AR-Sen, AR-03: Roll Call Says Boozman Will Challenge Lincoln in Arkansas

From Roll Call:

Barring a last-minute change of heart, Rep. John Boozman (R) appears set to jump into Arkansas’ Senate race in the coming days.

Sources on Capitol Hill said Wednesday that Boozman, the lone GOP Member of the state’s Congressional delegation, has made it clear that he intends to challenge Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D) in November. Boozman already has much of his Senate campaign team in place, and the announcement is expected to take place in Arkansas before the weekend is out.

When asked about a potential Senate bid Wednesday, a spokeswoman for Boozman would only say “nothing has been announced officially.”

CA-12, CA-AG: Speier May Run for Attorney General

She just got here less than two years ago, and now she may be setting her sights elsewhere:

In a move that could shake up an already hotly contested race, popular Peninsula Rep. Jackie Speier is eyeing a run for state attorney general.

Speier’s interest in returning to Sacramento, where she spent nearly 20 years in the Legislature, was sparked by a statewide poll that showed her outpacing the other Democratic candidates for AG by better than 4 to 1.

The poll of 450 likely Democratic and independent voters, taken by J. Moore Methods this month, showed Speier running first with 23 percent, followed by San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris at 5 percent, state Assemblyman Ted Lieu of Torrance (Los Angeles County) at 4 percent and ex-Los Angeles City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo at 3 percent. A smattering of other candidates pulled lesser numbers.

So: why the move, if she is indeed interested?

Sources say she hasn’t fully warmed up to Washington, where she has little seniority. Plus, Sacramento is a much shorter commute from the Peninsula.

The mere thought of Speier leaving Congress is certain to set off guessing over who might try to claim her seat – with everyone from state Sen. Leland Yee to San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom certain to be in the mix.

It’s a mad world.

RaceTracker Wiki: CA-12

SC-05: Spratt Leads Mulvaney by 7

Public Policy Polling (1/22-24, likely voters):

John Spratt (D-inc): 46

Mick Mulvaney (R): 39

Undecided: 15

John Spratt (D-inc): 46

Albert Spencer (R): 37

Undecided: 17

(MoE: ±4%)

I’d like these numbers if I were a Republican. Spratt, a longtime incumbent, is under the 50% danger zone mark, and his GOP opponents are still largely unknown, including highly-touted state Sen. Mick Mulvaney. (Interestingly, though, Mulvaney’s favorable rating is in net negative territory at 14-24, which is not something you normally see for undefined challengers.)

Still, there are bright spots for Spratt in the poll. From Jensen:

-47% of Spratt’s constituents think that he’s ideologically ‘about right’ compared to 34% who think he’s too liberal. That means a significant percentage of his constituents perceive Spratt differently than they do Congressional Democrats as a whole rather than lumping him in as ‘just another one of them.’ […]

What does it all add up to? Spratt leads potential Republican opponents Mick Mulvaney and Albert Spencer by margins of 46-39 and 46-37 respectively. Spratt is actually winning more of the Republican vote than either of the GOP candidates is of the Democratic vote, an unusual trend in the south where many voters registered as Democrats frequently vote for Republicans at the federal level. That’s an indication that Spratt is still in pretty strong standing with conservative Democrats and that his health care vote hasn’t ended his ability to win over some of the more moderate GOP voters.

At the same time he does trail both Republican hopefuls with independent voters by 4-9 points. Those numbers don’t seem so bad when you consider that Barack Obama’s approval rating is a miserable 27/64 spread with independents in the district though. Spratt continues to earn a lot of support from voters not enamored with the President.

VA-09: Boucher says he’s running again

The National Republican Congressional Committee has been trying to get 14-term incumbent Rick Boucher (D, VA-09) to retire, but he disappointed them today:

“I am planning to seek reelection. I have given no consideration to retiring,” Boucher said in a statement Wednesday. “While I never make political announcements this early in the year, due to the press inquires we are receiving, it is time to remove any doubt anyone has about my intentions.”

Holding this R+11 district would be a challenge if the seat opened up, but most election forecasters don’t expect Boucher to have any trouble.

If Republicans do recruit a prominent challenger to run in this district, Boucher’s vote for the Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy and Security Act last June will probably become a major issue in the campaign. Coal interests are big employers in Boucher’s district. He backed the climate change bill after securing amendments to make sure that coal usage would continue to grow between now and 2020 even if the bill became law.

Online Pollster YouGov Releases a Bazillion Senate Polls

YouGovPolimetrix just released a metric ton of senate polls. Be very, very warned, though: YouGov polls on the Internet. We’ve generally derided this methodology in the past (take a look at Zogby’s absurd “Interactive” polls), so consider this strictly for fun.

Arkansas

Lincoln (D-inc) 37%, Baker (R) 37%

Lincoln (D-inc) 39%, Hendren (R) 37%

Lincoln (D-inc) 38%, Coleman (R) 34%

Lincoln (D-inc) 37%, Cox (R) 36%

Colorado

Bennet (D-inc) 35%, Norton (R) 38%

Romanoff (D) 33%, Norton (R) 39%

Connecticut

Blumenthal (D) 47%, McMahon (R) 35%

Blumenthal (D) 47%, Simmons (R) 34%

Delaware

Biden (D) 37%, Castle (R) 49%

Florida

Meek (D) 34%, Crist (R) 36%

Meek (D) 33%, Rubio (R) 40%

Louisiana

Melancon (D) 32%, Vitter (R) 52%

Missouri

Carnahan (D) 43%, Blunt (R) 39%

Carnahan (D) 40%, Purgason (R) 34%

Nevada

41% Reid (D-inc), 42% Lowden (R)

43% Reid (D-inc), 41% Tarkanian (R)

North Dakota

29% Pomeroy (D), 56% Hoeven (R)

30% Heitkamp (D), 58% Hoeven (R)

Ohio

31% Fisher (D), 37% Portman (R)

31% Brunner (D), 39% Portman (R)

Pennsylvania

39% Specter (D-inc), 40% Toomey (R)

33% Sestak (D), 37% Toomey (R)

AZ-Gov: Goddard Makes It Official, and Ras Has Some Nums

The leading Democrat in the Arizona gubernatorial race made it official the other day – rather quietly:

Democratic Attorney General Terry Goddard on Friday formally became a candidate for Arizona governor, but he wasn’t talking publicly about it.

Goddard, who so far is unopposed for the Democratic nomination, filed official papers changing his exploratory committee to a campaign committee on Friday.

But there was no news conference to mark Goddard officially entering the race, and a campaign aide said he was not available to answer questions about dropping his exploratory status, the state’s budget crisis or other topics.

In a release sent out by Goddard’s committee to announce the filing, he said, “I will be making an announcement in the weeks to come.”

And Rasmussen has some numbers for us (general | primary) (1/20, likely voters, 11/18/09 in parens):

Terry Goddard (D): 43 (44)

Jan Brewer (R-inc): 41 (35)

Other: 7 (9)

Undecided: 9 (12)

Terry Goddard (D): 35 (40)

Dean Martin (R): 44 (38)

Other: 6 (11)

Undecided: 14 (1)

(MoE: ±3%)

Dean Martin (R): 31

Jan Brewer (R): 29

John Munger (R): 7

Vernon Parker (R): 5

Other: 8

Undecided: 20

(MoE: ±4.5%)

I’d like to see some other polls first before deciding whether Goddard truly has slipped, or if he’s just been Rasmussened. Meanwhile, the GOP primary fight looks interesting. The previous primary poll had Sherriff Joe Arpaio cleaning up, but he hasn’t given any indication that he actually wants to run, so he was dropped from this survey. That makes the trendlines hard to compare, though Brewer, who was at an abysmal 10% in the last poll, is looking a lot better with Arpaio gone.

Redistricting Massachusetts: (Relatively) Clean Elimination of Lynch

I honestly doubt that the Massachusetts legislature will opt to eliminate Rep. Stephen Lynch when they decide which district to axe following the 2010 census. However, as a relatively moderate Democrat in a D+11, I know he pisses a lot of people here off, like a mini-Artur Davis or Joe Lieberman. So while it may be unrealistic, I figured it might be interesting in the spirit of SSP to take a look at how we might go about tearing up Lynch’s district and minimizing his chances of election in other districts. Under the new plan, his district is split between several other districts, meaning he can’t count on all of his base to be there in any one district. Furthermore, should he decide to run again, Lynch would have to face a Democratic incumbent rather than sneaking through an open race with multiple opponents to split the liberal vote, which was how he won in 2001. So without further ado, here are the maps:

Western Mass/Berkshires:

http://img191.imageshack.us/i/…

Central Mass/Worcester Area:

http://img691.imageshack.us/i/…

Merrimack Valley/North Shore:

http://img18.imageshack.us/i/p…

Boston Area:

http://img685.imageshack.us/i/…

Southern Suburbs/Providence Suburbs:

http://img59.imageshack.us/i/p…

Southeast Mass, Including Cape and Islands:

http://img704.imageshack.us/i/…

Description over the flip.

District 1 (Darker Blue)

Incumbent: John Olver (D-AMHERST)

Demographics: 86% White, 2% Black, 0% Native American, 2% Asian, 8% Hispanic, 1% Other

Population Deviation: +4

Towns/Cities:

Berkshire County: Adams, Alford, Becket, Cheshire, Clarksburg, Dalton, Egremont, Florida, Great Barrington, Hancock, Hinsdale, Lanesborough, Lee, Lenox, Monterey, Mount Washington, New Ashford, New Marlborough, North Adams, Otis, Peru, Pittsfield, Richmond, Sandisfield, Savoy, Sheffield, Stockbridge, Tyringham, Washington, West Stockbridge, Williamstown, Windsor

Franklin County: Ashfield, Bernardston, Buckland, Charlemont, Colrain, Conway, Deerfield, Erving, Greenfield, Hawley, Heath, Leverett, Leyden, Monroe, Montague, New Salem, Northfield, Orange, Rowe, Shelburne, Shutesbury, Sunderland, Warwick, Wendell, Whately

Hampden County: Blandford, Chester, Granville, Holyoke, Montgomery, Russell, Southwick, Tolland, Westfield, West Springfield

Hampshire County: Amherst, Belchertown, Chesterfield, Cummington, Easthampton, Goshen, Granby, Hadley, Hatfield, Huntington, Middlefield, Northampton, Pelham, Plainfield, Southampton, South Hadley, Ware, Westhampton, Williamsburg, Worthington

Middlesex County: Ashby, Shirley, Townsend; pt. of Ayer

Worcester County: Ashburnham, Athol, Barre, Bolton, Fitchburg, Gardner, Hardwick, Harvard, Hubbardston, Lancaster, Leominster, Lunenburg, New Braintree, Oakham, Paxton, Petersham, Phillipston, Princeton, Royalston, Rutland, Sterling, Templeton, Westminster, West Brookfield, Winchendon

Comments: This district remains by far the largest district in Massachusetts, and due to slow population growth it grows even more. Regardless, it is still dominated by liberal Berkshire towns and liberal arts colleges, especially with the addition of two ultra-liberal women’s colleges, Smith (in Northampton) and Mount Holyoke (in South Hadley). Though Olver is getting up there in age, his successor will likely be just as liberal.

District 2 (Lighter Green)

Incumbent: Richard Neal (D-SPRINGFIELD)

Demographics: 82% White, 5% Black, 0% Native American, 2% Asian, 10% Hispanic, 1% Other

Population Deviation: 0

Towns/Cities:

Bristol County: North Attleborough; pt. of Attleboro

Hampden County: Agawam, Brimfield, Chicopee, East Longmeadow, Hampden, Holland, Longmeadow, Ludlow, Monson, Palmer, Springfield, Wales, Wilbraham

Norfolk County: Bellingham, Franklin, Medway, Plainville, Wrentham

Worcester County: Auburn, Blackstone, Brookfield, Charlton, Douglas, Dudley, East Brookfield, Grafton, Hopedale, Leicester, Mendon, Milford, Millbury, Millville, Northbridge, North Brookfield, Oxford, Southbridge, Spencer, Sturbridge, Sutton, Upton, Uxbridge, Warren, Webster

Comments: I chopped off the stupid tail going up into Northampton. (Why the hell was that even there in the first place?) As a result, the district gets pushed slightly to the east and ends up in South Attleboro. No huge change, Richard Neal will still have an easy time here.

District 3 (Darker Purple)

Incumbent: James McGovern (D-WORCESTER)

Demographics: 82% White, 4% Black, 0% Native American, 5% Asian, 8% Hispanic, 1% Other

Population Deviation: -110

Towns/Cities:

Bristol County: Dighton, Easton, Mansfield, Norton, Rehoboth, Seekonk, Somerset, Swansea; pt. of Attleboro, Taunton

Middlesex County: Ashland, Framingham, Holliston, Hopkinton, Marlborough, Natick, Sherborn

Norfolk County: Foxborough, Medfield, Millis, Norfolk, Walpole

Worcester County: Berlin, Boylston, Clinton, Holden, Northborough, Shrewsbury, Southborough, Westborough, West Boylston, Worcester

Comments: No remarkable changes. McGovern’s district grabs three towns (Easton, Medfield, Walpole) from Lynch’s old district; with a combined population of around 60,000, though, they won’t form enough of a base to allow Lynch to run here. Also, grabs Framingham and Natick because the current MA-07, like MA-02, has a stupid tail.

District 4 (Red)

Incumbent: Barney Frank (D-NEWTON)

Demographics: 85% White, 4% Black, 0% Native American, 5% Asian, 5% Hispanic, 1% Other

Population Deviation: -268

Towns/Cities:

Bristol County: Acushnet, Berkley, Dartmouth, Fairhaven, Fall River, Freetown, New Bedford, Raynham, Westport; pt. of Taunton

Middlesex County: Newton

Norfolk County: Avon, Brookline, Canton, Dedham, Dover, Needham, Norwood, Sharon, Stoughton, Wellesley, Westwood

Plymouth County: Bridgewater, Middleborough, Lakeville, West Bridgewater; pt. of Brockton

Comments: Frank’s district is mostly intact, although he picks up about 170,000 of Lynch’s consistuents. Regardless, as Financial Services chairman, Frank should have no problem raising money and winning establishment support, and with the exception of some of Fall River and the aforementioned Lynch constituents, Frank has already represented this district before. He should be just fine.

District 5 (Yellow)

Incumbent: Nicola Tsongas (D-LOWELL)

Demographics: 77% White, 2% Black, 0% Native American, 8% Asian, 13% Hispanic, 1% Other

Population Deviation: +149

Towns/Cities:

Essex County: Andover, Lawrence, Methuen, North Andover; pt. of Haverhill

Middlesex County: Acton, Bedford, Billerica, Boxborough, Burlington, Carlisle, Chelmsford, Concord, Dracut, Dunstable, Groton, Hudson, Lexington, Lincoln, Littleton, Lowell, Maynard, Pepperell, Stow, Sudbury, Tewksbury, Tyngsborough, Wayland, Weston, Wilmington; pt. of Ayer

Comments: No notable difference.

District 6 (Darker Green)

Incumbent: John Tierney (D-SALEM)

Demographics: 87% White, 2% Black, 0% Native American, 3% Asian, 6% Hispanic, 1% Other

Population Deviation: +203

Towns/Cities:

Essex County: Amesbury, Beverly, Boxford, Danvers, Essex, Georgetown, Gloucester, Hamilton, Ipswich, Lynn, Lynnfield, Manchester-by-the-Sea, Marblehead, Merrimac, Middleton, Nahant, Newbury, Newburyport, Peabody, Rockport, Rowley, Salisbury, Saugus, Swampscott, Topsfield, Wenham, West Newbury; pt. of Haverhill

Middlesex County: Melrose, North Reading, Reading, Stoneham, Wakefield, Winchester, Woburn

Suffolk County: pt. of Revere

Comments: No notable difference.

District 7 (Gray)

Incumbents: Edward Markey (D-MALDEN), Stephen Lynch (D-BOSTON)

Demographics: 75% White, 10% Black, 0% Native American, 6% Asian, 7% Hispanic, 2% Other

Population Deviation: +68

Towns/Cities:

Middlesex County: Arlington, Belmont, Everett, Malden, Medford, Waltham, Watertown

Norfolk County: Braintree, Canton, Holbrook, Milton, Randolph; pt. of Weymouth

Plymouth County: pt. of Brockton

Suffolk County: Winthrop; pt. of Boston, Revere

Comments: The bulk of Stephen Lynch’s old district is contained in this one; in fact, the majority of this district is represented by Lynch, though. Not to fear. For one thing, as the dean of the Massachusetts delegation, Markey would be able to outraise and out-establishment Lynch in a potential primary fight. Furthermore, the parts of the district that Markey currently represents are more Democratic than the parts that Lynch currently represents, meaning Markey’s chunk of the district will cast a disproportionate share of the primary vote. Also, as noted above, the liberal vote will be united behind Markey; Lynch will be unable to win with 40% like he did in 2001. Finally, Lynch’s shenanigans on health care have alienated many of his former supporters, meaning that they won’t lift a finger for him, possibly causing him to defer a challenge to Markey in the same way he dropped out of the Senate primary. For these reasons, I think Markey could hold off a primary challenge by Lynch in this district.

District 8 (Lighter Purple)

Incumbent: Michael Capuano (D-SOMERVILLE)

Demographics: 49% White, 21% Black, 0% Native American, 10% Asian, 18% Hispanic, 2% Other

Population Deviation: +142

Towns/Cities:

Middlesex County: Cambridge, Somerville

Suffolk County: Chelsea; pt. of Boston

Comments: Little change, remains minority-majority while taking on a handful of Lynch’s constituents.

District 9 (Lighter Blue)

Incumbent: William Delahunt (D-QUINCY)

Demographics: 91% White, 2% Black, 0% Native American, 4% Asian, 2% Hispanic, 1% Other

Population Deviation: -185

Towns/Cities:

Barnstable County: Barnstable, Bourne, Brewster, Chatham, Dennis, Eastham, Falmouth, Harwich, Mashpee, Orleans, Provincetown, Sandwich, Truro, Wellfleet, Yarmouth

Dukes County: Aquinnah, Chilmark, Edgartown, Gosnold, Oak Bluffs, Tisbury, West Tisbury

Nantucket County: Nantucket

Norfolk County: Cohasset, Quincy; pt. of Weymouth

Plymouth County: Abington, Carver, Duxbury, East Bridgewater, Halifax, Hanover, Hanson, Hingham, Hull, Kingston, Marion, Marshfield, Mattapoisett, Norwell, Pembroke, Plymouth, Plympton, Rockland, Scituate, Wareham, Whitman

Comments: This district takes on some more of Lynch’s old constituents to the tune of 35,000 people or so. Otherwise, no change.

Special Elections Tonight: MN & OR

We have a couple of special elections tonight, which SSP community members have already created diaries for. In MN, MinnesotaMike is covering a state Senate special election, while Oregon has a couple of tax-related measures on the ballot, which tietack is on top of. Check those links out for full coverage.

UPDATE: We’ve lost in Minnesota, where Mike says of the results: “Disapointing, but a 6.5 point loss is as close as a Dem has come to winning this seat in decades.”

On the plus side, the ballot measures in Oregon look like they are winning by pretty decent margins, with 79% of the vote tallied:

Measure 66

Yes: 55.3%

No: 44.7%

Measure 67

Yes: 54.6%

No: 45.4%

What do these measures do?

Measures 66 & 67 raise the $10 corporate minimum for the first time since 1931, and increase the marginal tax rate on the richest Oregonians (those who make more than $250,000 a year).

UPDATE: The Oregonian has called both measures – they both pass. More analysis here.

IL-Sen: Giannoulias Ahead, Kirk with Clear Lead

Market Shares Corp. for the Chicago Tribune/WGN-TV (1/16-20, likely voters, 12/2-8 in parens):

Alexi Giannoulias (D): 34 (31)

Cheryle Jackson (D): 19 (17)

David Hoffman (D): 16 (9)

Other: 5 (8)

Undecided: 26 (35)

Mark Kirk (R): 47 (41)

Patrick Hughes (R): 8 (3)

Other: 10 (10)

Undecided: 35 (46)

(MoE: ±4%)

Public Policy Polling (PDF) (1/22-25, likely voters, no trendlines):

Alexi Giannoulias (D): 32

Cheryle Jackson (D): 18

David Hoffman (D): 20

Other: 3

Undecided: 27

(MoE: ±4.9%)

Mark Kirk (R): 42

Patrick Hughes (R): 9

Other: 11

Undecided: 39

(MoE: ±4.1%)

Remarkably similar numbers from both pollsters in both primaries. It looks like teabagger extraordinaire Patrick Hughes has failed to take much of a bite out of Kirk’s hide. The real question is whether Kirk’s successful rightward march to head off the likes of Hughes will damage him in the fall – or if he can pull of a charade of Scott Brownian proportions.

On the Dem side, Giannoulias seems to be in the pole position, but the Tribune, at least, seems to think Hoffman is showing some momentum. Time is pretty much out for anyone to make a move, though.

PPP also took a look at the gubernatorial primaries:

Pat Quinn (D-inc): 40

Dan Hynes (D): 41

Undecided: 19

(MoE: ±4.9%)

Kirk Dillard (R): 19

Andy McKenna (R): 17

Bill Brady (R): 16

Jim Ryan (R): 13

Adam Andrzejewski (R): 11

Other: 8

Undecided: 17

(MoE: ±4.1%)

These numbers are also in line with the Tribune’s, though Hynes is doing just a hair better here. As for the Republican slate, several of the places are switched from where the Trib had them, but all of the players are still jostling inside a very tight band. Both races are too close to call – but we’ll know the answers on Tuesday.

And, as always, SSP will be liveblogging all of the Illinois primaries.

UPDATE: Rasmussen also just put out some numbers:

Andy McKenna (R): 20

Jim Ryan (R): 16

Kirk Dillard (R): 13

Bill Brady (R): 11

Adam Andrzejewski (R): 11

Other: 12

Undecided: 17

(MoE: ±4.5%)

Election Night, MN State Senate Special

A special election is being held today in MN State Senate district 26 to replace Republican State Senator Dick Day who resigned to become a Lobbiest for the gambling Industry (don’t get me started).

Senate District 26 leans Republican, McCain carried it 50-47, Norm Coleman 43-36-21. Still there is hope, the two State House Reps in the district are Democrats (each Senate district in Minnesota is divided into two house districts).

The Candidates are Democrat Jason Engbrecht, a college physics professor and Faribault School Board member. Republican teabagger and bussinessman Mike Parry. Independence Party member and Waseca mayor Roy Srp (yes that is his last name).

If you want more background on the candidates I suggest you check out a fine local blog, bluestempairie.

http://www.bluestemprairie.com/

You can get the results from the SOS ofice here.

http://electionresults.sos.sta…

To win Engbrecht will have to run up the margin in Rice County, especially the City of Faribault (his hometown). I would guess he will needs at least a 10 point margin in Faribault and 5 points in Rice County as a whole. Engbrecht will have to keep it within 3-5 points in the rest of the District.

The real wildcard is the Independence Party candidate Roy Srp. He is a 3 term mayor of Waseca (3rd largest town in the District) and has more political experiance than either of the major party candidates. Waseca also happens to be the hometown of the Republican Parry. I don’t think Srp can win without any Party machinery behind him but you never know.

Prediction

Engbrecht (D) 37

Parry (R) 32

Srp (I) 31

Polls close 8 central