Month: April 2010
PA-12: NRCC Drops $200K
Despite the fact that Democrats are perceived to have something of a turnout advantage in the special election to replace the late Jack Murtha (remember: the only truly competitive big-event statewide primaries in Pennsylvania are on the Democratic ticket, and those primaries happen to fall on the same day as the PA-12 special), the NRCC must be smelling an opportunity here. They just dropped some serious dollars on the race:
1. Opposes Candidate: MARK CRITZ (H0PA12132)
Office Sought: House of Representatives, Pennsylvania District 12
Payee: MCCARTHY MARCUS HENNINGS LTD
Date Expended = 04/09/2010 Amount Expended = $10500.00
Purpose: MEDIA2. Opposes Candidate: MARK CRITZ (H0PA12132)
Office Sought: House of Representatives, Pennsylvania District 12
Payee: NATIONAL MEDIA RESEARCH PLANNING & PLAC
Date Expended = 04/09/2010 Amount Expended = $168290.65
Purpose: MEDIA3. Opposes Candidate: MARK CRITZ (H0PA12132)
Office Sought: House of Representatives, Pennsylvania District 12
Payee: THE TARRANCE GROUP
Date Expended = 04/09/2010 Amount Expended = $15000.00
Purpose: SURVEY/RESEARCH
FL-25: Joe Garcia Will Return; SSP Moves Race to Lean R
Some good news from CQ:
Former Miami-Dade County Democratic Party Chairman Joe Garcia, who came 6 points shy of knocking off Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R) in 2008, is throwing his hat back into the ring for another try this cycle.
Sources say Garcia will announce his candidacy for the now-open 25th district seat mid-next week. Garcia is known to be gathering his campaign team. […]
Garcia had a meeting with Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen (Md.) in late February after the Diaz-Balart’s announced their electoral plans and he was also encouraged by officials within the administration to take another look at the race. He may have finally been convinced to run by the results of a poll that the DCCC conducted on the race in late March.
“A Joe Garcia candidacy would instantly make this seat an excellent pick up opportunity,” DCCC spokesman Shripal Shah said on Friday.
This is a seat that’s been trending Democratic in recent years. As CQ notes in their full piece, Democrats have turned a 21,000-strong voter registration deficit in 2006 to a voter registration advantage of about 600 at the beginning of 2010. That shift has played out at the Presidential level, too: Obama lost this CD by only 1% in 2008, a big gain from John Kerry’s 12% loss in 2004.
Garcia proved himself to be a capable fundraiser and campaigner in 2008, raising $1.8 million and holding GOP Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart to a six-point win. Garcia will need to bring his A-game this time, too, as his likely Republican opponent, state Rep. David Rivera, has announced that he’s hauled in over $700K in his first six weeks of campaigning.
UPDATE: With Garcia’s decision to enter the race, SSP is changing our rating of this contest from Likely R to Lean R.
SSP Daily Digest: 4/9 (Afternoon Edition)
• KY-Sen: AG Jack Conway has a new ad up in the Democratic primary, hitting Lt. Gov. Dan Mongiardo for $57K in luxury travel on the taxpayer dime. That might get some attention, but a potentially more interesting story is about decidedly non-luxurious accommodations: Mongiardo has been staying with his in-laws while he’s on the job in Frankfort. The problem with that? He’s still taking his $30K/yr. housing stipend despite not needing to spend it.
• AZ-Gov: Maricopa Sheriff Joe Arpaio is getting kind of like the boy who cried wolf, in terms of his constant expressions of interest in running for Governor that never pan out (the 77-year-old Arpaio been doing so for more than a decade). He’s back in the news today saying he’s looking into the costs of a petition drive, just in case he decides he wants to run this year.
• IL-Gov: If your fellow Republican is publicly criticizing you for being too extreme, you’re probably doing it wrong. Moderate ex-Gov. Jim Edgar (the last Illinois governor to finish his term without the law hot on his heels, and a Kirk Dillard backer in this year’s primary) smacked down state Sen. Bill Brady, saying instead that raising taxes (as Pat Quinn plans to do) is the only way out of the state’s budget mess.
• MN-Gov: State House speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher got a key union endorsement today, from hotel union UNITE HERE. She’s lining up the institutional pieces for the DFL endorsement, which will happen later this month.
• PA-Gov: Ex-Rep. Joe Hoeffel got the endorsement of Planned Parenthood in the Democratic primary in Pennsylvania. (With Hoeffel and state Sen. Anthony Williams the only pro-choice candidates in the field, it probably wasn’t a very tough decision.)
• HI-01: The DCCC has been hitting Charles Djou for signing the Grover Norquist/Americans for Tax Reform no-tax pledge, although they’re doing so in a roundabout way: they’re saying Djou signed a pledge “that protects tax breaks for companies that send jobs overseas” (as the pledge requires opposing the end of any deductions or credits). If the message gets some traction in this testing ground, expect to see more of it in November.
• MN-06: Aubrey Immelman is back. The college professor who ran against Michele Bachmann in the GOP primary in 2008 will try again in 2010, saying “I am a single-issue candidate. That is to defeat Michele Bachmann.” He hasn’t said whether he’ll run in the GOP primary again, though, or as an indie in the general (where he’d bump up against IP candidate Bob Anderson).
• ND-AL: In the wake of strong numbers from Republican opponent state Rep. Rick Berg, Earl Pomeroy released his own numbers today, and they’re good too. Pomeroy raised $407K (to Berg’s $483K), but Pomeroy’s big advantage is in cash on hand; he’s sitting on $1.6 million.
• NY-20: Scott Murphy also posted good fundraising numbers today, as he gears up to face Republican Chris Gibson, who’s only beginning his campaign. Murphy raised $475K last quarter, and has $1.1 million CoH.
• OR-05: Here’s a race where I didn’t even know cat fud was a-flyin’. But if his own poll is to believed, it looks like teabagger Fred Thompson (no, not the former presidential candidate) could steal the nomination from prized NRCC recruit state Rep. Scott Bruun (who’s from the moderate suburban wing of the GOP that used to actually be able to win elections in Oregon). Thompson has a poll from GOP pollster John Feliz showing him leading Bruun by 2% (although specific numbers don’t seem forthcoming). Either one would have an uphill fight against Rep. Kurt Schrader in the general.
• VA-09: One other fundraising highlight from today sees Rep. Rick Boucher girding for a likely battle against GOP state House majority leader Morgan Griffith. Boucher raised $317K for the quarter, not phenomenal although fine for a cheap media district and better than Griffith’s $104K (though Griffith’s fundraising was condensed into the last few weeks of the cycle, after his announcement). After years of facing nobodies or outright nobody, though, Boucher has built up a huge surplus, and is now sitting on just shy of $2 million CoH.
• Vermont: The Green Mountain State is moving up its primary date, in order to comply with national laws intended to make sure that military personnel have time to return their ballots. Gov. Jim Douglas says he won’t veto the new law, passed by the legislature, moving the primary from mid-September to August 24.
• Teabaggers: A Univ. of Washington study of teabaggers in battleground states has some interesting demographic information, and also some data about underlying attitudes that confirm what some of us have been suspecting: it’s largely about racial resentment. People who believe the government “has done too much to support blacks” are 36% more likely to back the teabaggers than those who don’t. And of those who approve of the Tea Party movement, only a minority said that they believe blacks to be “hardworking” (35%), “intelligent” (45%), or “trustworthy” (41%). Here’s the money quote from the study’s author:
“While it’s clear that the tea party in one sense is about limited government, it’s also clear from the data that people who want limited government don’t want certain services for certain kinds of people. Those services include health care,”Parker said.
• Polltopia: While some people (like Markos) have been feeling more optimistic as the enthusiasm gap between the parties narrows, PPP’s Tom Jensen sees the problem persisting even if it’s improving. PPP finds that if the electorate were composed the same as in 2008, they’d have found the Dems in the lead in their recent polls of OH-Sen, PA-Sen, IL-Sen, and WI-Gov. Instead, though, the LV samples pull in a disproportionate number of McCain voters than Obama voters.
Regional Realignment, Part 7: the Western Great Lakes
156 years ago, the Republican Party was created in this region. Many would be surprised at the strength the Republicans had in this region (Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Illinois), although a lot of this advantage had already evaporated by 1960. Today, we consider this area to be mostly controlled by the Democrats, but that hasn’t always been the case.
US House Representation Realignment
After the 1960 general election, the Democrats had approximately 60% of all house seats (and 64 of the 100 senate seats). I have inserted below the results of certain general elections.
1960 21(D), 23(R)
1964 22(D), 20(R)
1966 18(D), 24(R)
1972 19(D), 22(R)
1974 25(D), 16(R)
1980 18(D), 23(R)
1982 22(D), 17(R)
1990 25(D), 14(R)
1992 22(D), 15(R)
1994 19(D), 18(R)
2000 20(D), 17(R)
2002 17(D), 18(R)
2004 18(D), 17(R)
2006 20(D), 15(R)
2008 22(D), 13(R)
50 years ago, the Democrats and Republicans had basically a split in House representation. The Democrats gained control after the Watergate scandal, only to lose control with the emergence of the Reagan Revolution. In 1982, with the economy stagnant, Democrats picked up some momentum that carried the party thru 1992. The Republicans made some modest gains during the Contract With America rampage, eventually peaking with a slight edge of seats by 2002. With the failures of the Bush Administration, the Democrats picked up a sizable advantage.
US Senate Representation Realignment
1960 4(D), 2(R)
1964 5(D), 1(R)
1966 4(D), 2(R)
1972 5(D), 2(R)
1974 5(D), 1(R)
1980 2(D), 4(R)
1982 2(D), 4(R)
1990 4(D), 2(R)
1992 5(D), 1(R)
1994 5(D), 1(R)
2000 5(D), 1(R)
2002 4(D), 2(R)
2004 5(D), 1(R)
2006 5(D), 1(R)
2008 6(D), 0(R)
Exept for the several years in the early 80’s, the Democrats have enjoyed the majority of this region’s senate seats. With the advent of the Reagan Revolution, the Republicans won several Senate seats to gain this advantage, only to lose control again a few years later. Today, all 6 Senate seats are in the hands of the Democrats.
Conclusions
While we have no room to grow in the Senate, we have several vulnerable senate seats that may cause us to play some defense, most notably Burris’ seat (up in 2010) and Franken’s seat (up in 2014). While the IL seat is currently a tossup, I imagine Franken’s voting record won’t attract the ire of the voters. The House is a different story: although we have a 22-13 advantage, we still have room to grow. Minnesota and Wisconsin could provide Team Blue with a couple more house seats in the next 10 years. Illinois probably has 4 seats (IL-10, IL-6, IL-13, and IL-16) that could come to play with a combination of the right Democratic candidate and the right national tide. Unfortunately for the Western Great Lakes, the population growth is stagnant, and we will probably see Illinois and Minnesota lose 2 seats after the 2010 Census. I don’t believe a 23-10 post-2010 is out of the question.
OH-Sen, OH-Gov: Senate Dems, Strickland With Narrow Leads
Research 2000 for Daily Kos (4/5-7, likely voters, 7/6-8 in parentheses):
Lee Fisher (D): 43 (42)
Rob Portman (R): 39 (35)
Undecided: 18 (23)Jennifer Brunner (D): 41 (40)
Rob Portman (R): 40 (36)
Undecided: 18 (24)
(MoE: ±4%)Lee Fisher (D): 35 (22)
Jennifer Brunner (D): 26 (17)
Undecided: 39 (61)
(MoE: ±5%)
Ted Strickland (D-inc): 45 (44)
John Kasich: 40 (39)
Undecided: 15 (17)
(MoE: ±4%)
Things may finally be coming into focus in Ohio, according to R2K; while most polls of Ohio have been notable in terms of how few people were paying attention, it’s looking like people are starting to make up their minds with the May 4 primary now approaching. On the Senate side, the “no opinion”s for Lee Fisher (41/24 favorables), Jennifer Brunner (38/26), and Rob Portman (39/30) are all down into the 30s. Fisher leads Brunner in the Dem primary and also performs a tiny bit better against Portman, probably indicative of his huge financial edge — you can’t win an election with good intentions alone.
With Barack Obama (46/45) and Gov. Ted Strickland (47/41) seeming to be recovering a bit, and HCR tolerated by the public (43 support/37 repeal), Ohio (as also seen in the last Quinnipiac poll) may be starting to seem less-bad for the Dems right now than a number of other swing states. Strickland’s 45 is still ominous given that almost everyone has an opinion on him and he has little room to grow; both these races are poised to be very close, every-vote-counts affairs in November.
AR-01, AR-02, AR-03: Primary Polls
Talk Business, a multi-format Arkansas newsmagazine, is conducting a whole bunch of polling on the state’s congressional primaries. They are using an outfit I’m not familiar with, with the memorable name of “The Political Firm.” They look to be a Republican pollster, but I don’t know if they have any skin in the game (or if Talk Business has any axe to grind).
In any event, Talk Business says all the polls were taken April 6-7th, were of registered voters (sort of an unusual choice, given that the primary is on May 18th), and are unweighted. TPF says it uses IVR (aka robopolls). Talk Business also promises two more rounds of polling before the primary.
Tim Wooldridge: 18
David Cook: 11
Steve Bryles: 9
Chad Causey: 9
Ben Ponder: 5
Terry Green: 1
Undecided: 47
(MoE: ±4.5%)
Joyce Elliott: 21
Robbie Wills: 16
Patrick Kennedy: 11
David Boling: 7
John Adams: 4
Undecided: 41
(MoE: ±4.6%)
Tim Griffin: 20
Scott Wallace: 20
Undecided: 60
(MoE: ±3.6%)
Steve Womack: 21
Cecile Bledsoe: 17
Gunner DeLay: 16
Mike Moore: 8
Bernie Skoch: 5
Steve Lowry: 4
Doug Matayo: 2
Kurt Maddox: 1
Undecided: 27
(MoE: ±4%)
MI-01: Stupak Will Retire
First it looked like he would, then like he wouldn’t… but now it’s a done deal. Roll Call:
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), who led a key group of anti-abortion-rights House Democrats that helped secure passage of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, told the Associated Press that he will announce his retirement later Friday.
Stupak said he wants to spend more time with his family and start a new career after 18 years in Congress, and he will announce his retirement Friday afternoon at Northern Michigan University, the AP reported.
Stupak’s full statement is available here. In the diaries, Menhen recently took a look at some possible Stupak successors — it’s well worth a read.
UPDATE: With Stupak’s retirement, we’re adding MI-01 to our list of competitive House races, at “Tossup.”
UPDATE: At his news conference this afternoon where he confirmed his retirement, Stupak stopped short of an explicit announcement, but he gave a shout-out to conservative Democratic state Rep. Mike Lahti, who’s been on most people’s short lists of possible replacements:
“A lot of people could do it,” Stupak told a reporter when asked if Democratic candidate could win the seat. “People like Mike Lahti would do a great job.”
RaceTracker Wiki: MI-01
SSP Daily Digest: 4/9 (Morning Edition)
PA-Sen, PA-Gov: Harrisburg, We Have a Problem
Public Policy Polling (3/29-4/1, Pennsylvania voters, no trend lines):
Arlen Specter (D-inc): 43
Pat Toomey (R): 46
Undecided: 11Joe Sestak (D): 36
Pat Toomey (R): 42
Undecided: 22
(MoE: ±3.2%)
Quinnipiac (3/31-4/5, registered voters, 2/22-28 in parentheses) (primary numbers):
Arlen Specter (D-inc): 41 (49)
Pat Toomey (R): 46 (42)
Undecided: 12 (8)Joe Sestak (D): 34 (36)
Pat Toomey (R): 42 (39)
Undecided: 22 (24)
(MoE: ±2.6%)Arlen Specter (D): 53 (53)
Joe Sestak (D): 32 (29)
Undecided: 15 (14)
(MoE: ±3.2%)
PPP’s first look at the Pennsylvania Senate race finds a small lead for Pat Toomey; Quinnipiac’s newest entry pretty much confirms their numbers, despite their slightly different models (Quinnipiac polls registered voters) and despite showing a decent Arlen Specter lead last month. PPP’s sample breaks down very neatly: Specter leads by 71 among people who approve of Obama, while Toomey leads by 71 among people who disapprove. With Obama at 46/50 approval in Pennsylvania, that’s enough for a small Toomey lead. (The sample breaks down 49 voted for Obama, 48 for McCain, so their sort-of-LV model is a bit more conservative than the 2008 electorate.)
Public Policy Polling (3/29-4/1, Pennsylvania voters, no trend lines):
Dan Onorato (D): 32
Tom Corbett (R): 45
Undecided: 23Jack Wagner (D): 30
Tom Corbett (R): 43
Undecided: 27Joe Hoeffel(D): 31
Tom Corbett (R): 46
Undecided: 23Anthony Williams (D): 27
Tom Corbett (R): 45
Undecided: 28
(MoE: ±3.2%)
Quinnipiac (3/31-4/5, registered voters, 2/22-28 in parentheses) (primary numbers):
Dan Onorato (D): 33 (32)
Tom Corbett (R): 45 (42)
Undecided: 21 (24)Jack Wagner (D): 29 (30)
Tom Corbett (R): 48 (42)
Undecided: 21 (26)Joe Hoeffel(D): 28 (30)
Tom Corbett (R): 50 (41)
Undecided: 21 (27)
(MoE: ±2.6%)Dan Onorato (D): 20 (16)
Joe Hoeffel (D): 15 (10)
Jack Wagner (D): 13 (11)
Anthony Williams (D): 5 (2)
Undecided: 47 (59)
(MoE: ±3.2%)Tom Corbett (R): 58
Sam Rohrer (R): 7
Undecided: 35
(MoE: ±4.4%)
The Pennsylvania Governor’s race didn’t look good before, and now it looks even worse if you follow Quinnipiac’s trendlines (although the shift mirrors the shift in the Senate race in the same sample, indicating they got a much more conservative batch this month). PPP’s first look at the race isn’t quite as bad, but still confirms the general idea. As both PPP’s Tom Jensen and Quinnipiac’s Peter Brown point out in their writeups, things are likely to tighten up once the Democratic primary is over and the focus is on one candidate. Right now, the Dems have such a name rec deficit (against Tom Corbett, currently getting his name in the news constantly with the Bonusgate prosecutions) that the race is very much of a question mark at this point. With Corbett flirting with the 50% mark, though, the Dems may be getting into too deep a hole here to dig out once they’ve coalesced.