SSP Daily Digest: 3/16 (Morning Edition)

Our twice-daily digests are also open threads for any campaign-related news you might have. Interesting/helpful links always appreciated!

  • AR-Sen: State Sen. Gilbert Baker is jumping all over GOP primary opponent Rep. John Boozman for his extensive travels abroad on the taxpayer dime. In a statement, Baker promised that, as senator, he will be sure to visit Paris, London, and England – all towns in Arkansas.
  • CA-Sen: NOM, NOM, NOM. The haters at the National Organization for (Heterosexual-Only) Marriage have launched an ad campaign attacking Republican ex-Rep. Tom Campbell for supporting gay marriage. CQ describes it as a statewide ad buy, but at only $275,000, that doesn’t get you very much in California. Meanwhile, Carlyfornia has drunk the winger kool-aid – while she supported cap-and-trade when stumping for John McCain two years ago, now she’s against it. Of course.
  • FL-Sen: Heh – PPP asked Floridians who their favorite governors are out of the last five to hold office. Only 4% of Republicans answered Charlie Crist – fewer than the number who named either Dem Bob Graham or Dem Lawton Chiles.
  • PA-Sen: Republican pollster Susquehanna has GOPer Pat Toomey up over Arlen Specter by 42-36, in contrast to recent polls by Quinnipiac and Research 2000 showing Specter leading by that margin. Susquehanna didn’t poll the Dem primary, though, and more weirdly, they didn’t even test Joe Sestak against Toomey. Huh?
  • FL-22: Toward the bottom of an interesting, in-depth look at Base Connect (the sketchy GOP consultants formerly known as BMW Direct), Dave Weigel has a good catch. It turns out that the much-hyped vet Allen West is also a BMW client. He’s raised $1.2 million this cycle, an extraordinary sum for a challenger, but check out that burn rate – he’s spent over $500,000 so far. His opponent, Rep. Ron Klein, has only spent $95K. West still has a lot of cash on hand, but this revelation changes the picture somewhat.
  • NY-13: SEIU chief Andy Stern says that his organization will back independent candidacies against House Dems who vote against healthcare. It seems that Stern would prefer to challenge wayward Dems in primaries, but many filing deadlines have already passed. However, the one actual “nay” vote Stern cites, Rep. Mike McMahon, serves in New York, where the filing deadline does not close for quite some time. (And as per yesterday’s bullet, the Working Families Party said they won’t give their line to McMahon either.)
  • PA-06: The Pennsylvania SEIU, which just endorsed Arlen Specter, also gave their backing to Dem Doug Pike in his primary against Manan Trivedi.
  • Census: I received my 2010 Census form last night. Have you gotten yours yet?
  • Congress: Congress.org takes a look at former staffers who now occupy seats of their own on the Hill and notes that their ranks have been increasing since World War II. At least six staffers are running for office this year.
  • Lulz: Hard to believe, but disgraced and discredited “pollster” Strategic Vision claims to have undertaken a survey of the Georgia governor’s race. Even sadder, a flack for outgoing Gov. Sonny Perdue actually emailed around the “results” to reporters. Still waiting for that lawsuit against Nate Silver.
  • Teabagging: Virginia Thomas, the wife of none other than Sup. Ct. Justice Clarence Thomas, has formed a new lobbying company to exploit capitalize on teabagger sentiment. The LAT notes:
  • As a 501(c)(4) nonprofit, Liberty Central can raise unlimited amounts of corporate money and largely avoid disclosing its donors.

    Because of a recent Supreme Court decision, Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, the group may also spend corporate money freely to advocate for or against candidates for office.

    Justice Thomas was part of the 5-4 majority in that case.

  • SSP: We have 287 fans on le Facebook so far. Pretty please take us to 300? I ain’t too proud to beg.
  • Fusion Voting in New York, the Working Families Party & Close Elections

    New York State has an unusual way of conducting elections. Here, one candidate can run for office on the ballot lines of more than one political party. All votes each candidate receives on all lines get added up into one final total – it’s called “fusion voting,” and it’s actually not permitted in most states. But it adds a very interesting wrinkle to New York politics.

    For instance, back in 1993, the corrupt and thankfully defunct Liberal Party gave its line in the NYC mayor’s race to Rudy Giuliani. This gave Democrats who opposed David Dinkins but couldn’t countenance pulling the Republican lever a way to vote for Rudy that salved their consciences (even if it had zero practical effect). Giuliani scored some 62,000 votes on the Liberal line, but won by only 57K overall, putting him forever in Liberal chair Ray Harding’s debt. This debt was repaid through patronage, a common stock-in-trade for Harding – and an activity he was eventually indicted for last year (in connection with his dealings with Alan Hevesi).

    Not all third-party behavior in New York is this colorful or unseemly. There are fewer small parties today than in the past, and only three of them matter: the Conservative Party, the Independence Party, and the Working Families Party. To get on the ballot in the first place, you need to undertake a difficult, state-wide signature drive. To stay on the ballot, you need to get at least 50,000 votes for governor on your line every four years. Most minor parties, like the Green Party or the Right to Life Party, can’t sustain this and eventually wither. (Same with the Liberals.) The survivors, however, endure.

    The Conservatives, as you’d expect, almost always cross-endorse Republicans (though occasionally they back Democrats). They act as a grumpy right-ward pressure group and have been known to split the vote in favor of Democrats – remember NY-23 last year? (Something similar also happened in the same region in a race which led to Dem David Valesky getting elected to the state Senate a few years ago.)

    The Independence Party, near as I can tell, is a vestige from the Ross Perot days (though it was founded shortly before his presidential run). My personal opinion is that it remains a force because enough people register as members thinking instead that they are registering as “independents.” (To do that in NY, you need to leave the party selection box on your registration form blank.) Plenty of people probably vote that line for similar reasons. The IP doesn’t have much of a platform and sometimes experiences local power struggles reminiscent of the SDS, but for any politician craving the aura of “independence” (ie, all of them), it’s a bonus.

    Finally, there’s the most potent of the bunch, the Working Families Party. Formed in 1998 as the Liberal Party was clearly dying, they are by far the best organized and most powerful of the bunch. They are tightly aligned with NY’s unions and stake out a pretty progressive platform. They also offer a lot more than just their ballot line – a full-fledged WFP endorsement comes with serious field resources as well. At the federal level, they’ve cross-endorsing Dems since 2000. (They’ve supported some Republicans at other levels in the past, but I’ve already expressed enough grar about that to last a lifetime.)

    Anyhow, by my count, the WFP has provided the margin of victory in five House races in New York. They are:


















































    Year CD Democrat Overall Margin WFP Votes Without WFP
    2002 1 Timothy Bishop 2,752 2,951 -199
    2004 27 Brian Higgins 3,774 8,091 -4,317
    2008 29 Eric Massa 5,330 9,003 -3,673
    2009 20 Scott Murphy 726 3,839 -3,113
    2009 23 Bill Owens 3,584 6,589 -3,005

    The next-best “near-miss” performance was Dan Maffei’s run against Jim Walsh in 2006, which he lost by just 3,400 votes (and where the WFP supplied 6,500). On the flipside, Mike Arcuri’s close shave had very little margin for error – without the WFP line, he would have won by just 465 votes, instead of 9,919. And incidentally, the Working Families Party has also found its way into neighboring Connecticut, where they gave their line to all five Democrats who ran for Congress in 2008. That year, they helped pad out Jim Himes’s victory from fewer than 3,000 votes to almost 12,000.

    The bottom line is that the WFP’s recent decision not to back any Democrats who vote against healthcare reform can and very likely will have a material impact on the 2010 elections. In recent years, almost every Dem running for federal office in NY has gotten the WFP line. For vulnerable Democrats in close races, if the WFP endorsement is not forthcoming, it will be missed.

    CO-Sen: Bennet Leads Romanoff by 6, Norton Has Early Lead in GOP Primary

    Public Policy Polling (3/5-8, likely primary voters):

    Michael Bennet (D-inc): 40

    Andrew Romanoff (D): 34

    Undecided: 26

    (MoE: ±4.6%)

    Jane Norton (R): 34

    Ken Buck (R): 17

    Tom Wiens (R): 7

    Others: 9

    Undecided: 32

    (MoE: ±4.4%)

    For the Democratic field, that’s a surprisingly close result. At this point, though, neither Bennet nor Romanoff are drawing the bulk of their support from clearly identifiable blocs. Jensen:

    In the Democratic Senate contest Michael Bennet leads Andrew Romanoff 40-34. Support in this race may end up having to do more with personalities than ideology, as there’s no real divide in support along liberal/moderate lines for now. Bennet’s up 42-33 with liberals and 40-36 with moderates. Both candidates are pretty well liked by the party electorate. Bennet’s approval is a 57/21 spread with primary voters and Romanoff’s favorability comes down at 45/15. The one place where there is a clear division is along racial lines. Bennet’s up 42-34 with whites while Romanoff has the 42-31 advantage with Hispanics.

    That’s all well and good, but Romanoff will be hard-pressed not to be swamped out by Bennet’s huge fundraising edge in advance of the primary.

    PPP also threw in a question on the Republican gubernatorial primary, and found Scott McInnis sleepwalking to victory with a 58-8 lead over Some Dude Dan Maes.

    SSP Daily Digest: 3/15 (Afternoon Edition)

    CA-Sen: Wow, it actually looks like conservadem blogger Mickey Kaus is forging ahead with his planned challenge to Barbara Boxer; he submitted papers to run in the Democratic primary. It sounds like he’s approaching the race with rather limited expectations, though; in an interview with the New York Times, Kaus said that, in comparison to Al Franken: “I do not expect to win, and that is the difference between Franken and me. This is an issue-raising candidacy.”

    LA-Sen: The Charlie Melancon camp is offering up another Anzalone-Liszt internal, this one taken in mid-February, to show that things aren’t quite as bad off as Rasmussen would have you believe. Melancon’s poll shows David Vitter leading him, 48-38.

    NV-Sen: Ex-Assemblywoman Sharron Angle is on the air with a 60-second radio spot, her first of the campaign. It’s really more of an ad for the teabaggers than for herself, though, as it focuses on critiquing the TARP program and promoting the Tea Party rally planned for Harry Reid’s tiny town of Searchlight.

    NY-Sen-B: There’s been a remarkable churn-and-burn of celebrities showing up, saying they’re interested in challenging Kirsten Gillibrand, and then backing away after doing the math. This time, it was former state banking official and Michael Bloomberg girlfriend Diana Taylor. Politico is also abuzz about George Pataki’s dodging of questions of running for Senate when at a Rick Lazio rally, since of course his basic polite desire not to step on Lazio’s message means that Pataki is secretly planning to run for Senate.

    OH-Sen: This guy looks like he’s destined to end up with about one or two percent of the vote, but in what could be a super-close race between Lee Fisher and Rob Portman (if recent polling is any indication), that fraction could make all the difference. Surgeon Michael Pryce announced his independent candidacy for the Senate at a Tea Party gathering last week. (Of course, there’s still the little matter of his gathering those signatures.)

    PA-Sen: Arlen Specter pulled in another union endorsement over the weekend, and it’s one with a lot of boots on the ground: the state chapter of the SEIU, with nearly 100,000 members.

    MN-Gov: Howard Dean is weighing in with a pay-back endorsement in another Democratic gubernatorial primary. This time, it’s in Minnesota, and he’s backing Minneapolis mayor R.T. Rybak. Rybak was chair for Dean’s 2004 primary campaign in Minnesota.

    OR-Gov: This isn’t the kind of news that helps your gubernatorial campaign gain traction. Bill Sizemore, at one point one of the most dominant forces in Oregon’s GOP (and still persisting in running for Governor in spite of the odds), is facing three counts of tax evasion. He finally relented and accepted the help of a public defender despite previous plans to go it alone. He hasn’t been getting any private donations for his legal defense fund and is working as a landscaper to make ends meet, so he qualifies.

    SC-Gov: Rep. Gresham Barrett’s having a hard time washing the stench of Washington off his hands while running for the GOP gubernatorial nod in South Carolina. Under attack over his inside-the-Beltway vote in favor of TARP from inside-the-Beltway group Americans for Job Security, Barrett has decided to use his inside-the-Beltway federal campaign funds to run ads in South Carolina to defend himself, which is permissible because he’s defending his voting record rather than touting his gubernatorial campaign.

    UT-02: Despite the entry several months ago of former state Rep. and state party co-chair Morgan Philpot, the GOP is looking for a better option to go against Rep. Jim Matheson. GOP recruiters have been trying to get four-term state Rep. Greg Hughes to get in the race, who apparently offers more gravitas than the young Philpot.

    WA-03: Retiring Rep. Brian Baird took a while to settle on an endorsement for a replacement, but he’s going with ex-state Rep. and TVW founder Denny Heck. The Dem establishment (starting with Gov. Chris Gregoire) seems to be coalescing behind Heck, who faces off against liberal state Sen. Craig Pridemore in the primary.

    New York: New York’s Working Families Party is laying it all on the line: the party’s central committee voted to prohibit the endorsement of any member of Congress who votes against the pending healthcare bill. The WFP’s line provided the margin of victory for both Scott Murphy and Bill Owens in their special elections last year. It also (sigh) provided Eric Massa’s margin in 2008. (D)

    Demographics: An interesting University of Southern California study points to an trend that got underway in the 1990s that’s really started to show up lately in Census estimates: that immigrants to the U.S. are increasingly skipping the traditional ports of entry (New York, Los Angeles) and instead heading directly for the nation’s midsize metropolitan areas. The numbers of recent immigrants had the steepest gain, percentage-wise, in places like Nashville, El Paso, Bakersfield, and Stockton.

    StephenCLE’s 2010 House Predictions – Part 10

    Hello, and welcome to the 10th and final installment of my 2010 baseline predictions for the House of Representatives.  In this section I will cover the Pacific Coast.  This region officially contains Washington, Oregon, California, and Hawaii, but for division purposes I slid Washington and Oregon over to the Rocky Mountain region, leaving only Hawaii and California.  This is arguably the most liberal region of the United States, outside of maybe the Northeast region.  At present, Democrats hold 36 of 55 seats in the region, the Republicans have 19.  Because of high Obama approval ratings and a leftward shift in general, this might be an area where the Dems could hold even in 2010 and maybe even gain seats.

    First off, a recap of where we’ve been, and where we still have to go*:

    Northeast – Rep +3 – (Rep pickups of NH-1, NY-24, NY-29)

    Mid-Atlantic – Even – (Rep pickups of PA-11, MD-1, Dem pickups of PA-6, DE-1)

    Upper South – Rep +5 (Rep pickups of VA-2, VA-5, TN-4, TN-6, TN-8)

    South Atlantic – Even – (no pickups on either side)

    Eastern Great Lakes – Rep +3 (Rep pickups of OH-1, MI-7, IN-8)

    South Gulf – Rep +3 (Rep pickups of AL-2, MS-1, LA-3, TX-17, Dem pickup of LA-2)

    Western Great Lakes – Dem +1 (Dem pickup of IL-10)

    Central Plains – Rep +4 (Rep pickups of IA-3, AR-1, AR-2, KS-3)

    Rocky Mountains – Rep +4 (Rep pickups of CO-4, NV-3, ID-1, WA-3)

    Pacific Coast –

    Total National Score – Rep +21

    * – Please note that in most cases these ratings were done prior to any polling becoming known.  

    Do note that, despite what said in the beginning, this actually will not be the last diary in the series.  Following this diary, I’ll be going back over the whole list and seeing if, in lue of polls and other data from the last month, if I want to change any of my picks.  At that point I’ll post Part 11, in which I lock in my selections and I’ll show the entire list of races “on the board”, ie: those races between Likely D and Likely R.  All races will be re-visited as we head toward November.

    California-1 – Mike Thompson/Democrat – Here’s a district that covers most of the northern California coastline north of the Bay Area.  It’s an easy winner for Thompson, who is entrenched.

    District PVI – D+13

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-2 – Wally Herger/Republican – Herger actually got a moderately tough re-election in 2008, winning by a margin mirroring the presidential vote in this northern CA district.  That being said, this year’s race isn’t expected to be close at all.  

    District PVI – R+11

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-3 – Dan Lungren/Republican – Enjoy this one, folks, because this is bound to be a tough fight.  Lungren entered office in 2004 when this suburban Sacramento district was arguably much more conservative.  It’s taken a shift to the left, as evidenced by Barack Obama’s 49-48 plurality win over John McCain, and Lungren only survived against an underfunded Dem challenger 49-44.  This time he’s up against much tougher opposition.  Physician Ami Bera has launched a challenge and has cleared the democratic primary field.  And so far, Bera is leading Lungren in the fundraising race, 871k to 732k, and also leads in cash on hand by a slightly larger margin.  It’s uncertain just how good a campaigner Bera is, but if he is, Lungren will have to face that and an environment in California that has arguably bucked the national trend and stayed blue.  I haven’t done this much in this series, but I’m picking a minor upset here, Bera defeats Lungren, making him only the 3rd Rep incumbent to go down this cycle (Jim Gerlach in PA-6 and Anh Cao in LA-2 were the others)

    District PVI – R+6

    Stephen’s Rating – Toss Up

    Prediction – Weak Dem Pickup (5th overall)

    National Score – Rep +20

    California-4 – Tom McClintock/Republican – Surprisingly, this northeast California district was the site of one of the closest House races in the nation in 2008, as Air Force pilot Charlie Brown came within several hundred votes of beating McClintock.  It appears the democrats have pretty much ceded this race in 2010, the only confirmed candidate is Clint Curtis, who formerly lived in FL-24 and ran in the 06 primary there.  It is worth noting that McClintock is facing a primary challenge from medical firm executive Michael Babich.  If somehow Babich pulls that out the race could still get interesting, but I doubt that happens.  

    District PVI – R+10

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-5 – Doris Matsui/Democrat – The Sacramento-based 5th is a liberal bastion, as is much of northern California.  Matsui is safe.  (Hint hint, lots of one sentence reviews ahead)

    District PVI – D+15

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-6 – Lynn Woolsey/Democrat – This coastal district lies to the north of the bay, and is extremely democratic.  Safe.

    District PVI – D+23

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-7 – George Miller/Democrat – The 7th consists of much of the northeastern Bay Area.  It’s more democratic territory, and safe for Miller.

    District PVI – D+19

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-8 – Nancy Pelosi/Democrat – Central San Francisco is home to Pelosi, the Speaker of the House.  It’s funny reading on certain blogs, the people that say random stuff like “Pelosi needs to start worrying about HER re-election.”  If they were talking about a  primary challenge then maybe, but the idea of this seat ever going republican is just pure idiocy.

    District PVI – D+35

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold  

    California-9 – Barbara Lee/Democrat – This district consists mostly of Central Oakland, and is the most democratic district in California, and the 6th most democratic in the nation.  Safe.

    District PVI – D+37

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-10 – John Garamendi/Democrat – Garamendi actually had a crappy election in the 2009 special election here, winning by an underwhelming 55-43 against David Harmer.  I don’t imagine it’s because of weakness on Garamendi’s part, as it could be the fault of the democratic electorate instead.  Luckily, the republicans don’t have a confirmed candidate for November yet.

    District PVI – D+11

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-11 – Jerry McNerney/Democrat – The 11th used to be a republican district, but times are a changing here.  McNerney won this seat in 2006 over disgraced ex-Rep Richard Pombo, and held it by 10 points in 2008, mirroring Obama’s 9-point win.  McNerney has fundraised fairly well this cycle, pulling in 1.05 million to this point.  More good news for McNerney is that the republican primary looks crowded and tough.  U.S Marshal Tony Amador, vineyard owner Brad Goehring, non-profit org vice president Elizabeth Emken, and former 10th district nominee David Harmer are all alive in the race for the nomination.  Goehring has the fundraising lead, Harmer has the lead in name ID.  It’s hard to say what’s going to transpire here, but McNerney has set himself up fairly well I think.  

    District PVI – R+1

    Stephen’s Rating – Leans D

    Prediction – Moderate Dem Hold

    California-12 – Jacqueline Speier/Democrat – The 12th stretches from south San Francisco to San Jose, and like much of the region, is very democratic.  Safe.

    District PVI – D+23

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-13 – Pete Stark/Democrat – This district on the east said of the bay is again, very liberal and very democratic.  Stark is safe.

    District PVI – D+22

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-14 – Anna Eshoo/Democrat – Moving to the south of the Bay Area proper now, but nothing’s changed yet, still very democratic territory and safe.

    District PVI – D+21

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-15 – Mike Honda/Democrat – This somewhat gerrymandered district runs from San Jose down through Santa Clara.  It’s less democratic than the central Bay Area districts are, but we’re still a ways away from republicans competing still.  

    District PVI – D+15

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-16 – Zoey Lofgren/Democrat – This district lies to the east of CA-15, and is the last Bay Area district, lying mostly in Santa Clara county.  It’s another easy win for the democrats and for Lofgren.

    District PVI – D+16

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-17 – Sam Farr/Democrat – This district takes in much of the central California coast, stretching from Monterey Bay southward.  It, like most coastal California districts, is solidly democratic.

    District PVI – D+19

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-18 – Dennis Cardoza/Democrat – We now move toward the Central Valley, which is largely split apart between the democratic west and republican east.  This district, which lies on the east side of the imaginary line and contains Stockton and parts of Modesto, leans democratic but not overly.  Cardoza went unopposed in 2008, and so far only one republican, Mike Berryhill, has stepped up to challenge him.  Berryhill is well behind in the fundraising chase, and I don’t have much data on him.  Cook has this race at likely, but I don’t buy it.  

    District PVI – D+4

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-19 – Open/Republican – On the other side of the barrier lies the 19th, which takes in parts of Modesto and Fresno as well as rural areas.  As with most open seats, the primary field on both sides is cloudy.  State senator Jeff Denham is Radanovich’s preferred choice, but ex-Rep Richard Pombo is also in the race, along with former Fresno mayor Jim Patterson, who has the backing of SSP favorite, the Club for Growth.  On the democratic side, Mariposa County planning commission member Les Marsden is running, as is state representative Lorraine Goodwin.  I don’t have any fundraising data thus far, but the republicans clearly have a deeper bench here.  The wild card is Pombo.  If he wins the primary I think the Dems have a shot at a pickup because of his ethical problems.  Any other permutation and Team Red probably wins easily, so my rating will reflect these possibilities.

    District PVI – R+9

    Stephen’s Rating – Likely R

    Prediction – Strong Rep Hold

    California-20 – Jim Costa/Democrat – This district is back on the west side of the Central Valley boundary, taking in the west part of Fresno county and the most democratic parts of Kern county, including most of Bakersfield.  Costa is very popular here and won re-election by nearly 50 points in 2008.  Only one challenger, Andy Vidak, is going at this race for Team Red, he’s raised less than 60k thus far.  And yet, Cook again has this one at likely instead of solid.  I don’t know what he’s looking at.  CQ and the others all have it solid as far as I know.

    District PVI – D+5

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-21 – Devin Nunes/Republican – On the east side of the boundary again, the 21st is heavily republican, and should be no problem for Nunes to hold onto.

    District PVI – R+13

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-22 – Kevin McCarthy/Republican – This mostly rural district is the most republican in California, an easy hold for McCarthy.  

    District PVI – R+16

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-23 – Lois Capps/Democrat – The ridiculously shaped 23rd, which is almost literally the grains of sand running along the coast of south central California, is I guess democratic.  (Can fish vote?)

    District PVI – D+12

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-24 – Elton Gallegly/Republican – This district essentially takes in the same generally area as the 23rd except it starts on the hills overlooking the beach and moves inland.  It’s a marginally republican district that was carried by Obama in 2008 50-47.  That being said, a strong democratic challenge to Gallegly isn’t very likely.  

    District PVI – R+4

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-25 – Buck McKeon/Republican – In the 2008 presidential race, this district was one of the biggest shockers in the nation, as Obama won a 49-48 plurality over McCain in this republican stronghold.  McKeon held on to beat Jackie Conaway by a 57-42 mark despite the top ballot surge, but it was his lowest re-election total since his initial election in 1992.  I think this district bears some watching because Conaway is running again, and McKeon hasn’t declared for re-election yet and doesn’t have much cash on hand either, so it’s possible that he might have retirement on the brain.  If that happens, this could turn into a pickup opportunity, so I’ll keep it on the board just in case.

    District PVI – R+6

    Stephen’s Rating – Likely R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-26 – David Dreier/Republican – Starting to move toward the LA area now, the 26th contains affluent suburbs like Arcadia and Rancho Cucamonga.  Obama won this usually republican district by a 51-47 count, but like many republican incumbents, Dreier still managed a 12% win over Russ Warner.  Still, like McKeon in CA-25, that was a very low total compared to normal.  Warner is back for another run, but he’s facing a tough, entrenched incumbent who is the ranking Republican on the powerful House Rules Committee.  I don’t like his odds of success.

    District PVI – R+3

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-27 – Brad Sherman/Democrat – The Burbank-based 27th is fairly democratic, so I don’t think Sherman has too much to worry about.  

    District PVI – D+13

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-28 – Howard Berman/Democrat – We’re moving closer to central LA now, hitting it’s northwestern suburbs like San Fernando.  Berman is safe.

    District PVI – D+23

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-29 – Adam Schiff/Democrat – The Pasadena-based 29th isn’t quite as democratic as the 28th, but it’s still on the fringes of what the republicans could pick up even if the sky was falling for Team Blue.  Schiff is safe.

    District PVI – D+14

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-30 – Henry Waxman/Democrat – One of the most powerful Dems in the House, Waxman’s district takes in Santa Monica and parts of west LA county.  It’s safe territory.

    District PVI – D+18

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-31 – Xavier Becerra/Democrat – We’re now in the metropolitan core of Los Angeles, this district stretching from downtown to the north side.  Safe.

    District PVI – D+29

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-32 – Judy Chu/Democrat – This district covers LA’s eastern inner suburbs mostly, and Chu won a 2009 special election for this seat by a wide margin.  She’s safe.

    District PVI – D+15

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-33 – Open/Democrat – This western LA seat, which houses Culver City and most of Hollywood’s famous studios and stuff, is open as Diane Watson is retiring.  Doesn’t really matter though, as this is the 11th most democratic district in the US.  

    District PVI – D+35

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-34 – Lucille Royal-Allard/Democrat – This district comprises most of East LA, and is very heavily democratic not unlike the rest of the region.  Safe.

    District PVI – D+22

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-35 – Maxine Waters/Democrat – South-central LA is where we find ourselves now, and like so many other LA districts, this one’s a cinch for Team Blue

    District PVI – D+31

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-36 – Jane Harman/Democrat – Down into the shores south of LA, Redondo Beach-ish area, is where we find the seat of disgraced Rep Jane Harman.  In the wake of her flap with the FBI over trying to secure a chairmanship through very unethical means, teacher Marcy Winograd is attempting to primary Harman, and it’s looking like it could be an interesting race.  The republicans have two candidates here, financial advisor Peter Kesterson and Mattie Fien, founder of the Institute for Persian Studies.  My guess is if Harman survives the primary there’s a chance that Team Red could score an upset here.

    District PVI – D+12

    Stephen’s Rating – Likely D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-37 – Laura Richardson/Democrat – This district runs the whole economic continuum, stretching from the depths of Compton to more affluent suburbs.  It’s also safe democratic territory for Richardson and Team Blue.  

    District PVI – D+26

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-38 – Grace Napolitano/Democrat – Two more districts to go in the eastern LA suburbs for Team Blue, this one the first.  Safe.

    District PVI – D+18

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-39 – Linda Sanchez/Democrat – Another safe democratic district on the east and southeast side of LA.

    District PVI – D+12

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-40 – Ed Royce/Republican – Moving into Orange County now, Royce’s district is usually very republican but Obama put up a strong showing, only falling by 4% to McCain.  But the well entrenched Royce won re-election easily by 25% over Christine Avalos.  I don’t really see this one becoming competitive.  

    District PVI – R+8

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-41 – Jerry Lewis/Republican – This district contains most of San Bernardino County outside of the metroplex, and should be an easy hold for Lewis.  

    District PVI – R+10

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-42 – Gary Miller/Republican – This district is a suburban/exurban mix and contains some of the most conservative parts of the LA metro area.  Safe.

    District PVI – R+10

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-43 – Joe Baca/Democrat –  The San-Bernardino-based 43rd is a strong democratic bastion, much stronger than many realize.  Baca’s sitting pretty.  

    District PVI – D+13

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-44 – Ken Calvert/Republican – Well, here’s what, on paper, could probably have been the democrats’ best shot at a pickup in California this cycle.  Ken Calvert, an embattled incumbent who has struggled with ethical problems, barely survived 51-49 against democrat Bill Hedrick in 2008, while Obama won 50-49 in a close vote against McCain.  Calvert is facing a primary challenge from commercial real estate broker Chris Riggs, which doesn’t look overly problematic but it’s possible the district’s GOP voters might want an untainted candidate.  Hedrick, whose race wasn’t on the radar last cycle, certainly is now, but something isn’t right.  His fundraising has been downright horrible thus far at 179k, compared to 869k for Calvert.  That’s a huge advantage, and that combined with incumbency is going to make things very difficult on Hedrick assuming the GOP primary doesn’t get ugly.  

    District PVI – R+6

    Stephen’s Rating – Likely R

    Prediction – Strong Rep Hold

    California-45 – Mary Bono Mack/Republican – Bono Mack has taken a lot of hits from within her own party because of her voting record, most notably on her vote for cap-n-trade.  However, after several lawmakers threatened to primary her, Bono Mack is good to go for the general.  Despite Obama’s 52-47 win here last cycle, she still cruised to re-election by 17% against state representative Julie Bornstein.  The democrats have a very strong recruit in this district, Palm Springs mayor Stephen Pougnet, which could make this district interesting.  Bono Mack is currently leading the fundraising chase 992k to 553k, though the cash on hand race is closer.  All in all, Pougnet’s total is still pretty good.  I could see this race flipping if enough Republicans refuse to vote on this race because of Bono Mack’s lack of conservatism, but ultimately I think she’s going to win.  

    District PVI – R+3

    Stephen’s Rating – Leans R

    Prediction – Strong Rep Hold

    California-46 – Dana Rohrabacher/Republican – Rohrabacher had a more difficult re-election than usual in 2008, winning by only 9% over democrat Debbie Cook.  His re-election looks like it will be much easier this time as Team Blue isn’t putting up much of a fight here.

    District PVI – R+6

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-47 – Loretta Sanchez/Democrat – Sanchez is a fairly well entrenched incumbent, and while this district isn’t incredibly democratic, it did go for Barack Obama by 23% in 2008, and she cruised to re-election by over 40 points.  Given that, you wouldn’t expect a strong republican challenger to emerge, much less two, but that’s what we had as Van Tran and Quag Pham were headed for a primary battle until Pham bolted last week.  Tran is fundraising fairly well, but trails in the money race 719k to 448k.  Honestly, even if the red wave is big, it would be very hard to see Sanchez, who’s mostly beloved in her district, go down.

    District PVI – D+4

    Stephen’s Rating – Likely D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-48 – John Campbell/Republican – This district was another shocker in the presidential race of 08, as Obama fought to a 49-48 plurality win over McCain after Bush walloped Kerry by 20 four years earlier.  Campbell beat back his democratic challenger by 15% that same year, but this year the democrats found a strong challenger in Irvine city councilwoman Beth Krom.  Krom has been heralded as a solid campaigner, and she’ll need to be since the district at best leans republican and she’s losing to Campbell 949k to 299k in the money race, putting her in a similar position to Bill Hedrick in neighboring CA-44.  Thus, I give this race a similar rating.  

    District PVI – R+6

    Stephen’s Rating – Likely R

    Prediction – Strong Rep Hold

    California-49 – Darrell Issa/Republican – We’re getting close folks, into the northern San Diego exurbs now.  Issa is safe here.

    District PVI – R+10

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-50 – Brian Bilbray/Republican – Bilbray has had a rough go of it in recent elections since his 05 special election win, he hasn’t been elected with a double digit vote total yet, winning the special by 5, his 06 re-election by 9, and his 08 re-election by 5.  The good news for Bilbray is that Team Blue’s top candidate, Dave Roberts, dropped out late last year.  Francine Busby, who nearly won the seat back in 2005 but later struggled in 2006, is back for another run at the seat, though she’ll have to go up against attorney Tracy Emblem in the democratic primary.  Either way, Bilbray is looking pretty good, especially since he’s got a nice lead, 606k to 288k, over Busby in the money race.  Bilbray, much like republicans like Leonard Lance, Jerry Moran, and Dave Reichert, has gone out of their way to stress their moderate nature, so that may help him.

    District PVI – R+3

    Stephen’s Rating – Likely R

    Prediction – Strong Rep Hold

    California-51 – Bob Filner/Democrat – This district, which consists of San Diego’s south and east suburbs as well as Imperial county, is fairly democratic.  I don’t see the entrenched Filner having much of a problem here.

    District PVI – D+8

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    California-52 – Duncan Hunter/Republican – This district is comprised of the most republican parts of San Diego County, mostly rich suburbs.  This should be a cinch for Hunter.

    District PVI – R+9

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid R

    Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

    California-53 – Susan Davis/Democrat – This final district is comprised of downtown San Diego.  It’s a liberal bastion and an easy win for Davis and Team Blue.  

    District PVI – D+14

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    Hawaii-1 – Open/Democrat – We started this journey way up in the far northeast of Maine, and we finish it in the tropical Pacific islands of Hawaii.  Interestingly enough, we have an open seat race that because of the format of the race, could turn out to be crazy.  My projections are for November, but next month, a special election to replace Neil Abercrombie will take place.  It essentially amounts to a three-way R/D/I race between Honolulu city councilman Charles Djou, state senate majority leader Colleen Hanabusa, and former US Rep Ed Case.  The polls have shown this contest to be a close contest on all sides, and it’s a tough call.  But since this is a November prediction, I have to look ahead, and based on their political positions, you’d have to believe that, unless Case wins the special election, Hanabusa would destroy him in the democratic primary, resulting in a Hanabusa v Djou rematch in November.  If Case wins next month he might survive to face Djou instead, although it would probably be tight.  If that matchup comes to pass, I could see enough disenchanted democrats voting for Djou just because of how much Case is hated among the base, but if Hanabusa gets through either the special or the September primary, she’s going to win in November.  The only question is how to rate this race.  

    District PVI – D+11

    Stephen’s Rating – Likely D

    Prediction – Strong Dem Hold

    Hawaii-2 – Mazie Hirono/Democrat – The final district in the US, and it’s a snoozer, as Hirono will have no trouble retaining.

    District PVI – D+14

    Stephen’s Rating – Solid D

    Prediction – Solid Dem Hold

    Region recap:  Well, after all that, I have only one seat changing hands, a democratic pickup in CA-3, giving the Democrats a +1 in the Pacific Coast, and their 2nd region of positive gain along with the Western Great Lakes.  The final score thus comes out unofficially at Republican +20.  In my final post, I will make the total official and if any changes in the total score occur I will highlight them.  You’ll also see my full national board, with all races that are likely, lean, and toss up paired alongside one another.    

    SSP Daily Digest: 3/15 (Morning Edition)

  • CA-Sen: No one does weird-ass like Carly Fiorina, who has another web video out that hails from the land of the bizarre.
  • CO-Sen: Seventh CD Rep. Ed Perlmutter has endorsed Sen. Michael Bennet over Andrew Romanoff in the Dem primary.
  • FL-Sen: It looks like Marco Rubio is finally starting to come in for some serious scrutiny. The St. Pete Times has a lengthy examination of the corporate money that has flowed Rubio’s way, and the irregularities which have riddled his campaign finance reports.
  • IL-Sen: Alexi Giannoulias says he’s going to return all campaign contributions from, as Politico puts it, “accused bank fraudster Nick Giannis and his family.”
  • IN-Sen: Ah, this is good. Dan Coats is trying to run as hard as he can against the bailout… but back in 2008, he was lobbying the government on behalf of a hedge fund which owned 80% of Chrysler – a huge recipient of bailout funds. (He didn’t do a very good job, it seems, considering that the fund, Cerberus, has its equity stake wiped out.) As Texas Dem astutely noted the moment Coats rumors started flying, “Usually retired senators get rich in some unseemly way that makes them unelectable in the future.” Sure looks like the case here.
  • NY-Sen-B: I hope all those Democrats who supported Mike Bloomberg over the years are happy: The NYT has an in-depth look at Bloombo’s hostility to Kirsten Gillibrand, and all the candidates he has tried to push into running against her. The latest is his own girlfriend, Diana Taylor. The Times fails to find any rational reason for why His Bloominess has chugged so much haterade, but devtob points out that they ignored a key item: Bloombo was a big backer of Caroline Kennedy, who of course was snubbed in favor of Gillibrand.
  • RI-Sen: Don’t look to retiring Dem Rep. Patrick Kennedy to share any of his spoils with the DCCC. Calling his decision not to seek another term in the House more of a “sabbatical” than a retirement, Kennedy says he plans to transfer his $500K campaign purse into an interest-bearing account, just in case he should need it for a Senate campaign someday. This is total bullshit. (Thanks to SSPer Andrew for this one.) (JL)
  • ID-Gov: Dem Keith Allred has made it official. Allred, a former Harvard professor, had spent five years running a non-partisan “citizens group” called The Common Interest which he left to pursue a gubernatorial run.
  • MI-Gov: Virg Bernero locked down another big union endorsement: the AFL-CIO took a vote, and it was “overwhelming” (their words) in Bernero’s favor. The United Auto Workers union, itself a member of the AFL-CIO, had already gotten behind Bernero, but now the entire umbrella organization (which also includes AFSCME, IBEW and AFT) is doing so. Bernero’s been running exactly the sort of populist campaign his supporters would have hoped, lately proposing that Michigan establish a state-run bank, modeled after the Bank of North Dakota.
  • NM-Gov: Doña Ana County District Attorney Susana Martinez won the support of 47% of the delegates at the state GOP convention this past weekend, while former NM Republican Party chair Allen Weh pulled in 26%. Pete Domenici, Jr. took less than 5%, but still plans to file petitions to get on the ballot. Because Martinez and Weh got over 20%, they only have to file half as many signatures, but as Heath Haussamen points out, no candidate who hasn’t scored 20% at the convention has ever come back to win the nomination.
  • OH-Gov: A voluminous auditor’s report on the demise of Lehman Brothers was published last week, documenting all of the company’s shady financial practices which led to its doom. Why does this matter to the Ohio governor’s race? John Kasich was a managing partner at Lehman for several years, right up until the bitter end in 2008. Ted Strickland is putting some pointed questions to Kasich, whose response so far has been extremely feeble.
  • FL-08: Sarah Palin’s gotten mixed up in the race to take on Rep. Alan Grayson, firing some broadsides at the Democrat during a recent trip to Orlando. Grayson did not let this challenge go unanswered.
  • KY-03: Tacked on to a Louisville mayoral poll, SUSA included a sort of unusually-worded question about Dem Rep. John Yarmuth’s re-elects. They asked voters if they would vote for or against Yarmuth “no matter who else is on the ballot,” with a not sure “until I know who else is on the ballot” option. Yarmuth scored 27-23-48. It still seems that Yarmuth’s only challenger so far is a dude who owns a bunch of Pizza Huts.
  • NY-14: EMILY’s List has finally done something right: They’re endorsing Rep. Carolyn Maloney, a longtime advocate for women’s issues, in her primary fight against Some Dude Reshma Saujani.
  • NY-23: After months of sounding pretty serious about a bid, state Assemblyman Will Barclay has decided to pass on a race against Dem Rep. Bill Owens. Barclay’s exit greatly improves the chances of Club For Growth nutter Doug Hoffman in the GOP primary, where his main rival now appears to be investment banker Matt Doheny, who lost the special election nomination to Dede Scozzafava last fall. (JL)
  • OK-05: The Republican primary to succeed Mary Fallin in the House just gets bigger and bigger. State Rep. Shane Jett is now the sixth candidate in a field that includes state Rep. Mike Thompson, former state Rep. Kevin Calvey, and Some Other Dudes. (JL)
  • IL-Lt. Gov: The 38 members of the IL Dem central committee will hold interviews with prospective candidates around the state next week and then pick a replacement Lt. Gov. nominee on March 27.
  • WI-Sen: Univ. of Wisconsin Hammered for Partnering on Polls with Conservative Think Tank

    Wow, this looks pretty ugly. Last year, the University of Wisconsin announced a partnership with the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, which offered the school and poli sci Prof. Ken Goldstein money to support their polling. The problem is that WPRI is a conservative think tank, and UW-Madison and Goldstein have started taking a lot of heat for for accepting interest group money in order to fund polling. This is something that other universities simply don’t do:

    “It does compromise the independence and brings into question the accuracy,” said Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist College Poll. “It doesn’t mean that’s necessarily fair, but it does tend to do that in this very ideologically partisan time we live in.”

    This shady alliance has already produced foul fruit:

    Scot Ross, a liberal muckraker who runs the group One Wisconsin Now, was critical of the deal from the beginning. He said his “worst fears were confirmed” after he obtained e-mails under the open records law showing WPRI President George Lightbourn lobbied Goldstein to publicize results from one question in a way favorable to its agenda.

    The question asked whether government funding should be used for school vouchers, which WPRI supports. A majority of residents statewide were opposed, but those surveyed from Milwaukee County were in favor.

    Lightbourn wrote Goldstein he was concerned critics would portray the data as showing a lack of support for vouchers and asked for the Milwaukee County results to be emphasized. The university’s press release read: “School choice remains popular in Milwaukee.”

    And there’s a horserace aspect to all of this as well:

    That wasn’t the only question to generate controversy. Participants were asked if they supported former Republican Gov. Tommy Thompson in a matchup against Democratic U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold – even though Thompson had shown little interest in the race.

    WPRI is run by Lightbourn, Thompson’s former administration secretary, and its board chairman is Jim Klauser, another former top Thompson aide. After receiving results showing Thompson was favored 43-39, WPRI sent a press release claiming the poll showed Thompson would defeat Feingold.

    But Goldstein scolded Lightbourn for sending the release without his knowledge and not including his more balanced analysis. A release Goldstein later approved said the race would be competitive, that undecided voters may favor Feingold and Thompson would be re-evaluated after not running for office for years.

    It’s digusting that Goldstein would engage in this kind of behavior. Unless and until UWM totally disavows its partnership with WPRI, it’s going to be very hard to take anything they produce seriously. I’m certainly not going to put much stock in their newest poll, that’s for sure.

    Five State California (horrible Democratic gerrymander :P)

    Before I give everyone the details of this, I'd like to mention that this is not a realistic division of California, for a realistic view of California's political divisions; see californianintexas's diary.

    Now that we have that out of the way, I'd like to present you with dgm's unholy atrocity that is the five states of California:

     

     

     

     Let's get to the carnage, shall we?

     

    State 1 (New Marin)(Blue)

    Population: 3,870,989
    Demographics: (White 65%, Hispanic 19%)
    Partisanship (Obama 59%; McCain 38%)
    Population centers: (Marin County)

    Notes: You might be asking yourself, why did I name this state “New Marin”? Well, the answer is because it was originally not going to include Marin County (and was going to be a roughly 54-44 state) but at the last minute, I decided that Marin County could be taken from the San Francisio based state and moved over here to effectively create 4 totally safe Democratic states.

     

    State 2 (San Sacramento)(Green)

    Population: 4,808,296
    Demographics: (58% white, 15% Asian, 17% Hispanic)
    Partisanship (Obama 65%; McCain 33%)
    Population centers (San Francisco, Sacramento)

    Notes: Say hello to, hypothetically, the most latte-sipping, free-loving, liberal hippie state in the entire country! Interestingly, this is only the second most Democratic state of the five Californias, but it is probably the most liberal of them all (what with a good chunk of it's population being comprised of San Francisco (as well as San Mateo County).

     

    State 3 (California Grande)(Purple)

    Population: 9,472,898
    Demographics: (48% White, 11% Asian, 31% Hispanic)
    Partisanship (Obama 60%; McCain 38%)
    Population centers: (Fresno)

    Notes: This is probably the least egregious of the states I've come up with (not that that's saying much but still…) It basically takes up the entire interior of the state, as well as the costal area between San Francisco and Los Angeles.

     

    State 4 (Angeles Anaranjados)(Red)

    Population: 8,252,698
    Demographics: (39% White, Black 10%, Asian 11%, Hispanic 36%)
    Partisanship: (Obama 66%, McCain 32%)
    Population Center: Los Angeles

    Notes: If anyone thought that creating at least 4 safe states out of California would be pretty, then you were very, very wrong (well, at least if you aren't willing to cede anything to the Republicans in the fifth state). This is more or less eastern Los Angeles combined with the Republican parts of Orange and San Diego counties (which is why this state is “only” a 66% Obama state, it would've easily been over 70% otherwise).

     

    State 5 (Los Diegos)(Yellow)

    Population: 10,700,726
    Demographics (40% White, 11% Asian, 41% Hispanic)
    Partisanship (Obama 46%; McCain 42%)
    Population centers: (Los Angeles and San Diego)

    Notes: What? Ok, ok, this is a true atrocity, but at the same time this is, in many ways, the worst of all worlds for California Republicans. On the one hand, even in a bad year, it still leans Democratic, but the Republicans here are probably going to be completely unable to take advantage of it (considering the lunatics Orange County and San Diego Republicans tend to like). Yes, it's quite obvious that the only reason it's like this is to give the Democrats an advantage, but I'm actually ok with that fact!

     

    In conclusion: These 5 states are more or less guaranteed to go Democratic at the presidential level, elect two strong Democratic Senators (with the possible exception of Los Diegos), and have majority Democratic house delegations, so a little ugliness (and city-splitting) is a small price to pay for it :D.

    Rasmussen Reports, You Decide, Vol. 10

    More fresh meat from Scott Rasmussen’s sausage factory.

    LA-Sen (3/10, likely voters, 2/10 in parens):

    Charlie Melançon (D): 34 (33)

    David Vitter (R-inc): 57 (57)

    Undecided: 6 (7)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    MN-Gov (3/10, likely voters):

    Mark Dayton (D): 38

    Tom Emmer (R): 35

    Tom Horner (I): 7

    Undecided: 20

    Margaret Anderson Kelliher (D): 34

    Tom Emmer (R): 37

    Tom Horner (I): 10

    Undecided: 18

    R.T. Rybak (D): 38

    Tom Emmer (R): 35

    Tom Horner (I): 9

    Undecided: 18

    Tom Bakk (D): 29

    Tom Emmer (R): 36

    Tom Horner (I): 8

    Undecided: 27

    Tom Rukavina (D): 29

    Tom Emmer (R): 38

    Tom Horner (I): 7

    Undecided: 25

    Matt Entenza (D): 28

    Tom Emmer (R): 37

    Tom Horner (I): 8

    Undecided: 26

    Mark Dayton (D): 38

    Marty Seifert (R): 39

    Tom Horner (I): 7

    Undecided: 16

    Margaret Anderson Kelliher (D): 35

    Marty Seifert (R): 39

    Tom Horner (I): 8

    Undecided: 19

    R.T. Rybak (D): 38

    Marty Seifert (R): 38

    Tom Horner (I): 8

    Undecided: 16

    Tom Bakk (D): 30

    Marty Seifert (R): 37

    Tom Horner (I): 9

    Undecided: 24

    Tom Rukavina (D): 30

    Marty Seifert (R): 39

    Tom Horner (I): 9

    Undecided: 22

    Matt Entenza (D): 30

    Marty Seifert (R): 38

    Tom Horner (I): 9

    Undecided: 23

    (MoE: ±3%)

    MO-Sen (3/9, likely voters, 2/10 in parens):

    Robin Carnahan (D): 41 (42)

    Roy Blunt (R): 47 (49)

    Not sure: 8 (6)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    NH-Gov (3/8, likely voters, 1/12 in parens):

    John Lynch (D-inc): 51 (51)

    Jack Kimball (R): 32 (32)

    Undecided: 13 (12)

    John Lynch (D-inc): 54 (53)

    Karen Testerman (R): 28 (30)

    Undecided: 14 (12)

    John Lynch (D-inc): 50

    John Stephen (R): 35

    Undecided: 14

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    IA-Gov: A closer look at the Rod Roberts campaign

    I expected former four-term Governor Terry Branstad to drive all of the lesser-known Republicans out of the governor’s race. To my surprise, State Representative Rod Roberts has not followed the lead of Paul McKinley, Christian Fong, Jerry Behn and Chris Rants. Roberts has insisted that he is staying in the governor’s race all the way to the June primary, and another Republican has already filed in the Iowa House district Roberts has represented for five terms.

    Join me after the jump for closer look at Roberts and his campaign strategy. I doubt he has any chance of winning the primary, but he is becoming a politically correct alternative to the more conservative Bob Vander Plaats for Republicans who aren’t wild about a fifth term for Branstad.

    Rod Roberts faces long odds in the primary, having much lower name recognition than Branstad or Vander Plaats, less cash on hand for his campaign, no paid campaign staff and not much support from the GOP activist base. He started running radio ads in January to boost his name recognition. You can listen to the ads on his campaign website, but I decided to transcribe them as well. In this ad, Roberts reads the entire script himself:

    This is State Representative Rod Roberts, Republican for governor. I’m running for governor because I think our state needs new leadership. State government is spending taxpayer dollars at record highs. Next year’s budget gap could run over one billion dollars, and over 100,000 Iowans are out of work. The Roberts for Governor campaign is about using common-sense conservative values to solve these problems. As a five-term state representative, I have real experience being both a fiscal and a social conservative. As governor, I promise to restore fiscal discipline and to stop out-of-control state spending, and I will continue to be a strong advocate for policies that are pro-life and pro-traditional marriage. The Roberts for Governor campaign is about building a better Iowa. It’s time for new leadership, a fresh face, and a new direction for the state of Iowa. Visit www.robertsforgov.com to find out more about me, Rod Roberts, Republican candidate for governor. Paid for by Rod Roberts for governor.

    The second ad features male and female voice-overs:

    Man: Iowa needs leadership from their next governor. Over 100,000 Iowans are currently out of work. State spending is at a record high, and the state could face future budget deficits of one billion dollars or more. Who can Iowans trust as their next governor?

    Woman: Rod Roberts, the conservative Republican choice for governor. Rod Roberts is a state representative. He has a record of being both a fiscal and a social conservative. Rod Roberts has fought for lower taxes, less spending and he has led efforts to give Iowans the right to vote on the definition of marriage.

    Man: Rod Roberts will use common-sense conservative values to build a better Iowa. He doesn’t just talk the conservative talk, he walks the conservative walk. As governor, Roberts will work for everyday Iowans by creating new jobs and fighting for traditional family values.

    Woman: Visit www.robertsforgov.com It’s  time for new leadership, a fresh face, and a new direction for the state of Iowa. Rod Roberts, Republican for governor.

    Man: Paid for by Rod Roberts for Governor Committee

    This generic Republican message is designed to help Roberts position himself as a unifying figure for the Iowa GOP, where social conservatives have clashed with establishment figures in recent years. Last May, Carroll-based journalist Douglas Burns depicted Roberts as a strong candidate for governor because he could appeal to both Republican camps. Even with Branstad in the race, some analysts see Roberts as the candidate with more potential to unite the party.

    Republican moderates as well as some conservatives in the business community don’t care for Vander Plaats. Key donors recruited Branstad back into politics in part because Vander Plaats was the heavy favorite for the nomination among the declared candidates last summer.

    Meanwhile, many social conservatives do not trust Branstad, partly because of his record as governor, partly because he is not emphasizing social issues on the campaign trail, and partly because his backers include Doug Gross, a longtime nemesis of the religious right wing. Some Republicans view Gross as “baggage” for Branstad.

    Roberts doesn’t have much baggage and seems to have made no enemies during ten years in the Iowa House. In keeping with his nice guy reputation, he is mostly spreading a positive message at his campaign stops. He talks about creating a friendly business climate and advocates eliminating the state corporate income tax. He talks about the need to reduce spending and supports a constitutional amendment to “limit state spending to 99 percent of projected revenue.” Like most Republicans, he supports “the traditional definition of marriage” and promises to give Iowans the right to vote on a constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage. He has pointed out his ability to win votes from independents and conservative Democrats in the Carroll area.

    During this year’s legislative session, Roberts has introduced a bill to abolish the state corporate income tax as well as a bill that would increase the number of Iowa Supreme Court justices and require them to represent different regions in Iowa.

    It’s fine for candidates to be positive, and I’ve never heard a Republican say anything bad about Roberts, but I don’t see how he breaks through in the primary campaign without making a more direct case against Branstad and Vander Plaats. It’s not enough to be a fresh face; Roberts has to explain why he would be a better governor and/or better general election candidate than the better-known candidates. So far he has criticized some of Branstad’s decisions as governor, but that hasn’t been a focus of his campaign speeches or press releases. The Des Moines Register’s Kathie Obradovich suggests the “nice-guy candidate” with a “vanilla ice cream” demeanor could “appeal especially to older Iowans, who in recent polls have been the least supportive of Branstad but still tend to be the most reliable voters.” For that to happen, Roberts would need to draw more contrasts with Branstad. But he’s not an attack-dog type like Chris Rants, and I doubt he will spend his campaign’s limited resources to go negative on Branstad.

    To my mind, having Roberts in the race is great for Branstad, the clear favorite in the primary thanks to his campaign cash and establishment connections. The best hope for Vander Plaats would be to unite social conservatives who distrust Branstad. But Roberts is competing for the conservative niche, as this February 22 press release indicates:

    The Roberts for Governor Campaign announced today that current State Representative Jason Schultz and former State Representative Dan Boddicker have endorsed Rod Roberts’s campaign for governor. Schultz, who is a seven-year veteran of the Iowa National Guard, is from the western Iowa town of Schleswig and represents Iowa House District 55. Boddicker, who served in the Iowa House from 1993-2005, lives near the eastern Iowa town of Tipton and represented Iowa House District 79.

    “Iowa needs new leadership, and I believe that Iowa needs Rod Roberts as its next governor. In my time in the Iowa House, I have found Rod to be a strong advocate for the common-sense, conservative principles that are important to me and my fellow Republicans,” said Schultz, who currently serves on the Economic Growth Committee and the Economic Development Appropriations Subcommittee in the Iowa House.

    Boddicker echoed Roberts’s conservative credentials.

    “Rod is the type of man we can count on to fight for conservative values, and I strongly believe he should be Iowa’s next governor,” said Boddicker. “By supporting limited-government policies, Rod will be a fresh face to take Iowa in a new direction.”

    Jason Schultz doesn’t impress me, to put it mildly, but he may have clout with some conservative activists. He co-sponsored a bill this session to “remove sexual orientation and gender identity as definitions used for purposes of protecting students in public and nonpublic schools from harassment and bullying.” Schultz also co-sponsored a bill that would bring back elections for the Iowa Supreme Court justices.

    So far in March, five more Iowa House Republicans have endorsed Roberts (see here and here). All of them are from western Iowa, where Vander Plaats probably needs to do very well to win the primary. One of the Roberts backers, Clel Baudler, also serves on the board of the National Rifle Association.

    Branstad still has the most state legislator endorsements by far, but I believe Roberts has now surpassed Vander Plaats in that area. As far as I know, three current members of the Iowa House are supporting Vander Plaats for governor.

    In addition, Bill Schickel, a former state legislator and Mason City mayor stepped down as secretary of the Iowa GOP in order to back Roberts. Schickel also maintains the the conservative news aggregator The Bean Walker, which attempts to be Iowa’s version of The Drudge Report.

    One of Iowa’s leading conservative bloggers, Shane Vander Hart, endorsed Roberts last month:

    Rod Roberts is a fiscal, small government, pro-life, and pro-family conservative.  He is the complete package.  I don’t want to have to choose.  He has demonstrated competency.  He understands how state government works, and how it can be better.  He knows what he will do on day one, but also knows how he’ll govern on day 2 and 100.  He is a man of integrity.  He is a servant-leader and has demonstrated not only in the Iowa House, but also in his role with the Christian Churches/Churches of Christ in Iowa.  He is a humble man, but confident that he can lead Iowa competently.  He also isn’t overly partisan, and is genuinely likeable.  He has also run a very positive campaign.  I think he’s set up well to be competitive and end up being a surprise in June.

    I am proud to know him and consider him a friend.  I hope that my fellow Iowans will join me to support his candidacy.  Let’s help him become better known.  I believe that when Iowans get to know him they’ll like what they see.  I also encourage all conservatives to consider financially supporting the Reagan conservative in this race.

    Vander Hart alluded to the fact that Roberts is an ordained minister. He hasn’t been playing up that part of his resume in this campaign, but it can’t hurt him with social conservatives.

    Without Roberts in the race, the Republican primary for governor would be a clear choice between the old establishment and the more consistently conservative Vander Plaats. Roberts gives Republicans who are unsure about Branstad another place to go, which may be particularly appealing for those who doubt the wisdom of Vander Plaats’ promise to issue an executive order on day one halting gay marriage. Vander Plaats has been winning straw polls, but he hasn’t picked up many endorsements from within the Republican establishment since Branstad entered the race.

    Roberts lacks the money to run a significant statewide paid media campaign, so I would be surprised if he became a force to be reckoned with in the primary. That said, every vote he gets lengthens the odds for Vander Plaats.

    I wouldn’t go so far as to claim Roberts is a stalking horse for Branstad, but if he didn’t exist, the Branstad campaign might have reason to invent him. (Some Vander Plaats supporters also see Roberts indirectly hurting their candidate.)

    Roberts may end up as Branstad’s running mate. His presence on the ticket might reassure social conservatives who are still upset that Branstad picked moderate Joy Corning to be his lieutenant governor in the 1990s. Other potential lieutenant governor choices for Branstad include the young conservative from Cedar Rapids, Christian Fong, and Des Moines-area insurance company executive Doug Reichardt.