterans” entail cutting their healthcare by 13.5 billion dollars while doling out 106 billion in Corporate Welfare. Not to mention voting his stock options to allow the Oil Companies to rape ANWR.

However, the hypocrisy of Exxon Eddie does not end there. Just look at this bill which failed by one single vote. Again from an email from Ryan for Kentucky:

Whitfield voted against a $53 Million boost for Veteran’s Health Care and Benefits on MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND 2005 (FAILED BY 1 VOTE – WHITFIELD’S VOTE).  The bill would have aded $8 million for combat-related trauma care, $6 million for poly-trauma centersto support wounded trops once they return to their homes, $9 million for VA medical and prosthetic research and $7 million for 100 additional staff to process claims for compenstation and pension benefits.  Finally, the amendment would provide $23 million to help approximately 4100 spouses of service members with children whose spouse died during the War on Terrorism between September 11, 2001 and November 30, 2004 by making them eligible for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation.  The amendment failed, 213-214 [HR 2528, Vote #224, 5/26/2005; Failed; Republicans; 19-210; Democrats; 193-4; Independent; 1-0]

Now, how can Exxon Eddie claim to “Take Care of Veterans” if he casts the deciding vote that defeats respecting them with the benefits they have earned? To add insult to injury, Whitfield cast this deciding vote on MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND, while the rest of America was celebrating the sacrifice of these brave men and women!! What total hypocrisy, especially when you consider that Whitfield rubber-stamped the failed policy of President Bush which sent them to war in the wrong country without the proper training, equipment, and without adequate plans for the occupation or exit in Iraq!!!!

Ed Whitfield is so out of touch with the values of Western Kentucky it is embarrassing!!!! Here, we believe that our veterans should be respected and honored for their service with all the benefits they were promised, and earned. Here at Ryan for Kentucky, we fight for that!!! Perhaps Eddie should buy a house in the district and live among us and he would know that!!!

We have a great Democrat in Kentucky’s First named Heather Ryan who is running to truly represent the people and veterans of this district. She is a veteran herself, so “Taking Care of Veterans” is personal to her. Here is her take on the current service man and woman enlisted and fighting, and our veterans:

As a veteran of the United States Navy, and an active member of the American Legion, my dedication to the men and women in uniform is unyielding.  The current service member is highly skilled, highly trained and highly ignored by this administration.  The American people

were duped into an ill-conceived war under false pretenses and the administration continues to over utilize a national guard system which was never intended to be used for sustained combat missions.  Congress must insist that an exit strategy be planned and implemented immediately. By the Bush Administration’s own account, the nation will be forced to reinstate the draft system again should we continue to over-tax our National Guard with sustained combat.  I am not a supporter of reinstating the draft for as history clearly shows us, the draft is merely for those of us who are not wealthy enough to buy our way out of

active duty.  We must not allow this ill planned and ill executed war to continue to destroy the brave men and women in our armed forces while simultaneously placing our nation at a heightened risk with a limited national guard.

Every day we see reports about how our veterans services have fallen into severe disrepair.  The men and women who served this country deserve better.  Our VA system needs a complete overhaul; from the GI Bill to health care to disability benefits, without a modernized system, we do those who served our country a grave disservice.  Veterans deserve better.

http://www.ryanforkentucky.com…

It is time for Exxon Eddie to go. His list of accomplishments mostly include rubber-stamping all the failed policies of Mitch McConnell and President Bush, all the while sacrificing the interests of real citizens of Kentucky’s First District to blind partisanship.

Heather Ryan brings youth, intelligence and passion to serve the veterans and working families of our district. When Western Kentucky Democrats see adn hear her, they love her!!! We just need the resources to get our message to them to win!!!

Please help us reach the 63% of registered Democrats in this district, and invest in expanding our Congressional majority here:

http://www.actblue.com/page/am…

Every cent will be put to work immediately to defeat a sitting Republican and to advance the values of our party in a region we have long ignored. Please support fellow grassroots Democrats in their efforts to rebuild our party where it is needed most, on the ground!!

Best wishes fellow Democrats!!

 

ID-01 Larry Grant for Congress

We have just officially begun Q2 of the election cycle.  I want to bring back a good friend to the netroots community from the election cycle of 2006- Larry Grant.

As a refresher, Larry ALMOST pulled off an upset of epic proportions by barely losing to extreme right-wing nutjob Bill Sali.  In 2006, by running a grassroots and netroots oriented campaign, he gained recognition amongst both communities and garned immense name recognition and popularity.  Alas, Larry lost the district by a slim margin of 50-45.  

Here is a quick summary of the district from plf515‘s Congressional round-up diary:

District: ID-01

Location Western ID, bordering OR, WA and MT including Boise

Representative Bill Sali (R)

First elected  2006

2006 margin 50-45

2004 margin NA

Bush margin 2004 30-69

Notes on opponents Larry Grant raised about $750K to Sali’s $1 million

Current opponents   Larry Grant

and

Rand Lewis (site down)

and

Walt Minnick

Sali is also being primaried

Demographics Tied for fewest Blacks (0.3%), 14th most Republican

Assessment Even for a Republican, Sali is crazy. Even for an Idaho Republican Sali is crazy.  He’s really nuts.  He might even lose in this Republican stronghold (I hope he wins the primary)

 

To kick off our fundraising efforts for our BlueMajority, Red to Blue, and Obamajority candidates in Q2, I would like everyone to consider Larry as a potential candidate to donate to.

Although Idaho is a ruby red state, Larry provides the Democratic Party and the progressive community the perfect candidate to paint this state with a brilliant shade of blue.  

Here are his stances on the important issues:

Dear Friend,

Recently, I was asked what the Democrats should do when we win the election in 2008. I started imagining what it will be like having more seats in the U. S. House, a filibuster-proof Senate, and a Democrat in the White House. Starting with what Speaker Nancy Pelosi called her “6 in ’06” agenda last time, it wasn’t hard to come up with 9 for 09

Here they are:

1.     Provide for negotiating prescription drug prices under Medicare:

Speaker Pelosi got this one through the House last time, but it got blocked in the Senate. Let’s try again.

2.     End subsidies for big oil:

Speaker Pelosi got this one through too, but it got blocked in the Senate as well. Let’s do it again, too.

3.     Pass the expanded State Children’s Health Insurance Program (“SCHIP”):

Six million more deserving children would have been covered by the new SCHIP program. Let’s get them covered as soon as possible.

4.     Repeal No Child Left Behind:

Let’s quit mandating what local schools have to teach without providing the funds to do it.

5.     Pass an extended Craig-Wyden plan:

We need to continue the Craig-Wyden program for replacing revenue that local communities lost when the timber harvest on federal lands was curtailed.

6.     Repeal the Patriot Act:

We need to protect our civil liberties and stop spying on American citizens without a warrant.

7.     Balance the budget:

We need to stop burdening our grandchildren with our national debt.

8.     Pass comprehensive immigration reform:

We need to protect our borders while providing employers the workers they need.

9.     End the war in Iraq:

The war is costing far too much in both lives and money.

There you have it, my goals for Congress in 2009.  Now its your turn what are your top 9?  

Larry Grant

His stances is a perfect example of a true progressive looking to make a difference in Washington.  

To add a bit of a personal touch, here is a story from NYBri‘s diary over at DailyKos:

I have asked those who work with Larry in his campaign to tell me in their own words about why they are committing themselves to working with Larry in Idaho, and over the next few weeks, I’ll be sharing with you what they have written in a series called, In Their Own Words, and when it’s all over, I think Larry will be one of your favorite people as well.

Larry’s North Idaho Field Coordinator is Kristy Reed Johnson, and here is her story:

When I met Larry Grant over two years ago, I thought he was just another attorney who was willing to throw himself on his sword for Idaho Democrats in another 1st District Congressional race that would end like all the others since the early 1990’s.

I’m a fairly jaded political junkie.  In 1968, at the tender age of 22, and a “hostess” for Trans World Airlines I received two “special assignments.” First I was sent to work the Republican National Convention in Miami, FL. That was the  year of Barry Goldwater, Nelson Rockefeller, and Richard Nixon. We all know what happened.

My next assignment was to be one of three crews who worked the Hubert Humphrey Charter after he won the Democratic nomination. It was five years after John F. Kennedy was assassinated, and three years after the Democrats got Civil Rights legislation through Congress, lost all the support of the Southern Democrats, and Lyndon Johnson decided not to seek re-election.  It was also the year that Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated. Two months after that, on the same evening he won the California Primary, Bobby Kennedy was also shot to death, as we all watched on television.

I became a Eugene McCarthy supporter. At the scene of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, there were protests in a park across the street against the ongoing war in Vietnam. Those kids (my age) were dragged and beaten by Chicago Police, actions ordered by Mayor Daly (a Democrat and the father of the current Mayor Daly).  

I formed my life long opinion of politics that year. Politicians are just people, some good, some dreadful, and all flawed, just like the rest of us. There is nothing “grand” about them.

But they seem come in two types, regardless of party: The ones who are in it for their own aggrandizement and those who honestly believe they can make a difference in the lives of ordinary people.

Larry Grant is the only candidate I’ve had the opportunity to know that I would walk on hot coals for to get elected. Larry Grant earned my respect.

Time after time I have seen his honesty, his integrity, his core values and moral compass lead this campaign team in a way that restores my faith in the democratic process. It’s all about us, the people of Idaho, the team, the crew, the mission. I actually believe Larry possesses at the very roots of his character everything we so desperately need in our political leaders.

His kind of responsible, intelligent, thoughtful leadership is missing in most of the politicians who are running for office these days. Larry leads by example.  

He will take that Idaho-grown moral and ethical compass to Washington D.C. and restore our faith in how a government should be run — of the people, by the people, and for the people. Can you support a man like that?

Larry has a list of 9 reasonable, achievable goals he wants to accomplish the first year he gets to Congress. They are his ‘9 for 09.’ Check them out. You don’t have to walk on hot coals for him, but could you help us, his staff, help him, communicate with the voters in the 1st District?

Larry doesn’t take money from corporate lobbyists. Small donations of $9 or $19 or $29 are gratefully accepted. Larry knows times are tough for working families in Idaho, and he knows every donation that comes to him means that the donor is sacrificing something for him or herself.  

As I write this, The Grant Team just received a bulletin: Larry Grant just received a phone call from a person who offered him the database for the Republican Party in Idaho. He refused. He thanked the potential donor, but said it would not be ethical, and warned us (the staff) not to accept something like that either.  

I can vote for a man like that. Will you join me? Become a member of the club and let’s send Larry Grant to Congress. He is just what the citizen’s of Idaho ordered.

There you have it, please head on over to Larry’s website to join and contribute to a truly stand up guy!

Grant for Congress:

http://www.grantforcongress.co…

Larry’s stances on Issues:

http://www.grantforcongress.co…

Give Larry a shot in the arm!

http://www.actblue.com/entity/…

If we start now, we can provide Larry with an even BETTER chance!  

NJ-02: Van Drew Won’t Challenge LoBiondo

Earlier in the cycle, Democrats had hoped to target three House Republican incumbents in New Jersey: NJ-07’s Mike Ferguson, NJ-03’s Jim Saxton, and NJ-02’s Frank LoBiondo.  With the retirements of Ferguson and Saxton, Democrats have a solid shot of picking up both seats with the candidacies of Linda Stender and John Adler.  For a while, it looked possible that state Senator Jeff Van Drew would round out the trio by challenging the entrenched LoBiondo in his D+4 district.  Alas, that wasn’t meant to be:

State Sen. Jeff Van Drew won’t challenge incumbent Frank LoBiondo for a congressional seat in November, Van Drew said this afternoon.

Van Drew was elected to the Senate in November after serving three terms in the state Assembly. […]

“We are approaching the most complex and challenging budget in the state’s history and for that reason, I’m going to stay where I am for now, although I will clearly say I look forward to the day when I will run for the United States Congress,” Van Drew said in a telephone interview this afternoon.

Van Drew said it’s possible he could challenge LoBiondo in 2010.

This is the safer move for Van Drew — fresh from beating an incumbent GOP state Senator last November, another bid against an incumbent so soon after his last race might have rubbed some voters the wrong way.  However, it does look promising that Van Drew will be willing to make a real race of this seat in 2010.  I look forward to his candidacy.

Meanwhile, the promising campaign of Rabbi Dennis Shulman against NJ-05’s ultra-conservative Scott Garrett leaves me hopeful that we could see three pick-up opportunities in the Garden State, after all.

OH-03: Turner makes up controversy, Rangel fires back

Cross-posted from Jane Mitakides for Congress

What’s a Congressman to do, when the only legislation he’s passed during five years on the job renamed a Dayton park, when he votes as a right-wing partisan 87% of the time, and if he has a 30% rating with veterans groups?  Especially when he’s being challenged by a strong candidate, in a now-blue district that went 55% for Ted Strickland?

Well, he could just make something up. Unless of course, the Chairman of Ways and Means catches him!

Turner accused of causing needless worry

Democrats say questions he raised about Delphi worker eligibility for tax rebates were unfounded.

Cross-posted from Jane Mitakides for Congress

What’s a Congressman to do, when the only legislation he’s passed during five years on the job renamed a Dayton park, when he votes as a right-wing partisan 87% of the time, and if he has a 30% rating with veterans groups?  Especially when he’s being challenged by a strong candidate, in a now-blue district that went 55% for Ted Strickland?

Well, he could just make something up. Unless of course, the Chairman of Ways and Means catches him!

Turner accused of causing needless worry

Democrats say questions he raised about Delphi worker eligibility for tax rebates were unfounded.

By Lynn Hulsey Staff Writer Tuesday, April 01, 2008

Democrats are accusing U.S. Rep. Mike Turner of needlessly worrying former Delphi workers.

At issue are questions Turner raised about the workers' eligibility for economic stimulus rebates after he'd already voted for the bill that ensured the workers would get the money.

On Monday, March 31, Turner, R-Centerville, denied he misled anyone. He said he was responding to concerns from constituents and trying to change the bill to get rebate checks into workers' hands more quickly.

However, J. Jioni Palmer, spokesman for the House Ways and Means committee, said Turner sent no legislative language to the committee prior to final approval by Congress.

Turner's Third District Democratic opponent, Washington Twp. businesswoman Jane Mitakides, accused Turner of trying to create the "illusion of working for the people of this district."

"The notion that these rebates were at risk and then somehow salvaged was absolutely misleading," said Mitakides. "It's the legislative equivalent of turning in someone else's homework and taking credit for it."

[…]

On Feb. 1, a day after Turner voted for the House bill, he announced he'd sent a letter to House Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel, D-N.Y., and three other House and Senate leaders in response to concerns by former Delphi workers.

"I am writing to request that clarifying language be added to the Economic Stimulus package that ensures tax rebates will be given to workers" displaced by foreign trade, wrote Turner. He said workers' buyout payments should not count as income.

[…]

The next day Rangel wrote to Turner and said Turner's Feb. 1 letter was unnecessary because the problem "did not exist in the legislation that passed the House" with Turner's support.

"I'm hopeful that the misunderstanding did not cause alarm among Delphi workers who may have questioned their rebate eligibility," Rangel wrote.

[…]

Mike Turner did nothing but try to gain political points from a controversy he created.  He voted for the bill before he had problems with it, yet offered no legislative language – because none was necessary. Maybe the Congressman from the Ohio 3rd needs a little lesson in the legislative process? May I suggest the following?

KY-Sen: Lunsford Swamping All Comers in Dem Primary

SurveyUSA has the first public poll of the Democratic primary for race against Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell, and so far, it’s looking like a rout for Bruce Lunsford:

Bruce Lunsford (D): 42%

David Williams (D): 11%

Greg Fischer (D): 6%

James Rice (D): 5%

David Wylie (D): 5%

Mike Cassaro (D): 4%

Ken Stepp (D): 3%

Other: 17%

Undecided: 8%

(MoE: ±4.2%)

Lunsford’s only serious opponent in the primary, Greg Fischer, a seller of stadium bleachers, has some serious ground to make up.  It’s likely that Lunsford, from his acrimonious runs for the Governor’s mansion, has a ceiling of support in the Democratic primary, but the crowded field opposing him is splitting the remainder of the vote so far.  

Will Fischer be able to close the gap and consolidate the non-Lunsford vote in time for the Kentucky’s May 20th primary?

IL-18: You Have Got To Be Kidding Me

In a recent column in Roll Call, Stuart Rothenberg takes a moment to lament the diminished spotlight for a talented crop of young men and women running for Congress across America.  Now, that’s all well and good, except when you don’t know what you’re talking about.  

Here’s Rothenberg’s “assessment” of IL-18 GOP candidate Aaron Schock, who is running for the open seat of retiring Rep. Ray LaHood:

If you like your candidates young, you’ll find Illinois state Rep. Aaron Schock (R), 26, more than interesting. He was elected to the Peoria school board in 2001, even before he graduated from Bradley University.

In 2004, Schock knocked off an incumbent Democratic state legislator in a Democratic district, and he turned back a major challenge two years later. A conservative who says he focuses on constituent services, Schock is the GOP nominee for retiring Rep. Ray LaHood’s (R) open seat.

The clean-cut hopeful looks like the president of a College Republicans chapter (and acts far older than his years), and he sounded well-versed on most matters. If you can be a seasoned political pro at 26, Schock is. It’s a bit scary, actually.

“Well-versed on most matters”?  Stu, were you lost in his dreamy eyes or did you flat-out forget to ask him about his downright scary foreign policy musings on selling “Pershing nuclear missiles” to Taiwan?  You may have read about this thoroughly whacked-out and amateurish suggestion in the press as something that Ray LaHood himself blasted as “outrageous”:

In his announcement address in late October, Schock said that if China didn’t work to persuade Iran away from development of nuclear weapons, “we will sell Pershing nuclear missiles to Taiwan for their defense. Non-proliferation will either be enforced universally or not at all – it is their choice. The Chinese will come around, I have no doubt.”

“My advice on that is that he should have done his homework, and I think it’s an outrageous statement to be making,” LaHood said, “particularly when you have as your No. 1 employer in the Peoria area Caterpillar (Inc.), that has developed many, many relationships with the Chinese, including establishing facilities in China.

“To make a statement that you’re going to arm one country with nuclear weapons to attack China I think shows a fairly high level of not doing your homework, and… immaturity and not using good political sense.”

Sure, Schock eventually backed off from the plan, but not before his campaign manager dismissed his skeptics as ivory tower eggheads.  Schock claimed that the idea was “more in jest” than anything else, but that didn’t quite jibe with his campaign manager’s depiction:

In a phone interview with the Journal-Register’s political writer, Bernard Schoenburg, the day Schock retracted the statement, his campaign manager, Steve Shearer, said Schock’s proposal was “not just something that he pulled out of his pocket. … It’s a deeply thought-out policy.”

So, the GOP’s golden boy in IL-18 is a nutter on foreign policy?  It’s a bit scary, actually.