NC-Sen: Burr Leads Marshall by Only 1 Point, Cunningham by 5

Public Policy Polling (5/8-10, North Carolina voters, 4/8-11 in parens):

Elaine Marshall (D): 42 (37)

Richard Burr (R-inc): 43 (43)

Undecided: 15 (20)

Cal Cunningham (D): 39 (35)

Richard Burr (R-inc): 44 (43)

Undecided: 17 (22)

(MoE: ±3.9%)

Interesting numbers out of North Carolina, showing both Democrats getting a boost after the first round of their primary battle. Both Marshall and Cunningham are still severely unknown at this point, underscoring just how much of a meekly-funded campaign the first round of this primary was. 66% have no opinion of Cunningham and 56% regard Marshall with a blank expression.

If the winner of this runoff can quickly marshal together some resources, this could turn out to be a race well worth watching.

Analyzing Britain’s 2010 General Election

By: Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/

Several days ago Great Britain held a general election to decide the country’s government over the next few years. Facing discontent and a nation thirsty for change, Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the governing Labor Party were soundly defeated. The challenging Conservative Party, led by David Cameroon, gained 97 seats but failed to take a majority in Parliament. Meanwhile the Liberal Democrats, who had surged after a strong performance in the first debate by their leader Nick Clegg, badly underperformed their expectations.

This election offers a useful study of a political system outside of the United States. While more similar to the United States than most countries, Great Britain’s electorate also offers a number of intriguing differences.

A map of the results illustrates several aspects of this system:

Analyzing Britain's 2010 General Election

Note: In Britain and most of the world, the party of the left – Labour – is traditionally represented by the color red (symbolizing the revolution and the so-called blood of the workers). The Conservatives are represented by blue; the Liberal Democrats by yellow.

More below.

At first, it seems that the Tories swept the board. One can’t help but notice the sheer landmass covered by conservative-won seats.

Indeed, the Conservative Party did do quite well; with 36.1% of the vote, they won 306 out of 650 seats. Labour dropped to 29.0% and 258 seats; the Liberal Democrats took 57 seats on 23.0% of the vote.

Yet the map overstates Tory strength. Like the Republican Party of the United States, the Conservative Party does best in rural areas. Winning these seats looks good on a map but doesn’t guarantee winning an election.

The Labour Party, on the other hand, has traditionally dominated Great Britain’s densely populated cities – much like the Democrats in the United States. Much of its base lies among cities such as Sunderland, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, and – of course – London. These places look small on maps but elect quite a lot of MPs.

To illustrate this point, here is a map of the 2005 general election under redrawn boundaries for 2010:

Analyzing Britain's 2010 General Election,Analyzing Britain's 2010 General Election

Labour did quite a bit better in 2005, as this map indicates. Yet one might be inclined to guess, by the geographic spread of Conservative seats, that they lost the election. In reality, Prime Minister Tony Blair had led his party to win 35.3% of the vote and 356 seats – a governing majority.

Interestingly, Labour majorities in cities tend to be somewhat thinner than Tory majorities in the countryside. This constitutes the opposite of the situation in the United States – where Democrats often win cities by 75-25 margins and Republicans win rural regions by 60-40  margins.

A proportional map, therefore, offers a more accurate visualization:

Analyzing Britain's 2010 General Election,Analyzing Britain's 2010 General Election

One sees another interesting pattern emerge here; the electorate exhibits a coherent North-South divide. In the poorer North Labour does quite well, winning a good majority of seats. In the wealthier South the Conservatives are dominant. With the exception of London, Labour wins almost no seats in southern Great Britain.

There is also a substantial difference between England, Scotland, and Wales. While England votes strongly Conservative, the latter two remain Labour strongholds. In Scotland the Tories actually come in fourth, winning only one seat – a legacy of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who to this day remains extraordinarily unpopular in Scotland. Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s Scottish heritage also probably also helped Labour and hurt the Tories. While the Conservatives do better in Wales, winning eight seats, they still run ten points behind Labour.

It is in South England where the Conservatives do best. Labour runs in third place in the Southwest, Southeast, and East regions. In the Southeast region, for instance, Labour wins a mere 16.2% of the vote; the Tories win 49.9% of it.

These patterns go back for a long time. Take the 1955 general election:

Analyzing Britain's 2010 General Election

There are some differences, for sure. In 1955 Conservatives had a base in rural Scotland; that has vanished today. The strength of third parties is noticeably less.

Yet what strikes the eye is the degree of similarity between 1955 and 2010. By and large, the bases of the Labour and Conservative Parties remain the same as they were half a century ago. Britain’s regions exhibit a remarkable degree of stability in which party they support – something which can not be said for the United States.

Finally, perhaps the most interesting difference between the United States and the United Kingdom is the strength of third parties in the latter. Both countries follow a first-past-the-post system, which makes the presence of a non-regional third party almost impossible. Yet in Great Britain the Liberal Democrats have somehow managed to gain legitimacy and a respectable amount of seats, through careful targeting. In the aftermath of this election, with a hung parliament, there has even been substantial discussion about changing the electoral system. Meanwhile the two-party system remains iron strong in America. Despite all their similarities, cultural and systemic, the electorates of the United States and the United Kingdom are following sharply divergent paths.

StephenCLE’s 2010 Senate Predictions

Welcome all once again to StephenCLE’s predictions, these being the Senate variety.  Last time, we went through the first third of the Senate seats up for grabs this cycle.  Those seats included competitive races throughout the Eastern US, such as Florida, Pennsylvania, Delaware, North Carolina, and New Hampshire.  Today, we head to the region that will more or less determine the balance of power in the Senate this election cycle, the Central US.  

Current National Score – Republicans +.5

Current Seat Changes:

1.Delaware – Republican pickup

2.Florida – Independent pickup

Before We Begin –

I feel the need to bring up the Pennsylvania Senate race I covered last week, where I had Arlen Specter running away from Pat Toomey in the end.  Well, it now appears that Joe Sestak is going to defeat him in the primary.  As a result, I am now moving the race to Toss Up status, but it is still a democratic retention.  I just think Toomey is way too conservative for the state, which is much more blue now than when Rick Santorum was elected.

Eastern Great Lakes –

Ohio – Open (Republican) – Ohio is always a contested, swing state.  An uncontested race here usually means a landslide for one party or the other.  Strangely, despite the Republicans doing well nationally, they are struggling here.  Part of that is because GOP candidate Rob Portman isn’t catching on with voters.  Now that could be because of lack of name recognition, but it’s more likely that his reputation as a free trading, anti-government type isn’t well suited to the state.  His base is very energized though, as evidenced by his crazy strong fundraising.  Conversely, the democratic candidate, Lee Fisher, has a bit of a problem as far as his base is concerned.  Voters just aren’t enthused by his candidacy.  Despite outspending primary opponent Jennifer Brunner 10-1, he badly underperformed pre-election polls and won by a high single digit margin.  I think that in many ways, this race is tied heavily to the other big race in Ohio this cycle, the gubernatorial contest between Ted Strickland and John Kasich, because Portman/Kasich are practically the same candidate, as Strickland/Fisher are tied at the hip in the governor’s mansion.  Flat out, I don’t see Kasich beating Strickland.  There won’t be a lot of crossover voting in this race, so if Strickland wins by more than 5%, I think that’s enough to pull Fisher over the finish line. Fisher’s going to need coattails from somewhere to drive up Dem turnout, something that he has a hard time doing himself.  Still, this is arguably the Democrats’ best shot at a pickup, and I think by a miniscule margin they get it done.

State PVI – R+0

Stephen’s Rating – Toss Up

Prediction – Weak Dem Pickup (1st overall)

National Score – Democrats +.5

Indiana – Open (Democratic) – Indiana for many years had been a republican bastion, before the Democrats swept to wins in 3 house seats in 2006 before bringing down the house with Obama’s 2008 statewide victory.  I’m concerned that the state might be reverting back to it’s former roots, as most polls here have been friendly to the GOP, but again, most have come from Rassmussen and it’s strict likely voter screen.  This is a race though, in which the Democrats have the arguably better candidate.  Representative Brad Ellsworth is a conservative democrat that should play well outside of the most republican parts of the state.  A former sheriff, Ellsworth has the support of law-and-order types, and his conservative stances on guns and certain social issues should be a plus.  His republican opponent, former senator Dan Coats, is a relative moderate GOPer that has lots of experience.  But he has visible negatives, namely working as a lobbyist.  For what it’s worth, lobbyists are probably about as popular as Saddam Hussein these days.  This is one race where I don’t think the polls have much bearing right now, since Ellsworth is very little known outside of the 8th district.  Still, I think that because of the environment, Coats will barely hold off a hard-charging Ellsworth at the wire.

State PVI – R+6

Stephen’s Rating – Lean Republican

Prediction – Weak Rep Pickup (2nd overall)

National Score – Republicans +.5

Michigan – no election

Western Great Lakes –

Illinois – Open (Democrat) – This race makes my blood boil.  First off, the democrats suffered through the Rob Blagojevich scandal which broke when he tried to sell the seat to the highest bidder.  Then Roland Burris was put in the seat, he of the $20 fundraising quarter.  And then, candidate recruitment here was a category 5 disaster, as the Republicans got the one man that could probably win, Representative Mark Kirk.  The Democrats failed to get the one woman that could’ve put the race to bed, attorney general Lisa Madigan.  And after all that, the democratic candidate, treasurer Alexi Giannoulias, is struggling with the breakdown of his family’s bank.  By all accounts, this race should be hopeless, but Giannoulias is only behind by 4-6 points in most polls.  While I think the partisan lean of Illinois could be such that Giannoulias has a shot, I haven’t liked this matchup from the start, and I don’t like it now.  Alexi won’t be getting any help from the governor’s race either, so no coattails.  In the end, I think Kirk wins fairly handily.

State PVI – D+8

Stephen’s Rating – Lean Republican

Prediction – Moderate Rep Pickup (3rd overall)

National Score – Republicans +1.5

Wisconsin – Russ Feingold (Democrat) – Feingold and the DSCC got a big break when the Republicans’ top candidate, former governor Tommy Thompson, failed to get into the race.  Still, I think it’s possible that the race could be competitive if the GOP gets a self-funder.  There are several candidates in the field with the ability to do that.  A lot of the trajectory of this race will be determined by who gets the GOP nomination.  Ultimately I think Feingold will win, but a wary eye never hurt anybody.

State PVI – D+2

Stephen’s Rating – Likely Democrat

Prediction – Strong Dem Hold

Minnesota – No election

Central Plains –

North Dakota – Open (Democrat) – This is the one seat over all others that we KNOW is going to flip in November.  Popular governor John Hoeven elected to challenge senator Byron Dorgan back in January, and Dorgan, perhaps sensing the inevitable, dived out of the way.  This is a shame because Dorgan was a popular figure at home and in the democratic caucus.  But his chances of surviving against Hoeven were very small.  Only token opposition will face Hoeven now.

State PVI – R+10

Stephen’s Rating – Solid Republican

Prediction – Solid Rep Pickup (4th overall)

National Score – Republicans +2.5

South Dakota – John Thune (Republican) – No democrat filed to run against John Thune, so he will skate by uncontested.  Blah.

State PVI – R+9

Stephen’s Rating – Solid Republican

Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

Nebraska – No election

Iowa – Chuck Grassley (Republican) – Now this is a race that not many people saw coming.  Grassley has been an institution in the Hawkeye State for many years, and usually wins big.  But it appears that he erred during the health care debate by doing all he could to try to kill the bill.  Iowa democrats have now turned against Grassley as a result and have coalesced behind a stronger than expected candidate, Roxanne Conlin.  Current polling shows that Grassley’s lead is down to about 10-13 points, still a nice cushion but hardly impossible for an opponent to make up.  Ultimately I think Conlin can make things interesting, but she will need to fight hard and hope for an unforced error from Grassley to win.

State PVI – D+1

Stephen’s Rating – Likely Republican

Prediction – Strong Rep Hold

Missouri – Open (Republican) – Missouri is usually a hotly contested state, and that will be the case again this year as Kit Bond’s Senate seat is up for grabs.  This race is intriguing because the state appears to be moving slightly to the right, and the national environment should put Missouri into the red column this year.  The problem is, the Democrats came up with a very solid candidate in secretary of state Robin Carnahan, who hails from a prominent political family.  The Republican candidate is 7th district representative Roy Blunt, who is definitely NOT the #1 guy for the GOP here.  Most public polls have had this race very close, except for Rasmussen, who shows Blunt up 6-8.  Curiously, most other public polling has shut off over the last two months, so we don’t have any corroborating evidence.  Bottom line though, I refuse to believe that an incumbenty-establishmenty type like Roy Blunt is pulling away from Robin Carnahan.  This is a race that I think is a great pickup opportunity for the Democrats, and if Carnahan campaigns well in the fall, unless the national environment has reached defcon 5, they’ll get it.

State PVI – R+3

Stephen’s Rating – Toss Up

Prediction – Weak Dem Pickup (2nd overall)

National Score – Republicans +1.5

Arkansas – Blanche Lincoln (Democrat) – Here’s a formerly democratic state that has turned republican red in a hurry at the federal level.  And worse yet for Team Blue, Blanche Lincoln really killed her favorables during the health care debate by flip-flopping at every turn in the road.  Like Chuck Grassley, Mary Landrieu, and Ben Nelson, she became one of the prominent figures that received the national scorn.  Even 2nd tier republicans were beating her, and that was before 3rd district representative John Boozman jumped into the race.  Lt. Governor Bill Halter is primarying Lincoln from the left, and has a chance to knock her off.  His chances in the general election are marginally better than Lincoln’s but still bad.  Ultimately, I’ve pretty much written this seat off barring an unforced error from Boozman, who’s way up in his primary battle for the GOP nomination.

State PVI – R+8

Stephen’s Rating – Likely Republican

Prediction – Strong Rep Pickup (5th overall)

National Score – Republicans +2.5

Kansas – Open (Republican) – Kansas is a solidly republican state, and usually the game boils down to the GOP primary.  The Democrats did have one chance to flip the seat, as governor Kathleen Sebelius could have jumped into the race, but Barack Obama made her secretary of Health and Human Services, taking her out of the race.  Now it’s a battle between representatives Jerry Moran and Todd Tiahrt to see who will cruise to victory in November.

State PVI – R+12

Stephen’s Rating – Solid Republican

Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

Oklahoma – Tom Coburn (Republican) – Oklahoma was the reddest state in the nation in 2008, and the Senate race here was never really a question.  I suppose maybe, that governor Brad Henry could have run for the seat, which would have made things at least mildly competitive, but even with him in the race a victory would be very unlikely.  Instead, I don’t think Coburn has any competition at all.

State PVI – R+17

Stephen’s Rating – Solid Republican

Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

Deep South Gulf –

Alabama – Richard Shelby (Republican) – Here’s another race that won’t even be a contest.  Alabama is about as red a state as you’ll find these days.

State PVI – R+14

Stephen’s Rating – Solid Republican

Prediction – Solid Rep Hold

Mississippi – no election

Louisiana – David Vitter (Republican) – Personally, this is a race that pisses me off.  Louisianans should be running to the polls in droves to vote out David Vitter, who’s a gigantic jerk for his ethical transgressions.  But apparently being a good, moral human being matters much less than being a conservative republicans, as not only is Vitter beating up on his democratic opponent, Charlie Melancon, he’s actually got positive favorables for the most part.  Meanwhile, Melancon’s favorables are underwater.  Why?  Because he’s a demmy-crat, apparently.  I’m not totally writing this off because Vitter’s lead is still only about 10-15 in most polls, but I fail to really see a path to victory for Melancon in a state that is just being bass-ackward and stupid when it comes to this election.  Yeah, I went there.

State PVI – R+8

Stephen’s Rating – Likely Republican

Prediction – Strong Rep Hold

Texas – no election

Recap – There’s a lot of upheaval in this region of the country.  I have the Republicans picking up 4 seats, Indiana, Illinois, North Dakota, and Arkansas.  The Democrats counter by picking up 2 seats of their own, Ohio and Missouri.  That leaves the national score so far at 5 Republican pickups, 2 for the Democrats, and 1 for the Independents, composite score of Republicans +2.5.

In the final section of the Senate baseline predictions, we head to the western third of the country, where we have potential R pickups in Colorado and Nevada, a very indecisive Repub-man in Washington, a competitive race in California, and some teabagger induced desert warfare in Arizona.  You won’t want to miss it.

SSP Daily Digest: 5/11 (Morning Edition)

  • KY-Sen: Wendell Ford, the Democrat who held this seat before retiring Sen. Jim Bunning, endorsed AG Jack Conway. Conway is running a TV ad touting the endorsement, but no word (sigh) on the size of the buy. Meanwhile, Rand Paul is sticking both thumbs in the eye of the Kentucky GOP establishment: He says he’s not sure if he’ll support Mitch McConnell as Republican Senate leader. Given that McConnell has done everything in his power to flush Paul down the toilet, this isn’t so shocking, but it is extra-juicy.
  • NY-Sen-B, NY-14: The Working Families Party endorsed both Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Rep. Carolyn Maloney. NY-14 wannabe Reshma Saujani whinged about the “establishment endorsing the incumbent,” which is pretty rich, given that she herself signed a letter last summer asking Maloney not to challenge Gillibrand. Not too surprising, though, given that Saujani claimed last week she hasn’t “issue-tested or poll-tested” – even though she conducted a $50,000 focus group earlier this Spring.
  • MI-Gov, MI-12: Troy businessman David Kniffen’s gubernatorial signature drive fell short, so he’s decided instead to run against Rep. Sandy Levin in this D+12 district.
  • CA-36: Blue America PAC has thrown down a $13K independent expenditure on behalf of Marcy Winograd, who is challenging Dem Rep. Jane Harman in the primary.
  • FL-22: After attacking Marco Rubio for going ever-so-slightly wobbly on Arizona’s new immigration law, Allen West has now turned his fire on Jeb Bush. Even if this guy somehow wins, he’s going to have a hard time staying on anyone’s good side.
  • HI-01: Another one of those polls with too many significant digits: An outfit I hadn’t previously heard of, Aloha Vote (which is a subsidiary of a Mass. consulting shop called Merriman River Group), has Charles Djou at “39.5”, with Colleen Hanabusa and Ed Case at “25.5” apiece. Half of the sample had already voted, and among that group, Djou was at 45%.
  • IA-01: Some Dude Mike LaCoste is dropping out of the GOP primary less than a month before election day. A couple of Republicans remain in the race against Rep. Bruce Braley, but really, the GOP has wound up with stems and seeds here.
  • NC-08: Three Republicans who failed to make the runoff in the race to challenge Rep. Larry Kissell – Hal Jordan, Lou Huddleston, and Darrell Day – all endorsed rival Harold Johnson today, over crackpot freakazoid Tim D’Annunzio. What’s more, Johnson is in DC today and tomorrow to meet with NRCC chief Pete Sessions and other key GOP honchos. Dems just have to hope that D’Annunzio, who’s already plowed a million of his own into his campaign, keeps spending like an RNC official at a bondage club.
  • NY-01: A nice score for Rep. Tim Bishop: Bill Clinton is doing a $1000-a-head fundraiser for him in NYC on June 2nd.
  • NY-13: Though he’s repeatedly denied his interest, GOP ex-Rep. Vito Fossella – best known for a drunken driving arrest and fathering a child with a woman other than his wife – is supposedly interested in making a comeback attempt. In other words, he’s got perfect Republican values. Fossella would have to make a decision by next month, when nominating petitions must be circulated.
  • PA-12: Crikey – another quarter mil on paid media from the NRCC on this race. You can see the new TV ad, which hits Pelosi, here.
  • WI-07: It looks like Dems are quickly rallying around state Sen. Julie Lassa to fill retiring Rep. Dave Obey’s considerable shoes. Lassa has held office since 1998, first as a state representative, then as a state senator since 2003. She would not have to give up her current office to run for Obey’s seat. Meanwhile, Wausau attorney Christine Bremer says she won’t run, while state Rep. Donna Siedel sounds like she’s still considering it (albeit tepidly).
  • Rasmussen Reports, You Decide, Vol. 16

    AR-Sen (4/26, likely voters, 3/30 in parentheses):

    Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 29 (36)

    John Boozman (R): 57 (51)

    Some other: 9 (6)

    Not sure: 5 (7)

    Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 30 (35)

    Kim Hendren (R): 51 (51)

    Some other: 11 (5)

    Not sure: 8 (8)

    Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 31 (36)

    Gilbert Baker (R): 53 (51)

    Some other: 12 (6)

    Not sure: 4 (7)

    Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 32 (36)

    Curtis Coleman (R): 52 (48)

    Some other: 8 (7)

    Not sure: 7 (8)

    Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 31 (35)

    Jim Holt (R): 54 (51)

    Some other: 6 (7)

    Not sure: 9 (7)

    Bill Halter (D): 31 (34)

    John Boozman (R): 56 (48)

    Some other: 7 (8)

    Not sure: 7 (11)

    Bill Halter (D): 33 (34)

    Kim Hendren (R): 45 (42)

    Some other: 13 (10)

    Not sure: 9 (13)

    Bill Halter (D): 33 (36)

    Gilbert Baker (R): 48 (44)

    Some other: 10 (7)

    Not sure: 9 (12)

    Bill Halter (D): 37 (37)

    Curtis Coleman (R): 43 (40)

    Some other: 11 (10)

    Not sure: 9 (13)

    Bill Halter (D): 31 (34)

    Jim Holt (R): 49 (43)

    Some other: 12 (9)

    Not sure: 8 (14)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    AZ-Gov (4/27, likely voters, 4/16 in parentheses):

    Terry Goddard (D): 40 (40)

    Jan Brewer (R-inc): 48 (44)

    Some other: 7 (9)

    Not sure: 5 (6)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    CO-Sen (5/3, likely voters, 4/5 in parentheses):

    Michael Bennet (D-inc): 41 (41)

    Jane Norton (R): 48 (46)

    Some other: 5 (5)

    Not sure: 6 (8)

    Michael Bennet (D-inc): 41 (40)

    Ken Buck (R): 48 (44)

    Some other: 4 (3)

    Not sure: 7 (12)

    Michael Bennet (D-inc): 42 (39)

    Tom Wiens (R): 44 (45)

    Some other: 5 (4)

    Not sure: 9 (12)

    Andrew Romanoff (D): 39 (38)

    Jane Norton (R): 46 (49)

    Some other: 6 (5)

    Not sure: 8 (8)

    Andrew Romanoff (D): 40 (37)

    Ken Buck (R): 45 (45)

    Some other: 5 (4)

    Not sure: 11 (13)

    Andrew Romanoff (D): 40 (38)

    Tom Wiens (R): 45 (45)

    Some other: 4 (6)

    Not sure: 11 (11)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    CT-Gov (5/4, likely voters, 4/1 in parentheses):

    Ned Lamont (D): 42 (37)

    Thomas Foley (R): 35 (44)

    Some other: 11 (7)

    Not sure: 13 (13)

    Ned Lamont (D): 48 (41)

    Michael Fedele (R): 28 (38)

    Some other: 9 (9)

    Not sure: 15 (12)

    Dan Malloy (D): 38 (35)

    Thomas Foley (R): 35 (44)

    Some other: 11 (8)

    Not sure: 16 (14)

    Dan Malloy (D): 44 (40)

    Michael Fedele (R): 27 (37)

    Some other: 10 (7)

    Not sure: 20 (16)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    CT-Sen (5/4, likely voters, 4/7 in parentheses):

    Richard Blumenthal (D): 52 (55)

    Linda McMahon (R): 39 (35)

    Some other: 6 (3)

    Not sure: 4 (6)

    Richard Blumenthal (D): 55 (52)

    Rob Simmons (R): 32 (38)

    Some other: 5 (4)

    Not sure: 8 (6)

    Richard Blumenthal (D): 54 (58)

    Peter Schiff (R): 29 (32)

    Some other: 6 (4)

    Not sure: 11 (6)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    DE-Sen (4/29, likely voters, 2/22 in parentheses):

    Chris Coons (D): 32 (32)

    Mike Castle (R): 55 (53)

    Some other: 7 (8)

    Not sure: 7 (8)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    FL-Sen (5/3, likely voters, 4/21 in parentheses):

    Kendrick Meek (D): 17 (22)

    Marco Rubio (R): 34 (37)

    Charlie Crist (I): 38 (30)

    Not sure: 11 (11)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    GA-Gov (4/28, likely voters, 3/17 in parentheses):

    Roy Barnes (D): 43 (41)

    John Oxendine (R): 45 (41)

    Some other: 6 (6)

    Not sure: 6 (11)

    Roy Barnes (D): 39 (40)

    Nathan Deal (R): 46 (43)

    Some other: 7 (5)

    Not sure: 8 (13)

    Roy Barnes (D): 41 (39)

    Karen Handel (R): 42 (42)

    Some other: 7 (5)

    Not sure: 10 (14)

    Roy Barnes (D): 42 (40)

    Eric Johnson (R): 37 (38)

    Some other: 8 (6)

    Not sure: 13 (16)

    Thurbert Baker (D): 34

    John Oxendine (R): 44

    Some other: 9

    Not sure: 13

    Thurbert Baker (D): 31

    Nathan Deal (R): 47

    Some other: 9

    Not sure: 13

    Thurbert Baker (D): 36

    Karen Handel (R): 44

    Some other: 5

    Not sure: 15

    Thurbert Baker (D): 35

    Eric Johnson (R): 38

    Some other: 9

    Not sure: 18

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    IA-Gov (4/29, likely voters, 3/17 in parentheses):

    Chet Culver (D-inc): 38 (36)

    Terry Branstad (R): 53 (52)

    Some other: 6 (6)

    Not sure: 3 (6)

    Chet Culver (D-inc): 41 (40)

    Bob Vander Plaats (R): 45 (42)

    Some other: 9 (8)

    Not sure: 5 (11)

    Chet Culver (D-inc): 43 (40)

    Rod Roberts (R): 41 (38)

    Some other: 9 (10)

    Not sure: 7 (13)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    IA-Sen (4/29, likely voters, 3/17 in parentheses):

    Roxanne Conlin (D): 40 (36)

    Charles Grassley (R-inc): 53 (55)

    Some other: 3 (4)

    Not sure: 4 (5)

    Bob Krause (D): 31 (31)

    Charles Grassley (R-inc): 57 (57)

    Some other: 4 (4)

    Not sure: 8 (8)

    Tom Fiegen (D): 30 (28)

    Charles Grassley (R-inc): 57 (57)

    Some other: 6 (7)

    Not sure: 7 (9)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    IL-Gov (4/28, likely voters, 4/5 in parentheses):

    Pat Quinn (D-inc): 38 (38)

    Bill Brady (R): 45 (45)

    Some other: 5 (7)

    Not sure: 11 (10)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    IL-Sen (4/28, likely voters, 3/ in parentheses):

    Alexi Giannoulias (D): 38 (37)

    Mark Kirk (R): 46 (41)

    Some other: 5 (8)

    Not sure: 12 (13)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    IN-Sen (5/5-6, likely voters, 4/13-14 in parentheses):

    Brad Ellsworth (D): 36 (33)

    Dan Coats (R): 51 (54)

    Some other: 6 (5)

    Not sure: 8 (9)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    KY-Sen (4/28, likely voters, 3/31 in parentheses):

    Jack Conway (D): 38 (36)

    Rand Paul (R): 47 (50)

    Some other: 4 (3)

    Not sure: 10 (11)

    Jack Conway (D): 38 (32)

    Trey Grayson (R): 43 (52)

    Some other: 8 (5)

    Not sure: 12 (11)

    Dan Mongiardo (D): 32 (37)

    Rand Paul (R): 48 (52)

    Some other: 8 (3)

    Not sure: 12 (8)

    Dan Mongiardo (D): 31 (33)

    Trey Grayson (R): 45 (53)

    Some other: 10 (5)

    Not sure: 13 (9)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    MI-Gov (D primary) (4/22, likely voters, 3/24 in parentheses):

    Andy Dillon (D): 13 (12)

    Virg Bernero (D): 12 (8)

    Alma Wheeler Smith (D): 9 (10)

    Some other: 15 (17)

    Not sure: 51 (53)

    (MoE: ±6%)

    MI-Gov (R primary) (4/22, likely voters, 3/24 in parentheses):

    Peter Hoekstra (R): 28 (27)

    Rick Snyder (R): 14 (18)

    Mike Cox (R): 13 (13)

    Mike Bouchard (R): 9 (6)

    Some other: 5 (5)

    Not sure: 32 (32)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    MO-Sen (5/3, likely voters, 3/9 in parentheses):

    Robin Carnahan (D): 42 (41)

    Roy Blunt (R): 50 (47)

    Some other: 4 (4)

    Not sure: 4 (8)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    NC-Sen (5/5, likely voters, 4/19 in parentheses):

    Elaine Marshall (D): 40 (32)

    Richard Burr (R-inc): 48 (50)

    Some other: 3 (6)

    Not sure: 9 (12)

    Cal Cunningham (D): 37 (31)

    Richard Burr (R-inc): 50 (53)

    Some other: 3 (4)

    Not sure: 10 (13)

    (MoE: ±3%)

    NC-Sen (D runoff) (5/5, likely voters, no trendlines):

    Elaine Marshall (D): 42

    Cal Cunningham (D): 37

    Some other: 4

    Not sure: 17

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    ND-AL (4/20, likely voters, 3/23 in parentheses):

    Earl Pomeroy (D-inc): 45 (44)

    Rick Berg (R): 49 (51)

    Some other: 2 (1)

    Not sure: 4 (4)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    ND-Sen (4/20, likely voters, 3/23 in parentheses):

    Tracy Potter (D): 24 (25)

    John Hoeven (R): 69 (68)

    Some other: 2 (2)

    Not sure: 5 (5)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    NV-Gov (4/27, likely voters, 3/31 in parentheses):

    Rory Reid (D): 47 (43)

    Jim Gibbons (R-inc): 37 (45)

    Some other: 12 (8)

    Not sure: 3 (4)

    Rory Reid (D): 35 (34)

    Brian Sandoval (R): 53 (55)

    Some other: 6 (6)

    Not sure: 5 (4)

    Rory Reid (D): 39 (38)

    Mike Montandon (R): 45 (45)

    Some other: 9 (9)

    Not sure: 8 (8)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    NV-Sen (4/27, likely voters, 3/31 in parentheses):

    Harry Reid (D-inc): 39 (39)

    Sue Lowden (R): 52 (54)

    Some other: 6 (4)

    Not sure: 3 (2)

    Harry Reid (D-inc): 41 (42)

    Danny Tarkanian (R): 51 (49)

    Some other: 4 (6)

    Not sure: 4 (2)

    Harry Reid (D-inc): 40 (40)

    Sharron Angle (R): 48 (51)

    Some other: 7 (6)

    Not sure: 4 (3)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    NY-Gov (4/27, likely voters, 3/29 in parentheses):

    Andrew Cuomo (D): 56 (52)

    Rick Lazio (R): 24 (29)

    Some other: 6 (6)

    Not sure: 14 (13)

    Andrew Cuomo (D): 50 (50)

    Steve Levy (R): 27 (26)

    Some other: 6 (7)

    Not sure: 17 (17)

    Andrew Cuomo (D): 55 (51)

    Carl Paladino (R): 25 (28)

    Some other: 6 (6)

    Not sure: 14 (15)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    OH-Gov (5/5, likely voters, 3/30 in parentheses):

    Ted Strickland (D-inc): 45 (45)

    John Kasich (R): 46 (46)

    Some other: 3 (2)

    Not sure: 6 (7)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    OH-Sen (5/5, likely voters, 3/30 in parentheses):

    Lee Fisher (D): 43 (38)

    Rob Portman (R): 42 (43)

    Some other: 4 (4)

    Not sure: 11 (14)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    OR-Gov (4/26, likely voters, 2/17 in parentheses):

    John Kitzhaber (D): 41 (42)

    Chris Dudley (R): 41 (36)

    Some other: 6 (7)

    Not sure: 13 (15)

    John Kitzhaber (D): 48 (42)

    Allen Alley (R): 33 (34)

    Some other: 6 (8)

    Not sure: 13 (16)

    John Kitzhaber (D): 50 (40)

    John Lim (R): 34 (38)

    Some other: 5 (8)

    Not sure: 12 (14)

    Bill Bradbury (D): 40 (39)

    Chris Dudley (R): 40 (36)

    Some other: 6 (7)

    Not sure: 13 (17)

    Bill Bradbury (D): 43 (41)

    Allen Alley (R): 34 (35)

    Some other: 7 (9)

    Not sure: 16 (16)

    Bill Bradbury (D): 44 (38)

    John Lim (R): 32 (35)

    Some other: 9 (9)

    Not sure: 15 (17)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    PA-Gov (D primary) (5/6, likely voters, no trendlines):

    Dan Onorato (D): 34

    Jack Wagner (D): 17

    Anthony Williams (D): 17

    Joe Hoeffel (D): 9

    Some other: 6

    Not sure: 17

    (MoE: ±5%)

    PA-Sen (5/6, likely voters, 4/12 in parentheses):

    Arlen Specter (D-inc): 38 (40)

    Pat Toomey (R): 50 (50)

    Some other: 7 (4)

    Not sure: 6 (6)

    Joe Sestak (D): 40 (36)

    Pat Toomey (R): 42 (47)

    Some other: 10 (5)

    Not sure: 9 (12)

    (MoE: ±3%)

    PA-Sen (D primary) (5/6, likely voters, 4/12 in parentheses):

    Joe Sestak (D): 47 (42)

    Arlen Specter (D-inc): 42 (44)

    Some other: 3 (4)

    Not sure: 8 (10)

    (MoE: ±5%)

    RI-Gov (4/21, likely voters, 3/25 in parentheses):

    Frank Caprio (D): 33 (28)

    John Robitaille (R): 21 (22)

    Lincoln Chafee (I): 33 (39)

    Not sure: 13 (11)

    Patrick Lynch (D): 24 (22)

    John Robitaille (R): 26 (26)

    Lincoln Chafee (I): 35 (37)

    Not sure: 15 (15)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    SD-AL (4/21, likely voters, 3/25 in parentheses):

    Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-inc): 45 (44)

    Chris Nelson (R): 41 (42)

    Some other: 5 (6)

    Not sure: 9 (9)

    Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-inc): 50 (46)

    Kristi Noem (R): 35 (35)

    Some other: 5 (8)

    Not sure: 9 (10)

    Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-inc): 48 (45)

    Blake Curd (R): 36 (33)

    Some other: 7 (8)

    Not sure: 9 (14)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    SD-Gov (4/21, likely voters, 3/25 in parentheses):

    Scott Heidepriem (D): 33 (32)

    Dennis Daugaard (R): 53 (49)

    Some other: 5 (6)

    Not sure: 9 (13)

    Scott Heidepriem (D): 41 (37)

    Dave Knudson (R): 41 (32)

    Some other: 9 (13)

    Not sure: 10 (19)

    Scott Heidepriem (D): 46 (39)

    Gordon Howie (R): 31 (34)

    Some other: 8 (9)

    Not sure: 14 (17)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    WA-Sen (5/4, likely voters, 4/6 in parentheses):

    Patty Murray (D-inc): 48 (48)

    Dino Rossi (R): 46 (46)

    Some other: 2 (3)

    Not sure: 3 (4)

    Patty Murray (D-inc): 52 (48)

    Don Benton (R): 38 (40)

    Some other: 3 (4)

    Not sure: 7 (8)

    Patty Murray (D-inc): 51 (47)

    Clint Didier (R): 36 (37)

    Some other: 4 (5)

    Not sure: 8 (11)

    Patty Murray (D-inc): 49 (45)

    Paul Akers (R): 35 (37)

    Some other: 6 (5)

    Not sure: 10 (13)

    (MoE: ±4.5%)

    CA-Gov, CA-Sen: Poizner Neck-and-Neck With Whitman in New SUSA Poll

    SurveyUSA (5/6-9, likely voters, 4/19-21):

    Meg Whitman (R): 39 (49)

    Steve Poizner (R): 37 (27)

    Others (R): 7 (9)

    Undecided: 14 (15)

    (MoE: ±4.3%)

    Jerry Brown (D): 66 (63)

    Richard Aguirre (D): 4 (6)

    Others (D): 9 (13)

    Undecided (D): 19 (18)

    (MoE: ±3.8%)

    Wow. If these results are accurate, Whitman apparently has one hell of a glass jaw. Whitman had the airwaves to herself for a long, long while, and Poizner has only recently responded on the air with attack ads of his own. We’ve seen evidence that this race was getting mildly close for a few weeks now, but this is something else.

    Meanwhile, in the Senatorial primary, ex-Rep. Tom Campbell maintains a clear edge on the GOP field:

    Tom Campbell (R): 35 (34)

    Carly Fiorina (R): 24 (27)

    Chuck DeVore (R): 15 (14)

    Tim Kalemkarian (R): 3 (3)

    Undecided: 23 (23)

    (MoE: ±4.3%)

    SSP Daily Digest: 5/10 (Afternoon Edition)

    AR-Sen: Those nasty anti-Bill Halter Americans for Job Security ads just keep being an issue in the Arkansas Senate race, to the extent that the Halter camp just filed an FEC complaint against AJS. The content of the ads isn’t at issue, though, but rather that AJS spent $900K on the ads without disclosing its donors.

    PA-Sen, PA-Gov: Joe Sestak continues to hold a narrow lead over Arlen Specter in the daily Muhlenberg tracker that first opened up over the weeknd; today Sestak’s lead is up to 5, at 47-42. On the gubernatorial side, it’s Dan Onorato 35 41, Anthony Williams 15 8, Joe Hoeffel 8 6, and Jack Wagner 10 5. If there were serious doubts about the Muhlenberg poll (maybe based on the small daily sample size), that might be assuaged by Rasmussen, who also polled the primary on May 6 (Thursday) and found the exact same thing: Sestak leading Specter 47-42.

    CT-Gov: Ned Lamont is out with an internal poll via Garin Hart Yang, which has him in firm control of the Democratic gubernatorial primary. He leads former Stamford mayor Dan Malloy 53-18. There’s also one less minor candidate in the midst of the Lamont/Malloy fray; former state Rep. Juan Figueroa ended his bid after not getting out of the low single digits.

    GA-Gov: Here’s some interesting behind-the-scenes intrigue in the GOP primary that seems to have good ol’ interpersonal tension at its roots, as Rep. Tom Price (the current leader of the right-wing RSC) switched his endorsement from his former House colleague, Nathan Deal, to former SoS Karen Handel. Deal responded with a statement today that essentially questioned the Michigan-born Price’s southern cred.

    OR-Gov: Bill Bradbury is hitting the TV airwaves at the last minute, with Oregon’s primary in a week (kind of buried under the monumental Arkansas, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania elections). He’s leading off with his endorsement from ex-Gov. Barbara Roberts (which seems a little underwhelming if he has Al Gore and Howard Dean in his corner). Roberts probably is unknown to younger voters and unpopular with older voters, as she’s mostly known for proposing a sales tax, which is, quite simply, the one thing you don’t propose in Oregon. She also may have something of an axe to grind with John Kitzhaber, who basically pushed her out the door in 1994 after only one term.

    SC-Gov: The Club for Growth sure loves its lost causes; they weighed in in favor of state Rep. Nikki Haley in the Republican gubernatorial primary, who’s something of a minor player in a field that includes Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer and AG Henry McMaster but known for her anti-tax zealotry. Haley is a key ally of Mark Sanford, which isn’t exactly the electoral asset that it might have been a couple years ago.

    TN-Gov: Rep. John Duncan, the occasionally iconoclastic long-time GOPer in TN-02, offered an endorsement in the GOP gubernatorial primary. He gave his nod to his fellow Knoxvillean, mayor Bill Haslam, rather than to House colleague Zach Wamp.

    ID-01: Looks like Vaughn Ward, last seen trying to out-wacky the competition in the GOP field in the 1st on the issue of repealing the 17th Amendment, may have a Democrat problem in his past. He interned for a Democratic state legislator (Jim Hansen, now the state party chair) while in college in Boise in the early 90s, and much more recently, is listed as being part of Tim Kaine’s volunteer database from his 2005 campaign.

    KS-03: State Rep. Kevin Yoder (running to succeed retiring Dennis Moore) has conventionally been regarded as something of a “moderate” by Kansas Republican standards, but in a legislature where the battle lines are often Democrats + moderate Rs vs. conservative Rs, he seems to be on the conservative side in the state’s current budget impasse. Is he moving to the right for his primary, or was he just incorrectly identified from the outset?

    MI-01: Connie Saltonstall had a few good months there as the beneficiary of NOW and NARAL support when she decided to primary Rep. Bart Stupak. With his retirement, though, the interest seems to have dried up, and today she announced she’s getting out of the primary to replace Stupak. She still decided to lob a few grenades back at the establishment on her way out the door, though, accusing them of having anointed state Rep. Gary McDowell as Stupak’s successor and saying she can’t support him because of his anti-abortion views.

    PA-12: There have been concerns about Mark Critz’s warchest dwindling (supposedly down into the $70K range) as the clock ticks down toward the May 18 special election. However, word comes from his campaign that the most recent 48-hour report has him sitting on a much more comfortable $252K. Critz also benefits from an endorsement yesterday from the Tribune-Democrat, the newspaper in the district’s population center of Johnstown.

    TX-17: Could this actually be the year Chet Edwards’ luck runs out? He survived 1994 (albeit in a much friendlier district) and the 2004 DeLay-mander, but an internal poll from Republican rival Bill Flores shows Edwards in some serious trouble this time around. The poll from OnMessage Inc. has Flores leading 53-41, quite a change from August 2009 where a Flores poll gave Edwards a 44-36 lead. That’s all despite Edwards having very positive favorables (53/38); in a district where Obama’s favorables are 33/66, Edwards needs to work his usual magic, de-nationalize the race, and make it about the two candidates.

    WA-03: More establishment backing for Denny Heck in the Dem primary in the 3rd: Heck got the endorsement from Rep. Rick Larsen, who represents a similarly swingy rural/suburban district on the other side of the Seattle area.

    NY-St. Sen.: Here’s an opportunity for a pickup in the New York state Senate, if Democrats are actually willing to play some offense. Republican Tom Morahan is not expected to seek re-election in SD-38 in the Hudson Valley, a district that was won by Barack Obama 52-47. Assemblyman Kenneth Zebrowski is a potential Dem contender, but he’ll face off against a strong Republican: Rockland Co. Executive Scott Vanderhoef, most recently seen turning down entreaties to get into the GOP Senate primary to go against Kirsten Gillibrand.

    SEIU: The SEIU plans to spend freely in a number of gubernatorial races this year. They’ve set aside $4 million more for governor’s races; they plan on getting involved in Arizona, California, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, Ohio, and Florida. (Uh, New York? Are you sure that’s necessary?)

    Redistricting: The flow of money is about to rush into one more small area of the political battlefield. The FEC issued an advisory opinion that allows members of Congress to raise soft money for legal activities concerning redistricting. The FEC allowed members to raise funds for the National Democratic Redistricting Trust. This doesn’t affect a number of other redistricting-oriented groups in either party that aren’t focused on legal issues, though — like the Dems’ Foundation for the Future, which is set up as a 527.

    Passings: One of Alaska’s legendary politicians, Walter Hickel, died over the weekend at age 91. Hickel has one thing in common with Sarah Palin: he served half a term as the state’s Republican governor… although he left to become Richard Nixon’s Interior Secretary in 1968. He then encored with another term from 1990 to 1994, as a member of the Alaskan Independence Party.

    MI-Gov: Alma Wheeler Smith Drops Out

    The Democratic field in Michigan’s gubernatorial race is down to two:

    State Rep. Alma Wheeler Smith ended her bid for the Democratic nomination for governor this morning, leaving only two candidates in a primary that has been topsy-turvy almost since it began.

    Smith, 69, from Salem Township in Washtenaw County, did not make a formal endorsement of either of her rivals, Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero or state House Speaker Andy Dillon.

    But she said in a statement that she shared a “concern of splitting the progressive vote and ending up with a candidate that does not represent core Democratic values.”

    With Smith routinely polling in the single digits, there wasn’t much of a route to victory for her. But what she was accomplishing was siphoning enough liberal votes away from fellow progressive Virg Bernero to leave centrist Andy Dillon in the lead (and her statement shows she recognized that problem). Tomorrow is the deadline for filing signatures for the August primary, so the field is looking pretty locked-in now… and with Smith out (and with the Geoffrey Feiger boomlet thankfully vanishing), it looks like Bernero has the progressive end of the party to himself now, giving him much better odds of grabbing the nomination.  

    MD-Gov: O’Malley Either Tied With Ehrlich or Winning Big

    Washington Post (5/3-6, likely voters):

    Martin O’Malley (D-inc): 47

    Bob Ehrlich (R): 47

    (MoE: ±4%)

    Sorry to sound indecisive in the title, but the first Washington Post poll of this year’s Maryland governor’s race reaches two different conclusions, depending on whether you want to look at likely voters or registered voters. The LV model shows a tie between Democratic incumbent Martin O’Malley and Republican ex-Gov. Bob Ehrlich in their rematch, a closer result than any other pollster (including Rasmussen) has seen.

    If you prefer a registered voter model, though, O’Malley has a decently comfortable lead of 8 points, at 49-41, which is pretty consistent with most previous polls of this race. We’ve seen this before in a few polls of other races this year that have offered the choose-your-own-adventure approach (like Franklin & Marshall‘s PA-Sen polls), showing just how big the disparity is between in voter motivation between the two parties right now. November’s storyline is going to be shaped by how well Democrats do at getting currently “unlikely” voters to turn out.

    HI-01: DCCC Makes Pullout Official

    The DCCC has been telegraphing this for most of a week (ever since Colleen Hanabusa’s press conference to announce that she wasn’t dropping out), but it’s official today:

    The DCCC is pulling out of the race to replace ex-Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI), effectively ceding the heavily Dem seat to the GOP as intra-party feuding splits the vote.

    “The DCCC will not be investing additional resources in the HI-01 (Abercrombie-open) special election. Local Democrats were unable to work out their differences,” DCCC communications director Jennifer Crider said in an emailed statement. “The DCCC will save the resources we would have invested in the Hawaii special election this month for the general election in November.”

    It had been at least a week since the Dems invested any money in this race, but they’d spent $314K on anti-Charles Djou advertising (as well as sending around a Barack Obama robocall advising a vote “for a Democrat”). With about one in five (60K out of 317K) of the election’s mail-in ballots already returned (the deadline is May 22 for the all-mail election), the die is already looking pretty well cast, meaning the outcome could be set even with a last-minute NY-23 bombshell where one candidate bails out.