CT-Gov: AP Withdraws Malloy Call

Uh-oh:

The Associated Press is withdrawing its call of Democrat Dan Malloy as the winner of Connecticut’s race for governor.

The Associated Press based its call on statements by the Connecticut Secretary of State. Susan Bysiewicz that Malloy had defeated Republican Tom Foley by 3,103 votes and that there would be no statewide recount, if her preliminary totals held.

AP’s vote count now shows Foley with a lead of 8,424 votes over Malloy, with all but 1.5 percent of the precincts counted. Bysiewicz has not released any vote results to support her statements earlier Wednesday.

UPDATE: Jeez. Both Malloy and Foley are declaring victory and announcing transition teams.

LATER UPDATE: Taniel, in the comments here and over at his own blog points to some pretty seriously sloppy number-counting by the Associated Press, amounting to a significant under-reporting of Malloy’s vote in the city of New Haven. I’ll note here that as someone who has more than a few liveblogs under my belt, I can think of several instances where the AP has made significant errors in their tabulation of results. (For instance, they made big errors in their OH-15 and SC-01 results reporting last cycle.) While an invaluable resource, they’ve been known to make mistakes!

Analysis of the results since my prediction

I feel not very bad after all. Maybe because I’m a positive person what find always the good part of the situation.

They are some results what touch my mind. But they are not very much:

FIRST LEVEL:

Turn me off

WI-ST D Sass

MN-08 J Oberstar

IL-10 D Seals

NH-02 A Kuster

and if the democratic candidates lose, OR-Gov J Kitzhaber, WA-02 R Larsen and NY-25 D Maffei would be in this group too.

Turn me on

SECOND LEVEL (little less surprise):

Turn me off

IL-Sen A Giannoulias

IA-SS M Mauro

VT-SA D Hoffer

Turn me on

IL-Gov P Quinn

IL-LG S Simon

NY-23 W Owens

SENATE

My prediction works not bad in this level. I tell 5 but finally can be 6 seats because WA seems to go by the right way.

Illinois is the state where I fail. And it is sad lose this seat because I think we lose cause of have not the strongest candidate.

R Feingold and J Sestak finally lose and this is an important coup to the democrats from Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. They can not keep the seats despite they run with their best but the year was too bad for it. Still, I think both can return in a better year.

Sometimes I tell M Beeve would be the candidate what can keep the seat in Arkansas this year, but I have to admit that the challenge was hard. I think E Bayh would not keep his seat against the more prominent republicans from his home state.

This was my last prediction:

Republican gains = 5

ND-Sen (- 45.00%)

IN-Sen (- 18.25%)

AR-Sen (- 16.00%) B Lincoln

WI-Sen (- 05.50%) R Feingold

PA-Sen (- 03.25%)

Democratic gains = 0

Other interesting races in single digits

KY-Sen (- 08.75%)

MO-Sen (- 07.25%)

AK-Sen (- 04.75%)

CO-Sen (+ 00.75%) M Bennet

NV-Sen (+ 01.00%) H Reid

IL-Sen (+ 02.50%) A Giannoulias

WV-Sen (+ 03.50%) J Manchin

WA-Sen (+ 04.00%) P Murray

CA-Sen (+ 08.50%) B Boxer

CT-Sen (+ 09.00%) R Blumenthal

The percentage is for McAdams under the first republican. My numbers gives Murkowsky leading still, Miller – 00.75% and McAdams – 4.75%.

GOVERNOR

Still can be too early for talk about the gubernatorial races, but it would be a pretty good result if we can keep the gubernatorial race in Oregon, winning too Illinois, Minnesota and Connecticut. If someone of these races goes to the republican side will be a disappointing moment for me.

I’m so happy of be wrong about P Quinn in the gubernatorial election of Illinois. Just this was one of the surprises with higher power for turn me on.

I would like L Chafee join the democratic team fast. The people back him and they are not reasons for continue as independent in one of the bluest states. RI-Gov must be a new gain for the democrats.

My last prediction was:

Republican gains = 13

WY-Gov (- 32.33%)

KS-Gov (- 31.00%)

TN-Gov (- 25.75%)

MI-Gov (- 15.75%)

OK-Gov (- 14.75%)

IA-Gov (- 11.25%) C Culver

ME-Gov (- 09.25%)

NM-Gov (- 07.75%)

PA-Gov (- 07.25%)

WI-Gov (- 06.00%)

IL-Gov (- 04.75%) P Quinn

OH-Gov (- 03.00%) T Strickland

FL-Gov (- 00.25%) (republican gain from Independents)

“Democratic” gains = 5 + 1

CT-Gov (= 00.00%) D Malloy

VT-Gov (+ 02.33%) P Shumlin

HI-Gov (+ 04.25%) N Abercrombie

MN-Gov (+ 05.00%) M Dayton

CA-Gov (+ 06.75%) J Brown

RI-Gov (+ 08.50%) L Chafee (Ind) (over Robitaille)

Other interesting races in single digits

AZ-Gov (- 09.25%)

GA-Gov (- 08.00%)

SC-Gov (- 07.50%)

OR-Gov (+ 02.75%) J Kitzhaber

CO-Gov (+ 05.00%) J Hickenlooper

MA-Gov (+ 06.25%) D Patrick

HOUSE

Here my numbers give the worst results with difference. I was right about the seats what I give as republican gains or retentions except for NY-23, HI-01 and maybe VA-11, but my numbers tell what the democratic side would keep other seats what finally lose.

Like for all the groups I bold emphasize the races where my numbers fail. Still they are more what I include not in the list because my numbers give high single digits of advantage to the incumbent party. I talk explicitly about AL-02 in my prediction but they are more like ID-01, NY-13, NY-24, VA-09 and MN-08. Maybe NY-25 too.

Some house races are without call still but I take the leading candidate as favored for this analysis.

Just MN-08 gives one of the results what I take worse with IL-10 and NH-02. Minnesota appears as an easy state by many months and we can see in the final results a strong enthusiasm gap.

This was my last prediction for this group:

Republican gains = 45

TN-06 (<- 10.00%) (double digits for the republican)

KS-03 (<- 10.00%)

LA-03 (<- 10.00%)

IN-08 (- 18.50%)

FL-02 (- 16.50%) A Boyd

NY-29 (- 15.50%)

AR-02 (- 14.25%)

TN-08 (- 11.50%)

GA-08 (- 10.75%) J Marshall

IL-11 (- 10.75%) D Halvorson

TX-17 (- 10.25%) C Edwards

PA-03 (- 10.25%) K Dahlkemper

NH-01 (- 10.00%) C Shea-Porter

OH-16 (- 09.67%) J Boccieri

OH-01 (- 09.00%) S Driehaus

WI-08 (- 08.00%) S Kagen

OH-15 (- 07.75%) M Kilroy

WA-03 (- 07.50%)

WI-07 (- 07.50%)

PA-07 (- 07.25%)

FL-24 (- 06.67%) S Kosmas

VA-02 (- 06.25%) G Nye

MI-01 (- 06.00%)

CO-04 (- 04.67%) B Markey

MS-01 (- 04.50%) T Childers

MD-01 (- 04.50%) F Kratovil

VA-05 (- 04.50%) T Perriello

CO-03 (- 04.50%) J Salazar

NM-02 (- 04.25%) H Teague

FL-08 (- 04.25%) A Grayson

AR-01 (- 04.00%)

TX-27 (- 04.00%) S Ortiz

TX-23 (- 03.33%) C Rodriguez

PA-10 (- 02.75%) C Carney

IL-17 (- 02.25%) P Hare

NV-03 (- 02.00%) C Titus

NY-23 (- 01.75%) W Owens

NY-20 (- 01.50%) S Murphy

NJ-03 (- 01.00%) J Adler

VA-11 (- 01.00%) G Connolly

AZ-01 (- 00.75%) A Kirkpatrick

IL-14 (- 00.50%) W Foster

SC-05 (- 00.25%) J Spratt

PA-08 (- 00.25%) P Murphy

MI-07 (= 00.00%) M Schauer

Democratic gains = 4

FL-25 (+ 01.25%) J Garcia

IL-10 (+ 03.50%) D Seals

DE-AL (+ 12.00%) J Carney

LA-02 (+ 13.75%) C Richmond

Other interesting races in low single digits

AZ-03 (- 02.00%)

HI-01 (- 01.25%)

FL-12 (- 00.50%)

NY-19 (+ 00.25%) J Hall

OH-06 (+ 00.33%) C Wilson

MA-10 (+ 00.50%) W Keating

MI-09 (+ 00.67%) G Peeters

ND-AL (+ 01.00%) E Pomeroy

SD-AL (+ 01.00%) S Herseth-Sandlin

NC-02 (+ 01.00%) R Etheridge

CA-11 (+ 01.00%) G McNerney

OR-05 (+ 01.00%) K Schrader

CT-04 (+ 01.00%) J Himes

AZ-05 (+ 01.25%) H Mitchell

PA-12 (+ 01.25%) M Critz

PA-11 (+ 01.25%) P Kanjorski

CA-20 (+ 01.33%) J Costa

TN-04 (+ 02.50%) L Davis

IL-08 (+ 02.50%) M Bean

NH-02 (+ 02.50%) A Kuster

WA-02 (+ 02.50%) R Larsen

FL-22 (+ 03.00%) R Klein

CO-07 (+ 03.00%) E Perlmutter

GA-02 (+ 03.25%) S Bishop

MS-04 (+ 03.33%) G Taylor

IN-09 (+ 03.33%) B Hill

OH-13 (+ 03.50%) B Sutton

OH-18 (+ 04.00%) Z Space

AZ-08 (+ 04.00%) G Giffords

NM-01 (+ 04.25%) M Heinrich

WV-01 (+ 04.50%) M Oliverio

MO-04 (+ 05.00%) I Skelton

My numbers tell NC-07, AL-02 and NC-08 are in high single digits.

They are 25 races between 0 and -5 and 31 between 0 and +5. The majority in the House is still in play. It is time of fight hard until the last day.

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

Here my point is so close with the gubernatorial races with few differences. As example, they are not Lieutenant Governor in Oregon. That mean I also feel not bad about this group.

My numbers again work so well in this group, but fail for AL-LG race, and maybe for IL-LG (running in the same ticket that the governor). J Folsom is affected by the wave like many house members running in R+ districts.

My last prediction for this group was:

Republican gains = 10

LA-LG (<- 10.00%)

KS-LG (- 31.00%)

MI-LG (- 15.75%)

OK-LG (- 12.00%)

IA-LG (- 11.25%) P Judge

NM-LG (- 07.75%)

WI-LG (- 06.00%)

IL-LG (- 04.75%)

OH-LG (- 03.00%)

AR-LG (- 02.33%)

Democratic gains = 4

CT-LG (= 00.00%) N Wyman

HI-LG (+ 04.25%) B Schatz

MN-LG (+ 05.00%) Y Prettner Solon

CA-LG (+ 06.50%) G Newsom

Other interesting races in single digits

PA-LG (- 07.25%)

VT-LG (- 05.00%)

SC-LG (- 04.00%)

FL-LG (- 00.25%)

MA-LG (+ 06.25%) T Murray

AL-LG (+ 06.33%) J Folsom

STATEWIDE OFFICES

This is the code for some statewide offices included in this box (quote):

AG=Attorney General

SS=Secretary of State

ST=State Treasurer

SC=State Comptroller

SA=State Auditor

IC=Insurance Commissioner

CL=Commissioner of Labor

For this group again my numbers work so well. I have 5 mistakes in my prediction. The biggest surprise is WI-ST, but this is a relative surprise looking to the other prospects and results for this state. Four close races (following my numbers) go finally to the republican side too, giving new gains to the republicans. They are IA-SS, VT-SA, OH-SS and SC-SE.

Republican gains = 25

AL-CAI (<- 10.00%) (Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries)

AR-CSL (- 24.00%) (Commissioner of State Lands)

KS-SS (- 22.67%) C Biggs

OK-AG (- 20.00%)

IL-SC (- 18.00%)

KS-ST (- 16.00%) D McKinney

GA-CA (- 16.00%)

OK-ST (- 14.00%)

KS-AG (- 12.33%) S Six

GA-AG (- 11.67%)

OK-CL (- 11.00%) L Fields

FL-CFO (- 09.00%) (Chief Financial Officer)

AZ-AG (- 08.75%)

NM-SS (- 08.00%) M Herrera

OK-SA (- 06.00%) S Burrage

OK-IC (- 06.00%) K Holland

CO-ST (- 06.00%) C Kennedy

IL-ST (- 05.67%)

CO-SS (- 04.33%) B Buescher

OH-AG (- 04.25%) R Cordray

AR-SS (- 04.00%)

OK-SPI (- 03.00%) (Superintendent of Public Instruction)

MO-SA (- 03.00%) S Montee

OH-ST (- 00.25%) K Boyce

GA-CL (= 00.00%)

Democratic gains = 3

VT-SA (= 00.00%) D Hoffer

CA-IC (+ 17.00%) D Jones

NM-CPL (>+ 10.00%) (Commissioner of Public Lands) R Powell

Other interesting races in low single digits

OH-SA (- 02.50%)

IA-SS (+ 01.00%) M Mauro

CA-AG (+ 01.50%) K Harris

NV-SC (+ 01.75%) K Marshall

OH-SS (+ 02.00%) M O’Shaughnessy

DE-ST (+ 02.00%) C Flowers

SC-SE (+ 03.00%) (Superintendent of Education) F Holleman

MA-SA (+ 04.25%) S Bump

I bold emphasize the races where my numbers give not the right winner. For four of the five goups (Senate, Governor, Lieutenant Governor and Statewide Offices) my numbers give so good numbers. For some hundreds of offices, I fail for 9 (waiting still for OR-Gov). They are:

IL-Sen

IL-Gov

IL-LG

AL-LG

WI-ST

IA-SS

VT-SA

OH-SS

SC-SE

I think this is a good result for my prediction. I’m happy cause of it. My numbers work better as example than the numbers of Nate Silver where he has results (Senate, Governor and the majority of LG).

And I think the results in this four groups are not the bests, but well, are not as bad in the bluest states. In the red states, J Manchin and M Beeve are the alone democrats what can defeat to their republican challenger in a statewide election (the republicans have not candidate for AR-AG, AR-ST and AR-SA).

For the House, my numbers work worse. The balance between the seats was not bad. I give low margins to the big majority of the races where my numbers fail. But I must improve this.

When I give my first indications about the firewall for the last days, some people get surprised of see in my lists seats like TX-27 or VA-11, but something was right in my numbers.

My mistakes for the house come in the majority of cases from R+ districts. Here is a relation between the big majority of the offices where I fail. And that despite I use the same numbers for all the races of all the group of offices.

I think the attacks of the last days against Pelosi, Obama and the democratic agenda can fire back against all these candidates, many times the most conservative. Maybe many of they go too far turning off part of their democratic basis. J Marshall can be a good example

And I suspect that get out the last numbers because the house has less number of polls for every seat. Just GA-08 has many polls in the last days what show his decreasing prospects. But the polls change with less speed for other seats.

It is difficult for me to find other reason for this difference between my results for the house and for the other offices.  

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

WA-09: AP Calls Race for Smith (D); WA-02: Larsen Takes First Lead

Via Taniel, some good news: The AP has called WA-09 for Dem Rep. Adam Smith, over Republican Dick Muri. Local media called this one yesterday (see here and here), but I guess the AP wanted to be cautious. Also, I’m the millionth person to say this, but Washington really needs to switch to an Oregon-style in-by-election-day voting system, not the postmarked-by-election-day regime they currently have.

Also from Taniel:

Rep. Rick Larsen just inched into his first lead in WA-2, albeit a narrow one: 397 votes! (30% of ballots remain to be counted.)

NY-25: Buerkle Takes the Lead

The losses may not be over:

With the recent update of election results from Wayne County, it appears Republican Ann Marie Buerkle has edged ahead of Democrat Dan Maffei in the race for the 25th District Congressional Seat.

Prior to the release of Wayne County’s preliminary results, Maffei had led Buerkle by about 3,000 votes. Now, Buerkle leads by less than 1,000 votes with roughly 6,000 absentee ballots remaining to be counted.

Oy. This could take a while, though – absentees aren’t due until November 9th (and military absentees on the 24th). 8,371 absentee ballots have been received so far (out of 11,645 that were mailed out). Sounds like we’ll have to let this one grease for at least a few more days.

Leadership in the 112th Senate

With all but a few races called, it’s a good time to take a look at how the leadership is going to take shape in the Senate and House. Yes, the Republicans will now be the majority in the House, but the leadership changes will be more complex than that, with committee chairs and ranking members leaving the House and party caucus leaders seeking to move up or move out. Here’s a first look at the internal politicking we can expect between now and January for the Senate, with the House version to come in a day or two.

I encourage you to comment on my projections and suggests what Senators you’d like to see in leadership–either now or in the future, after they build some seniority.

SENATE DEMOCRATS

The five main positions are:

Majority Leader: Harry Reid will almost certainly retain his post after his wider-than-expected win in Nevada. There has been some gossip on the internet that Chuck Schumer will make a run against Reid, but I doubt that. Ambitious as Schumer is, he also seems like a team player and won’t want to burn bridges with any fellow Democratic Senators.

Majority Whip and Conference Vice Chairman: Dick Durbin and Chuck Schumer. These two might have been quietly happy if Sharron Angle had defeated Reid, but it looks like they’ll hold their positions for another two years.

DSCC Chair: This seat is open because Bob Menendez is up for re-election in 2012, and he probably would have been challenged anyway after a disappointing tenure at the DSCC helm. Potential replacements such as Debbie Stabenow and Amy Klobuchar are out because they are up for re-election too. We could see Barbara Boxer try to move up, or this could be a chance to bring a new face into the leadership (one of the Udalls, perhaps?) Feel free to suggest someone in the comments!

Policy Committee Chair: Vacated by Byron Dorgan, this is the perfect spot for a wonkish, reasonably liberal Democrat who is not widely known but is looking to move up in leadership. Ron Wyden, Mark Udall, Sherrod Brown, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Mark Warner would all make sense, and I’m sure there are plenty of others who merit consideration.

The Democratic leadership also has several lower-ranking positions that may be in flux this year. Conference Secretary Patty Murray is likely to be back, as will Outreach Chair Jeff Bingaman and Steering Chair Debbie Stabenow. The aforementioned Boxer will retain her job as Chief Deputy Whip unless she decides to move up to something else, and Tom Carper and Bill Nelson should remain as Deputy Whips. However, there will be one Whip spot open, as Russ Feingold has been defeated. Finally, there will be a newRural Outreach Chair now that Blanche Lincoln is heading home, and Democrats have a slew of options here, ranging from fellow Arkansawyer Mark Pryor to stalwart Tim Johnson to a newer option like Jon Tester or Tom Udall.



SENATE REPUBLICANS

Actually, there is barely any action to discuss here. Mitch McConnell, Jon Kyl, Lamar Alexander, and John Barrasso should retain their positions as Minority Leader, Minority Whip, Conference Chairman, and Conference Vice Chair. John Thune may make a presidential run, but until then, he will be Policy Committee Chairman, and Republicans will probably invite John Cornyn to return as NRSC Chair unless he is worn out from this year or challenges one of the higher-ranking leaders. Bob Bennett will vacate the position of Counselor to the Minority Leader, but this appears to be a non-permanent position anyway. McConnell may use this vacancy to bring Lisa Murkowski back into the fold if she is indeed certified as the winner in Alaska, as she lost her leadership position to Barrasso when she decided to go ahead with her write-in bid. Jim Risch, Mike Crapo, and Mike Johanns are all Senators who could move up if one of these positions is open.

SENATE COMMITTEES

The Senate has 17 committees (plus a few special “select committees”), 10 of which should see no change in Chair or Ranking Minority Member. These are: Appropriations (Inouye/Cochran), Armed Services (Levin/McCain), Commerce (Rockefeller/Hutchison), Energy (Bingaman/Murkowski), Environment (Boxer/Inhofe), Finance (Baucus/Grassley), Foreign Relations (Kerry/Lugar), Homeland Security (Lieberman/Collins), Small Business (Landrieu/Snowe), and Veterans Affairs (Akaka/Burr.)

Agriculture: Another spot vacated by Blanche Lincoln. Tom Harkin is next in seniority, but he gave up the chairmanship here to take over HELP following the death of Ted Kennedy. Patrick Leahy, Kent Conrad, and Max Baucus all passed up the Agriculture gavel as well following Harkin’s departure, choosing to remain chairmen of their present committees. That means that fifth-ranked Debbie Stabenow of Michigan is likely to become the next chairwoman of Agriculture, which should aid her with her 2012 re-election bid. For the Republicans, Saxby Chambliss will remain as RM.

Banking: Chris Dodd has retired, opening up this chairmanship for the more moderate Tim Johnson of South Dakota. The ranking Republican is Richard Shelby.

Budget: All the fun is on the Republican side here, as Kent Conrad will remain chairman. After the retiring Judd Gregg, Chuck Grassley is the most senior GOPer, but he is almost certain to remain RM of the Finance Committee. Mike Enzi, RM of HELP, may jump to Budget, but that’s not likely either. The same goes for Jeff Sessions, who ranks on Judiciary. Skip the departing Jim Bunning, and the hot potato passes to Mike Crapo of Idaho, who is looking likely to make the surprising jump from #6 to Ranking Member.

HELP: That’s Senate-speak for Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, and this is only relevant if Tom Harkin grows nostalgic for Agriculture, or if Mike Enzi bolts for Budget. The next Senators in line are Barbara Milkulski and Lamar Alexander, and this would be the first opportunity for either.

Judiciary: Again, only relevant if Jeff Sessions wants Budget. Orrin Hatch is next but he doesn’t seem to want the position anymore (his seniority outranks Sessions’), and once again Chuck Grassley is unlikely to move (I can see why Iowa keeps this guy around….he’s everywhere!) Jon Kyl would be next, and then Lindsey Graham if the Minority Whip is otherwise occupied. Oh yeah, Chairman Pat Leahy isn’t going anywhere.

Rules and Administration: First things first: the chairman is Chuck Schumer. Now, ready for some fun? Bob Bennett is out, and (in order of seniority) Mitch McConnell is the floor leader, Thad Cochran is on Appropriations, Kay Bailey Hutchison is on Commerce, and Saxby Chambliss is on Agriculture. Next is Lamar Alexander, who would fit unless he takes over HELP, and after him is John Ensign, who seems to be a poor fit given his misconduct. That means that, under a perfect storm, Pat Roberts could rise from the most junior Republican to ranking member!

Indian Affairs: This is an oft-overlooked committee that is nonetheless very important to any Senator looking to win re-election in a Native-heavy state. With Byron Dorgan retiring, and Inouye, Akaka, Conrad, and Johnson unlikely to give up their chairmanships of Appropriations, Veterans Affairs, Budget, or Banking for a less powerful post, it looks like Maria Cantwell will be the new chairwoman. Jon Tester, who ranks just below Cantwell, has a much higher Native population in his home state, but I doubt he’ll be able to talk Cantwell out of the gavel.

House version to follow!

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

IN-Gov: Pence Prepping for Gube Bid

I guess it’s time to start up a new House open seat watch, huh?

NewsChannel 15 political analyst and Republican Allen County Recorder John McGauley says Congressman Mike Pence will run for Indiana governor in 2012.

McGauley said that information came straight from people who work for Pence .

“He’s running for governor. He’s laying the groundwork with all these bus tours that he’s doing; supporting legislative candidates [in Indiana]. And he’s even out there right now recruiting county coordinators for a governor’s race,” said McGauley.

Pence is staying mum for now, but it sure looks like he may be the man to challenge Evan Bayh in two years.

AZ-07: Grijalva Declares Victory

He didn’t have a whole lotta people in his corner, but it looks like Raul Grijalva had enough to survive last night’s slaughter:

Democrat Raul Grijalva claimed victory in Arizona’s District 7 congressional race Wednesday, leaving Republicans with a gain of two seats in the state’s delegation.

A spokesman for Grijalva said the congressman had decided he was the winner in the southwestern Arizona district, although a number of mail-in and provisional ballots remained to be counted.

Right now, with 99.6% reporting, Grijalva leads Republican Ruth McClung by 3,586 votes, for a percentage spread of 49-46. I note that some folks raised their eyebrows when we shot this race straight from Safe D to the Tossup column. I hope you understand where we were coming from now!