Tag: Polls

• FL-Sen: The big rumor, all over the Interwebs today (courtesy of Southern Political Report/Insider Advantage’s Matt Towery), is that Charlie Crist has fully resolved to run as an independent for Senate. The announcement will be “sooner rather than later,” and he’s drafting the speech for the announcement. There’s no confirmation from anyone else, though. Crist’s camp has denied they’ve been scrubbing all references to “Republican” from Crist’s websites in preparation for the big switch. Meanwhile, GOP establishment support within Florida for Crist seems to be cratering, as current state House speaker Larry Cretul threw his lot in with Rubio today. John McCain also said today that he can’t support Crist’s independent candidacy. (Wow, that’s really going out on a limb there, Mr. Maverick.)

• AK-Sen: Lisa Murkowski may be one of the least endangered Senate incumbents out there, with no Democrats of note stepping forward to challenge her. Her GOP primary may turn out to require at least a little effort, though, as a challenger of at least something-of-note has stepped forward: former judge Joe Miller, whose only elective experience is losing a Fairbanks-area state House race. Miller is sounding teabaggy themes about the Constitution and socialism, but has endorsements from three state legislators, all from the socially conservative side of the GOP.

• IN-Sen: Hey, big spender! John Hostettler reports raising $37K in the first quarter, spending $27K, and ending with $10K CoH.

• NC-Sen: Cal Cunningham’s fundraising haul for Q1 was a weak $345K, leaving him $478K CoH. That’s still more than Elaine Marshall, who has $181K. Pundits are left wondering if the DSCC (who seem to prefer Cunningham) will intervene on Cunningham’s behalf to get him out of the primary, where polls have shown the former state Senator lagging behind Marshall, who as SoS is known statewide.

• NV-Sen: Sue Lowden would do well to heed the old expression about finding oneself in a hole and stopping digging. After her disastrous comments about bartering chickens to doctors in exchange for surgeries and MRIs, she was given ample opportunity to back down, but she doubled down yesterday, saying no, she was serious, and now her spokesperson is tripling down today, saying, no, she was still serious, and presenting a quote from one doctor who says that, yes, he does accept payment in alfalfa and bathtub form. Meanwhile, over in the other Senate seat, badly-damaged John Ensign is also on the receiving end of a lot of derision after reporting $50 in receipts in Q1. TPM actually tracked Ensign’s one donor down, who shrugged off Ensign’s problems, saying “All men are dogs.”

• UT-Sen: Mitt Romney will be at the Utah Republican convention next month to lend his support to faltering incumbent Bob Bennett. I’m not sure if Romney will be able to vote for Bennett, though, as Utah may not be one of the approximately 14 states in which he has residency.

• WA-Sen: Dino Rossi seems content to pad out his waiting game all the way up to Washington’s June 11 filing deadline (seemingly blissfully unaware that he needs to raise a metric ton of money ASAP if he’s going to run). That’s not sitting well with John Cornyn, who’s amping up the public statements telling Rossi to get his ass in gear.

• CA-Gov: Meg Whitman’s out with an internal poll via McLaughlin, giving her a 53-22 edge over Steve Poizner in the GOP primary. Some of you may also have noticed a Rasmussen poll out today showing the needle zooming back in Jerry Brown’s direction in the general. I’m very puzzled about this one… why is Rasmussen, of all people, putting up better California results for Dems than the Field Poll? I’m wondering if California is intensely blue enough that Rasmussen’s LV model works in Dems’ favor somehow.

• MI-Gov: I suppose it was only a matter of time before someone went after Republican AG Mike Cox over the alleged coverup of a party-gone-very-awry at then-mayor Kwame Kilpatrick’s place in 2002. The ad (a small buy on Lansing-area radio stations) attacking Cox is from Foundation for a Secure and Prosperous America, who, if the name sounds familiar, is the handiwork of Rick Reed, auteur of the Swift Boat Vets ads. Fingers are being pointed at primary rival Rick Snyder, but he says he didn’t have anything to do with it.

• NY-19: This ought to ease the risk of a NY-23 type situation in the 19th: Nan Hayworth, from the county club wing of the GOP and facing some teabagging opposition in the primary, managed to nail down the endorsement of the Putnam County Conservative Party. Of course, exurban Putnam County is only a small minority of the district, so we’ll have to see what happens in the other more populous counties.

• NY-29: Speaking of New York and teabaggers, it looks like Corning mayor Tom Reed  — a moderate who managed to deter bigger GOP names from jumping into the race following Eric Massa’s implosion — is now drawing some teabagging opposition in the GOP primary from small businessman Angelo Campini.

• NY-St. Sen.: It’s kind of sad that I had to debate over whether a New York state Senate majority leader’s office getting raided by the FBI and the state AG’s office even qualifies as newsworthy because it’s so totally expected. At any rate, Pedro Espada, who mere months ago held the linchpin of power in New York, now seems on his way to an ignominious end, as the scandal over Soundview Health Center heats up.

• NY-St. Ass.: This feels more like “Where Are They Now?” than an actual state Assembly story, but Dede Scozzafava, who went in a few short weeks from likely U.S. Representative to historical footnote, has decided that she’s through with the Assembly (having gotten sacked from her deputy leadership position). She’ll be retiring at the end of her term.

• Governors: Here’s a fun conversation piece: CREW has released its list of the 10 worst governors, in terms of corruption, unethical behavior, and general malfeasance. In a surprise to me, Jim Gibbons didn’t top the list. (I’ll give you a hint of who did: he’s thinking of running for President in 2012, and he seems to be made partly of Foghorn Leghorn DNA.) Only two Dems made the cut: David Paterson and Bill Richardson.

Public Policy Polling (4/17-18, New Hampshire voters, no trendlines) (primary numbers):

Paul Hodes (D): 40

Kelly Ayotte (R): 47

Undecided: 13

Paul Hodes (D): 41

Bill Binnie (R): 46

Undecided: 13

Paul Hodes (D): 43

Jim Bender (R): 40

Undecided: 18

Paul Hodes (D): 43

Ovide Lamontagne (R): 38

Undecided: 19

(MoE: ±2.6%)

Kelly Ayotte (R): 43

Bill Binnie (R): 19

Jim Bender (R): 11

Ovide Lamontagne (R): 5

Tom Alciere (R): 1

Undecided: 21

(MoE: ±3.9%)

This is PPP’s first poll of New Hampshire since Judd Gregg retired; they find what most non-Rasmussen pollsters have been finding for the last half a year, which is a high-single-digits lead for ex-AG Kelly Ayotte over Democratic Rep. Paul Hodes. PPP thinks that Barack Obama may be dragging the Dems down in this race, but Obama’s approval in New Hampshire is a tolerable 47/48, pretty consistent with national averages and with New Hampshire’s position near the nation’s midpoint. Instead, some of the problem seems to be with Hodes himself, who’s in deeper negative territory, with 32/39 favorables. (The law-and-order, no-controversial-positions Ayotte fares beter at 34/24.)

They also take a rare look at the state of the GOP primary. R2K had a look at the primary from February, finding a much closer race between Ayotte and conservative insurgent Ovide Lamontagne, which Ayotte was winning 36-27. However, that’s gotten scrambled by the two random rich guys in the race, Bill Binnie and Jim Bender, spending money to introduce themselves, while Lamontagne has continued to languish in obscurity. Lamontagne seems to have been a receptacle for all anti-Ayotte votes, and they’re migrating elsewhere thanks to money (despite the fact that Binnie is pretty moderate and seems to be running to Ayotte’s left); as far as teabagger challenges go, Lamontagne seems to be headed in the Chuck DeVore/Patrick Hughes direction rather than that of Marco Rubio or Rand Paul.

CA-Sen: Just a day after President Obama did three fundraisers for her campaign, Sen. Barbara Boxer says she expects the POTUS to be back next month for another event in San Francisco.

FL-Sen: The US Attorney’s Office, the FBI and the IRS are all investigating the possible misuse of credit cards by state Republican Party officials – a case which has already led to the indictment of former House Speaker Ray Sansom. In a separate investigation, the IRS is looking at Marco Rubio’s tax records to see if he misused his party credit cards for personal expenses. Meanwhile, state Rep. Tom Grady becomes the latest Charlie Crist ally to pull away from the campaign.

PA-Sen: PoliticsPA says that, according to a source, Joe Sestak’s week-long TV ad buy is “worth” $930,000. It’s not clear to me whether that’s how much Sestak is actually spending, though – it’s possible to lock in lower rates by reserving time in advance, which his campaign may have done here (thus inflating the “worth” of the buy). Meanwhile, in an email to supporters, Sestak is decrying Arlen Specter’s attacks on his service in the Navy as “Swift Boat-like.”

ME-Gov: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner (D) for Libby Mitchell (4/11-14, likely voters, no trendlines):

Libby Mitchell (D): 36

Steve Rowe (D): 16

Pat McGowan (D): 13

John Richardson (D): 4

Rosa Scarcelli (D): 3

(MoE: ±4%)

If these names – all of whom are running in the Maine Democratic gubernatorial primary – aren’t familiar to you, follow the link to the Hotline for some background details.

MN-Gov: Dem Matt Entenza is going up on the air with TV and radio ads after the DFL’s statewide convention this weekend – but of course, no word on the size of the buy. Speaking of the convention, things are about to either get very interesting or a lot simpler in the MN gubernatorial race. Entenza and ex-Sen. Mark Dayton, who can both self-fund, are both saying they’ll fight on through the primary, while the two apparent frontrunners, state House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher and Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak, are pledging to abide by the convention’s endorsement.

AL-05: Notorious turncoat Rep. Parker Griffith is still sitting on $20K that various Democratic lawmakers have given him, supposedly because they haven’t asked for it back. This includes money from Rahm Emanuel, Nydia Velazquez, Rosa DeLauro and the retiring Bart Gordon, among others. Gordon, for what can only be bizarre, unspecified reasons, isn’t asking for his money back. Rahm, since he’s serving in the White House, won’t make a formal request, but twists the knife, saying “Whether the contribution is returned or not will be left up to Rep. Griffith’s conscience.” As for the rest of you dudes, DEMAND YOUR MONEY BACK!

CA-19: SurveyUSA (4/16-19, likely voters, 3/15-17 in parens):

Jeff Denham (R): 27 (25)

Jim Patterson (R): 26 (26)

Richard Pombo (R): 16 (13)

Larry Westerlund (R): 6 (7)

Undecided: 25 (29)

(MoE: ±3.6%)

Loraine Goodwin (D): 18 (14)

John Estrada (D): 15 (24)

Les Marsden (D): 10 (8)

Undecided (D): 56 (54)

(MoE: ±4.9%)

Seriously, of all the races they could poll? I realize this is on behalf of a media client, but still.

DC-AL, UT-AL: Sigh. Legislation which would have given the District of Columbia an actual voting seat in the House is yet again being derailed. Republicans insist that any such bill also eviscerate any remaining gun control laws in the district, and they’ve frightened enough conservative Dems into supporting such an amendment that you can’t have one (the voting rights bill) without the other (the gun provision). The pro-gun measure has become even more absurd, though, such that Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton asked Steny Hoyer to pull the bill altogether. On the Senate side, Orrin Hatch had spazzed about the fact that the bill’s other sop to Republicans (a temporary extra seat for Utah) would have been at at-large district – he wants to be able to re-draw the lines (and presumably screw Dem Rep. Jim Matheson) – and said he was glad the bill got scuttled.

HI-01: The D-Trip just spent another $55K on a second negative TV ad attacking Charles Djou, which you can see here. Meanwhile, in light of recent polling showing this unusual jungle race to be incredibly tight, SSP is changing its rating from “Lean Dem” to “Tossup.

MI-01: Term-limited Dem state Rep. Gary McDowell will apparently run to succeed Bart Stupak. McDowell is from the Upper Peninsula, which Crisitunity aptly described as the district’s “cultural center of gravity.” One possible holdup, though, is that it sounds like McDowell may be willing to defer to former House Democratic Floor Leader Pat Gagliardi, who has not yet made up his mind.

NY-29: Dem Matthew Zeller, tapped by county leaders as the Democratic nominee in the (potential) special election to succeed Eric Massa, formally launched his campaign on Monday. However, it’s starting to look like there won’t be a special election after all, which means there will be a primary. If that winds up being the case, businessman David Nachbar (who withdrew his name from consideration for the special) has said he might run.

WV-01: Rep. Alan Mollohan is going on the air with a TV ad that attacks his primary opponent, state Sen. Mike Oliverio, “for his ties to a conservative-leaning organization of state legislators.” Oliverio had previously launched an ad attacking Mollohan on ethical grounds. No word on the size of either buy.

Alaska: Alaska’s state legislature voted to increase its size, by two seats in the Senate and four in the House. AK’s population has tripled since statehood fifty years ago, but its lege had remained constant in numbers. What’s more, its rural districts are enormous, and would have gotten even larger after redistricting as the population concentrates in the state’s few big cities.

Polling: Reid Wilson, diving into recent FEC reports, notes that few Dems commissioned polls in the first quarter of this year – and among those who have, pretty much no one is sharing the data with the public. However, Reid doesn’t say whether Republicans have spent similarly on internal polling in the past quarter, or how Q1 2010 compares with prior years.

RNC: God bless Michael Steele. Under his stewardship, the RNC decided to blow $340K to hold a big staff meeting in… Hawaii. Because that’s both convenient and inexpensive. If Dems suffer anything less than an utter blowout this fall, we’ll be able to thank Steele in no small part.

WATN?: Former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, who already served 99 days in jail for obstruction of justice (among other things), may be headed back to prison for probation violations (including hiding assets).

• AR-Sen, IL-Sen: The hot potato that no one wants to get caught holding today is money from Goldman Sachs. Interestingly, Republican Mark Kirk is dumping his Goldman money, but Blanche Lincoln, who was trying to recast herself as anti-derivatives crusader last week, is saying there’s no reason for her to return contributions from Goldman employees. (She said she wouldn’t take money from companies receiving TARP funds, but Goldman never did.)

• CO-Sen: A subpar fundraising quarter from Andrew Romanoff, who’s going to have to expand beyond his base of the activists and party insiders if he’s going to knock off Michael Bennet in the Democratic primary. He brought in only $386K in the first quarter and spent most of that, bringing his CoH to $502K.

• FL-Sen: Charlie Crist hasn’t pulled the trigger on switching over to an indie bid… yet… but he is making two things clear, in an interview with National Review Online. He’s not dropping out of the Senate race (“damn right, I’m staying in this race,” he says), and he’s not switching over to be a Democrat. He says he’s undecided about the indie bid, and has until April 30 to make up his mind.

• IN-Sen: Jim DeMint seems intent on putting his stamp on every contested Senate primary he can find, even if it doesn’t seem likely to amount to much of anything. Case in point, Indiana, where DeMint just endorsed state Sen. Marlin Stutzman in the GOP primary. Stutzman is woefully underfunded and likely to finish third in the primary, but he’s probably the most akin to DeMint, as DeMint isn’t likely to throw his support to worn-out establishment figure Dan Coats or John Hostettler, who seems to be throwing his lot in with the Paulists instead.

• NC-Sen: The state Teamsters previously backed Cal Cunningham in the Democratic Senate primary in North Carolina, but that’s prompted a bit of a fissure. The Charlotte-area Local 71 is instead endorsing Elaine Marshall, leery of Cunningham’s statement that seemed to disapprove of the “card check” provision of EFCA (although he subsequently did a partial back-track).

• OH-Sen: Jennifer Brunner’s fundraising seemed to improve a little, as she’s done more outreach to the netroots this quarter. “Little” is all relative though, as it’s still a day late and few million dollars short; she raised $144K in the first quarter and spent $125K, leaving her with $79K CoH.

• PA-Sen: If there’s one guy who knows how to do negative advertising, it’s Arlen Specter, and he turned both barrels on Joe Sestak today (who’s also launching his own first TV spot today), going after not only Sestak’s frequent House absences but even his Navy record. Meanwhile, Pat Toomey channels Mike Dukakis, breaking one of the cardinal rules of campaigning: no funny hats.

• UT-Sen: If a new poll that Dave Weigel got a glimpse of is to be believed, the incumbent Senator least likely to be coming back next year isn’t Blanche Lincoln or Harry Reid, but… Bob Bennett? A poll of 1,000 delegates to the Utah convention suggests that Bennett is in no position to even make it out of the convention onto the primary ballot: he has the support of only 15% of delegates and second-choice support of only 5% more. Mike Lee has 35% first-choice support and 22% second-choice support, so if Lee consolidates the support of minor candidates as they’re knocked off subsequent ballots and breaks the 60% threshold on the final two-way ballot, he could nail down the nomination right there. (Of course, considering how poorly Bennett is faring, he might not even make it to the final two-way ballot, running the risk of getting knocked off earlier.) Bennett’s only hope is to make it to the final ballot and keep Lee from getting 60% there, which would let him get to the primary, where he might be able to get a majority among the non-activist, name-rec-driven public.

• FL-10: I can always count on Daily Kos’s Steve Singiser to find that stray poll that fell down the slot between the washer and dryer that everyone else missed. He points to a several-week old poll from Dem pollster Anzalone-Liszt that shows Democratic state Sen. Charlie Justice in surprisingly good shape, considering the nature of the year, his underfunded candidacy, the senior-heavy population of the 10th, and most of all that he’s running against the unsinkable Bill Young. Of course, he’s still down 49-34, so this still may not be Justice’s year.

• MI-01: Republicans look like they’ve gotten a state Senator into the race to replace the retiring Rep. Bart Stupak: Jason Allen. Allen has one major liability, though: not only is he not from the Upper Peninsula, where the district’s cultural center of gravity is, but his Traverse City-area house isn’t even in the district. There is a bit of overlap between his legislative district and the 1st, at least.

• NY-23: Hot cat fud a-flyin’ in the 23rd! Matt Doheny, the investment banker who lost the GOP selection process to Dede Scozzafava for the special election despite bringing bushels of his own money to the table, is still angling for the GOP nomination despite the presence of Doug Hoffman. And Doheny is getting some traction among the local GOP establishment, many of whom still resent Hoffman and his Conservative Party candidacy for essentially screwing up what would have otherwise been a slam-dunk. Doheny picked up the endorsement of the Oneida County GOP, and the backing of individual GOP chairs in three other counties. That institutional divide can also be seen in their fundraising; Doheny raised $363K last quarter, while Hoffman, despite his 15 minutes of fame, raised only $13K.

• PA-07: Aggressively pursuing ballot challenges against, well, everyone else on the ballot seems to have paid off for Democratic state Rep. Bryan Lentz. His final remaining Democratic primary opposition, political consultant Teresa Touey, got removed from the ballot after a number of signatures were invalidated, leaving Lentz the only Dem in the primary. He’ll face Republican ex-US Attorney Pat Meehan in the general to replace Joe Sestak.

• NRCC: The NRCC upgraded its “Young Guns” program again in the wake of first-quarter reports, bumping about a dozen challengers to the middle “Contenders” tier and adding 40 more (pretty much anyone who showed a pulse in their FEC reports) to the bottom “On the Radar” tier. It’s a long, long list, so click the link to see all the names.

• DCCC: CQ’s Greg Giroux takes a look at how the various members of the DCCC’s Frontline program (House seats playing defense) fared in the last fundraising quarter. Gabrielle Giffords leads in CoH, while Alan Grayson had the biggest one-quarter haul. To no one’s surprise, Larry Kissell and Carol Shea-Porter bring up the rear.

• Redistricting: The Sacramento Bee has a detailed look at the money-bags interests behind dueling redistricting measures. A big Republican donor, Charles Munger, is behind proposed Proposition 14 in California, which will be on the June primary ballot and proposes a citizen redistricting panel for congressional districts similar to the one in place for legislative districts. However, (usually) Dem donor Haim Saban is trying to get an initiative in place to undo Prop 11’s panel for legislative redistricting and giving the power back to the legislature, which is odd, since he supported Prop 11 when it was on the ballot. One other good redistricting piece: Josh Goodman looks at population shifts in New York over the last decade, which are subtle compared with fast-growing states but suggest that more legislative power will be consolidated in New York City next decade with or without the rejiggering for counting prisoners.

PPP (4/17-18, likely voters, no trendlines):

Mark Critz (D): 41

Tim Burns (R): 44

Undecided: 15

(MoE: ±2.8%)

There’s a battle going on in the special election in the 12th, and that’s a battle between the district’s natural Democratic tendencies and its very high disapproval of Barack Obama. The sample is 55% Democratic, but at the same time, Obama clocks in with a 33/57 approval, and approval of HCR is an alarming 28/59 (so maybe not surprising Critz is running ads saying he’d have voted against it).

If you’re wondering what’s up with that disparity, it mostly has to do with demographics. This is a historically Democratic district where Pittsburgh’s collar counties start to fade into the hills of Appalachia, a seat of traditional union strength among coal miners and steelworkers… but it’s also one of the most elderly districts in the nation (with the second highest percentage of seniors of any district outside Florida). Seniors have been the group most resistant to Obama (if Tea Party demographics are any indication), and in this district hard-hit by lost industry, there’s probably a lot more listening to Fox News than the voices at the union hall these days. Much has been made of how this was the only district in the nation to go from voting for Kerry in 2004 to McCain in 2008; it should also be pointed out that this was one of Hillary Clinton‘s strongest congressional districts anywhere in the primary, with most of the counties in the 12th going for her by at least 70%.

That leaves Critz and Burns, both of whom are very blank slate-ish (people feel positively about both: Burns’ favorables are 45/26 and Critz’s favorables are 41/34). Critz may yet benefit from his connections to John Murtha — despite this district’s seeming turn to the right, Murtha is still held in high esteem in the district (55/33 posthumous approval rating, and by a 49/37 margin, voters want their next Rep. to “carry on” Murtha’s legacy). With a motivation gap in the Republicans’ favor (the PPP likely electorate went for McCain by 7%, instead of his 1% margin in 2008), Critz’s best hope is to tie himself to Murtha, rather than the national party, in order to motivate Democratic base voters to get out.

McLaughlin (R) (4/15, likely voters, no trendlines):

Mark Critz (D): 40

Tim Burns (R): 39

Undecided: 21

(MoE: ±5.6%)

Ordinarily, I’d trust PPP (and a MoE of 2.8%) over a Republican internal poll (and a MoE of 5.6%), and I guess I still have to, despite the GOP internal presenting a rosier scenario. The McLaughlin poll (on behalf of conservative group American Action Network, rather than the Burns campaign) points to the same underlying problem holding down Critz: they find Obama with a 31/68 approval rating.

Taking these two polls into consideration, SSP is moving its rating of this race to “Tossup” from “Lean Democrat”.

Western New England Coll. (4/11-15, likely voters, no trendlines):

Deval Patrick (D-inc): 34

Charlie Baker (R): 27

Tim Cahill (I): 29

Undecided: 10

(MoE: ±4.5%)

Charlie Baker, the former CEO of Harvard-Pilgrim Health Care, secured the GOP nomination at the state party’s convention over the weekend. Baker earned 89% of the delegates’ votes at the convention, pushing rival Christy Mihos below the rather low 15% bar for making it onto the ballot. Baker is something of the heir to the William Weld-style school of socially tolerant (down to the openly gay running mate, Richard Tisei), big-business-friendly, WASPy school of moderate Massachusetts Republicanism.

Mihos, by contrast, is a quirkier outsider figure who had run as a sorta-moderate independent in 2006 but was courting the Tea Party crowd this year… which apparently didn’t work, as the GOP opted by a wide margin for electability (Mihos’s campaign has been awash in financial disarray and general confusion this year). I can’t quite ascertain whether Mihos would still be able to qualify by signature gathering, but it’s a moot point as Mihos pledged his support to Baker at the convention.

The newest poll of the race, the first from WNEC, points to the tough road ahead of Baker, though. Like most pollsters, they find Democratic incumbent Deval Patrick in the 30s, no place an incumbent wants to be. However, they show that Baker and Dem-turned-conservative-indie Tim Cahill are splitting anti-Patrick votes down the middle, more or less canceling each other out and letting Patrick win. One of Baker or Cahill will need to collapse for the other to win. In the poll’s writeup’s words:

Among voters who disapprove of the job that Patrick is doing, 45 percent said they would support Baker, and 40 percent said they would back Cahill. Among voters who said the state is on the wrong track, 39 percent said they would vote for Baker and 38 percent said they would support Cahill.

• FL-Sen: That bell is tolling pretty loudly for Charlie Crist right about now, although it’s unclear today whether it spells a switch to an independent Senate bid (keep your fingers crossed) or an exit (if only temporarily) from politics. Crist’s camp has pulled all of its GOP-primary-related ads from Florida television. Florida junior Senator/Crist errand boy George LeMieux is downplaying this, saying no switch is imminent, but the NRSC is leaning on Crist even more heavily than before, trying to disabuse their endorsee of the idea of an indie bid.

• IN-Sen: I wonder if this will boost John Hostettler with his fundraising by hooking him up with a national base, or if he’s going to be more Peter Schiff than Rand Paul in the end? The former Rep., in his run for the GOP nomination in Indiana, now has the endorsement of Rep. Ron Paul, bringing together two of the very few GOPers to vote against the Iraq War. Meanwhile, state Sen. Marlin Stutzman, the dark-horse third-wheel in the GOP derby, is hitting the TV airwaves with an introductory ad, banking much of his small warchest on getting his name rec out of the basement with the primary only weeks away.

• KS-Sen: Rep. Mike Pence weighed in on the GOP field in Kansas, endorsing Rep. Todd Tiahrt over fellow Rep. Jerry Moran. There’s something of a social/fiscal conservative split on this race, where social conservatives love Tiahrt but fiscal hawks don’t, based on his long career on the goodie-doling Appropriations Committee. If nothing else, it’s interesting to see Pence, who tries to have a foot in each camp, choose sides, as he gears up for a possible presidential bid. Meanwhile, Moran is going up with his first TV spot, with a big buy in the Kansas City market.

• KY-Sen: More tasty cat fud in Kentucky, where Rudy Giuliani just endorsed Trey Grayson and, in doing so, slammed the bejesus out of Rand Paul on the 9/11 front, saying that Grayson “is not part of the ‘blame America first’ crowd that wants to bestow the rights of U.S. citizens on terrorists and point fingers at America for somehow causing 9/11.” Just the kind of softening-up of Paul we need for the general election.

• NY-Sen-B, NY-Gov: Siena’s latest poll of the Empire State doesn’t contain any big surprises; even David Paterson’s 17/83 job rating isn’t that surprising anymore. In their first look at the post-George Pataki Senate landscape, they find that Kirsten Gillibrand is cruising against all of her seemingly interchangeable third-tier opposition; she beats Joe DioGuardi 46-27, Bruce Blakeman 46-26, and David Malpass 46-24. DioGuardi, apparently with the name rec that comes with a celebrity daughter (or maybe it’s from the two terms in Congress in the 1980s), has the edge in a Pataki-free GOP primary, winning with 24 to 7 for Blakeman and 5 for Malpass. On the gubernatorial side, Andrew Cuomo fares even better than Gillibrand, beating Rick Lazio 61-24, Steve Levy 58-23, and Carl Paladino 64-19. Lazio still has the edge in the GOP primary, at 29 with 15 for Levy and 13 for Paladino.

• WA-Sen: Strange that it takes a foul-mouthed blogger to notice the clues that Dino Rossi isn’t running that the Beltway press seems oblivious to. Goldy notices that minor candidate Chris Widener, another personal friend of Rossi, is saying the same thing as state Sen. Don Benton: if he’s running, why the hell isn’t he doing me the favor of calling me up and telling me to get out of the way? (Well, maybe because he’s a jerk?) Even more telling is that another minor GOP candidate, former NFL player Clint Didier, has commercial real estate mogul Kemper Freeman (one of Rossi’s big-name donors and a major insider player in the state GOP), as his campaign chair.

• FL-Gov: I’m wondering if Bill McCollum’s lead role in the pursuit of the GOP AGs’ lawsuit over HCR is suddenly taking a toll on him (voters are opposed to the suit by a 54-40 margin), or if Quinnipiac got an unusually Dem-friendly sample (it’s the same one that found Kendrick Meek with 4 of Marco Rubio in a head-to-head, and Obama gets a 48/46 approval). Either way, Quinnipiac has the nicest numbers we’ve seen out of the Florida gubernatorial race in a while. McCollum leads Democratic state CFO Alex Sink by just 40-36. McCollum leads state Sen. Paula Dockery 56-7 in the GOP primary; Sink leads Dockery 37-28.

• MD-Gov: Usually when a heavyweight jumps into the field, the random odds and ends get out, but the opposite happened in Maryland. Shortly after Bob Ehrlich got in, little-known rich guy Brian Murphy just announced his candidacy today. Murphy will be running against Ehrlich from the right and has the support of former state GOP chair James Pelura. Murphy also got a vote of confidence from former state Del. Carmen Amedori, who dropped her long-shot bid against Barbara Mikulski to sign on as Murphy’s Lt. Governor running mate.

• CA-36: At the state convention, incumbent Rep. Jane Harman managed to ward off Marci Winograd’s attempts to deny Harman the state party’s endorsement. After a floor fight, Harman won the endorsement with a 599-417 vote. The two will still face off in the Democratic primary (in a rematch of 2006).

• GA-09: Here’s a problem for Georgia Dems: they lost their only candidate in the 9th, pastor Mike Freeman. His name will still remain on the ballot for the May 11 special election to replace Nathan Deal, but he leaves behind a hole for the general election. Not that the absence of a Dem in this R+28 district would be noticed much, though.

• MA-09: Rep. Stephen Lynch has dodged a primary challenge so far, following his vote against HCR, but it seems like organized labor has found a candidacy that might stick. Mac d’Alessandro, a regional director for the SEIU, says he’ll take a shot at Lynch in the Democratic primary, although he has only a couple weeks to round up the necessary 2,000 signatures.

• MN-01: The Republicans had their endorsement convention for the 1st District and gave their nod to state Rep. Randy Demmer. While Demmer is hardly anyone’s idea of a moderate, he’s less polarizing than his main rival, former state Rep. Allen Quist (a Michele Bachmann ally). Quist sounds like he’ll honor the endorsement and not run in the primary.

• MN-02: On the Dem side, though, former state Rep. Shelley Madore has decided to keep running in the primary even though the DFL endorsement went to Dan Powers.

• NH-01: In a surprise to almost no one, Sean Mahoney (who made a big show of quitting his committee position on the RNC recently, ostensibly to protest Michael Steele) announced that he’s going to run in the GOP primary in the 1st for the right to take on Rep. Carol Shea-Porter. The primary that looked like a victory lap for former Manchester mayor Frank Guinta last year is now a four-way bar brawl instead.

• NY-24: Rep. Mike Arcuri is, all of a sudden, sounding kind of Stupak-ish in the wake of his getting bruised by all ends of the spectrum after his ill-advised ‘yes’ to ‘no’ switch on HCR; he won’t commit to running for re-election just yet. Either he’s particularly thin-skinned and vindictive about getting his widdle feewings hurt, or he’s looking at some particularly unappetizing polling numbers, especially if the Working Families Party runs someone against him.

By: Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/

Believe it or not, Tuesday was election night. Several million Americans voted (or more accurately, did not vote) in mostly local races.

These results provide a helpful snapshot of the national mood. Polls may be inaccurate, or – more commonly – different pollsters may have different pictures of the public mood. Unlike polls, elections have that useful tendency of never being wrong.

Special elections for congressional districts are especially convenient, because there is already a wealth of accumulated data about them. Moreover, because name recognition of both candidates is generally very low, they come as close as one can get to “generic Democrat versus generic Republican.”

Quite happily, a special election occurred on Tuesday in one such congressional district. Specifically, voters in Florida’s 19th congressional district went about replacing retired House Representative Robert Wexler. Here are the results:

More below.

Of course Democrats do not and have – almost – never have enjoyed a majority anything close to that pictured here. These results must be placed in the context of the congressional district’s political lean. If, for instance, FL-19 constituted a Democratic stronghold, this result would be fairly unremarkable. It might even be quite worrisome for Democrats, depending on the district’s Democratic lean (there are some very, very, very Democratic congressional districts out there). On the other hand, if FL-19 usually voted Republican, Democrats would have some reason to celebrate a victory of this magnitude.

As it turns out, FL-19 constitutes a reliable Democratic stronghold. Located in the Miami metropolis, elderly and Jewish voters compose much of the district’s population. The latter accounts for Democratic strength, making Florida’s 19th 15% more Democratic than the nation as a whole.

With this in mind, last night’s election results do not look so impressive for Democrats. In fact, it appears that the party underperformed relative to the district’s lean.

But this is not news at all – in recent months the public mood has shifted quite strongly against the Democratic Party. Almost the entire Beltway agrees that Democrats will lose seats in November’s midterm elections; the only question is the degree of their loss. Republicans are hoping for a repeat 1994-type landslide; Democrats would be happy to retain control of the House.

Due to the unfavorable public mood, Democrats have had a terrible batting average in the most recent special elections; they most famously lost the state of Massachusetts to an unknown Republican State Senator:

In this context, Florida’s result looks positively respectable. The Democratic Party can take heart in the relatively small drop-off since 2008 – especially compared to their previous performances. Given that President Barack Obama won the election by more than 4.65%, it even suggests that Democrats hold a slight lead on the national level.

Indeed, in recent weeks Democratic fortunes have been on the rise. The passage of health care, alongside a slowly but surely improving economy, has led to an ever-so-slight uptick in their polling. Florida’s result substantiates these polls.

Finally, the very nature of FL-19 can lead Democrats to be optimistic. Mr. Obama’s strongest supporters, young and minority voters, are not present in large numbers in FL-19. Instead, this district – whiter and much more elderly than the nation at large – is composed of the very groups which have been moving away from the Democratic Party. Although it still votes strongly Democratic, Fl-19 is not as blue as it once was:

That Democrats performed as well as they did in a district such as this provides further reason for Democratic optimism. Elderly and white voters have not all abandoned the party; it still can do well with constituencies outside the Obama coalition.

The national mood is still fairly unfavorable towards the Democratic Party; certainly the public is more antagonistic than it was when electing Mr. Obama. If an election were held today, there is a good chance Republicans would end up controlling at least one chamber of Congress. But perhaps, if these results are to be believed, the Democrats are climbing out of the hole the recession has dug for them.

Research 2000 for Daily Kos (4/12-14, likely voters, 3/22-24 in parentheses):

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 45 (44)

Bill Halter (D): 33 (31)

Other: 6 (0)

Undecided: 16 (25)

(MoE: ±5%)

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 43 (42)

John Boozman (R): 50 (49)

Undecided: 7 (9)

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 41 (41)

Gilbert Baker (R): 48 (49)

Undecided: 11 (10)

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 42 (43)

Kim Hendren (R): 49 (48)

Undecided: 9 (9)

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 43 (44)

Curtis Coleman (R): 46 (47)

Undecided: 11 (9)

Bill Halter (D): 41 (40)

John Boozman (R): 48 (48)

Undecided: 11 (12)

Bill Halter (D): 43 (44)

Gilbert Baker (R): 45 (46)

Undecided: 12 (10)

Bill Halter (D): 43 (44)

Kim Hendren (R): 46 (45)

Undecided: 11 (11)

Bill Halter (D): 44 (45)

Curtis Coleman (R): 43 (44)

Undecided: 13 (11)

(MoE: ±4%)

There’s hardly any change here in the topline numbers from the R2K poll of Arkansas released last Friday, either in the primary, or especially in the general. (There were also Tom Cox matchups; I’m leaving them out, as he’s dropped out.) Undecideds are dropping in the primary, but the real gainer here is “other,” probably in the form of previously unknown conservadem D.C. Morrison.

The numbers to note in this poll are the approvals: Blanche Lincoln’s problem is that everyone has an opinion of her, and the majority of that is negative: 43/53. Bill Halter, by contrast, is at 47/30. 23% still haven’t formed an opinion of him, giving him room to grow. Lincoln, by contrast, has hit her ceiling and is upside down — not the conditions that get you re-elected.

AZ-Sen (4/13, likely voters, no trendlines):

Rodney Glassman (D): 32

John McCain (R-inc): 54

Some other: 8

Not sure: 6

Rodney Glassman (D): 39

J.D. Hayworth (R): 48

Some other: 7

Not sure: 7

(MoE: ±4.5%)

AZ-Sen (R primary) (4/13, likely voters, 3/16 in parentheses):

John McCain (R-inc): 47 (48)

J.D. Hayworth (R): 42 (41)

Some other: 2 (3)

Not sure: 8 (8)

(MoE: ±4%)

CA-Sen (4/12, likely voters, 3/11 in parentheses):

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 43 (43)

Tom Campbell (R): 41 (41)

Some other: 6 (6)

Not sure: 10 (10)

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 42 (46)

Carly Fiorina (R): 38 (40)

Some other: 7 (4)

Not sure: 13 (10)

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 42 (46)

Chuck DeVore (R): 39 (40)

Some other: 8 (4)

Not sure: 12 (9)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

CO-Gov (4/14, likely voters, 3/4 in parentheses):

John Hickenlooper (D): 42 (42)

Scott McInnis (R): 48 (48)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 6 (6)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

CO-Sen (4/5, likely voters, 3/2 in parentheses):

Michael Bennet (D-inc): 41 (39)

Jane Norton (R): 46 (48)

Some other: 5 (7)

Not sure: 8 (6)

Michael Bennet (D-inc): 40 (38)

Ken Buck (R): 44 (44)

Some other: 3 (6)

Not sure: 12 (11)

Michael Bennet (D-inc): 39 (40)

Tom Wiens (R): 45 (43)

Some other: 4 (7)

Not sure: 12 (11)

Andrew Romanoff (D): 38 (42)

Jane Norton (R): 49 (44)

Some other: 5 (6)

Not sure: 8 (9)

Andrew Romanoff (D): 37 (40)

Ken Buck (R): 45 (41)

Some other: 4 (5)

Not sure: 13 (13)

Andrew Romanoff (D): 38 (41)

Tom Wiens (R): 45 (41)

Some other: 6 (6)

Not sure: 11 (13)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

CT-Gov (4/1, likely voters, 2/1 in parentheses):

Ned Lamont (D): 37 (40)

Tom Foley (R): 44 (37)

Some other: 7 (9)

Not sure: 13 (14)

Ned Lamont (D): 41 (41)

Michael Fedele (R): 38 (33)

Some other: 9 (8)

Not sure: 12 (18)

Dan Malloy (D): 35 (37)

Tom Foley (R): 44 (36)

Some other: 8 (10)

Not sure: 14 (18)

Dan Malloy (D): 40 (36)

Michael Fedele (R): 37 (35)

Some other: 7 (9)

Not sure: 16 (21)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

CT-Sen (4/7, likely voters, 3/2 in parentheses):

Richard Blumenthal (D): 52 (58)

Rob Simmons (R): 38 (32)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 6 (7)

Richard Blumenthal (D): 55 (60)

Linda McMahon (R): 35 (31)

Some other: 3 (3)

Not sure: 6 (7)

Richard Blumenthal (D): 58 (57)

Peter Schiff (R): 32 (27)

Some other: 4 (6)

Not sure: 6 (10)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

FL-Sen (R primary) (4/8, likely voters, 3/18 in parentheses):

Marco Rubio (R): 57 (56)

Charlie Crist (R): 28 (34)

Some other: 3 (1)

Not sure: 12 (8)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

IL-Gov (4/5, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

Pat Quinn (D-inc): 38 (37)

Bill Brady (R): 45 (47)

Some other: 7 (6)

Not sure: 10 (9)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

IL-Sen (4/5, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

Alexi Giannoulias (D): 37 (44)

Mark Kirk (R): 41 (41)

Some other: 8 (5)

Not sure: 13 (10)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

KY-Sen (3/31, likely voters, 3/2 in parentheses):

Jack Conway (D): 36 (34)

Rand Paul (R): 50 (49)

Some other: 3 (4)

Not sure: 11 (13)

Jack Conway (D): 32 (31)

Trey Grayson (R): 52 (49)

Some other: 5 (6)

Not sure: 11 (14)

Dan Mongiardo (D): 37 (34)

Rand Paul (R): 52 (51)

Some other: 3 (3)

Not sure: 8 (12)

Dan Mongiardo (D): 33 (33)

Trey Grayson (R): 53 (46)

Some other: 5 (5)

Not sure: 9 (16)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

LA-Sen (4/, likely voters, 3/10 in parentheses):

Charlie Melancon (D): 36 (34)

David Vitter (R-inc): 52 (57)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 8 (6)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

MA-Gov (4/5, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

Deval Patrick (D): 35 (35)

Charlie Baker (R): 27 (32)

Tim Cahill (I): 23 (19)

Not sure: 15 (14)

Deval Patrick (D): 38 (34)

Christy Mihos (R): 15 (19)

Tim Cahill (I): 33 (30)

Not sure: 14 (16)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

MO-Sen (4/6, likely voters, 3/9 in parentheses):

Robin Carnahan (D): 42 (41)

Roy Blunt (R): 48 (47)

Some other: 3 (4)

Not sure: 7 (8)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NH-Gov (4/7, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

John Lynch (D-inc): 47 (50)

John Stephen (R): 37 (35)

Some other: 5 (2)

Not sure: 11 (14)

John Lynch (D-inc): 50 (51)

Jack Kimball (R): 34 (32)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 12 (13)

John Lynch (D-inc): 50 (54)

Karen Testerman (R): 33 (28)

Some other: 6 (5)

Not sure: 11 (14)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NH-Sen (4/7, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

Paul Hodes (D): 35 (37)

Kelly Ayotte (R): 50 (47)

Some other: 4 (4)

Not sure: 11 (12)

Paul Hodes (D): 37 (36)

Bill Binnie (R): 49 (46)

Some other: 4 (4)

Not sure: 10 (14)

Paul Hodes (D): 39 (42)

Ovide Lamontagne (R): 44 (38)

Some other: 7 (5)

Not sure: 11 (15)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NV-Gov (3/31, likely voters, 3/3 in parentheses):

Rory Reid (D): 43 (44)

Jim Gibbons (R-inc): 45 (36)

Some other: 8 (15)

Not sure: 4 (4)

Rory Reid (D): 34 (35)

Brian Sandoval (R): 55 (53)

Some other: 6 (7)

Not sure: 4 (5)

Rory Reid (D): 38 (37)

Mike Montandon (R): 45 (42)

Some other: 9 (13)

Not sure: 8 (8)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NV-Sen (3/31, likely voters, 3/3 in parentheses):

Harry Reid (D-inc): 39 (38)

Sue Lowden (R): 54 (51)

Some other: 4 (7)

Not sure: 2 (3)

Harry Reid (D-inc): 42 (37)

Danny Tarkanian (R): 49 (50)

Some other: 6 (9)

Not sure: 2 (4)

Harry Reid (D-inc): 40 (38)

Sharron Angle (R): 51 (46)

Some other: 6 (11)

Not sure: 3 (5)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

PA-Sen (4/12, likely voters, 3/15 in parentheses):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 40 (40)

Pat Toomey (R): 50 (49)

Some other: 4 (5)

Not sure: 6 (7)

Joe Sestak (D): 36 (37)

Pat Toomey (R): 47 (42)

Some other: 5 (7)

Not sure: 12 (15)

(MoE: ±3%)

PA-Sen (D primary) (4/12, likely voters, 3/15 in parentheses):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 44 (48)

Joe Sestak (D): 42 (37)

Some other: 4 (5)

Not sure: 10 (9)

(MoE: ±5%)

UT-Gov (4/8, likely voters, no trendlines):

Peter Corroon (D): 29

Gary Herbert (R-inc): 57

Some other: 4

Not sure: 10

(MoE: ±3%)

UT-Sen (R primary) (4/8, likely voters):

Bob Bennett (R-inc): 37

Tim Bridgewater (R): 14

Mike Lee (R): 14

Merrill Cook (R): 6

Cherilyn Eagar (R): 4

Some other: 3

Not sure: 21

(MoE: ±4%)

WA-Sen (4/6, likely voters, 3/9 in parentheses):

Patty Murray (D-inc): 48 (46)

Dino Rossi (R): 46 (49)

Some other: 3 (3)

Not sure: 4 (2)

Patty Murray (D-inc): 48 (48)

Don Benton (R): 40 (37)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 8 (12)

Patty Murray (D-inc): 47 (49)

Clint Didier (R): 37 (30)

Some other: 5 (6)

Not sure: 11 (15)

Patty Murray (D-inc): 46 (47)

Chris Widener (R): 37 (32)

Some other: 5 (5)

Not sure: 12 (16)

Patty Murray (D-inc): 45 (NA)

Paul Akers (R): 37 (NA)

Some other: 5 (NA)

Not sure: 13 (NA)

(MoE: ±4.5%)