Virginia House of Delegates Targets: Mid-September Edition

Likely D Lean D Tossup Lean R Likely R
3rd (Bowling)

23rd (Valentine)

32nd (Poisson)

44th (open)

87th (Miller)
51st (Nichols)

52nd (open)

64th (Barlow)

67th (Caputo)

93rd (Hamilton)
6th (Crockett-Stark)

17th (open)

21st (Mathieson)

34th (Vanderhye)

42nd (Albo)

83rd (Bouchard)

86th (Rust)
7th (Nutter)

13rd (B. Marshall)

14th (D. Marshall)
58th (Bell)

73rd (O’Bannon)

82nd (Purkey)

94th (Oder)

Ratings changes since last time:

6th – moved to Tossup from Lean Republican (Pratt is running a spirited campaign; Crockett-Stark seems to be sleepwalking)

7th – moved to Lean Republican from Tossup (Deeds’ sagging poll numbers are not going to help Frank)

21st – moved to Tossup from Lean Democratic (Tough race in McDonnell’s home turf + embezzlement problem for Mathieson)

23rd – moved to Likely Democratic from Lean Democratic (huge cash advantage for Valentine)

26th – dropped from the list (Just doesn’t look like it’s there)

35th – dropped from the list (Keam is kicking Hyland’s butt money-wise)

50th – dropped from the list (Rishell’s campaign is terrible)

67th – moved to Lean Democratic from Likely Democratic (Caputo underperforms)

93rd – moved to Lean Democratic (pickup) from Tossup (Hamilton scandal)

94th – moved to Likely Republican from Lean Republican (3-1 cash advantage for Oder)

Democratic Targets

6th: Anne Crockett-Stark vs. Carole Pratt (Bland, Giles, Pulaski, Tazewell, Wythe)

Anne Crockett-Stark picked up this seat in 2005, then failed to increase her margin much in 2007, winning 54-46 then 56-44. Challenger Carole Pratt was a last-minute fill-in, but her campaign is incredibly energetic, having more than doubled Crockett-Stark’s cash on hand and wrested the Virginia Education Association endorsement from her. The district is fairly Republican but is sympathetic to the right Democrat — Deeds only lost the district 55-45 in 2005, whereas Obama lost it 61-37.

7th: Dave Nutter vs. Peggy Frank (Montgomery, Pulaski, Radford)

Nutter won 53-47 over Peggy Frank in 2007, and she’s come back for a rematch. There hasn’t been much news out of this race, and it will probably come down to the margin at the top of the ticket; if Deeds wins or makes it close (he got 48% here in 2005), Frank will have a much higher chance of winning than if Deeds loses by a significant margin.

13th: Bob Marshall vs. John Bell (Loudoun, Prince William)

Bob Marshall is a far-right culture warrior in a rapidly-expanding exurban district (it has twice as many registered voters as most other House districts and narrowly voted for Obama last year after supporting Republicans in the past). He trounced Bruce Roemmelt in 2005 and 2007, but Air Force vet John Bell looks to be a stronger challenger, having outraised Marshall 2-1, although his high burn rate gives Marshall a slight cash advantage, and Marshall is very good at holding this seat without spending a lot of money.

14th: Danny Marshall vs. Seward Anderson (Danville, Henry, Pittsylvania)

Danny Marshall narrowly held off Adam Tomer in 2007 52-48, and faces another strong challenger this time, former Danville Mayor Seward Anderson. The problem for Anderson is winning enough of the vote in Pittsylvania; Marshall narrowly lost Danville last time but won an overwhelming 63% in Pittsylvania to hold on. The district is swingy, voting for Deeds, Kaine, and Obama while also voting for Allen and Bolling, and Allen was the only one to hit 54% in the district. Marshall has rocketed to a 2-1 cash on hand advantage over Anderson as of September, so Anderson has some ground to make up in the last two months of the campaign.

17th: open (William Fralin retiring); Bill Cleaveland vs. Gwen Mason (Botetourt, Roanoke County, Roanoke City)

This is an open seat, the only reason this seat is a target, as it’s a pretty solidly Republican district (although Kaine did get 47% there). Democrat Gwen Mason, a member of the Roanoke City Council, was able to sit back and accrue a war chest as five Republicans battled it out for the nomination, in which attorney Bill Cleaveland emerged as the Republican victor. Cleaveland doesn’t seem to have much of a base in the district — he lives in Botetourt, the smallest part of the district, although his practice is in the City of Roanoke. His post-primary fundraising is also sputtering, aside from a large infusion of cash from retiring Fralin.

42nd: Dave Albo vs. Greg Werkheiser (Fairfax)

Dave Albo is notorious for being the driving force (no pun intended) behind the incredibly-unpopular abusive driving fees that were passed in 2007 and summarily repealed the next year. Greg Werkheiser, Albo’s 2005 opponent who came within a few percent of beating Albo, is running again. Albo has realized the peril he’s in and pumped a bunch of PAC money into his account. There doesn’t seem to be a special interest around that he won’t take money from, and it’s given him a 2-1 cash advantage over Werkheiser.

52nd: open (Jeff Frederick retiring); Rafael Lopez vs. Luke Torian (Prince William)

Jeff Frederick, ostracized by his party, is retiring, so the Republican nominee is Rafael Lopez. Frederick’s wife Amy had filed for the Republican nomination but withdrew before the primary. Democrats chose pastor Luke Torian in the primary, who will likely cruise to victory in November. This district was won by Obama 63-36 — not fertile ground for a Republican hold in the best of circumstances.

58th: Robert Bell vs. Cynthia Neff (Albemarle, Fluvanna, Greene, Orange)

Another masterful Republican gerrymander, this district is basically a New Jersey-shaped wedge around Charlottesville that has an ever-so-slight Republican lean. Bell faces a challenge from Cynthia Neff, a retired IBM executive, but get this — Bell has over $500,000 on hand. Not a typo, half a million dollars. I guess he’s been wanting to run statewide for a while. Neff is going to have to go a long way to make up for this financial disadvantage.

73rd: John O’Bannon vs. Thomas Shields (Henrico, Richmond City)

Suburban Richmond is home to John O’Bannon, who has $175,000 in the bank and is being challenged by college professor Thomas Shields. Shields has a lot of catching up to do to match O’Bannon’s fundraising. This is actually the first time a Democrat has bothered to run against O’Bannon, who succeeded Eric Cantor following his election to Congress in 2000. The district is one of many in the Commonwealth that is moving towards the center after being Republican-leaning for a while.

82nd: Bob Purkey vs. Peter Schmidt vs. John Parmele (Virginia Beach)

Purkey, a former Wall Street broker, sleepwalks through one campaign after another. His first serious opponent in years is Republican-turned-Democrat Peter Schmidt, who challenged Purkey in the Republican primary in 2005. Schmidt’s profile as a moderate former Republican could be a boon in his bid, but he will be fighting the heavy Republican lean in this district — 60-40 for both McDonnell in 2005 and McCain last year. Independent John Parmele, who lost 71-29 to Purkey in a two-way race in 2005, will be the third option on the ballot.

86th: Tom Rust vs. Stevens Miller (Fairfax, Loudoun)

Rust’s first serious challenge came in 2007, when he was held to 53% by Jay Donohue. The district has made a sharp left turn to the Democrats, voting 62% for Obama in 2008. Rust is being challenged this time by Loudoun County Supervisor Stevens Miller. Miller’s geographic location may help, as in 2007 Rust only narrowly won the Fairfax part of the district but dominated the Loudoun portion 55-45. If anything saves Rust, it’s his large cash on hand advantage over Miller.

93rd: Phil Hamilton vs. Robin Abbott (James City, Newport News)

Hamilton represents a Democratic district that has only gotten stronger in recent years, but hasn’t faced an opponent since 1995. Now he’s going up against attorney Robin Abbott. Like Albo, Hamilton has sensed danger and is suckling at the teat for PAC money. Hamilton has run into quite a bit of trouble about a job he was given by Old Dominion University that sprung from an appropriation he made for the school, particularly lying about not having any communication with them about it. He’s resisted calls to resign, but it seems that the wheels are coming off his campaign; donations continue to roll into his campaign, though, mostly from his fellow Republican Delegates. He retains a 2-1 cash advantage over Abbott, so he’s not going down without a fight, but it remains to be seen whether he will be able to buy his way out of the hole he’s dug himself into. I’m leaning towards “no”, personally.

94th: Glenn Oder vs. Gary West (Newport News)

Oder is yet another Republican in a slightly Republican-leaning district, although it was won by Obama last year. He hasn’t faced a Democrat since he defeated John Miller (now a State Senator) 54-46 when he was first elected to the House in 2001. This year he is challenged by attorney Gary West, who is running a spirited campaign but faces an uphill fight against the district’s Republican lean in the off-year; although it barely went for Kaine in 2005, it supported McDonnell by an 8-point margin. West’s fundraising has lagged; as of September he has only $22,000 in the bank compared to Oder’s $78,000.

Republican Targets

3rd: Dan Bowling vs. James Morefield (Buchanan, Russell, Tazewell)

This is a fairly swingy district that went 59-40 for McCain while supporting both Webb and Deeds in previous years. Bowling will find Deeds a boon at the top of the ticket, and his opponent, James Morefield, trails Bowling in fundraising (although Morefield is being propped up by in-kinds), but it’s still one to watch.

21st: Bobby Mathieson vs. Ron Villanueva (Virginia Beach)

Mathieson trounced incumbent Republican John Welch in 2007, but this time he faces Ron Villanueva, a member of the Virginia Beach City Council, who has twice been elected citywide. There is a small but significant Filipino community in Virginia Beach which Villanueva might be able to appeal to, and this is Bob McDonnell’s home turf, definitely a boon for any Republican running here. However, working against the Republicans is the fact that this is the most Democratic House district in the city (although still won by McDonnell in 2005), and Villanueva’s fundraising has lagged behind Mathieson’s so far. Mathieson may be hindered by the news in September that one of his campaign aides had embezzled campaign funds.

23rd: Shannon Valentine vs. Scott Garrett (Amherst, Lynchburg)

Valentine won the seat in a 2006 special election and was unopposed in 2007, but this year she will face Lynchburg City Councilman Scott Garrett, who won the June primary. Garrett apparently blew his wad in the primary — after spending $115,000 on a 54-46 primary win, he’s now seriously trailing Shannon Valentine in money. Valentine is sitting pretty with $225,000, whereas Garrett has only $32,000 on hand.

32nd: David Poisson vs. Tag Greason (Loudoun)

Poisson underperformed in 2007 after defeating Dick Black in 2005, but his 2009 opponent, Tag Greason, doesn’t seem to be up to the challenge, as Poisson holds a 3-1 cash advantage as of September. This is a swing district with a slight Democratic lean.

34th: Margi Vanderhye vs. Barbara Comstock (Fairfax)

When longtime incumbent Vince Callahan retired in 2007, this was considered an easy pickup. He was the last Republican from inside the beltway in the House of Delegates, and the district was won by every Democrat from John Kerry forward. However, Margi Vanderhye only managed a 3% victory. She’s being challenged by Barbara Comstock, a much more conservative Republican than the moderate Callahan. This race is one of the most expensive House races of 2009, with Comstock having raised over $300,000 and Vanderhye having raised $235,000; Vanderhye has been more judicious in her expenditures, though, and trails by only $158,000 to $132,000 cash on hand as of September.

44th: open (Kris Amundson retiring); Scott Surovell vs. Jay McConville vs. Glenda Gail Parker (Fairfax)

Admunson retired in late June, giving the Republicans a leg up with a decent fundraiser, Jay McConville, but the substitute candidate, Fairfax County Democratic party chair Scott Surovell, took no time catching up, raising $80,000 in eight days, and he remains ahead in the money race as of September. In addition, the district is pretty Democratic, which helps Surovell’s chances. The third candidate in the race is our favorite light rail-supporting perennial candidate, Glenda Gail Parker of the Indy Greens.

51st: Paul Nichols vs. Richard Anderson (Prince William)

Nichols picked up this seat from retiring Republican Michele McQuigg in 2007 against a pretty lame opponent, but similar to Vanderhye, only won by about 4%. He’s facing Richard Anderson in November. Nichols loaned himself $100k to get a leg up on Anderson; he’s since repaid half those loans and still remains far ahead of Anderson in cash on hand.

64th: Bill Barlow vs. Stan Clark vs. Albert Burckard Jr. (Franklin City, Isle of Wight, James City, Southampton, Surry, Williamsburg)

Barlow is a longtime incumbent who has been winning with shrinking margins over the years, from 65-32 in 1999 to just 54-45 in 2005, his last contested election. The Republicans have chosen Isle of Wight County Supervisor Stan Clark to face off against him, and Independent Green Albert Burckard Jr., who also ran in 2005, will also be on the ballot. Barlow is far ahead in money coming into the home stretch, but Clark may be able to cut into Barlow’s base in Isle of Wight.

67th: Chuck Caputo vs. Jim LeMunyon (Fairfax, Loudoun)

Chuck Caputo easily defeated wingnut Chris Craddock to win an open Republican seat in 2005, then nearly lost the seat in 2007, winning only 53-47 against Marc Cadin. Now he will face another challenge, this time from entrepreneur Jim LeMunyon. Caputo currently leads LeMunyon 2-1 in cash on hand (who has had to loan himself $20,000 to try to keep up), which, if 2007 is any indicator, is about what he needs to win again. However, he probably won’t be winning by a large margin.

83rd: Joe Bouchard vs. Chris Stolle (Virginia Beach)

Retired Navy Commander Joe Bouchard defeated Chris Stolle, brother of State Sen. Ken Stolle, by a mere 131 votes in 2007. Stolle has come back for a rematch, but can’t depend on his brother’s help this time, as Ken is busy running for Virginia Beach Sheriff. Stolle’s fundraising hasn’t been able to keep up with Bouchard, but working in his favor is that he’ll be running downticket from Bob McDonnell, who won the district by 10 points in 2005.

87th: Paula Miller vs. John Amiral (Norfolk)

Miller picked up Thelma Drake’s House of Delegates seat in a 2004 special election, winning by a 97-vote margin over Michael Ball. She won against Ball again in 2005, that time by a 50-38 margin, with Republican-running-as-Independent John Coggeshall picking up the remaining 12 percent. In 2007, she defeated retired Vice Admiral Hank Giffin by a 54-46 margin (and keep in mind, this district includes a lot of the area near Norfolk Naval Station). This may be her easiest fight yet, against another Navy vet, John Amiral, but her fundraising is pretty anemic so far. Although Obama cleaned up here in 2008, this is a swing district in off-years, and has enough recent high-end residential development to keep any Democrat wary.

One More to Watch

91st: Tom Gear vs. Gordon Helsel vs. Sam Eure (Hampton, Poquoson, York)

This won’t cause a change in the House of Delegates, but I thought it was an interesting race nonetheless. Gear is being challenged by Democrat Sam Eure (who has raised nearly no money and his last campaign was for York County Board of Superviors — he lost by 15 percent) and Republican-turned-Independent Gordon Helsel, the Mayor of Poquoson, who is outraising Gear by about 2-1. The district is about 50-50 split between Hampton and Poquoson/York, and each locality has their own candidate — Gear from Hampton, Helsel from Poquoson, and Eure from York. Gear, however, performed weakest in Hampton the last time he was opposed, against an independent in 2005. He only won Hampton 57-42, whereas he won Poquoson and York with over 60%. It will be interesting to see how this race plays out.

Dropped from the List

26th: Matt Lohr vs. Gene Hart (Harrisonburg, Rockingham)

Lohr was elected 54-46 in 2005 against Lowell Fulk (not to be confused with blogger Lowell Feld), and faced only an independent in 2007. Harrisonburg attorney Gene Hart is taking a swing at it this time. Though he seems to be running a spirited campaign, his fundraising just doesn’t look strong enough to make it a close race in a district that’s this tough — blood-red Rockingham County didn’t even go for Warner in 2008.

35th: open (Steve Shannon retiring); Mark Keam vs. James Hyland (Fairfax)

Steve Shannon, of course, is the Democratic nominee for Attorney General. Republican James Hyland, a former chair of the Fairfax County Republican Party who lost 60-40 to Shannon in 2005, had a clear path to the nomination; Democrats overwhelmingly chose Mark Keam, an attorney who worked on Barack Obama’s Virginia campaign, in the four-way primary. Keam is a fundraising machine, and will leave Hyland in the dust by November.

50th: Jackson Miller vs. Jeanette Rishell (Manassas, Manassas Park, Prince William)

Rishell has run for this seat twice before and lost twice, first 53-47 in a 2006 special election, then by 61-39 in 2007. This is a swing district, and Rishell is good at raising money, but that’s about it. Her campaign has been ineptly run, possibly since her campaign manager has been involved in a scandal and keeps making gaffes.

California State Legislature Race Ratings (2010)

Here are my SSP-style ratings for the California State Legislature in 2010. In the State Senate table, I listed all the districts, even-numbered, that are up, because there are only 20 of them, and as of now only 3 are somewhat competitive. In the State Assembly table, I listed only the districts that are or could be competitive since all 80 districts there are up. Open seats are in italics.

District details can be found at the 2010 California Race Tracker. Feel free to jump in and add any updates as you find them.

State Senate

Solid D Likely D Lean D Toss-Up Lean R Likely R Solid R
2 (Wiggins)
6 (Steinberg)
8 (Yee)
10 (Corbett)
20 (Yee)
22 (Cedillo)
24 (Romero)

26 (Price)
28 (Oropeza)
30 (R. Calderon)
32 (Negrete-McLeod)
40 (Ducheny)
16 (Florez)
34 (Correa)
12 (Denham)
4 (Aanestad)
14 (Cogdill)
18 (Ashburn)
36 (Hollingsworth)
38 (Wyland)

State Assembly

Likely D Lean D Toss-Up Lean R Likely R
31 (Arambula)
78 (Block)
15 (Buchanan)
80 (Perez)
5 (Niello)
10 (Huber)
30 (Gilmore)
36 (Knight)
26 (Berryhill)
33 (Blakeslee)
37 (A. Strickland)
63 (Emmerson)

65 (Cook)
68 (Tran)
72 (DuVall)
3 (Logue)
38 (Smyth)
59 (Adams)
64 (Nestande)
70 (DeVore)
74 (Garrick)
75 (Fletcher)

Below the flip are the Senate and Assembly districts’ Cook PVI’s, with the Board of Equalization and counties thrown in, just in case anyone is curious.

State Senate

District Incumbent PVI
SD-01
Cox
R+8.0
SD-02
Wiggins
D+15.4
SD-03
Leno
D+29.1
SD-04
Aanestad
R+10.1
SD-05
Wolk
D+7.4
SD-06
Steinberg
D+9.4
SD-07
DeSaulnier
D+13.2
SD-08
Yee
D+24.3
SD-09
Hancock
D+32.0
SD-10
Corbett
D+18.8
SD-11
Simitian
D+20.2
SD-12
Denham
D+2.3
SD-13
Alquist
D+19.2
SD-14
Cogdill
R+11.8
SD-15
Maldonado
D+5.2
SD-16
Florez
D+3.6
SD-17
Runner
R+6.0
SD-18
Ashburn
R+16.5
SD-19
T. Strickland
D+1.5
SD-20
Padilla
D+18.4
SD-21
Liu
D+15.6
SD-22
Cedillo
D+25.6
SD-23
Pavley
D+16.9
SD-24
Romero
D+16.4
SD-25
Wright
D+24.9
SD-26
Price
D+33.1
SD-27
A. Lowenthal
D+12.2
SD-28
Oropeza
D+13.8
SD-29
Huff
R+4.9
SD-30
R. Calderon
D+14.9
SD-31
Dutton
R+4.9
SD-32
Negrete-McLeod
D+13.1
SD-33
Walters
R+9.4
SD-34
Correa
D+1.5
SD-35
Harman
R+5.9
SD-36
Hollingsworth
R+12.4
SD-37
Benoit
R+4.9
SD-38
Wyland
R+6.2
SD-39
Kehoe
D+10.6
SD-40
Ducheny
D+6.9

State Assembly

District Incumbent PVI
AD-01
Chesbro
D+12.2
AD-02
Nielsen
R+14.9
AD-03
Logue
R+4.9
AD-04
Gaines
R+8.6
AD-05
Niello
R+4.0
AD-06
Huffman
D+23.0
AD-07
Evans
D+17.3
AD-08
Yamada
D+8.9
AD-09
Jones
D+19.1
AD-10
Huber
R+3.8
AD-11
Torlakson
D+16.4
AD-12
Ma
D+28.5
AD-13
Ammiano
D+36.0
AD-14
Skinner
D+31.6
AD-15
Buchanan
D+3.0
AD-16
Swanson
D+36.2
AD-17
Galgiani
D+4.0
AD-18
Hayashi
D+21.2
AD-19
Hill
D+20.5
AD-20
Torrico
D+17.5
AD-21
Ruskin
D+18.7
AD-22
Fong
D+19.1
AD-23
Coto
D+18.3
AD-24
Beall
D+14.5
AD-25
T. Berryhill
R+8.6
AD-26
B. Berryhill
R+4.5
AD-27
Monning
D+18.7
AD-28
Caballero
D+13.5
AD-29
Villines
R+10.2
AD-30
Gilmore
R+4.0
AD-31
Arambula
D+6.9
AD-32
Fuller
R+18.3
AD-33
Blakeslee
R+4.1
AD-34
Conway
R+13.7
AD-35
Nava
D+12.7
AD-36
Knight
R+6.6
AD-37
A. Strickland
R+3.1
AD-38
Smyth
R+3.0
AD-39
Fuentes
D+22.6
AD-40
Blumenfield
D+13.0
AD-41
Brownley
D+14.5
AD-42
Feuer
D+23.2
AD-43
Krekorian
D+16.5
AD-44
Portantino
D+13.4
AD-45
de León
D+29.0
AD-46
J. Pérez
D+31.7
AD-47
Bass
D+32.4
AD-48
Davis
D+37.0
AD-49
Eng
D+12.7
AD-50
De La Torre
D+23.2
AD-51
Bradford
D+27.9
AD-52
Hall
D+37.9
AD-53
Lieu
D+9.1
AD-54
B. Lowenthal
D+8.7
AD-55
Furutani
D+15.6
AD-56
Mendoza
D+8.0
AD-57
Hernandez
D+11.9
AD-58
C. Calderon
D+13.0
AD-59
Adams
R+7.1
AD-60
Hagman
R+8.3
AD-61
Torres
D+8.2
AD-62
Carter
D+16.0
AD-63
Emmerson
R+3.7
AD-64
Nestande
R+5.0
AD-65
Cook
R+7.4
AD-66
Jeffries
R+11.4
AD-67
Silva
R+7.2
AD-68
Tran
R+7.1
AD-69
Solorio
D+8.0
AD-70
DeVore
R+4.0
AD-71
Miller
R+10.9
AD-72
Vacant
R+7.2
AD-73
Harkey
R+7.8
AD-74
Garrick
R+4.3
AD-75
Fletcher
R+3.4
AD-76
Saldaña
D+12.3
AD-77
Anderson
R+11.4
AD-78
Block
D+5.1
AD-79
Salas
D+9.9
AD-80
M. Perez
D+5.1

Board of Equalization

District Incumbent PVI
BOE-01
Yee
D+19.1
BOE-02
Leonard
R+3.8
BOE-03
Steel
R+4.1
BOE-04
Shea
D+18.0

County 1996-2000 2000-2004 2004-2008
Alameda
D+18.8
D+24.0
D+26.3
Alpine
R+1.2
D+2.4
D+6.4
Amador
R+7.8
R+10.1
R+10.9
Butte
R+7.4
R+4.8
R+3.1
Calaveras
R+7.9
R+9.3
R+9.7
Colusa
R+15.3
R+16.8
R+14.4
Contra Costa
D+8.5
D+12.2
D+14.4
Del Norte
R+3.7
R+6.5
R+6.4
El Dorado
R+10.8
R+10.5
R+9.5
Fresno
R+6.0
R+6.0
R+4.8
Glenn
R+17.4
R+17.3
R+15.1
Humboldt
R+4.5
D+2.7
D+9.3
Imperial
D+5.6
D+4.6
D+6.7
Inyo
R+11.8
R+10.4
R+7.9
Kern
R+13.0
R+14.3
R+14.1
Kings
R+8.6
R+12.3
R+12.6
Lake
D+1.3
D+3.9
D+5.0
Lassen
R+2.8
R+7.0
R+20.1
Los Angeles
D+12.6
D+15.0
D+15.6
Madera
R+13.0
R+13.1
R+11.6
Marin
D+12.4
D+20.4
D+24.9
Mariposa
R+10.0
R+10.1
R+9.3
Mendocino
R+1.8
D+7.6
D+15.8
Merced
R+3.4
R+4.9
R+2.8
Modoc
R+18.4
R+23.1
R+21.8
Mono
R+5.0
R+1.9
D+1.8
Monterey
D+6.6
D+10.6
D+13.7
Napa
D+3.8
D+8.6
D+11.7
Nevada
R+2.9
R+4.8
R+2.1
Orange
R+9.5
R+8.5
R+6.8
Placer
R+11.7
R+11.7
R+10.4
Plumas
R+11.4
R+12.1
R+10.1
Riverside
R+4.2
R+5.3
R+4.9
Sacramento
D+0.7
D+1.1
D+3.3
San Benito
D+3.7
D+5.1
D+5.8
San Bernardino
R+2.8
R+2.7
R+2.7
San Diego
R+3.3
R+1.8
R+0.3
San Francisco
D+25.1
D+30.9
D+32.9
San Joaquin
R+2.0
R+1.8
R+0.6
San Luis Obispo
R+5.1
R+3.2
R+1.9
San Mateo
D+13.7
D+18.6
D+20.9
Santa Barbara
R+1.7
D+2.0
D+6.1
Santa Clara
D+10.0
D+14.0
D+16.1
Santa Cruz
D+10.2
D+18.9
D+24.6
Shasta
R+15.8
R+16.8
R+16.3
Sierra
R+13.2
R+14.5
R+13.0
Siskiyou
R+10.1
R+11.8
R+4.7
Solano
D+7.3
D+8.8
D+9.6
Sonoma
D+8.8
D+15.0
D+19.8
Stanislaus
R+3.9
R+6.2
R+5.6
Sutter
R+17.2
R+17.0
R+14.1
Tehama
R+12.7
R+15.7
R+15.3
Trinity
R+6.0
R+6.9
R+3.3
Tulare
R+12.8
R+13.9
R+13.3
Tuolumne
R+7.1
R+8.5
R+9.3
Ventura
R+2.7
R+0.4
D+0.8
Yolo
D+7.1
D+8.8
D+12.6
Yuba
R+12.0
R+14.7
R+13.4

NC-Sen: Burr Leads by 10 or More

Rasmussen (9/15, likely voters):

Elaine Marshall (D): 38

Richard Burr (R-inc): 48

Undecided: 11

Kenneth Lewis (D): 32

Richard Burr (R-inc): 48

Undecided: 14

Bob Etheridge (D): 34

Richard Burr (R-inc): 48

Undecided: 15

(MoE: ±4.5%)

Here’s another variation on the same theme we’ve been seeing out of North Carolina: Burr is still under 50, and his potential Democratic competitors are all starting in a similar position. PPP recently had Burr in the low 40s, and leading by similar margins. The major distinction is that PPP found that Etheridge started in the strongest position (41-34), compared to Marshall shining the brightest from the Dem field according to Rasmussen.

RaceTracker Wiki: NC-Sen

ME-Gov: Still Mostly a Question Mark

Research 2000 for Daily Kos (9/14-16, likely voters):

Elizabeth Mitchell (D): 34

Les Otten (R): 28

Undecided: 38

Elizabeth Mitchell (D): 35

Peter Mills (R): 15

Undecided: 50

Elizabeth Mitchell (D): 35

Matt Jacobson (R): 14

Undecided: 51

Michael Michaud (D): 33

Les Otten (R): 29

Undecided: 38

Michael Michaud (D): 34

Peter Mills (R): 15

Undecided: 51

Michael Michaud (D): 34

Matt Jacobson (R): 14

Undecided: 52

Steve Rowe (D): 30

Les Otten (R): 31

Undecided: 39

Steve Rowe (D): 31

Peter Mills (R): 15

Undecided: 54

Steve Rowe (D): 31

Matt Jacobson (R): 14

Undecided: 55

(MoE: ±4%)

Research 2000 polled Maine to get a sense of where the anti-gay marriage initiative on the statewide ballot in November stands. The poll finds the initiative passing (where “yes” = a vote against gay marriage), but by a narrow 48-46 margin. As one might expect, the younger you are, the likelier you are to support gay marriage (18-29s are 43 yes, 52 no, while 60+ are 55 yes, 38 no), but there’s also a big disparity between the two congressional districts in the state (the more cosmopolitan 1st is 45 yes, 50 no, while the backwoodsy 2nd is 51 yes, 42 no).

As a bonus, they also threw in the first look anyone has taken at the Maine governor’s race for 2010, a race that has been particularly slow to take shape and where nobody terribly well-known is running. The results aren’t what you would call conclusive, with ‘undecided’ winning every race, but show the Dems with a decent margin in every permutation, except for a Steve Rowe/Les Otten matchup.

The players here are:

• Elizabeth “Libby” Mitchell: Democratic state Senate president, former state House speaker, and loser of the 1984 U.S. Senate election to William Cohen (she got into the race in August, so quietly that we at SSP didn’t even notice; the 69-year-old Mitchell would be Maine’s first female governor)

• Mike Michaud, Democratic Representative in ME-02 (has been rumored to be interested, but has taken no steps to run)

• Steve Rowe, former two-term Democratic Attorney General and former state House speaker (is officially in the race)

• Les Otten, Republican former co-owner of Boston Red Sox and of American Ski Company (has formed exploratory committee)

• Peter Mills, Republican state Senator and loser of the 2006 GOP gubernatorial primary (is running)

• Matt Jacobson, Republican CEO of Maine & CO., a nonprofit that seeks to attract business to Maine and former president of St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad (is running)

RaceTracker Wiki: ME-Gov

Meaningless and Premature 2009-2010 Governor Predictions

Here are my sometimes arbitrary and always meaningless and premature picks for the 2009-2010 governor’s races.  I’m seeing 7 Republican pickups, 6 Democratic pickups, and 1 Independent pickup of a Republican seat in RI.  That would leave the governor distribution at 27D-22R-1I.  I’m expecting substantial economic recovery, but still a fairly anti-incumbent mood.

PARTY SWITCHES

1. WY-OPEN – Simpson (R) over Generic D by 36 – I can’t imagine Freudenthal suing for a third term, but why doesn’t he just say so already?  Otherwise, there is officially no hope.

2. KS-OPEN – Brownback (R) over Generic D by 33 – No significant D has stepped up.  We will be asking, “What’s the matter with Kansas” more than ever with Brownback in charge.

3. RI-OPEN – Chafee (I) over Lynch (D) by 10 and Trillo (R) by 28 – Chafee’s partyless brand will play well in an anti-incumbent year.

4. HI-OPEN – Abercrombie (D) over Aiona (R) by 14 – Kos poll looks solid for Dems.

5. CA-OPEN – Brown (D) over Whitman (R) by 12 – Whitman will not be able to pick up enough D’s to make it all that competitive against Brown.

6. OK-OPEN – Fallin (R) over Edmondson (D) by 10 – Tough times for D’s in OK.  PPP poll looks good for Fallin.

7. TN-OPEN – Wamp (R) over McWherter (D) by 9 – No polling, but D hold seems unlikely here given overall trends in the South.  No top-notch D candidate has emerged.

8. VT-OPEN – Racine (D) over Dubie (R) by 9 – Third party candidate likely holds the margin down for Dubie, but D should win.

9. VA-OPEN – McDonnell (R) over Deeds (D) by 8 – Video of Deeds dodging tax question is going around.  Pretty ugly stuff.

10. MN-OPEN – Rybak (D) over Haas (R) by 6 – Hope and expect that R.T. gets in.  Seems like the strongest candidate in the running.

11. MI-OPEN – Cox (R) over Cherry (D) by 4 – Economically strapped Michigan gives strong Republican candidate a chance in the Statehouse.

12. FL-OPEN – Sink (D) over McCollum (R) by 3 – Sink a good candidate for Florida.  Can win some of the panhandle/North Florida votes as well as traditional D areas.

13. CO-Ritter – McInnis (R) over Ritter (D) by 3 – Ritter pretty unpopular.  Colorado still conservative enough to elect McInnis statewide.

14. AZ-Brewer* – Goddard (D) over Martin (R) by 2 – Goddard a very strong, well-known D in Arizona.  Unpopular Brewer bows out or loses primary to State Treasurer Dean Martin.  Hope PPP polls here next week.  They were talking about it.

HOLDS

15. NJ-Corzine – Corzine (D) over Christie (R) by 1 – Christie numbers continue to go down, Daggett goes up.  Just enough for Corzine win.  See Franken v. Coleman.

16. PA-OPEN – Onorato (D) over Corbett (R) by 2 – Dogfight.  Hopefully Onorato can find strong runningmate from Philly.

17. MA-Patrick – Patrick (D) over Cahill (I) by 3 and Baker (R) by 18 – R has no chance here.  Battle is between Patrick and Cahill.  Hopefully, economy will improve enough for Patrick to hold on.  Plus Patrick has first rate operation with Plouffe.

18. SC-OPEN – McMaster (R) over Rex (D) by 5 – PPP polled this one 36-36.  Rex a strong candidate.  Republican lean carries McMaster to victory.  SC demographics slowly trending blue.

19. GA-OPEN – Oxendine (R) over Barnes (D) by 5 -Barnes a very strong candidate.  Again, Republican lean carries Oxendine.

20. WI-OPEN – Barrett (D) over Walker (R) by 7 – Superhero Barrett wins tough one through personal popularity in Milwaukee, which is also Walker’s base, and slight D lean of the state.

21. ME-OPEN – Mitchell (D) over Otten (R) by 8 – Wide open primaries on both sides.  Otten’s money carries him to nomination.  Senate President Mitchell is best candidate for D’s.

22. AL-OPEN – Byrne (R) over Davis (D) by 9 – Davis has a respectable showing, but comes up well short.  It’s still Alabama.

23. IA-Culver – Culver (D) over Vander Plaats (R) by 10 – Branstad chickens out or loses primary to winger Vander Plaats.  That’s the tougher part of the equation for Branstad given IA’s conservative Republican base.  Culver holds on easily over the winger.

24. IL-Quinn – Quinn (D) over Brady (R) by 11 – Second tier Republican field here.  Should not be much of a problem for Quinn.

25. OH-Strickland – Strickland (D) over Kasich (R) by 12 – Kasich is too conservative for Ohio.  Strickland has done about as well as he can in this strapped state.

26. SD-OPEN – Knudson (R) over Heidepriem (D) by 13 – Decent D challenger, but it won’t be a D year and the state leans R.

27. MD-O’Malley – O’Malley (D) over Hogan (R) by 18 – Ehrlich will not run.  Maryland has only gotten bluer, although O’Malley is not the most popular guy in the world.

28. NV-Gibbons* – Sandoval (R) over Reid (D) by 18 – What a wasted opportunity with Rory Reid.  DGA apparently expecting no primary.  For shame.  Somebody save us from the double Reid!

29. OR-OPEN – Kitzhaber (D) over Atkinson (R) by 19 – Nobody beats Kitzhaber here.  Great news that he is running.

30. NM-OPEN – Denish (D) over Martinez (R) by 20 – Denish polling strong against higher tier candidates – Pearce and Wilson – who aren’t running.  Should beat Martinez.

31. AK-Parnell – Parnell (R) over Berkowitz (D) by 21 – Don’t know why so many top Dems trying for this one, but there are only so many places to move up in Alaska.  Parnell popularity at 67-8 according to recent Hays poll.

32. CT-Rell – Rell (R) over Bysiewicz (D) by 24 – Decent challenger but Rell still too popular.

33. TX-Perry* – Hutchison (R) over Schieffer (D) by 26 – KBH narrowly beats Perry and crunches Schieffer by more than what Perry would have.

34. UT-Herbert – Herbert (R) over Generic D by 28 – No prominent D has stepped up.  Overwhelming R lean of the state prevails.

35. ID-Otter – Otter (R) over Generic D by 31 – No significant D has stepped up.  Otter probably not vulnerable if one did.

36. NH-Lynch – Lynch (D) over Generic R by 34 – Lynch cruises again.

37. NY-Paterson* – Cuomo (D) over Lazio (R) by 35 – Lazio humiliated out of politics.  What the hell is Paterson doing, by the way?  

38. AR-Beebe – Beebe (D) over Generic R by 37 – Beebe very, very popular in reddening state.

39. NE-Heineman – Heineman over Generic D by 41 – Smooth sailing for Heineman.

SSP Daily Digest: 9/18

CO-Sen: It’s primary protection week at the White House. Fresh off hosting a big fundraiser for Arlen Specter, Barack Obama officially endorsed Sen. Michael Bennet, who’s fending off an ideologically curious primary challenge from former CO House Speaker Andrew Romanoff. (J)

FL-Sen: Marco Rubio has picked up his second endorsement from Florida’s GOP House delegation. 5th District Rep. (and Main Street Partnership member, although certainly one of its less ‘moderate’ members) Ginny Brown-Waite endorsed Rubio yesterday, giving his Senate candidacy a potentially useful endorsement in the Tampa and Orlando exurbs. Back in June, dark red Panhandle Rep. Jeff Miller gave Rubio his official blessing. (J)

MA-Sen: On a recent appearance on Fox Business, Harvard law professor and TARP watchdog Elizabeth Warren refused to flat-out say “no” when asked if she’d consider running for Ted Kenneday’s Senate seat. Warren is one of the most important progressive thinkers and activists in America today, but with little time, no prior electoral experience, and no campaign warchest, it’s hard to see how a potential candidacy could catch fire. (D)

Also, as expected, the Massachusetts legislature moved halfway toward modifying state law to allow temporary appointment of a stopgap Senator until the special election. The bill cleared the state House, 95-58; it is also expected to pass the state Senate, although procedural tactics will allow the Republicans to drag it out till next week.

CA-Gov: Jerry Brown is being coy about when (or if) he’ll announce his gubernatorial bid, appearing at a function with three other would-be governors but saying “The people of California are not anxious to hear from their candidates yet, and the deadline for filing papers isn’t until March – so tune in.” Hopefully he left off the part about turning on and dropping out.

NY-Gov: David Paterson either isn’t getting the message or has an admirable single-mindedness, but either way, he’s gearing up for a re-election run, hiring a campaign manager, Richard Fife (who previously managed the failed-to-launch Carolyn Maloney senatorial campaign).

OR-Gov: We have our first poll of the Oregon governor’s race since people started piling into it, courtesy of vaunted local pollster Tim Hibbitts’ firm on behalf of the Portland Tribune and Fox 12 News. Ex-Gov. John Kitzhaber has wide leads over his Republican opponents (although still below the 50% mark): 43-23 over state Sen. Jason Atkinson and 46-21 over Allen Alley. Ex-SoS Bill Bradbury, who made it offical yesterday, isn’t tested. In other news, ex-Sen. Gordon Smith hadn’t seemed likely to make the race, and now it’s even much less likely, as he took a cushy new job in DC as president of the powerful lobby National Association of Broadcasters. This would leave Rep. Greg Walden as the one Republican of interest who has yet to weigh in on the race.

SC-Gov: Lt. Governor Andre Bauer has made the offer to stand down from running in the 2010 gubernatorial election if he has to succeed Mark Sanford in the event of a resignation (or impeachment). But he’s attaching an expiration date to that offer now (only through next month), saying he needs to get started on his campaign.

NY-23: Here’s a weird thought: could the ACORN scandal wind up sinking the Republican in the special election in the 23rd? The Conservative Party is going after Dede Scozzafava for her previous relationship with the Working Families Party, whose line she’s run on in the past. The WFP often works together with ACORN, so now Doug Hoffman is accusing her of palling around with the “radical left” and demanding she disavow the WFP. (Also noteworthy though expected: state Sen. Darrel Aubertine endorsed Dem candidate Bill Owens yesterday.)

PA-11: Lackawanna County Commissioner Corey O’Brien has taken a step toward actually challenging crusty Rep. Paul Kanjorski in the Democratic primary by opening up a campaign account and filing a statement of candidacy with the FEC. O’Brien remains in exploratory mode, but says that he’ll have “more to say” on his campaign by the end of the year. (J)

SD-AL: It’s starting to look like Republicans are going to make a real effort at giving Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin an actual race in 2010. The latest potential candidate whose name is being circulated in GOP circles is state Rep. Blake Curd of Sioux Falls. Secretary of State Chris Nelson says that he’s getting “very close” to making a decision, and state Rep. Shantel Krebs says that she’s still in “sit-and-wait mode” to see what Curd and Nelson decide. (J)

Cap & Trade: A poll taken for the Environmental Defense Fund shows, contrary to conventional wisdom, support for cap-and-trade in some conservative Dem districts. While we haven’t seen the question wording yet, Greg Sargent says the numbers are positive in NC-11, IN-09 and VA-05, and promises full results soon. He also rightly points out:

When the cap and trade debate heats up again, we’ll hear lots more about how risky it is for “marginal” Dems to support it. It’s striking how often reporters (myself included) just accept the view that such votes are risky in districts like these, simply because someone, somewhere, claimed this is the case.

Voting Rights: This is a welcome surprise. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a controversial Indiana law requiring voters to show identification last year, following a challenge to it in federal court. This year, though, there was a challenge to it in state court, and an appellate court in Indiana struck down the law for violating the state constitution’s Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause (primarily since it didn’t require mail-in voters to provide ID). The state plans to appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court. Has the pendulum swung far enough that challenges to voter suppression are likelier to get a fair hearing in state courts now instead of the federal system?

A look at the 2010 North Carolina elections

2010 will be a key year in North Carolina politics.  There has been some discussion on whether my home state has officially “seceded” from the South.  2010 (and 2012) will probably direct us on whether the Tar Heel state will become more reliably Democratic for the next generation.

NC-Sen  Richard Burr is not popular, and he is not unpopular.  The truth of the matter, Burr is unknown by a large portion of the electorate.  Enter in Cal Cunningham and Elaine Marshall, and we will see a healthy Democratic primary (Elaine is a class act, and Cal seems to be a true progressive).  This seat is a Tossup.

NC-01 G.K. Butterfield (D) will be re-elected.  Period.

NC-02 If Bob Etheridge (D) does not run for the US Senate, he will be easily re-elected.  If he doesn’t run, this seat will be a tossup.  Etheridge relates well in this area, but at the same time he represents a mildly conservative district.

NC-03  Until 1994, Walter B. Jones Jr.(R) was a Democrat!  Few know that his father was a representative for 28 years.  His father was a moderate/conservative Democrat.  That being said, Walter Jr. is popular in his conservative district, and as Republicans go, he doesn’t mind voting against his party.

NC-04 David Price (D) (my representative) will win in a cakewalk.

NC-05 Virginia Foxx (R)is not as popular in her very conservative district as many might think.  However, barring a scandal Foxx will be re-elected.

NC-06 Howard Coble (R) will win easily if he runs for re-election (he will be 79 in 2010).  If he doesn’t run, whomever wins the Republican primary will win the general election.  This is a very conservative district.

NC-07 Mike McIntyre (D) is a blue dog that represents his district well.  He will have no problem being re-elected.

NC-08 Larry Kissell (D) will have a fight on his hands even if the GOP can only pursuade a 2nd-rate candidate.  I think Kissell wil win, but he will probably get no more than 55-58% of the vote.  This district is culturally conservative, but a populist Democrat can (and will) prevail.

NC-09 Sue Myrick (R) will win re-election with little problem.

NC-10 Patrick McHenry (R) will win this race although he’s probably not as popular as you might think in a conservative district.  Unfortunately, the very young McHenry will become more entrenched as the years go by.

NC-11 Heath Shuler (D) knows how to play this district well.  A good challenger could defeat Shuler, but Shuler should win easier as the years go by.

NC-12 Mel Watt (D) will win this election as long as he has the desire to run.  There is no indication that he wants to step down.

NC-13 Brad Miller (D) will be safe barring (a) another economic meltdown and (b) a personal scandal.  I don’t consider a divorce will be much of a factor.

In conclusion, the Democrats have one race where they might pick up (NC-Sen), but they will have to play some defense in NC-08.  Also, if Bob Etheridge or Mike McIntyre leave their districts, the Democrats will have to play some defense.

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Florida, Part 4

By: Inoljt, http://thepolitikalblog.wordpr…



This is the fourth part of an analysis on the swing state Florida.

Photobucket

The Miami Metropolis

Diverse, populous, sun-baked – south Florida is far different from the rest of the state. It is the Democratic base, where liberals win their biggest margins.

Like most liberal places in this country, south Florida contains incredibly diversity; ethnic minorities compose a large share of the population. The region as a whole has reached majority-minority status. Blacks, Jews, Latinos ranging from Cubans to Nicaraguans, and many others call south Florida home.

Urban and densely populated – again, a trait common to Democratic-voting regions – South Florida is the seventh largest metropolitan region in the country. Most of its population resides along Florida’s southeastern shore, on a strip of land often only a few miles wide. More people voted in Miami-Dade and Broward than any other county out of the three swing states being reviewed (Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylania). Both counties are part of south Florida.

Photobucket

If south Florida, with its vast population, behaved like liberal Philadelphia, John Kerry would be president of the United States and Barack Obama would have won the state by double-digits.

That does not happen.

Continued below the flip.

While Palm Beach County and Broward County (the two top counties in south Florida) are solidly Democratic, they are far and away from the most liberal places in the country. Palm Beach, like many liberal-leaning suburbs, gives Democrats a 3:2 edge. Broward, a deeper shade of blue, gives Democrats two-thirds of its vote. Both places have voted this way consistently for the past four elections. Miami-Dade county, which is culturally and economically an entity by itself, behaves somewhat differently.

Here is how Barack Obama did in the Miami metropolis:

Photobucket

Like most Democratic candidates, he obtains huge margins. Compare the size of the circles here to those in the I-4 corridor (this can’t be done regarding northern Florida, unfortunately). They’re a magnitude bigger.

Several demographic factors lie behind Democratic strength in Palm Beach and Broward, the top two blue circles (Broward is the middle one). Palm Beach has a substantial black population, slightly above the national average. Latinos also compose a double-digit voting bloc – although many are Cubans, diluting their impact. Moreover, Palm Beach is the wealthiest county in Florida. While not all extremely rich areas vote Democratic, as a whole they tend to be bluer than the country at large.

Then there is the Jewish vote.

More Jews live in south Florida than anywhere else in the world, except for the state of Israel. Most are retirees living out their golden days in sunny Florida. Jews, much like their Catholic brethren, have a long history of voting for Democrats. In today’s world, their leftward stances on social issues drive them to Democrats. Mike Dukakis was the last Democrat to win less than 70% of the Jewish vote. The last Republican to beat a Democrat amongst Jews was Warren Harding, in 1920. And that was because 38% of them voted for a socialist.

Photobucket

Up to 20% of Palm Beach County is Jewish, an important Democratic advantage. This constituency gave Obama 78% of the vote in 2008, contributing heavily to his overall victory. In neighboring Broward County, approximately 12-13% of the population is Jewish (a decrease in recent years). There too, Jews helped increase Obama’s margin in the county.

Broward County is similar in many respects to Palm Beach. It is one of Florida’s wealthiest counties. Latinos comprise more than one-fifth of the population (although, again, there are many Republican-leaning Cubans). There are a number of Jewish voters, as noted previously. Finally, African-Americans comprise slightly less than one-fourth of the population. Their relatively larger presence translates to a stronger Democratic vote compared with Palm Beach.

A final note. In 2000, Al Gore chose Senator Joe Lieberman, a Jewish-American, as his running mate. In large part due to this, he performed extraordinarily well in Palm Beach and Broward; Lieberman’s presence ensured unusually high Jewish support. In fact, Gore did better than Obama in the two counties, despite Obama’s far stronger national performance.

Florida’s razor-thin margin in 2000 is a major reason pundits today regard it as a swing state. However, as the above analysis indicates, much of Gore’s strength was unique to him (or rather, his running-mate). Relative to the generic Democrat, Gore overperformed. This was why John Kerry’s campaign, which competed so hard in Florida, was taken aback by the margin he lost by. To this day, Democrats assume that Florida is a more liberal place than it actually is. Al Gore, Joe Lieberman, and the Jewish vote are largely responsible for this.

CT-Sen: Dodd Trails Simmons by 5 in New Q-Poll

Quinnipiac (9/10-14, registered voters, 7/16-20 in parens):

Chris Dodd (D-inc): 39 (39)

Rob Simmons (R): 44 (48)

Undecided: 15 (10)

Chris Dodd (D-inc): 40 (42)

Sam Caligiuri (R): 36 (40)

Undecided: 20 (15)

Chris Dodd (D-inc): 40 (42)

Tom Foley (R): 38 (42)

Undecided: 18 (14)

Chris Dodd (D-inc): 42 (43)

Peter Schiff (R): 36 (38)

Undecided: 19 (16)

(MoE: ±3.2%)

It’s been Connecticut overload this week, as Quinnipiac brings us our third recent poll gauging Chris Dodd’s electoral health. Rasmussen had Simmons up by 10 over Dodd, while R2K only had Dodd trailing by four. The Q&Q Polling Factory weighs in much closer to R2K, and finds some evidence of recovery for Dodd. (Not tested in any of these polls was newcomer Linda McMahon.) His favorability rating is 40-48, which is admittedly bad, but that number is a far cry from the 30-58 rating that Dodd was given back in April, and a slight improvement from the 40-50 rating he earned in July.

When asked whether or not they believe Dodd is “honest and trustworthy”, voters give the incumbent a 40-51 rating. Again, not good, but a marked improvement over his 35-55 score on this question in July. Quinnipiac also finds signs of improvement for Dodd among the Democratic base — in a primary match-up against Merrick Alpert (bio: some dude), Dodd leads by 56-13, up from 53-18 in July and 44-24 back in May.

Quinnipiac finds Simmons cruising in the GOP primary (at 43%, vs. single digits for everyone else), but that’s not stopping Paulist economist Peter Schiff from throwing his hat into the ring. Schiff, who formally entered the race today via an appearance on MSBNC’s Morning Joe, will at least be well-funded: he already has a cool million bucks in the bank.

RaceTracker Wiki: CT-Sen