IL-11: Halvorson loses chairmanship? What’s going on here?

Caught this story on The Fix.  Democratic candidate Debbie Halvorson has been removed from her chairmanship of the Illinois State Senate Rules Committee.

The Crete Democrat has been at the head of the committee for at least two years, but was removed completely after she came under fire by Republican Marty Ozinga III’s campaign for her apparent inability to pass a popular recall amendment, a measure Halvorson supported but Senate President Emil Jones and Gov. Rod Blagojevich vehemently opposed.

“Jones said we have some more issues that we need to work on for this session, and that my opponent is making a big deal and taking everything out of context, and that it’s distracting to what we need to get accomplished,” Halvorson said. “I’m very surprised. I did not ask for it.”

….

In a 2000 story by the Associated Press, Halvorson, then on the minority side, said the Rules Committee drives the legislative agenda of the in-power party. “That’s what happens when you rule the place. While you have the gavel, you have the power,” Halvorson was quoted as saying.

Ozinga’s campaign says Halvorson only started “bucking Jones” during her congressional campaign, but Halvorson offered two examples from before her campaign days: She opposed the proposed gross receipts tax and wanted a capital bill approved before a CTA bailout, both issues on which she and Jones disagreed, she said.

Are you kidding me?  Her Republican opponent complains about her standing up for what she believes in, so the Senate president removes her from her position?  Let’s hope this backfires on Ozinga from saying that Halvorson is simply a “rubber-stamp” for Jones.

Meanwhile, it looks like Ozinga hired Jack Abramoff consultant Jonathan Poe to be his media consultant.  We’ll see if this story has legs, though I doubt it, as Poe didn’t do anything illegal.

GOP Ethics Chair cheats on wife – support Vietnam Vet Bill O’Neill for Memorial Day

I know Rob already diaried this, but I really want to help Bill O’Neill turn OH-14 blue – so here’s a little more information about this race and our Memorial Day Donor Bomb

Rep. Steve LaTourette of Ohio is scum, but his opponent, Bill O’Neill is a Vietnam veteran we can really get behind. Summary of this Diary:

1. Support Bill O’Neill, winner of Election Inspection’s Memorial Day Donor Bomb contest to support a veteran running for Congress.

2. Why O’Neill is good for Veterans, Labor, Civil Rights, Small Business, and restoring the rule of law.

3. The sordid tale of GOP Rep. Steve LaTourette, a phony moderate, a corrupt scumbag who is literally in bed with his lobbyist, and a toothless ethics chair who made a mockery of the job and was still yanked by Tom DeLay for the smallest ounce of insubordination.

Please donate to Bill O’Neill for Memorial Day! Let’s give our veterans and the families of the fallen a congress that understands them and will vote to end the Iraq War.

Ohio’s 14th district is in the suburbs of Cleveland – exactly the kind of place where Democrats have been making inroads in the past two cycles. The PVI of the district is R+2 – a very winnable district. Steve LaTourette has a scandal against him and an opponent who’s both a Vietnam Vet and an elected Judge. We need to send O’Neill money to help get this race onto the DCCC radar and attract attention from VoteVets as well. That’s right, the only barrier to this race becoming competitive is money, the one thing nearly any of us can help with. Send a lot or a little to a veteran running for congress this Memorial Day.

Bill O’Neill is a Vietnam veteran who received a Bronze Star – that’s patriotism that no flag pin can match. He’s also been a civil rights lawyer, a small businessman, and a union organizer – a man who understands the economic challenges faced by Ohioans who’ve felt the brunt of the Bush Economy. In more recent years, he’s been one of the most respected appellate judges in Ohio – a man of integrity who can be trusted to make sure that no man, even the President of the United States, is above the law. He stepped down from the bench in June 2007 to run for Congress, because he knows a judge cannot be compromised by the trials of campaigning. Learn more about O’Neill.

Steve LaTourette is scum – he cheated on his wife with his former chief of staff, who was lobbying his committee, who LaTourette then remarried after getting a divorce. So he’s literally in bed with a lobbyist, and she suddenly got all sorts of new clients. For example, she represents the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, while he’s the ranking member on the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime, a part of the Transportation and Infrastructure committee. This isn’t why the GOP removed him as chair of the Ethics committee, of course – they simply didn’t like his toothless admonishment (with no penalties) of Tom Delay. LaTourette quickly fell in line after that. Salon article on LaTourette by Cliff Schecter. LaTourette has a perfect score on the Family Values card according to the GOP – that is, unless you count his own family values. (Is that why people think he’s a moderate?)

So please – spread the word, and Donate to Bill O’Neill!

This Memorial Day Donor Bomb brought to you by Election Inspection – your source for polls, predictions, analysis, news, and now fundraising efforts. Don’t forget to tip ActBlue for the great work they do!

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

On Memorial Day

A most safe and happy Memorial Day to all my cyber-friends and fellow Democrats.  More importantly, a happy Memorial Day and heartfelt thanks to our women and men, past and present, who have served all of us in the Armed Forces.  As someone who comes from a family with a long tradition of military service (and almost all are military Democrats!), there is nothing that bothers me more than the Democratic Party being tagged as “less patriotic” than the Republicans are.

In part, I would argue, that this is our fault, as at times over the past twenty years or so we have let this happen.  I think we have been too timid at times when it comes to this set of issues, and there is no reason to be.  From the impressive set of Democratic veterans now serving in Congress and candidates this fall, to the long history of military service and advocacy that makes up our party’s history, we should take a back seat to no one.  For example, the GOP loves to still talk about the “McGovern wing” of the Democratic Party.  Every time they say that, we should remind them that at age 19, George McGovern volunteered for military service during World War II, and was a highly decorated figher pilot.

We know, as Democrats, what the important issues are, and that veterans health care and support for military families (issues that our current Administration should hang their head in shame about more than anything else they’ve done) are more important things than whether or not one chooses to wear a flag pin on their suit jacket.  But these symbolic issues do matter as well.  For example, I would like to see more liberals, when they uphold the Constitutional right to burn the flag, also more strongly criticize people who choose to do it.

We’re going to be hit with the “unpatriotic” charge A LOT over the next several months.  Let’s not back down!

PA-05: McCracken for Congress — Remembering Those Who Served — Memorial Day Weekend 2008

While Memorial Day weekend is recognized as the unofficial start of the summer season with the first family picnics and backyard barbeques, we must take time to remember the true meaning of the Memorial Day holiday.  First and foremost, Memorial Day is to remember and honor those who accepted the call into military service to protect our country.  I always take a few moments while visiting local cemeteries on Memorial Day weekend to notice the flags marking the graves of deceased veterans.

This year, at Calvary Cemetery in Clearfield, there is a flag in place for the first time marking the grave of my recently deceased father, a World War II veteran.  My father was always proud of being a World War II veteran and the sad fact is the number of World War II vets is dwindling with each passing year.  They were called the “Greatest Generation” for their efforts to win the war against two powerful enemies on two different fronts.  Then, they came home and became the working force behind a strong economy, the expansion of our national infrastructure and they were the parents of the baby boom generation.

Back in the days following World War II, our nation and our leaders recognized the debt owed to the brave men and women who served during World War II.  Our government provided for their return to civilian life with the GI Bill to provide funding for education and financial assistance to purchase homes.

It was encouraging this past Thursday when the US Senate overwhelmingly passed the 21st Century post-9/11 GI Bill that was proposed by Virginia Senator Jim Webb.  The post-9/11 GI Bill passed the house the proceeding week and will provide veterans of the War in Iraq and Afghanistan with the opportunity for comprehensive educational benefits when they return home.  This was the right thing to do for our service men and woman and I congratulate Senator Webb and his colleagues for taking action on this important legislation.

Blossburg Coal Festival:  On Saturday, Kelly, Amanda and I traveled to Tioga County for the annual Blossburg Coal Festival.  We took part in the parade through Blossburg on Saturday morning.  The plan was for Kelly and Amanda to ride in our vehicle with the “McCracken for Congress” signs on display while I walked tossing candy.  When it was time for the parade to start, Amanda announced that she wanted to walk the parade route with me and help toss the candy.  I wasn’t sure how far her 5 year old legs would take her but I figured if she got tired I would put her in the car.  Well, Amanda must have a future in politics because she walked the whole parade route and had a smile on her face the entire time.

After the parade, we stayed at the festival for several hours where I worked at the Tioga County Democratic Party booth while Kelly and Amanda enjoyed the food, games and rides.  While was standing at the booth, I spoke with a number of people about many issues of concern in Tioga County.

Not surprisingly, people wanted to talk about the price of gas, the rising price of food and the war in Iraq.  I also was asked where I stood on Second Amendment rights and my support for alternative fuels including corn based ethanol.  The overwhelming majority of the people I spoke with were in agreement with the opinions and ideas I shared with them.  Tioga County is a wonderful place and the people there are very interested in our campaign.  I look forward to many more trips to Tioga County during the coming months of the campaign.

In closing, Kelly, Amanda and I wish everyone a safe and fun filled Memorial Day weekend.

Mark B. McCracken

Your Candidate For Congress

————————————————————————————————–

This diary is cross-posted at McCracken’s campaign blog, PA’s Blue Fifth

Mark McCracken for Congress

ActBlue page

supporting the troops in a way GWB never intended

The winner of the contest held by Election Inspection was Lt. Colonel Bill O’Neill.  More below the fold.

Bill O’Neill resigned from his seat on the Appelate Court in Ohio’s 11th district to run for Congress in Ohio’s 14th congressional district.  The seat is current held by Rethug Steve LaTourette.  

LaTourette is another one of the family values for you but not for me crowd having an extra marital affair with his former Chief of Staff who became a lobbyist with whom he is now married.  This is just one example of LaTourette’s relationships (literally) with lobbyists.  

The district is an R + 2 district that is trending blue so it is a winnable district with a conservative Republican that needs to be replaced.  O’Neill, despite solid fundraising numbers and a good district to play in, has not been named in either votevets endorsements or the the DCCC Red to Blue program.  We are hoping that with a successful donor bomb on this Memorial Day, that O’Neill will get the publicity and money he needs to achieve both of these crucial endorsements.

The actblue page can be found here  

http://www.actblue.com/page/ei…

So support your troops in a way George W. Bush never intended you to do, give Lt. Colonel Bill O’Neill some money and support him in his effort to throw the Republicans out of office.

NM-01, NM-03: Heinrich, Lujan Lead in New Primary Polls

Research & Polling Inc. (5/20-22, likely voters):

NM-01:

Martin Heinrich (D): 34

Rebecca Vigil-Giron (D): 23

Michelle Lujan Grisham (D): 10

Robert Pidcock (D): 4

Undecided: 29

(MoE: ±5)

The big news here is Vigil-Giron’s second place showing. Most had assumed that Heinrich’s more immediate competition would have been Lujan Grisham, as she has far outpaced Vigil-Giron in fundraising. However, Vigil-Giron is a former New Mexico Secretary of State, and her name recognition clearly is counting for something, despite her next-to-nil funding.

NM-03:

Ben Ray Lujan (D): 29

Don Wiviott (D): 23

Undecided: 33

(MoE: ±4.5)

There are a few other names in this contest (including the despicable Benny Shendo, Jr.), but apparently Lujan and Wiviott’s numbers were the only ones worth writing about.

Primary: June 3rd

(Hat-tip: New Mexico FBIHOP)

Do Primaries Help or Hurt in the General? : A Look at 51 House races from 2006

The general belief seems to be that it is important to “clear the field” in primaries to get a winning hand in the fall general election.  The belief is founded on a number of factors.  Many interest groups will not back a candidate with a primary election opponent.  Primary election campaigns can be costly and challengers generally have less money to spend than incumbents.  Anecdotal evidence points to a number of campaigns easch cycle where a strong primary is followed by disappointing results in the fall.

I decided to test this thesis by looking at election results for all 31 Democratic pickups in the House during the 2006 cycle (including Peter Welch as a pickup in Vermont) and comparing the results to close losses.  The close losses were not systenmatic but I looked at 20 races that fit the bill.

Overall, 14 of the 31 pickups (45%) were preceded by primary elections, a higher than expected number.  Although some of these were blowouts, a surprising number were close and in many cases surprise winners emerged despite less money.  As a comparison, among the 20 close but losing elections only seven (35%) were preceded by primaries and only one of those was close: the Tammy Duckworth-Christine Cegelis- Scott duel in IL-6.

Adding fuel to the fire, IIRC, all 3 of our special election vitories were preceded by primaries.  Bill Foster’s win in IL-14 (at least for November) against John Laesch, was a much tougher battle than his win against Jim Oberweis.

A listing and some commentary follow with emphasis on upsets and close races.

The only primary that mattered in the New England House races mattered a good deal.  Carol Shea-Porter surprised Jim Craig in a multi-candidate field and then won a close election to the House with just $290,000 in campaign expenditures (being outspent nearly 4:1). Nobody knows if the better known, more establishment Craig would have pulled it off.  Shea-Porter depended mostly on volunteers and a lot of shoe leather, particularly her own.  Her personal efforts in Manchester vs. Craig going door to door and bar to bar certainly paid off in both the general election and in the primary, itself.

NH-2 (Hodes) and the CT races (Joe Courtney, CT-2; Chris Murphy, CT-5, and Diane Farrell, CT-4 were all uncontested.

New York had six major races with three pickups and three close loses.  Only one had a primary and that produced what was seeen on the blogs as an upset.  In NY-19, John Hall won rather easily in a multi-candidate field converting his years as a local official and rock star status (singer with the band Orleans famous for “You’re the One”) into a comfortable victory over the much better funded Judy Aydelott and others (I remember Ben Shuldiner).  NY-20(Kirsten Gillibrand),24 (Michael Arcuri), 25 (Dan Maffei),26 (Jack Davis), and 29 (Eric Massa) were uncontested.  Gillibrand and Arcuri won in the fall.

PA produced four wins and one close loss.  Two of the four winners (Jason Altmire and Patrick Murphy) faced primary challengers.  Altmire got a fairly sturdy challenge besting Georgia Berner 55% to 45% en route to dethroning Melissa Hart in PA-4.  Murphy had an easier time over Andrew Warren 65% to 35%.  Lois Murphy had a token challenge against Anrew Leibowitz (76% to 24%)  prior to losing versus Jim Gerlach in PA-6.

Elsewhere in the Northeast, Linda Stender had no primary but lost closely to Mikrke Ferguson in NJ-7.  Peter Welch, a general election winner in VT also faced no primary.

Lest we forget, in OH-18 Zach Space coasted to an easy win in November but many thought Joe Sulzer would be the likely nominee.  Space won in a multi candidate field.  Only one of three close losers in OH faced a primary (Vic Wulsin who won in a multi candidate field including Thor Jacobs and Jim Parker).  John Cranley and Mary Jo Kilroy had an open path to the general election.

Both Joe Donnelly and Baron Hill faced easy primaries and Brad Ellsworth went unopposed among three Indiana pickups.  Tim Walz in Minnesota was also unopposed but Steve Kagen had to claw his way through a multi-candidate field  including Wall and Nussbaum.  I remember a lot of people touting Nussbaum.

Tammy Duckworth spent a bundle to secure the Democratic nomination by just 1,000 votes over Christine Cegelis.  And provided a disappointing loss in November.  Tim Walz in MN-1 had a clear field but Steve Kagen had to beat a multi-candidate field before he clould allegedly tell Karl Rove he was Dr. Multi-Millionaire.

John Yarmuth got 53% in a primary vs. Andrew Horne and others before taking on Anne Northrup in KY-3.  Heath Shuler coasted through his primary but Tim Mahoney and Ron Klein in Florida got free rides.  Close losers in the south also had to earn their way in with larry Kissell having an easy time but Christine Jennings (61%) drawing 2004 nominee Jan Schneider (39%) in FL-13.

In the Plains, Bruce Braley had a brutal three way battle against Dickinson and Gluba but Dave Loebsack had no opponent.  Nancy Boyda wa unopposed. Nick Lampson and Ciro Rodriguez were OK (although this was Ciro’s second go around in the cycle).

Out west, winner Harry Mitchell was unopposed butGabrielle Giffords won 54% in a multi-candidate fieldand Jerry McNerney had to upset the establishment fave, Steve Flson, befoe taking down Richard Pombo in the general.  Ed Perlmutter also triumphed against two other strong candidates particularly Peggy Lamm in CO.

Western close losers Gary Trauner, Darcy Burner and Angie Pacccione were unopposed and Tessa Hafen won easily in NV with 58% in a multi-candidate field.

In short, the winners in pickup races were more likely to face a challenge, more likely to face a serious challenge and were forced to pull upsets against better funded opponents in a number of races.  You would be hard pessed to make an argument for clearing the field based on these results.

Nasty blood fueds like Cegelis vs. Duckworth however were damaging and they should be avoided.

In the South, John Yarmuth (KY-3)

 

NE-Sen: New Poll Shows a Tough Race For Kleeb

In case you missed it.  Research 2000 for Daily Kos (5/19-21, likely voters, 11/12-14 in parens):

Scott Kleeb (D): 31 (28)

Mike Johanns (R): 58 (59)

(MoE: ±4)

Those are some rough numbers for Kleeb, who might have been expected to get a bit of a bounce from trouncing Tony Raimondo in the state’s May 13 primary — yet, 50% of voters have “no opinion” of him.

A recent Rasmussen poll pegged this race at a much less daunting 40-55 for Johanns.  The truth may be somewhere in between, but that’s still an awfully tough task for Kleeb.

Also of note are the poll’s presidential crosstabs, which have Obama lagging badly behind McCain at 29% to 57%.  (Rasmussen had it at 39% to 50%.) Despite a SurveyUSA poll from February showing Obama leading McCain within the margin of error in NE-01 and NE-02, R2K has Obama behind by 35 points in 1st and 30 points in 2nd.  Perhaps bizarrely, he’s only 20 points behind in the state’s most Republican district, the R+23.6 3rd.

NY-13: Vincent Gentile To Run

http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_…

Hidden amidst  the news that the GOP lost its two top contenders for Fossella’s seat was city councilman Vincent Gentile’s declaration that he’s going to run.

This took me by surprise because he seemed to be the only NY-13 candidate who hadn’t been discussed for a potential run. But he does have more experience in political office than most people in the area – he served in the state senate (in my girlfriend’s district) from ’96-’02 before losing to Republican Marty Golden, and proceeded to win the special election for Marty Golden’s city council seat in ’03.

He is a Brooklynite, and in the Daily News article offers that as a reason for his run, “saying he doesn’t believe the “myth” that a candidate from outside Staten Island can’t win.” I would suggest that the fact that he’s term-limited out of the council in ’09 is probably his real reason behind an unlikely run. Although his prior career as a prosecutor may make him a good match for the district, where lots of policemen live and “tough on crime” attitudes were what made Donovan so attractive a candidate for the GOP.

I don’t know too much about his politics – he did support the corrupt homophobe Noach Dear for Civil Court Judge despite the fact that Dear was not licensed to practice law, lumping him together in the same undesirable company of some other Brooklyn pols such as Marty Markowitz and former NY-13 candidate Domenic Recchia.

http://www.dailygotham.com/blo…

Anyway, I doubt he’s particularly progressive or electable given geography and associations – so I guess we’re still waiting on the two Michaels – McMahon and Cusick – to figure out which one is gonna run.

Novak: Rendell considering 2010 Senate run

While this is coming from Bob Novak’s column, I found it very interesting nonetheless.  I would still guess that Rendell won’t challenge Specter because (1) they are friends; and (2) I am not sure the Senate would be Rendell’s cup of tea.  

That being said, 2010 is a long ways away, plus Rendell realizes that after he leaves Harrisburg, he will be out of office completely.  It would certainly be a great opening, and there is no doubt Rendell would be our best possible nominee.  Besides, given Specter’s age, all of his talk about definitely running may just be bluster.  

SPECTER’S OPPONENT?

Pennsylvania’s popular Democratic Gov. Edward Rendell is reported by party sources to be considering a race for the Senate in 2010 even if his friend and fellow Philadelphian, Republican Sen. Arlen Specter, seeks re-election.

Specter has indicated that he wants a sixth term in the Senate, but that may depend on his health. He is suffering from a recurrence of cancer.

Republican insiders believe that Specter might decide to run as an independent if conservatives launch another serious Republican primary campaign against him, as they did in 2004. A three-way election would all but guarantee the election of a Democrat.