NY-26: WFP Backs Kryzan; Powers Should, Too

I’m as surprised as anyone about Alice Kryzan‘s upset win in NY-26, but while this is an uphill fight, we definitely still have a chance here. The only way we can do this, though, is if Democrats at all levels come together to support our nominee. The DCCC immediately jumped on board, and the Working Families Party has already pledged to back Kryzan despite the ballot situation, saying that they “play to win.” But Jon Powers for some reason has not:

As we are still on the ballot as the nominee for the Working Families Party, my family and team are currently deciding how best to proceed.

If Crazy Jack Davis had won the primary, Powers might have had a shadow of chance running on the WFP line. But with Kryzan on the ticket, Powers can only play spoiler. For a likeable, young guy with a bright future in politics, anything less than a full-throated endorsement would be an error.

According to the New York Times, there are only three ways a candidate can remove himself from the ballot: die, move out of state, or get nominated for a judgeship. Theoretically, that last avenue is still possible, but Powers isn’t an attorney, and I wouldn’t ask him to submit to something so ridiculous. (Though the corrupt schmucks who run New York’s judicial “elections” would probably go along with such a scheme – after all, Supreme Jerkward Antonin Scalia ruled just this year that the “smoke-filled rooms” which rule this process “have long been an accepted manner of selecting party candidates.”)

Anyhow, this obstacle is why it’s crucial for Powers to come out strongly for Kryzan right away – votes on the WFP line can only hurt us now. Even the WFP itself acknowledges that. I supported Jon Powers in the primary, and I know he’s already done a lot for the Democratic Party. This is the last thing I’d ask him to do this cycle. We can win this, but we’ve all got to do it together.

UPDATE: This Roll Call piece suggests that EMILY’s List may soon get involved.

CA-11, PA-11: Realtors Throw Down $585K For McNerney and Kanjorski

If you’ve already checked out SSP’s Independent Expenditure Tracker today (and I trust that you’ve been checking it daily), you’ve noticed that there have been a flurry of IEs in a number of House races in recent days. The biggest and baddest are these two investments made by the National Association of Realtors PAC:

  • CA-11: $203,000 on media buys for Jerry McNerney
  • PA-11: $382,500 for media buys for Paul Kanjorski (cycle-to-date: $616K)

I just checked into NARPAC’s 2006 activities to compare with what they’ve been up to so far this cycle. During that cycle, they involved themselves in three House races and three Senate races: IL-08 ($465K for Dem Rep. Melissa Bean), KY-03 ($1 million for GOP Rep. Ann Northup), NM-01 ($762K for GOP Rep. Heather Wilson), MO-Sen ($949K for GOP Sen. Jim Talent), HI-Sen ($602K for Dem primary challenger Ed Case), and NE-Sen ($173K for Dem Sen. Ben Nelson). An “interesting mix”, you might say.

So far, the Realtors haven’t dropped a penny for any Republicans, so this could be what a rock-solid majority buys you. We’ll be keeping an eye out on their next moves.

In other IE news, the NRCC has recently commissioned polls in six vulnerable districts: AL-02, ID-01, NJ-03, NV-03, OH-02, PA-03. Will the results ever see the light of day? We’ll be waiting.  

Wrapping Yourself in the Brand

Chris Bowers recently posted a diary at Open Left that contained a fascinating piece of information.  Generic House Democrats were running 9 percentage points ahead of Barack Obama (who was tied with McCain).  It is not like this has not happened before.  Jimmy Carter ran barely 2 percentage points ahead of Gerald Ford in 1976 but nationally, Democrats share of the US House vote was 13% ahead of the Republican share.  Carter repeated the feat 4 years later running distinctly behind Ronald Reagan and a sturdy 12% behind the national Democratic vote for the House.

The obvious point, of course, is that if generic House Democrats are clearly popular, House Democratic challengers would be lining up to run as Democrats rather than as non-partisan or unaligned types.  Democrats should be wrapping themselves ever tighter in their popular brand as we get nearer to the general election.  A review of the web sites for House challengers showed that some candidates are following that strategy but many are still running scared as if it was still 2002.

The trend to stress Democratic ties seemed particularly clear in Washington (all three challengers were clearly identified as Democrats), Florida, California and Texas.  It was surprisingly weak in the Northeast.  Specific data follows below thew fold.

One Northeastern candidate who is clearly pushing his party ties is Jim Himes in CT-4.  Himes is easily labelled a “Democrat for Congress” and includes a picture with Barack Obama and a video with Nancy Pelosi.  Karen Hartley-Nagle (DE-At Large), running as a long shot from the most democratic district held by a Republic follows the strategy to the max.  Joe Courtney from CT is also upfront.

Following the opposite mode is Mike McMahon (NY-13) whose only use of Democratic or Democrat is in a list of endorsements: the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.  Otoh, McMahon basks in camapign appearance by Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton.  wtf.  

Many northeastern Dems include the affiliation on the fron page but not on the logo:  John Hall (NY-19), Dan Maffei (NY-25), Alice Kryzan (NY-26), John Adler (NJ-3), Dennis Shulman (NJ-5), Jennifer Dougherty (MD-6), and Frank Kratovil (MD-1) fit this picture.  Others bury the affiliation in a bio page (Tom Allen for the Senate, Chellie Pingree (ME-1), Mike Arcuri (NY-24), Linda Stender (NJ-7), Josh Zeitz (NJ-4), and Eric Massa (NY-29). Pingree says she’s in the same mold as Donna Edwards. Kirsten Gillibrand identifies herself as a Blue Dog leader but not as a Democrat.

Those Democrats in other parts of the country who push the affiliation include Mary Jo Kilroy (OH-15), Dan Seals (IL-10), Anne Barth (WV-2), Gerry Connally (VA-11), Mary Etta Riley (IN-5), Andrew Concannon (MI-4), Darcy Burner (WA-8), Mark Mays (WA-5), George Fearing (WA-4), Noah Lemas (OR-2), Robert Neeld (FL-14), Tim Cunha (FL-6), Alan Grayson (FL-8), Bob Hackworth (FL-10),Christina Avalos (CA-40), Ed Chau (CA-42), John Thrasher (AZ-2), Jay Stoddard (NE-3), Georgiana Oliver (OK-1), Tracey Smith (TX-12), Roger Waun (TX-13), Tom Love (TX-24), and Brian Ruiz (TX-31).

NY-26: DCCC Adds Kryzan to Red to Blue

From the DCCC Press:

Following her victory in the Democratic Primary in New York’s 26th Congressional District, Alice Kryzan has immediately been added to the DCCC’s Red to Blue program for open seats. Alice Kryzan earned a spot in the competitive program by establishing significant local support and skillfully showing New York’s voters that she stands for change and will represent new priorities.

“Congratulations to Alice Kryzan on her primary victory,” said DCCC Chairman Chris Van Hollen. “Alice Kryzan is a strong leader who will fight to make college and health care more affordable, and lower gas prices. Alice Kryzan will be a formidable candidate in the general election. With 55 days left to make her case to the voters of the 26th district, the Red to Blue program will give Alice the financial and structural edge to be even more competitive.”

The DCCC has also released a viability memo on this race, indicating that they still consider this one very much on the big board of opportunities. I wonder if EMILY’s List will decide to make a bit of penance for its embarrassing support of Nikki Tinker against Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen earlier this summer by throwing their fundraising support to Kryzan. Might be a good idea for them.

Many have asked if Jon Powers can remove himself from the Working Families line on the November ballot. The short answer? He can’t. But if he endorses and campaigns for Kryzan, his votes should be minimal.

SSP currently rates this race as Lean Republican.

IA-05: Hidden Gem–Hubler takes on Steve King!

Cross posted at dailykos: Ia-o5: Hubler takes on Steve King!

Here’s a campaign I am getting excited about–Rob Hubler in IA-05 . I’d like to encourage you all to take a look at this (surprisingly) competitive race. We’ve got a real chance to send a progressive, democratic, smart, thoughtful, mature candidate to congress from what is traditionally considered a deep red district. Bonus points: we get to send one of the worst congressmen in the world packing!

We get behind races all over the country: Darcy Burner, Andrew Rice, John Hall, Jon Powers, Scott Kleeb, Eric Massa, Gary Trauner, Charlie Brown-I think this is one race we haven’t looked at closely yet that is worthy of our attention. I’d like to see if we can get some energy  for IA-05 and Rob Hubler here in the blogosphere.

So what’s a nice blue state girl like me doing touting a +8 red district?  Follow me below the fold to find out why this red district is well-positioned to exchange a great progressive candidate for one of the worst wingnuts in Congress.

Contribute through ActBlue

 

So first, why is “Democracylover in NYC” touting a race in Iowa?

I was honored and thrilled to be accepted into Russ Feingold’s Patriot Corps this fall and was looking forward to going to Iowa to work on Rob Hubler’s campaign . Sadly, (and I do mean sadly) I was unable to make it for logistical and financial reasons. But I still got a good look at Hubler and when I saw what a great race this is, I was determined to help, even if I’m stuck in blue New York.

I am convinced that we have a real shot at winning in this traditionally deep red district. Let me describe to you why and how. Then I encourage each of you, if you agree, to help out in whatever way you can (contributions, message amplification etc). Below my very loose analysis (I am not a campaign wonk) of why I think this is a great race.

Throw the bum out…

First for those who are motivated to “throw the bums out” there ain’t no bigger bum in congress than Steve King. I won’t spend too much time on the negative (though for those that like that sort of thing you may want to look at www.kingwatch.org for a comprehensive list at King’s positions, gaffes and general ickiness. I’ll only say a few things

1) He’s the guy that infamously said Islamic fundamentalists would be dancing in the streets when Barack Hussein Obama is elected president…

2) Here’s a recent interview with King in which our hero takes his bigotry  further as he slams Obama . He also comes out pro-“drill, baby, drill” and pro strict constructionist judges. Not exactly the positions we (and most Iowans, as I understand it) would like to see.

3) King has a net negative job approval rating.  And  some well respected and well-connected Iowa republicans are quietly working to get rid of someone even they perceive as an embarrassment to their party.

4) He was voted worst person in the world…by CNBC!!!!

Replace the bum with a true progressive:

First it’s important to remember this is the first time  a serious candidate is running against King. Rob’s positions are good, strong, progressive and much better aligned to his constituents positions than King’s.

Rob Hubler is a serious candidate, who supportsuniversal healthcare, a hybrid economy, andopposed retroactive immunity for telecoms .

And Rob’s personal story is unique and full of heart. He’s a decorated veteran who served his country seven years on the first nuclear-powered submarine, and as a nuclear plant operator. He went on to an impressive career in progressive politics working to help Dick Clark and Tom Harkin among others. Hubler left politics in 1989 to follow his calling as a presbyterian minister (like his father and uncles before him), pastoring churches throughout the midwest and California. He retired from the ministry in 2000 to take care of his dying father and sick aunt (while teaching disabled children) before returning to politics at the request of friends and former colleagues who felt he could make a difference. This is a candidate who puts the heart in heartland.

The situation on the ground:

Rob  has spent 18 months running an aggressive campaign and positioning his organization for a strong finish. The campaign has 6 field offices open with a full complement of paid and volunteer veteran staff. The Iowa coordinated campaign is running canvasses and has regional full time staff working with Hubler’s group.  Meanwhile Hubler is coordinating with the huge Iowa Obama organization which has placed 20 organizers in the 5th district alone (!).  All the Obama data is shared and they are able to base targeted mail on independents they already know are supporting a democratic ticket.

There is growing support for Rob’s campaign. He’s brought Joe Trippi as Media Advisor on board, and beloved former congressman, Dean supporter and local icon Berkley Bedell is now General Chair to the campaign. Bedell was in congress for 12 years, was known for his populist stances and for  winning deep republican counties with 60% of the vote. Rob’s communications director, Keith Dinsmore, ran 1/3 of the newspapers in the state, has worked on many campaigns, and knows how to talk with Iowans. It’s a great, thoughtful campaign.

Rob has been selected for funding and staff support from the Patriot Corps as noted above, and he has active support from Governer Chet Culver, former Governer Vilsack, and Senator Harkin.

Meanwhile in King’s Court:

Let’s  take a look at King’s organization…Well, he has his son, who is a car salesman, paid as his manager. He has no campaign offices and no staff except a spokeswoman. That’s it. Seriously. He has no plan on the ground. This is a major weakness, folks. We can hit King before he knows what happened.

What about the famous republican “War Chest”? Surely King has money to burn? King had as of mid August, less than a quarter of a million dollars. This is the least amount of money of any incumbent in Iowa, Democrat or Republican.

Can we win? You bet we can!

I know, I know it’s all very nice unless we have a viable race. This is a red district …yep, that’s true. At the bottom, I know people don’t want to waste time and money where they don’t think it can accomplish much. Well let me tell you this could be one of the most satisfying victories ever on election day. Let’s  take a look at some recent polling numbers.

The first and only poll conducted in this race, shows that these candidates are neck-and-neck. In a nutshell, likely voters are tipping in Hubler’s favor with dissent in republican ranks and independents breaking democratic. All that’s missing? Name recognition and some national support. A couple of ads in the district could put Hubler over the top.

The findings are so compelling I’ll let them speak for themselves**:

Our recent poll results indicate that Iowa’s 5th Congressional District has officially reached the tipping point, as the generic ballot between any “Democrat” and a “Republican” for Congress starts out virtually even, 36% to 38%.   Key results are as follows:

– The first finding of note, as mentioned above, is that the generic ballot choice, one without any information about the candidates, is tied at 36% Democrat and 38% Republican. In addition, the key subgroup of Independents favor the “Democrat”  by a 35% to 29% margin.  

– After hearing one positive statement about Hubler and nothing critical of King, voters are quickly able to reevaluate the congressional race, preferring Hubler over King by 47% to 30%.  This again underscores how potentially fluid this electorate is.  Hubler is a different type of nominee for this district, and his views match up more closely with voters then their current congressman’s.

King’s job rating is a poor showing of only 36% excellent/good to 43% only fair/poor; aside from the fact that it is a net negative showing, one should note that 36% approval is a long way from 50%; voters are clearly connecting the dots between their discontent and King’s work in Washington.

**Four hundred registered, likely 2008 voters were interviewed.  The poll was designed to assess the strengths and weaknesses of Rob Hubler and his opponent Steve King as candidates for Congress.

Likely voters in the 5th district of Iowa are ready to fire Steve King.  Our challenge is to get the resources in place to communicate Rob’s message so that they know him well enough to hire him as their new Congressman.

So what can you do to make a difference?

As always, contribute, contribute, contribute. And get the word out. As we know we’re all committed to more and better democrats from everywhere.

Also just because I couldn’t get out there, that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t yourselves. If you are anywhere near Western Iowa in the next few weeks, please get out and help. I’ve been in touch with these guys and they are a great, great team. Also there are Obama offices all over the state. We can turn Iowa blue, boys and girls, and we should do it!

So take a closer look. See if this is someone you can get behind. Write to your friends who think nationally about Hubler if you like what you see. Bug the DFA. Tell the good Doctor to take a close look. And put him on your support list if you can.

This is Democracylover in NYC with her heart in the heartland…

Contribute to Rob Hubler

NJ-07: Stender Edges Lance by 3 in New Poll

Anzalone-Lizst for Linda Stender (8/20-25):

Linda Stender (D): 36

Leonard Lance (R): 33

Michael Hsing (I): 9

Tom Abrams (I): 2

(MoE: ±4.4%)

Hsing is a Republican councilman from Bridgewater who is running as an independent, and Abrams, who ran on the “Withdraw Our Troops Now” line in 2006 (might as well have been the “Stay In Iraq Forever” line, but I digress), is again running as an anti-war independent. Without those two pretenders on the ballot, Stender leads Lance by 43-42.

Up the ballot, this district is incredibly tight, with a slight GOP lean: McCain leads Obama by 45-43. It’s worth mentioning that Bush carried New Jersey’s 7th twice — by a single point in 2000, and six points four years later. Looks like it could be another close one. I’ve been told that the DCCC has just gone up on the air in this district with a negative spot against Lance.

I’m still trying to obtain some key info about this poll — including its margin of error and the date lines, and will update this post accordingly once I get the details. (Update: Got it.)

SSP currently rates this race as a Tossup.

NM-Sen: Udall Sits on 7-Point Lead

Rasmussen (9/8, likely voters, 8/20 in parens):

Tom Udall (D): 51 (52)

Steve Pearce (R): 44 (44)

(MoE: ±4%)

Republicans are coming home for Steve Pearce — that much is clear from the crosstabs. Pearce now enjoys 86% support from Republicans, up significantly from 77% in July. This isn’t that surprising — with groups like the Club For Growth beaning Udall, the GOP was bound to rally the base.

We still feel very confident about this race, and SSP rates it as Likely Democratic. With no help from the NRSC, Pearce has extremely slim odds barring a major stumble by Tom Udall.

Bonus finding: John McCain is nosing Obama by 49-47 in the same poll.

AK-Sen: Stevens Bounce in Effect in New Poll

Rasmussen (9/9, likely voters, 7/30 in parens):

Mark Begich (D): 48 (50)

Ted Stevens (R-inc): 46 (37)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

Stevens isn’t dead yet — no doubt about it. This is the third poll confirming the incredible closeness of this race (releases by Moore Information and Ivan Moore being the other two).

It’s clear that even with the taint of corruption, Stevens is still gonna be one tough sumbitch to beat. Let’s hope for a conviction.

Bonus finding: With Palin on the ticket, McCain is now utterly wrecking shop in Alaska: 64-33. Not very surprising.

GA-08: Now Goddard Steps In It

Lynn Westmoreland got nailed for referring to Barack Obama as “uppity” last week. Well, it turns out he’s not the only one, suggesting more of a pattern and practice by white Georgian politicians than an innocent misuse of what one might mistakenly think is a racially-neutral word.

On Thursday (the same day as Westmoreland’s gaffe) Retired Air Force major general Rick Goddard, who’s running against Jim Marshall in the neighboring Eighth District, referred to MSNBC reporter Ron Allen, who is African-American, as “uppity” while being interviewed on a Macon radio news show.

Last night, Newt Gingrich disarmed a very uppity newscaster who tried to question him on the capabilities and leadership of Governor Palin.

Now unlike Westmoreland, who’s not in any immediate electoral peril, Goddard is a challenger and was considered a strong recruit against the perenially-endangered Marshall. This may have made Goddard’s slog a little more uphill.

NC-Sen: Hagan Edges Dole in New Poll

This is more like it.

Public Policy Polling (9/9, likely voters, 8/20-23 in parens):

Kay Hagan (D): 43 (42)

Elizabeth Dole (R-inc): 42 (39)

Chris Cole (L): 6 (5)

Undecided: 9 (13)

(MoE: ±3.9%)

Ahh, that feels a lot better than that funked up SUSA poll from last night showing Dole up 8 (and Johnny Mac up 20). In this poll, Democrats have a more reasonable 49%-36% advantage in the crosstabs, compared to the one-point GOP advantage in SUSA’s latest and greatest.

Bonus finding: McCain leads Obama by 48-44 in the same poll.

UPDATE by Crisitunity: Bonus bonus finding: Dem Bev Perdue is up over Republican Pat McCrory by only 41-40 in the governor’s race, down from 43-38 in the last PPP poll.

SPECIAL UPDATE by J. Hell: Bev Perdue has released an internal poll by Garin-Hart-Yang (9/5-7): Perdue +6, McCain +3, Dole +2.